Sign in Register

Wuhan Three Towns 1-3 Qingdao Jonoon – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 10

Kick-off

Wed 6 May 2026

11:00

Venue

Wuhan Sports Centre

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Wuhan Three Towns at 51% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Wuhan Three Towns and Qingdao Jonoon meet at Wuhan Sports Centre in Super League, Regular Season - 10. This fixture gets under way on Wednesday 6 May 2026 at 11:00 UTC.

Form

Wuhan Three Towns (all games): 1W 1D 8L across 10 Super League fixtures this term — 0.40 PPG. Last five: L D L L L. They are averaging 0.80 goals per game and conceding 2.60 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.60 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation.

Wuhan Three Towns's form when playing at home: 2W 4D 4L across 10 games at Wuhan Sports Centre this term (1.00 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.30 goals scored and 1.90 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.00 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.40 — Wuhan Three Towns are significantly better at Wuhan Sports Centre than their overall form suggests.

Qingdao Jonoon have collected 1.10 PPG across 10 Super League outings this season: 2W 5D 3L. Last five: L L W W D. They are scoring at 1.50 per game and conceding 1.60. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

When travelling in Super League this season, Qingdao Jonoon have posted 1W 3D 6L from 10 away outings — 0.60 PPG. Away from home they average 0.90 goals scored and 1.90 conceded per game. Their away PPG of 0.60 is notably below their overall 1.10 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

The travelling side arrive in better shape. Qingdao Jonoon are 0.70 PPG clear of Wuhan Three Towns in recent Super League fixtures (1.10 vs 0.40). Backing the visitors outright or on Draw No Bet are both valid approaches where the price allows.

H2H Analysis

Historically, Wuhan Three Towns have had the better of this match-up — 4 wins from 6 meetings, with Qingdao Jonoon managing just 1 victories and 1 draws shared.

Scoring has been limited when these teams have met. The 6 previous contests averaged 1.7 goals, making the Under 2.5 the historically backed angle in the goals market. The most recent clash, on 2 Nov 2025, ended 0–1 with Qingdao Jonoon winning.

The historical record gives Wuhan Three Towns a meaningful edge here — 4 wins from 6 meetings is the kind of ledger that should not be discounted when the form picture is inconclusive. Even away from home, the visitors have struggled to impose themselves in this fixture.

Trading

Wuhan Three Towns half-time and goal-timing data (60 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 77% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 71% of the time; BTTS occurs in 57% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 53% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 37%; they fail to score in 33% of games.

Qingdao Jonoon half-time and goal-timing data (60 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 77% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 88% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 59% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 37% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 43% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 37%; they fail to score in 45% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Wuhan Three Towns 58% versus Qingdao Jonoon 43%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Wuhan Three Towns 53% | Qingdao Jonoon 42%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Wuhan Three Towns 1.44 xG and Qingdao Jonoon 0.85 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Wuhan Three Towns attack 0.903 / defence 0.944 | Qingdao Jonoon attack 0.763 / defence 0.933. League average goals — home 1.712 / away 1.175. Data: 39 Wuhan Three Towns games / 39 Qingdao Jonoon games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Wuhan Three Towns 51% | Draw 27% | Qingdao Jonoon 22%. Fair-value odds: Wuhan Three Towns 1.96 | Draw 3.70 | Qingdao Jonoon 4.55. Wuhan Three Towns hold a narrow Poisson edge at 51% — the draw (27%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 40% | BTTS probability 44% | Total xG 2.29. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 60% — total xG of 2.29 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 44% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Verdict

Wuhan Three Towns dominate the H2H record, yet Qingdao Jonoon are the in-form side right now — historical edge versus current momentum creates a genuine dilemma.

The Poisson model's primary lean is Wuhan Three Towns at 51% — moderate model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Qingdao Jonoon (1.10 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. Draw probability of 27% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Wuhan Three Towns if the outright odds are short.

