Sign in Register

Chengdu Better City 0-1 SHANGHAI SIPG – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 13

Kick-off

Tue 19 May 2026

12:00

Venue

Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Chengdu Better City at 73% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Chengdu Better City vs SHANGHAI SIPG encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Chengdu Better City and SHANGHAI SIPG meet at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park in Super League, Regular Season - 13. This fixture gets under way on Tuesday 19 May 2026 at 12:00 UTC.

Form

Chengdu Better City (all games): 4W 5D 1L across 10 Super League fixtures this term — 1.70 PPG. Last five: D W D L D. They are averaging 2.10 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone.

Chengdu Better City's home record at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park: 7W 2D 1L from 10 Super League appearances (2.30 PPG). They are averaging 2.10 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Their home PPG of 2.30 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.70 — Chengdu Better City are significantly better at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park than their overall form suggests.

SHANGHAI SIPG's overall Super League record this term: 7W 1D 2L from 10 games (2.20 PPG). Last five: W W L W W. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.50 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play.

SHANGHAI SIPG's away record: 8W 0D 2L from 10 road trips in Super League this season (2.40 PPG). They are averaging 2.40 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. Both teams have scored in 90% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

The travelling side arrive in better shape. SHANGHAI SIPG are 0.50 PPG clear of Chengdu Better City in recent Super League fixtures (2.20 vs 1.70). Backing the visitors outright or on Draw No Bet are both valid approaches where the price allows.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Chengdu Better City have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, SHANGHAI SIPG in 90%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H History

The head-to-head record favours Chengdu Better City, who have won 5 of the last 8 meetings against SHANGHAI SIPG — a 1D 2W return for the visitors.

The 8 previous meetings have averaged 2.8 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 30 Aug 2025, ended 4–1 with Chengdu Better City winning.

From a betting standpoint, the H2H backs both Chengdu Better City and goals. The home side's 5 wins from 8 meetings, combined with an average of 2.8 goals per game, gives the home win and Over 2.5 combination a historically grounded case.

Trading

Chengdu Better City half-time and goal-timing data (60 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 93% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 89% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 56% of those occasions; they lead at the break 48% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 60% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 37%.

SHANGHAI SIPG half-time and goal-timing data (60 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 90% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 89% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 78% of those occasions; they lead at the break 58% of the time; BTTS occurs in 63% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 77% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 60%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Chengdu Better City 58% and SHANGHAI SIPG 70% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (Chengdu Better City 60% | SHANGHAI SIPG 77%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Chengdu Better City 2.36 xG and SHANGHAI SIPG 0.77 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Chengdu Better City attack 1.521 / defence 0.680 | SHANGHAI SIPG attack 0.904 / defence 0.915. League average goals — home 1.695 / away 1.244. Chengdu Better City carry an above-average attack strength of 1.521 — their λ of 2.36 reflects genuine attacking quality above the league norm. Chengdu Better City's defence rating of 0.680 is below average — the home backline is amplifying the visitor's projected output. Data: 42 Chengdu Better City games / 42 SHANGHAI SIPG games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Chengdu Better City 73% | Draw 17% | SHANGHAI SIPG 10%. Fair-value odds: Chengdu Better City 1.37 | Draw 5.88 | SHANGHAI SIPG 10.00. The model has a clear lean to Chengdu Better City (73%) — a 63pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 60% | BTTS probability 49% | Total xG 3.12. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 60% — the 3.12 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 49% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Picks & Verdict

Chengdu Better City dominate the H2H record, yet SHANGHAI SIPG are the in-form side right now — historical edge versus current momentum creates a genuine dilemma.

On the Poisson output, Chengdu Better City are the pick at 73% — clear model lean. Note a divergence: in-form SHANGHAI SIPG (2.20 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results.

