Sign in Register

SHANGHAI SIPG 1-1 Tianjin Teda – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 14

Kick-off

Sat 23 May 2026

11:00

Venue

Pudong Football Stadium

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model favours SHANGHAI SIPG (43%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as SHANGHAI SIPG face Tianjin Teda.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

SHANGHAI SIPG host Tianjin Teda at Pudong Football Stadium in Super League, Regular Season - 14. Kick-off is scheduled for Saturday 23 May 2026 at 11:00 UTC.

Form Guide

SHANGHAI SIPG — All Games: 7W 1D 2L from 10 Super League outings this season, averaging 2.20 points per game. Last five: W W L W W. They are averaging 2.50 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone.

In front of their own supporters this season, SHANGHAI SIPG have posted 6W 3D 1L at Pudong Football Stadium — 2.10 PPG. They are averaging 2.50 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 80% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Across all Super League games this season, Tianjin Teda have recorded 4W 2D 4L from 10 outings — 1.40 PPG. Last five: W L D L L. Their scoring rate of 1.30 per game is modest, conceding 1.20 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity.

Tianjin Teda's form when playing away from home: 3W 2D 5L across 10 road games this term (1.10 PPG). Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.90 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

On current form, SHANGHAI SIPG have the edge — a 0.80 PPG advantage (2.20 vs 1.40) represents a meaningful gap. That momentum makes them the form-based pick, though if the outright price looks short, Draw No Bet is worth comparing.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. SHANGHAI SIPG register both teams scoring in 80% of relevant matches, Tianjin Teda in 60% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

Head to Head

SHANGHAI SIPG hold a clear advantage in this fixture, picking up 6 wins from 9 previous encounters compared to 1 for Tianjin Teda, with 2 draws in between.

The 9 previous meetings have averaged 2.8 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 24 Aug 2025, ended 1–1 with a draw.

From a betting standpoint, the H2H backs both SHANGHAI SIPG and goals. The home side's 6 wins from 9 meetings, combined with an average of 2.8 goals per game, gives the home win and Over 2.5 combination a historically grounded case.

Trading Patterns

SHANGHAI SIPG in-play and half-time data (60 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 80% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 89% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 78% of those occasions; they lead at the break 58% of the time; BTTS occurs in 77% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 77% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 60%.

Tianjin Teda in-play and half-time data (60 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 93% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 73% of the time; BTTS occurs in 70% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 70% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 35%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — SHANGHAI SIPG 70% and Tianjin Teda 57% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (SHANGHAI SIPG 77% | Tianjin Teda 58%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects SHANGHAI SIPG 1.69 xG and Tianjin Teda 1.47 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: SHANGHAI SIPG attack 1.136 / defence 1.044 | Tianjin Teda attack 1.146 / defence 0.886. League average goals — home 1.682 / away 1.230. Data: 43 SHANGHAI SIPG games / 43 Tianjin Teda games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: SHANGHAI SIPG 43% | Draw 24% | Tianjin Teda 33%. Fair-value odds: SHANGHAI SIPG 2.33 | Draw 4.17 | Tianjin Teda 3.03. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 24% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 61% | BTTS probability 63% | Total xG 3.16. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 61% — the 3.16 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 63% reflects that both xG figures (1.69 / 1.47) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, SHANGHAI SIPG are the pick at 43% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. With a 24% draw probability, Draw No Bet on SHANGHAI SIPG offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 3.16 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 61% probability — strong conviction, supported by form averaging 3.4 goals per game and H2H averaging 2.8 goals per meeting.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 63%. Form rates corroborate: SHANGHAI SIPG 80% | Tianjin Teda 60% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H SHANGHAI SIPG hold a strong historical advantage, winning 6 of 9 meetings.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to SHANGHAI SIPG — H2H win rate 67% vs Poisson 43%.
Form SHANGHAI SIPG lead on PPG: 2.20 vs 1.40 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
Form SHANGHAI SIPG Poisson xG (1.69) is below their recent form scoring rate (2.50) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Form Tianjin Teda Poisson xG (1.47) exceeds their form scoring rate (1.20) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (SHANGHAI SIPG 8/10, Tianjin Teda 6/10) and Poisson model (63%).
Form Form and Poisson model both favour SHANGHAI SIPG — SHANGHAI SIPG at 43% win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 61% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 63% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: SHANGHAI SIPG vs Tianjin Teda | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 14 | Venue: Pudong Football Stadium • Kick-off: Saturday 23 May 2026, 11:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: SHANGHAI SIPG 43% | Draw 24% | Tianjin Teda 33% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 61% | BTTS 63% | xG SHANGHAI SIPG 1.69 / Tianjin Teda 1.47 • Poisson strength factors: SHANGHAI SIPG attack 1.136 / def 1.044 | Tianjin Teda attack 1.146 / def 0.886 | league avg home 1.682 / away 1.230 • Poisson stance: SHANGHAI SIPG (43%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.69