Poisson projects 2.29 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 40% probability — marginal — conflicting signals conviction, supported by H2H averaging 1.7 goals per meeting — though form averaging only 3.0 goals per game points in the other direction.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 44% on No. Form rates are neutral: Wuhan Three Towns 70% | Qingdao Jonoon 40%.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H Wuhan Three Towns hold a strong historical advantage, winning 4 of 6 meetings.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to Wuhan Three Towns — H2H win rate 67% vs Poisson 51%.
BTTS H2H BTTS 17% and Poisson BTTS 44% — BTTS No has double-source support.
Form Qingdao Jonoon lead on PPG: 1.10 vs 0.40 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Form (PPG) favours Qingdao Jonoon but Poisson leans Wuhan Three Towns (51%) — divergence worth monitoring.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is only 40% — the model points to an Under 2.5 outcome.
Contradiction Wuhan Three Towns dominate the H2H record, yet Qingdao Jonoon are the in-form side right now — historical edge versus current momentum creates a genuine dilemma.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 10 | Venue: Wuhan Sports Centre • Kick-off: Wednesday 6 May 2026, 11:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Wuhan Three Towns 51% | Draw 27% | Qingdao Jonoon 22% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 40% | BTTS 44% | xG Wuhan Three Towns 1.44 / Qingdao Jonoon 0.85 • Poisson strength factors: Wuhan Three Towns attack 0.903 / def 0.944 | Qingdao Jonoon attack 0.763 / def 0.933 | league avg home 1.712 / away 1.175 • Poisson stance: Wuhan Three Towns (51%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.44

Wuhan Three Towns xG

Expected Goals

0.85

Qingdao Jonoon xG

51%
27%
22%
Wuhan Three Towns Draw Qingdao Jonoon

44%

BTTS

67%

Over 1.5

40%

Over 2.5

20%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon kick off?

Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon kicked off at 11:00 on Wednesday 6 May 2026 at Wuhan Sports Centre.

What was the final score in Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon?

Wuhan Three Towns 1 - 3 Qingdao Jonoon.

Where is Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon being played?

The match is being played at Wuhan Sports Centre.

What competition is Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon part of?

Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon is a Regular Season - 10 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon?

Our statistical model gives Wuhan Three Towns a 51% chance of winning, Qingdao Jonoon a 22% chance, and a 27% chance of a draw — making Wuhan Three Towns the favourite.

Will both teams score in Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon?

Our model estimates a 44% probability that both Wuhan Three Towns and Qingdao Jonoon will score (BTTS).

Will Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 40%.

What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Three Towns and Qingdao Jonoon?

Record (6 meetings): Wuhan Three Towns 4W | Draws 1 | Qingdao Jonoon 1W.

What form are Wuhan Three Towns and Qingdao Jonoon in?

Wuhan Three Towns (all comps): 1W-1D-8L in 10 | 0.40 PPG | GF 0.80 / GA 2.60 | L5 L-D-L-L-L. Qingdao Jonoon (all comps): 2W-5D-3L in 10 | 1.10 PPG | GF 1.50 / GA 1.60 | L5 L-L-W-W-D.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

The model rates Wuhan Three Towns's attack at 0.90x the league average against Qingdao Jonoon's defence at 0.93x — combine the two and it projects 1.44 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — Qingdao Jonoon's attack (0.76x) against Wuhan Three Towns's defence (0.94x) — and the away total comes out at 0.85.

These ratings are built from 39/39 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 14.0% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 1-0 (13.0%), 0-0 (11.7%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 39% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Wuhan Three Towns Win

51%

Wuhan Three Towns

1.96

27%

Draw

3.72

22%

Qingdao Jonoon

4.53

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 0

14.6%

Home win

Most likely

1 – 1

12.4%

Draw

2 – 0

10.6%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.44

Wuhan Three Towns xG

Total xG

2.29

0.85

Qingdao Jonoon xG

51%
27%
22%
Wuhan Three TownsDrawQingdao Jonoon

1.96

51%

Home win

3.72

27%

Draw

4.53

22%

Away win

Goals Markets

67%

Over 1.5

1.49

33%

Under 1.5

3.03

40%

Over 2.5

2.50

60%

Under 2.5

1.67

20%

Over 3.5

5.00

80%

Under 3.5

1.25

8%

Over 4.5

12.50

92%

Under 4.5

1.09

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

44%

BTTS Yes

2.29

56%

BTTS No

1.77

Clean Sheet

43%

Wuhan Three Towns

2.33

24%

Qingdao Jonoon

4.23

Win to Nil

22%

Wuhan Three Towns

4.56

5%

Qingdao Jonoon

19.19

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 10.1 8.6 3.6 1.0 0.2
1 14.6 12.4 5.2 1.5 0.3 0.1
2 10.6 8.9 3.8 1.1 0.2
3 5.1 4.3 1.8 0.5 0.1
4 1.8 1.5 0.7 0.2
5 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.443
λ Away (xG) 0.846
Total xG 2.289
League avg home goals 1.712
League avg away goals 1.175
Wuhan Three Towns attack strength 0.903
Wuhan Three Towns defence strength 0.944
Qingdao Jonoon attack strength 0.763
Qingdao Jonoon defence strength 0.933
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 39 / 39

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 14.0%.

How many goals are Wuhan Three Towns and Qingdao Jonoon expected to score?