On the goals line, Poisson's 3.12 combined xG gives a 60% probability to Over 2.5 — strong, supported by form averaging 3.5 goals per game and H2H averaging 2.8 goals per meeting.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is No at 49%. This conflicts with form data: Chengdu Better City 60% | SHANGHAI SIPG 90% from recent games — a notable divergence.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H Chengdu Better City hold a strong historical advantage, winning 5 of 8 meetings.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to Chengdu Better City — H2H win rate 62% vs Poisson 73%.
Form SHANGHAI SIPG lead on PPG: 2.20 vs 1.70 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Chengdu Better City Poisson xG (2.36) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (2.10) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Form SHANGHAI SIPG Poisson xG (0.77) is below their form scoring rate (2.40) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
Goals Form averages (~2.9 goals/game) and Poisson xG (3.12) both support Over 2.5 goals at 60%.
Form Form (PPG) favours SHANGHAI SIPG but Poisson leans Chengdu Better City (73%) — divergence worth monitoring.
Prediction Poisson model strongly favours Chengdu Better City at 73% home win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 60% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
Contradiction Chengdu Better City dominate the H2H record, yet SHANGHAI SIPG are the in-form side right now — historical edge versus current momentum creates a genuine dilemma.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Chengdu Better City vs SHANGHAI SIPG | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 13 | Venue: Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park • Kick-off: Tuesday 19 May 2026, 12:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Chengdu Better City 73% | Draw 17% | SHANGHAI SIPG 10% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 60% | BTTS 49% | xG Chengdu Better City 2.36 / SHANGHAI SIPG 0.77 • Poisson strength factors: Chengdu Better City attack 1.521 / def 0.680 | SHANGHAI SIPG attack 0.904 / def 0.915 | league avg home 1.695 / away 1.244 • Poisson stance: Chengdu Better City (73%) — strong lean

🧮 Prediction Model

2.36

Chengdu Better City xG

Expected Goals

0.77

SHANGHAI SIPG xG

73%
17%
Chengdu Better City Draw SHANGHAI SIPG

49%

BTTS

82%

Over 1.5

60%

Over 2.5

38%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Chengdu Better City vs SHANGHAI SIPG kick off?

Chengdu Better City vs SHANGHAI SIPG kicked off at 12:00 on Tuesday 19 May 2026 at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park.

What was the final score in Chengdu Better City vs SHANGHAI SIPG?

Chengdu Better City 0 - 1 SHANGHAI SIPG.

Where is Chengdu Better City vs SHANGHAI SIPG being played?

The match is being played at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park.

What competition is Chengdu Better City vs SHANGHAI SIPG part of?

Chengdu Better City vs SHANGHAI SIPG is a Regular Season - 13 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Chengdu Better City vs SHANGHAI SIPG?

Our statistical model gives Chengdu Better City a 73% chance of winning, SHANGHAI SIPG a 10% chance, and a 17% chance of a draw — making Chengdu Better City the favourite.

Will both teams score in Chengdu Better City vs SHANGHAI SIPG?

Our model estimates a 49% probability that both Chengdu Better City and SHANGHAI SIPG will score (BTTS).

Will Chengdu Better City vs SHANGHAI SIPG have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 60%.

What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City and SHANGHAI SIPG?

Record (8 meetings): Chengdu Better City 5W | Draws 1 | SHANGHAI SIPG 2W.

What form are Chengdu Better City and SHANGHAI SIPG in?

Chengdu Better City (all comps): 4W-5D-1L in 10 | 1.70 PPG | GF 2.10 / GA 1.20 | L5 D-W-D-L-D. SHANGHAI SIPG (all comps): 7W-1D-2L in 10 | 2.20 PPG | GF 2.50 / GA 1.80 | L5 W-W-L-W-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Where the Numbers Come From

Chengdu Better City's attacking strength (1.52x league average) is weighed against SHANGHAI SIPG's defensive record (0.92x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 2.36. Flip it around — SHANGHAI SIPG's attack (0.90x) against Chengdu Better City's defence (0.68x) — and the away total comes out at 0.77.