SHANGHAI SIPG xG

Expected Goals

1.47

Tianjin Teda xG

43%
24%
33%
SHANGHAI SIPG Draw Tianjin Teda

63%

BTTS

83%

Over 1.5

61%

Over 2.5

39%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does SHANGHAI SIPG vs Tianjin Teda kick off?

SHANGHAI SIPG vs Tianjin Teda kicked off at 11:00 on Saturday 23 May 2026 at Pudong Football Stadium.

What was the final score in SHANGHAI SIPG vs Tianjin Teda?

SHANGHAI SIPG 1 - 1 Tianjin Teda.

Where is SHANGHAI SIPG vs Tianjin Teda being played?

The match is being played at Pudong Football Stadium.

What competition is SHANGHAI SIPG vs Tianjin Teda part of?

SHANGHAI SIPG vs Tianjin Teda is a Regular Season - 14 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win SHANGHAI SIPG vs Tianjin Teda?

Our statistical model gives SHANGHAI SIPG a 43% chance of winning, Tianjin Teda a 33% chance, and a 24% chance of a draw — making SHANGHAI SIPG the favourite.

Will both teams score in SHANGHAI SIPG vs Tianjin Teda?

Our model estimates a 63% probability that both SHANGHAI SIPG and Tianjin Teda will score (BTTS).

Will SHANGHAI SIPG vs Tianjin Teda have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 61%.

What is the head-to-head record between SHANGHAI SIPG and Tianjin Teda?

Record (9 meetings): SHANGHAI SIPG 6W | Draws 2 | Tianjin Teda 1W.

What form are SHANGHAI SIPG and Tianjin Teda in?

SHANGHAI SIPG (all comps): 7W-1D-2L in 10 | 2.20 PPG | GF 2.50 / GA 1.80 | L5 W-W-L-W-W. Tianjin Teda (all comps): 4W-2D-4L in 10 | 1.40 PPG | GF 1.30 / GA 1.20 | L5 W-L-D-L-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

Working from SHANGHAI SIPG's attack rating (1.14) and Tianjin Teda's defence rating (0.89), the model arrives at 1.69 expected goals for the home side. The same calculation in reverse, Tianjin Teda's attack versus SHANGHAI SIPG's defence, projects 1.47 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 43/43 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 11.9%. Close behind: 2-1 (8.9%), 1-2 (7.7%). Together the top three scorelines make up 29% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