The model projects 1.44 expected goals for Wuhan Three Towns and 0.85 for Qingdao Jonoon, a combined total of 2.29.

How confident is the prediction model for Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 51%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Wuhan Three Towns's recent record stands at 14W 14D 32L from 60 games, a 0.93 PPG return, with L-D-L-L-L in the last five.

Qingdao Jonoon, meanwhile, have gone 13W 15D 32L across 60 games — 0.90 PPG, with L-L-W-W-D in their last five.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 0.93 PPG for Wuhan Three Towns against 0.90 for Qingdao Jonoon. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

Home & Away Splits

At home specifically, Wuhan Three Towns have managed 8W 7D 15L from 30 games — 1.03 PPG in front of their own supporters.

Qingdao Jonoon's away record stands at 3W 6D 21L across 30 trips, a 0.50 PPG haul. That's a step down from their 0.90 PPG overall record — away form has been the weaker part of Qingdao Jonoon's season.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Wuhan Three Towns come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Wuhan Three Towns are averaging 1.08 goals scored and 1.77 conceded per game recently; Qingdao Jonoon are on 1.05 scored and 1.72 conceded.

Last 60 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Wuhan Three Towns

Wuhan Three Towns

Current Season
L D L L L
Qingdao Jonoon

Qingdao Jonoon

Current Season
L L W W D
60 Played 60
14/14/32 W / D / L 13/15/32
0.93 Points Per Game 0.90
1.08 Avg Goals Scored 1.05
1.77 Avg Goals Conceded 1.72
2.85 Avg Goals / Game 2.77
9 Clean Sheets 9
35 BTTS 26
32 Over 2.5 Games 25
Wuhan Three Towns

Wuhan Three Towns

L
H Shandong Luneng
1–5 HT 0–2
22 Nov
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
0–1 HT 0–1
02 Nov
L
H Sichuan Jiuniu
1–2 HT 0–1
24 Oct
D
A Dalian Zhixing
0–0 HT 0–0
19 Oct
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
2–3 HT 0–1
26 Sep
L
H Henan Jianye
2–5 HT 0–2
19 Sep
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–4 HT 0–2
14 Sep
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–0 HT 0–0
31 Aug
L
A Beijing Guoan
0–4 HT 0–2
25 Aug
L
A Yunnan Yukun
1–2 HT 0–1
15 Aug
L
H Meizhou Kejia
1–2 HT 0–1
10 Aug
D
H Changchun Yatai
0–0 HT 0–0
03 Aug
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–3 HT 1–0
27 Jul
D
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 1–0
18 Jul
D
H Chengdu Better City
2–2 HT 1–1
29 Jun
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–3 HT 0–1
25 Jun
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
2–1 HT 0–0
18 Jun
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
2–0 HT 2–0
13 Jun
D
H Dalian Zhixing
2–2 HT 0–2
11 May
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–2 HT 0–2
05 May
W
A Henan Jianye
2–1 HT 0–0
01 May
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 0–1
27 Apr
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–1
19 Apr
D
H Beijing Guoan
4–4 HT 1–3
15 Apr
W
H Yunnan Yukun
3–1 HT 3–0
12 Apr
L
A Meizhou Kejia
1–3 HT 1–0
06 Apr
D
A Changchun Yatai
1–1 HT 1–1
02 Apr
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
0–4 HT 0–4
28 Mar
L
A Qingdao Youth Island
0–2 HT 0–1
03 Mar
L
A Chengdu Better City
0–1 HT 0–0
22 Feb
L
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–3 HT 0–2
02 Nov
L
A Meizhou Kejia
0–1 HT 0–1
27 Oct
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
0–2 HT 0–1
18 Oct
W
H Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 0–0
29 Sep
D
A Shandong Luneng
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Sep
D
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–1 HT 0–1
15 Sep
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–1 HT 0–0
16 Aug
L
A Changchun Yatai
0–2 HT 0–2
10 Aug
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
4–1 HT 3–0
03 Aug
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–1
29 Jul
D
H Chengdu Better City
1–1 HT 0–0
20 Jul
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 1–1
12 Jul
W
A Beijing Guoan
2–1 HT 1–0
07 Jul
L
H Nantong Zhiyun
1–2 HT 0–1
29 Jun
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–2 HT 0–2
25 Jun
W
A Qingdao Youth Island
1–0 HT 1–0
16 Jun
L
H Meizhou Kejia
0–1 HT 0–0
25 May
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
1–3 HT 1–2
21 May
W
A Henan Jianye
3–2 HT 2–1
17 May
L
H Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 0–1
11 May
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 1–0
05 May
D
A Chengdu Better City
2–2 HT 1–1
01 May
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–1
26 Apr
D
H Changchun Yatai
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Apr
D
A Sichuan Jiuniu
1–1 HT 0–0
14 Apr
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–4 HT 0–2
09 Apr
L
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–3 HT 0–1
04 Apr
L
H Beijing Guoan
0–1 HT 0–0
30 Mar
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
3–1 HT 1–0
09 Mar
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–3 HT 1–1
01 Mar
Qingdao Jonoon