These ratings are built from 42/42 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 2-0, at 12.2%. Close behind: 3-0 (9.6%), 2-1 (9.4%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 31% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Chengdu Better City Win

73%

Chengdu Better City

1.38

17%

Draw

5.81

10%

SHANGHAI SIPG

9.91

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

2 – 0

12.2%

Home win

Most likely

1 – 0

10.4%

Home win

3 – 0

9.6%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

2.36

Chengdu Better City xG

Total xG

3.12

0.77

SHANGHAI SIPG xG

73%
17%
Chengdu Better CityDrawSHANGHAI SIPG

1.38

73%

Home win

5.81

17%

Draw

9.91

10%

Away win

Goals Markets

82%

Over 1.5

1.22

18%

Under 1.5

5.56

60%

Over 2.5

1.67

40%

Under 2.5

2.50

38%

Over 3.5

2.63

62%

Under 3.5

1.61

21%

Over 4.5

4.76

79%

Under 4.5

1.27

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

49%

BTTS Yes

2.06

51%

BTTS No

1.95

Clean Sheet

47%

Chengdu Better City

2.15

9%

SHANGHAI SIPG

10.58

Win to Nil

34%

Chengdu Better City

2.96

1%

SHANGHAI SIPG

104.86

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 4.4 3.4 1.3 0.3 0.1
1 10.4 7.9 3.0 0.8 0.1
2 12.2 9.4 3.6 0.9 0.2
3 9.6 7.4 2.8 0.7 0.1
4 5.7 4.3 1.7 0.4 0.1
5 2.7 2.0 0.8 0.2

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 2.359
λ Away (xG) 0.765
Total xG 3.124
League avg home goals 1.695
League avg away goals 1.244
Chengdu Better City attack strength 1.521
Chengdu Better City defence strength 0.680
SHANGHAI SIPG attack strength 0.904
SHANGHAI SIPG defence strength 0.915
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 42 / 42

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Chengdu Better City vs SHANGHAI SIPG?

Our Poisson model rates 2-0 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 12.2%.

How many goals are Chengdu Better City and SHANGHAI SIPG expected to score?

The model projects 2.36 expected goals for Chengdu Better City and 0.77 for SHANGHAI SIPG, a combined total of 3.12.

How confident is the prediction model for Chengdu Better City vs SHANGHAI SIPG?

Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 73%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.

📈 Form Insight

Recent Form Overview

Chengdu Better City come into this having played 60 games, going 35W 14D 11L for 1.98 points per game. Their last five reads D-W-D-L-D.

On the other side, SHANGHAI SIPG sit at 2.40 PPG from 60 outings (45W 9D 6L), a run that reads W-W-L-W-W across their last five.

SHANGHAI SIPG carry the stronger recent form of the two, 0.42 PPG clear of Chengdu Better City — worth weighing alongside whatever the head-to-head and market data say.

How They Fare by Venue

Chengdu Better City's home form reads 21W 5D 4L across 30 games on their own ground, a 2.27 PPG return.

Away from home, SHANGHAI SIPG have taken 2.33 points per game from 30 outings (22W 4D 4L).

Attack vs Defence

Chengdu Better City are averaging 2.08 goals scored and 0.98 conceded per game recently; SHANGHAI SIPG are on 2.80 scored and 1.23 conceded. SHANGHAI SIPG's attacking output running into Chengdu Better City's solid defensive record is the key goals-market tension in this fixture.

On BTTS specifically: SHANGHAI SIPG in 70%.

Last 60 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

Current Season
D W D L D
SHANGHAI SIPG

SHANGHAI SIPG

Current Season
W W L W W
60 Played 60
35/14/11 W / D / L 45/9/6
1.98 Points Per Game 2.40
2.08 Avg Goals Scored 2.80
0.98 Avg Goals Conceded 1.23
3.07 Avg Goals / Game 4.03
20 Clean Sheets 18
35 BTTS 42
36 Over 2.5 Games 46
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