SHANGHAI SIPG Win

43%

SHANGHAI SIPG

2.34

24%

Draw

4.14

33%

Tianjin Teda

3.02

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

10.5%

Draw

Most likely

2 – 1

8.9%

Home win

1 – 2

7.7%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.69

SHANGHAI SIPG xG

Total xG

3.16

1.47

Tianjin Teda xG

43%
24%
33%
SHANGHAI SIPGDrawTianjin Teda

2.34

43%

Home win

4.14

24%

Draw

3.02

33%

Away win

Goals Markets

82%

Over 1.5

1.22

18%

Under 1.5

5.56

61%

Over 2.5

1.64

39%

Under 2.5

2.56

39%

Over 3.5

2.56

61%

Under 3.5

1.64

21%

Over 4.5

4.76

79%

Under 4.5

1.27

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

63%

BTTS Yes

1.58

37%

BTTS No

2.72

Clean Sheet

23%

SHANGHAI SIPG

4.35

18%

Tianjin Teda

5.44

Win to Nil

10%

SHANGHAI SIPG

10.20

6%

Tianjin Teda

16.39

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 4.2 6.2 4.6 2.2 0.8 0.2
1 7.2 10.5 7.7 3.8 1.4 0.4
2 6.1 8.9 6.6 3.2 1.2 0.3
3 3.4 5.0 3.7 1.8 0.7 0.2
4 1.4 2.1 1.6 0.8 0.3 0.1
5 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.693
λ Away (xG) 1.471
Total xG 3.164
League avg home goals 1.682
League avg away goals 1.230
SHANGHAI SIPG attack strength 1.136
SHANGHAI SIPG defence strength 1.044
Tianjin Teda attack strength 1.146
Tianjin Teda defence strength 0.886
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 43 / 43

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for SHANGHAI SIPG vs Tianjin Teda?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 11.9%.

How many goals are SHANGHAI SIPG and Tianjin Teda expected to score?

The model projects 1.69 expected goals for SHANGHAI SIPG and 1.47 for Tianjin Teda, a combined total of 3.16.

How confident is the prediction model for SHANGHAI SIPG vs Tianjin Teda?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 43%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Across their last 60 outings, SHANGHAI SIPG have picked up 2.40 PPG on a 45W 9D 6L record — W-W-L-W-W across the most recent five.

Tianjin Teda's form line: 24W 14D 22L from 60 games, 1.43 PPG, last five W-L-D-L-L.

Put side by side, SHANGHAI SIPG are the form team by 0.97 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against Tianjin Teda.

Home Ground vs the Road

On home soil, SHANGHAI SIPG have posted 2.47 PPG from 30 outings (23W 5D 2L).

On the road, Tianjin Teda have gone 9W 5D 16L from 30 away games — 1.07 PPG when travelling.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, SHANGHAI SIPG come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

The Goals Picture

SHANGHAI SIPG are averaging 2.80 goals scored and 1.23 conceded per game recently; Tianjin Teda are on 1.40 scored and 1.47 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: SHANGHAI SIPG have seen both teams score in 70% of their recent games.

Last 60 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

SHANGHAI SIPG

SHANGHAI SIPG

Current Season
W W L W W
Tianjin Teda

Tianjin Teda

Current Season
W L D L L
60 Played 60
45/9/6 W / D / L 24/14/22
2.40 Points Per Game 1.43
2.80 Avg Goals Scored 1.40
1.23 Avg Goals Conceded 1.47
4.03 Avg Goals / Game 2.87
18 Clean Sheets 16
42 BTTS 34
46 Over 2.5 Games 35
SHANGHAI SIPG