Qingdao Jonoon

D
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–2 HT 1–1
22 Nov
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 1–0
02 Nov
W
A Beijing Guoan
4–2 HT 0–1
26 Oct
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
3–4 HT 2–3
17 Oct
L
A Meizhou Kejia
0–1 HT 0–1
04 Oct
D
A Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 1–0
27 Sep
D
H Shandong Luneng
2–2 HT 0–2
20 Sep
D
H Henan Jianye
1–1 HT 1–0
29 Aug
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–0
23 Aug
D
A Chengdu Better City
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Aug
W
H Yunnan Yukun
5–1 HT 2–1
09 Aug
L
A Dalian Zhixing
0–2 HT 0–1
03 Aug
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–0 HT 1–0
27 Jul
L
A Sichuan Jiuniu
0–4 HT 0–2
19 Jul
L
A Qingdao Youth Island
0–1 HT 0–1
29 Jun
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
0–3 HT 0–0
25 Jun
L
A Wuhan Three Towns
0–2 HT 0–2
13 Jun
D
H Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–0
17 May
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–3 HT 1–1
09 May
W
H Changchun Yatai
3–0 HT 0–0
05 May
D
A Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 0–0
01 May
D
H Meizhou Kejia
1–1 HT 0–1
27 Apr
L
A Henan Jianye
1–3 HT 1–0
20 Apr
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
2–3 HT 2–2
16 Apr
L
H Chengdu Better City
0–1 HT 0–1
12 Apr
L
A Yunnan Yukun
0–1 HT 0–0
06 Apr
D
H Dalian Zhixing
1–1 HT 0–1
02 Apr
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–1 HT 0–1
29 Mar
L
H Sichuan Jiuniu
0–1 HT 0–0
01 Mar
D
H Qingdao Youth Island
2–2 HT 2–1
23 Feb
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–0 HT 1–0
02 Nov
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–1 HT 0–1
27 Oct
L
A Beijing Guoan
0–6 HT 0–2
19 Oct
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–1 HT 0–1
28 Sep
L
A Nantong Zhiyun
1–2 HT 0–1
22 Sep
D
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–1 HT 1–0
15 Sep
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
1–0 HT 1–0
17 Aug
L
H Henan Jianye
0–2 HT 0–0
10 Aug
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
3–4 HT 1–2
03 Aug
W
H Meizhou Kejia
4–2 HT 2–1
28 Jul
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–5 HT 0–0
21 Jul
D
A Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 1–1
13 Jul
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
3–1 HT 3–1
07 Jul
L
A Changchun Yatai
0–5 HT 0–2
30 Jun
L
H Chengdu Better City
1–5 HT 1–2
26 Jun
W
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–0 HT 1–0
16 Jun
W
H Tianjin Teda
3–1 HT 2–0
26 May
D
H Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–0
21 May
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–0
15 May
D
H Nantong Zhiyun
2–2 HT 0–0
10 May
L
A Wuhan Three Towns
0–1 HT 0–1
05 May
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–5 HT 0–2
01 May
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
3–1 HT 3–0
26 Apr
L
A Henan Jianye
0–1 HT 0–0
21 Apr
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
2–0 HT 1–0
14 Apr
D
A Meizhou Kejia
0–0 HT 0–0
10 Apr
L
H Shandong Luneng
0–1 HT 0–0
05 Apr
L
A Qingdao Youth Island
0–1 HT 0–1
30 Mar
L
H Changchun Yatai
0–1 HT 0–0
08 Mar
L
A Chengdu Better City
0–2 HT 0–1
02 Mar

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Wuhan Three Towns and Qingdao Jonoon in coming into this match?

Wuhan Three Towns have gone 14W 14D 32L in their last 60 games (0.93 PPG), while Qingdao Jonoon have gone 13W 15D 32L in their last 60 (0.90 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Wuhan Three Towns at home or Qingdao Jonoon away?