D
A Sichuan Jiuniu
1–1 HT 1–1
22 Nov
L
H Henan Jianye
1–2 HT 1–0
31 Oct
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
2–2 HT 0–1
26 Oct
W
H Meizhou Kejia
3–1 HT 1–1
17 Oct
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
3–3 HT 3–2
26 Sep
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 0–0
21 Sep
W
H Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Sep
W
H SHANGHAI SIPG
4–1 HT 3–1
30 Aug
W
A Yunnan Yukun
5–1 HT 1–1
23 Aug
D
H Qingdao Jonoon
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Aug
W
A Dalian Zhixing
2–0 HT 0–0
08 Aug
W
H Shandong Luneng
2–1 HT 1–1
02 Aug
W
H Beijing Guoan
2–0 HT 1–0
26 Jul
L
A Tianjin Teda
1–2 HT 0–0
18 Jul
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–2 HT 1–1
29 Jun
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
5–0 HT 2–0
25 Jun
L
A Henan Jianye
2–3 HT 2–2
14 Jun
D
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 1–1
17 May
W
A Meizhou Kejia
4–0 HT 3–0
10 May
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
2–1 HT 1–0
05 May
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–0 HT 1–0
02 May
W
A Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 1–0
26 Apr
W
A SHANGHAI SIPG
3–1 HT 2–1
20 Apr
D
H Yunnan Yukun
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Apr
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Apr
W
H Dalian Zhixing
2–0 HT 1–0
06 Apr
W
A Shandong Luneng
3–0 HT 2–0
02 Apr
D
A Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Mar
L
H Tianjin Teda
1–2 HT 1–1
02 Mar
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 0–0
22 Feb
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–2 HT 1–1
02 Nov
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 0–1
27 Oct
W
H SHANGHAI SIPG
3–1 HT 3–1
18 Oct
W
H Meizhou Kejia
2–0 HT 1–0
29 Sep
L
A Henan Jianye
0–2 HT 0–1
21 Sep
D
H Beijing Guoan
2–2 HT 2–0
14 Sep
L
A Shandong Luneng
0–3 HT 0–1
17 Aug
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
3–0 HT 3–0
09 Aug
W
H Changchun Yatai
4–0 HT 3–0
03 Aug
W
A Hangzhou Greentown
3–1 HT 1–1
28 Jul
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–1 HT 0–0
20 Jul
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–1
12 Jul
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
1–0 HT 0–0
07 Jul
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–0 HT 2–0
30 Jun
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
5–1 HT 2–1
26 Jun
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–1
16 Jun
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
7–0 HT 3–0
26 May
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–2 HT 0–0
22 May
W
A Meizhou Kejia
4–1 HT 1–0
17 May
W
H Henan Jianye
4–2 HT 3–2
10 May
L
A Beijing Guoan
1–2 HT 0–2
05 May
D
H Wuhan Three Towns
2–2 HT 1–1
01 May
L
H Shandong Luneng
0–1 HT 0–1
26 Apr
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
3–1 HT 1–1
20 Apr
W
A Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 0–1
14 Apr
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
3–0 HT 1–0
10 Apr
W
A Tianjin Teda
3–2 HT 1–0
06 Apr
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
1–0 HT 1–0
30 Mar
L
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
0–1 HT 0–0
10 Mar
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
2–0 HT 1–0
02 Mar
SHANGHAI SIPG