SHANGHAI SIPG

W
A Dalian Zhixing
1–0 HT 1–0
22 Nov
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
3–0 HT 1–0
31 Oct
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–3 HT 1–1
26 Oct
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
4–3 HT 3–2
17 Oct
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
3–2 HT 1–0
26 Sep
W
A Beijing Guoan
3–2 HT 1–1
21 Sep
W
H Yunnan Yukun
4–2 HT 1–1
12 Sep
L
A Chengdu Better City
1–4 HT 1–3
30 Aug
D
H Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–1
24 Aug
W
H Henan Jianye
4–1 HT 3–0
15 Aug
W
A Shanghai Shenhua
2–1 HT 1–0
09 Aug
W
A Meizhou Kejia
4–2 HT 4–0
02 Aug
D
H Qingdao Youth Island
2–2 HT 1–0
26 Jul
W
A Changchun Yatai
3–1 HT 1–0
18 Jul
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
2–1 HT 0–1
30 Jun
W
H Dalian Zhixing
3–0 HT 2–0
26 Jun
W
A Henan Jianye
3–1 HT 3–0
18 Jun
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–2 HT 1–0
14 Jun
D
H Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 0–0
17 May
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
3–1 HT 1–1
09 May
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–0 HT 2–0
05 May
L
H Beijing Guoan
1–2 HT 1–1
01 May
W
A Yunnan Yukun
3–2 HT 1–0
25 Apr
L
H Chengdu Better City
1–3 HT 1–2
20 Apr
W
A Tianjin Teda
4–1 HT 3–0
16 Apr
D
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–0
06 Apr
W
H Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 2–0
02 Apr
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
3–3 HT 1–3
28 Mar
W
H Changchun Yatai
2–0 HT 0–0
28 Feb
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
3–1 HT 1–0
23 Feb
W
H Tianjin Teda
5–0 HT 2–0
02 Nov
W
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–0 HT 1–0
27 Oct
L
A Chengdu Better City
1–3 HT 1–3
18 Oct
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
2–1 HT 1–0
28 Sep
W
A Changchun Yatai
4–3 HT 3–1
21 Sep
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
2–0 HT 1–0
13 Sep
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–3 HT 1–0
17 Aug
W
H Meizhou Kejia
7–2 HT 4–1
09 Aug
W
A Shandong Luneng
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Aug
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
8–1 HT 4–0
26 Jul
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
5–0 HT 0–0
21 Jul
W
H Beijing Guoan
5–1 HT 3–1
12 Jul
W
A Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 1–0
05 Jul
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
3–1 HT 1–1
29 Jun
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–0 HT 2–0
25 Jun
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 0–0
18 Jun
W
A Tianjin Teda
3–0 HT 2–0
14 Jun
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–1 HT 1–1
26 May
W
H Chengdu Better City
2–0 HT 0–0
22 May
W
A Qingdao Youth Island
5–3 HT 3–1
18 May
W
H Changchun Yatai
5–2 HT 3–1
10 May
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
6–0 HT 3–0
05 May
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
5–0 HT 2–0
01 May
D
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 0–0
27 Apr
W
H Shandong Luneng
4–3 HT 2–3
14 Apr
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
3–0 HT 2–0
09 Apr
D
A Beijing Guoan
2–2 HT 1–1
05 Apr
W
H Henan Jianye
3–1 HT 0–0
30 Mar
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
0–0 HT 0–0
09 Mar
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
3–1 HT 1–1
01 Mar
Tianjin Teda

Tianjin Teda

L
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–3 HT 0–2
22 Nov
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 0–2
01 Nov
D
H Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 0–2
25 Oct
L
A Yunnan Yukun
0–2 HT 0–1
18 Oct
W
H Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 0–0
28 Sep
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
1–0 HT 1–0
21 Sep
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
4–0 HT 2–0
14 Sep
D
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–1 HT 1–1
24 Aug
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
0–2 HT 0–1
20 Aug
W
H Dalian Zhixing
2–0 HT 1–0
16 Aug
D
H Qingdao Youth Island
0–0 HT 0–0
10 Aug
D
A Beijing Guoan
2–2 HT 1–1
03 Aug
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
0–2 HT 0–1
27 Jul
W
H Chengdu Better City
2–1 HT 0–0
18 Jul
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 2–0
29 Jun
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–3 HT 0–2
25 Jun
W
H Shandong Luneng
1–0 HT 1–0
14 Jun
W
A Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 1–0
17 May
L
H Yunnan Yukun
0–1 HT 0–1
11 May
W
A Henan Jianye
4–3 HT 2–2
05 May
L
A Sichuan Jiuniu
0–1 HT 0–1
01 May
L
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–2 HT 1–0
27 Apr
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
2–0 HT 0–0
20 Apr
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
1–4 HT 0–3
16 Apr
D
A Dalian Zhixing
1–1 HT 1–0
12 Apr
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
2–2 HT 2–1
06 Apr
D
H Beijing Guoan
2–2 HT 0–1
02 Apr
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 1–0
29 Mar
W
A Chengdu Better City
2–1 HT 1–1
02 Mar
D
H Meizhou Kejia
2–2 HT 0–1
23 Feb
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–5 HT 0–2
02 Nov
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 1–0
27 Oct
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–4 HT 0–2
18 Oct
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
3–2 HT 1–1
29 Sep
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–2 HT 1–0
21 Sep
W
H Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 1–0
14 Sep
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 0–0
16 Aug
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
3–2 HT 2–0
11 Aug
L
A Meizhou Kejia
2–3 HT 0–1
03 Aug
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
2–1 HT 1–0
27 Jul
L
A Beijing Guoan
0–2 HT 0–0
21 Jul
L
A Chengdu Better City
1–2 HT 1–1
12 Jul
D
H Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 2–0
06 Jul
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
3–0 HT 1–0
29 Jun
D
A Nantong Zhiyun
1–1 HT 0–1
25 Jun
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–3 HT 0–2
14 Jun
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–3 HT 0–2
26 May
D
H Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 1–0
21 May
W
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–2 HT 1–0
17 May
D
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–0 HT 0–0
11 May
W
A Henan Jianye
2–1 HT 0–1
04 May
L
H Beijing Guoan
0–1 HT 0–0
30 Apr
L
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–2 HT 1–1
26 Apr
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–3 HT 1–1
19 Apr
D
H Meizhou Kejia
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Apr
W
A Qingdao Youth Island
3–1 HT 0–0
10 Apr
L
H Chengdu Better City
2–3 HT 0–1
06 Apr
W
A Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
31 Mar
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
4–0 HT 1–0
10 Mar
D
H Nantong Zhiyun
1–1 HT 0–0
02 Mar

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are SHANGHAI SIPG and Tianjin Teda in coming into this match?

SHANGHAI SIPG have gone 45W 9D 6L in their last 60 games (2.40 PPG), while Tianjin Teda have gone 24W 14D 22L in their last 60 (1.43 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — SHANGHAI SIPG at home or Tianjin Teda away?

SHANGHAI SIPG's home record (2.47 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — SHANGHAI SIPG at home: 2.47 PPG; Tianjin Teda away: 1.07 PPG.

Have SHANGHAI SIPG or Tianjin Teda been keeping clean sheets recently?

SHANGHAI SIPG have kept a clean sheet in 30% of their recent games, Tianjin Teda in 27%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between SHANGHAI SIPG and Tianjin Teda runs to 10 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to August 2021. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. They last met on 23 May 2026, roughly 3 months ago.

Digging Into the Numbers

The last 2 meetings have all been drawn — an unusually settled recent run for this fixture.

The biggest gap between the sides came on 15 Aug 2021, when SHANGHAI SIPG won 5-0 — the largest margin of victory on record between these two.

SHANGHAI SIPG's record when hosting Tianjin Teda specifically: 4W 2D 0L from 6 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 10 Meetings

SHANGHAI SIPG

6

SHANGHAI SIPG

3

Draws

Tianjin Teda

1

Tianjin Teda

Recent Meetings

SHANGHAI SIPG
1–1
23 May 26
Tianjin Teda
SHANGHAI SIPG
1–1
24 Aug 25
Tianjin Teda
Tianjin Teda
1–4
16 Apr 25
SHANGHAI SIPG
SHANGHAI SIPG
5–0
02 Nov 24
Tianjin Teda
Tianjin Teda
0–3
14 Jun 24
SHANGHAI SIPG
SHANGHAI SIPG
2–1
03 Aug 23
Tianjin Teda
Tianjin Teda
0–0
06 May 23
SHANGHAI SIPG
Tianjin Teda
1–0
26 Nov 22
SHANGHAI SIPG
SHANGHAI SIPG
1–0
27 Aug 22
Tianjin Teda
SHANGHAI SIPG
5–0
15 Aug 21
Tianjin Teda

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between SHANGHAI SIPG and Tianjin Teda?

From 10 meetings on record, SHANGHAI SIPG have won 6, Tianjin Teda have won 1, and 3 have been drawn.