SHANGHAI SIPG

W
A Dalian Zhixing
1–0 HT 1–0
22 Nov
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
3–0 HT 1–0
31 Oct
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–3 HT 1–1
26 Oct
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
4–3 HT 3–2
17 Oct
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
3–2 HT 1–0
26 Sep
W
A Beijing Guoan
3–2 HT 1–1
21 Sep
W
H Yunnan Yukun
4–2 HT 1–1
12 Sep
L
A Chengdu Better City
1–4 HT 1–3
30 Aug
D
H Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–1
24 Aug
W
H Henan Jianye
4–1 HT 3–0
15 Aug
W
A Shanghai Shenhua
2–1 HT 1–0
09 Aug
W
A Meizhou Kejia
4–2 HT 4–0
02 Aug
D
H Qingdao Youth Island
2–2 HT 1–0
26 Jul
W
A Changchun Yatai
3–1 HT 1–0
18 Jul
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
2–1 HT 0–1
30 Jun
W
H Dalian Zhixing
3–0 HT 2–0
26 Jun
W
A Henan Jianye
3–1 HT 3–0
18 Jun
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–2 HT 1–0
14 Jun
D
H Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 0–0
17 May
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
3–1 HT 1–1
09 May
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–0 HT 2–0
05 May
L
H Beijing Guoan
1–2 HT 1–1
01 May
W
A Yunnan Yukun
3–2 HT 1–0
25 Apr
L
H Chengdu Better City
1–3 HT 1–2
20 Apr
W
A Tianjin Teda
4–1 HT 3–0
16 Apr
D
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–0
06 Apr
W
H Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 2–0
02 Apr
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
3–3 HT 1–3
28 Mar
W
H Changchun Yatai
2–0 HT 0–0
28 Feb
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
3–1 HT 1–0
23 Feb
W
H Tianjin Teda
5–0 HT 2–0
02 Nov
W
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–0 HT 1–0
27 Oct
L
A Chengdu Better City
1–3 HT 1–3
18 Oct
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
2–1 HT 1–0
28 Sep
W
A Changchun Yatai
4–3 HT 3–1
21 Sep
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
2–0 HT 1–0
13 Sep
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–3 HT 1–0
17 Aug
W
H Meizhou Kejia
7–2 HT 4–1
09 Aug
W
A Shandong Luneng
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Aug
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
8–1 HT 4–0
26 Jul
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
5–0 HT 0–0
21 Jul
W
H Beijing Guoan
5–1 HT 3–1
12 Jul
W
A Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 1–0
05 Jul
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
3–1 HT 1–1
29 Jun
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–0 HT 2–0
25 Jun
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 0–0
18 Jun
W
A Tianjin Teda
3–0 HT 2–0
14 Jun
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–1 HT 1–1
26 May
W
H Chengdu Better City
2–0 HT 0–0
22 May
W
A Qingdao Youth Island
5–3 HT 3–1
18 May
W
H Changchun Yatai
5–2 HT 3–1
10 May
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
6–0 HT 3–0
05 May
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
5–0 HT 2–0
01 May
D
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 0–0
27 Apr
W
H Shandong Luneng
4–3 HT 2–3
14 Apr
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
3–0 HT 2–0
09 Apr
D
A Beijing Guoan
2–2 HT 1–1
05 Apr
W
H Henan Jianye
3–1 HT 0–0
30 Mar
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
0–0 HT 0–0
09 Mar
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
3–1 HT 1–1
01 Mar

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Chengdu Better City and SHANGHAI SIPG in coming into this match?

Chengdu Better City have gone 35W 14D 11L in their last 60 games (1.98 PPG), while SHANGHAI SIPG have gone 45W 9D 6L in their last 60 (2.40 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Chengdu Better City at home or SHANGHAI SIPG away?

SHANGHAI SIPG's away record (2.33 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Chengdu Better City at home: 2.27 PPG; SHANGHAI SIPG away: 2.33 PPG.

Have Chengdu Better City or SHANGHAI SIPG been keeping clean sheets recently?

Chengdu Better City have kept a clean sheet in 33% of their recent games, SHANGHAI SIPG in 30%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

The Rivalry So Far

These sides have met 9 times that we have on record, stretching back to September 2022 — a rivalry that has played out across roughly 3 years. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. They last met on 19 May 2026, roughly 3 months ago.

Notable Numbers

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: SHANGHAI SIPG won 3-0 on 29 Sep 2022, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Chengdu Better City have gone 3W 1D 1L from 5 meetings on their own ground against SHANGHAI SIPG — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 9 Meetings

Chengdu Better City

5

Chengdu Better City

1

Draws

SHANGHAI SIPG

3

SHANGHAI SIPG

Recent Meetings

Chengdu Better City
0–1
19 May 26
SHANGHAI SIPG
Chengdu Better City
4–1
30 Aug 25
SHANGHAI SIPG
SHANGHAI SIPG
1–3
20 Apr 25
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
3–1
18 Oct 24
SHANGHAI SIPG
SHANGHAI SIPG
2–0
22 May 24
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
2–1
23 Sep 23
SHANGHAI SIPG
SHANGHAI SIPG
0–1
03 Jun 23
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
0–0
10 Dec 22
SHANGHAI SIPG
SHANGHAI SIPG
3–0
29 Sep 22
Chengdu Better City

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City and SHANGHAI SIPG?

From 9 meetings on record, Chengdu Better City have won 5, SHANGHAI SIPG have won 3, and 1 have been drawn.

When did Chengdu Better City and SHANGHAI SIPG last play each other?