When did SHANGHAI SIPG and Tianjin Teda last play each other?

They last met on 23 May 2026, when SHANGHAI SIPG 1-1 Tianjin Teda.

Who has won more matches between SHANGHAI SIPG and Tianjin Teda?

SHANGHAI SIPG have the better head-to-head record, with 6 wins from 10 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

SHANGHAI SIPG are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 80% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 50% of the time.

Tianjin Teda are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 93% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 30% of the time.

The Numbers That Matter

Both teams scoring has been the norm for this pairing lately — SHANGHAI SIPG at 77%, Tianjin Teda at 70%. That combined rate makes BTTS Yes a well-supported trading angle.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 77% for SHANGHAI SIPG and 70% for Tianjin Teda. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 60% and 37% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = SHANGHAI SIPG home games / Tianjin Teda away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

SHANGHAI SIPG SHANGHAI SIPG Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 51/60
(85%)
24/30
(80%)
2+ Goals Before HT 35/60
(58.3%)
17/30
(56.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/9
(88.9%)
6/6
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 7/9
(77.8%)
6/6
(100%)
Winning at HT 35/60
(58.3%)
15/30
(50%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/60
(6.7%)
2/30
(6.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 3/60
(5%)
1/30
(3.3%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 42/60
(70%)
23/30
(76.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 46/60
(76.7%)
23/30
(76.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 36/60
(60%)
18/30
(60%)
Clean Sheet 18/60
(30%)
7/30
(23.3%)
Failed to Score 1/60
(1.7%)
0/30
(0%)
Tianjin Teda Tianjin Teda Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 49/60
(81.7%)
28/30
(93.3%)
2+ Goals Before HT 22/60
(36.7%)
14/30
(46.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/11
(72.7%)
2/2
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/11
(45.5%)
2/2
(100%)
Winning at HT 21/60
(35%)
9/30
(30%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 6/60
(10%)
4/30
(13.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 5/60
(8.3%)
2/30
(6.7%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 34/60
(56.7%)
21/30
(70%)
Over 2.5 Goals 35/60
(58.3%)
21/30
(70%)
Over 3.5 Goals 21/60
(35%)
11/30
(36.7%)
Clean Sheet 16/60
(26.7%)
2/30
(6.7%)
Failed to Score 13/60
(21.7%)
7/30
(23.3%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when SHANGHAI SIPG play Tianjin Teda?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 77% of SHANGHAI SIPG's games and 70% of Tianjin Teda's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is SHANGHAI SIPG vs Tianjin Teda usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 77% of SHANGHAI SIPG's matches and 70% of Tianjin Teda's.

Do SHANGHAI SIPG and Tianjin Teda tend to score early?

SHANGHAI SIPG have had a goal before half-time in 80% of their recent matches, Tianjin Teda in 93% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

SHANGHAI SIPG and Tianjin Teda share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Pudong Football Stadium, Regular Season - 14, as SHANGHAI SIPG and Tianjin Teda drew 1-1 in the Super League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting SHANGHAI SIPG 1.69 xG and Tianjin Teda 1.47 xG, a combined 3.16. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of SHANGHAI SIPG attack 1.14 / defence 1.04 against Tianjin Teda attack 1.15 / defence 0.89, drawn from 43/43 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it SHANGHAI SIPG 43% | Draw 24% | Tianjin Teda 33%, with SHANGHAI SIPG to win its most likely call at 43%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 24% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 61%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 83% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 63% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 68% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (SHANGHAI SIPG 77%, Tianjin Teda 58%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 63%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

SHANGHAI SIPG's trading profile (60 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 70% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 30% of the time, and conceded here.

Tianjin Teda's trading profile (60 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 57% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, SHANGHAI SIPG arrived the stronger side — 2.40 PPG against 1.43. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. SHANGHAI SIPG (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 3.10 scoring average — below par going forward. Tianjin Teda (home/away splits) conceded 1 against a 1.90 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit), form (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 61% Over 2.5 probability, but 2 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 63% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data bucked — 68% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.