They last met on 19 May 2026, when Chengdu Better City 0-1 SHANGHAI SIPG.

Who has won more matches between Chengdu Better City and SHANGHAI SIPG?

Chengdu Better City have the better head-to-head record, with 5 wins from 9 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Early Goal Trends

Chengdu Better City are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 93% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 63% of the time.

SHANGHAI SIPG are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 90% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 67% of the time.

Full-Time Markets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Chengdu Better City 50%, SHANGHAI SIPG 63% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 60% for Chengdu Better City and 77% for SHANGHAI SIPG. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 37% and 60% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Chengdu Better City keep a clean sheet in 47% of their matches; SHANGHAI SIPG in 37%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Chengdu Better City home games / SHANGHAI SIPG away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Chengdu Better City Chengdu Better City Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 51/60
(85%)
28/30
(93.3%)
2+ Goals Before HT 29/60
(48.3%)
16/30
(53.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/9
(88.9%)
1/2
(50%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/9
(55.6%)
0/2
(0%)
Winning at HT 29/60
(48.3%)
19/30
(63.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/60
(6.7%)
3/30
(10%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/60
(6.7%)
0/30
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 35/60
(58.3%)
15/30
(50%)
Over 2.5 Goals 36/60
(60%)
18/30
(60%)
Over 3.5 Goals 22/60
(36.7%)
11/30
(36.7%)
Clean Sheet 20/60
(33.3%)
14/30
(46.7%)
Failed to Score 6/60
(10%)
2/30
(6.7%)
SHANGHAI SIPG SHANGHAI SIPG Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 51/60
(85%)
27/30
(90%)
2+ Goals Before HT 35/60
(58.3%)
18/30
(60%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/9
(88.9%)
2/3
(66.7%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 7/9
(77.8%)
1/3
(33.3%)
Winning at HT 35/60
(58.3%)
20/30
(66.7%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/60
(6.7%)
2/30
(6.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 3/60
(5%)
2/30
(6.7%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 42/60
(70%)
19/30
(63.3%)
Over 2.5 Goals 46/60
(76.7%)
23/30
(76.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 36/60
(60%)
18/30
(60%)
Clean Sheet 18/60
(30%)
11/30
(36.7%)
Failed to Score 1/60
(1.7%)
1/30
(3.3%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Chengdu Better City play SHANGHAI SIPG?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 50% of Chengdu Better City's games and 63% of SHANGHAI SIPG's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Chengdu Better City vs SHANGHAI SIPG usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 60% of Chengdu Better City's matches and 77% of SHANGHAI SIPG's.

Do Chengdu Better City and SHANGHAI SIPG tend to score early?

Chengdu Better City have had a goal before half-time in 93% of their recent matches, SHANGHAI SIPG in 90% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Shock result as SHANGHAI SIPG defy the odds to beat Chengdu Better City 0-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

SHANGHAI SIPG beat Chengdu Better City 0-1 at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park, Regular Season - 13, in the Super League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Chengdu Better City 2.36 xG and SHANGHAI SIPG 0.77 xG, a combined 3.12. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. Chengdu Better City fell 2.4 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Chengdu Better City attack 1.52 / defence 0.68 against SHANGHAI SIPG attack 0.90 / defence 0.92, drawn from 42/42 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Chengdu Better City 73% | Draw 17% | SHANGHAI SIPG 10%, with Chengdu Better City to win its most likely call at 73%. Instead the game produced a SHANGHAI SIPG win, an outcome the model had rated at just 10% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 60%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 82% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 49% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 68% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Chengdu Better City 60%, SHANGHAI SIPG 77%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 64%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Chengdu Better City's trading profile (60 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 58% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and conceded here.

SHANGHAI SIPG's trading profile (60 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 70% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 30% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

On form, SHANGHAI SIPG arrived the stronger side — 2.40 PPG against 1.98. The form guide was vindicated by the result. Chengdu Better City (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 2.23 scoring average — below par going forward. SHANGHAI SIPG (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 2.50 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.37 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit), form (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 60% Over 2.5 probability, but 1 goal scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 49% projected, both teams did not both score.
Trading Trading data bucked — 68% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.