Wuhan Three Towns's home record (1.03 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Wuhan Three Towns at home: 1.03 PPG; Qingdao Jonoon away: 0.50 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 8 times since April 2023 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. The two were last together as recently as 29 August 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Records & Recent Trends

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Wuhan Three Towns won 1-5 on 29 Aug 2026, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Wuhan Three Towns have gone 3W 0D 1L from 4 meetings on their own ground against Qingdao Jonoon — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 8 Meetings

Wuhan Three Towns

5

Wuhan Three Towns

1

Draws

Qingdao Jonoon

2

Qingdao Jonoon

Recent Meetings

Qingdao Jonoon
1–5
29 Aug 26
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
1–3
06 May 26
Qingdao Jonoon
Qingdao Jonoon
1–0
02 Nov 25
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
2–0
13 Jun 25
Qingdao Jonoon
Qingdao Jonoon
1–1
15 Sep 24
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
1–0
05 May 24
Qingdao Jonoon
Wuhan Three Towns
1–0
30 Jul 23
Qingdao Jonoon
Qingdao Jonoon
0–3
29 Apr 23
Wuhan Three Towns

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Three Towns and Qingdao Jonoon?

From 8 meetings on record, Wuhan Three Towns have won 5, Qingdao Jonoon have won 2, and 1 have been drawn.

When did Wuhan Three Towns and Qingdao Jonoon last play each other?

They last met on 29 August 2026, when Qingdao Jonoon 1-5 Wuhan Three Towns.

Who has won more matches between Wuhan Three Towns and Qingdao Jonoon?

Wuhan Three Towns have the better head-to-head record, with 5 wins from 8 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Wuhan Three Towns are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 77% of their matches.

Qingdao Jonoon are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 77% of their matches.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Wuhan Three Towns 57%, Qingdao Jonoon 37% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 53% (Wuhan Three Towns) and 43% (Qingdao Jonoon).

On the defensive side: Wuhan Three Towns have failed to score in 30% of games; Qingdao Jonoon in 60%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Wuhan Three Towns home games / Qingdao Jonoon away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Wuhan Three Towns Wuhan Three Towns Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 46/60
(76.7%)
23/30
(76.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 23/60
(38.3%)
13/30
(43.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 10/14
(71.4%)
5/7
(71.4%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 4/14
(28.6%)
1/7
(14.3%)
Winning at HT 11/60
(18.3%)
5/30
(16.7%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/60
(5%)
1/30
(3.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/60
(6.7%)
3/30
(10%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 35/60
(58.3%)
17/30
(56.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 32/60
(53.3%)
16/30
(53.3%)
Over 3.5 Goals 22/60
(36.7%)
10/30
(33.3%)
Clean Sheet 9/60
(15%)
6/30
(20%)
Failed to Score 20/60
(33.3%)
9/30
(30%)
Qingdao Jonoon Qingdao Jonoon Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 43/60
(71.7%)
23/30
(76.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 19/60
(31.7%)
10/30
(33.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 15/17
(88.2%)
5/7
(71.4%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 10/17
(58.8%)
3/7
(42.9%)
Winning at HT 16/60
(26.7%)
4/30
(13.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/60
(8.3%)
2/30
(6.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/60
(6.7%)
1/30
(3.3%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 26/60
(43.3%)
11/30
(36.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 25/60
(41.7%)
13/30
(43.3%)
Over 3.5 Goals 22/60
(36.7%)
12/30
(40%)
Clean Sheet 9/60
(15%)
3/30
(10%)
Failed to Score 27/60
(45%)
18/30
(60%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Wuhan Three Towns play Qingdao Jonoon?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 57% of Wuhan Three Towns's recent matches and 37% of Qingdao Jonoon's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 53% of Wuhan Three Towns's recent games and 43% of Qingdao Jonoon's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Wuhan Three Towns and Qingdao Jonoon tend to score early?

Wuhan Three Towns have had a goal before half-time in 77% of their recent matches, Qingdao Jonoon in 77% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Qingdao Jonoon cruise to a comfortable 1-3 victory over Wuhan Three Towns.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Qingdao Jonoon beat Wuhan Three Towns 1-3 at Wuhan Sports Centre, Regular Season - 10, in the Super League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Wuhan Three Towns 1.44 xG and Qingdao Jonoon 0.85 xG, a combined 2.29. The scoreboard read 1-3 for 4 actual goals. Qingdao Jonoon outscored their 0.85 projection by 2.2. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Wuhan Three Towns attack 0.90 / defence 0.94 against Qingdao Jonoon attack 0.76 / defence 0.93, drawn from 39/39 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Wuhan Three Towns 51% | Draw 27% | Qingdao Jonoon 22%, with Wuhan Three Towns to win its most likely call at 51%. Instead the game produced a Qingdao Jonoon win, an outcome the model had rated at just 22% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 40%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 67% and landed. Over 3.5 was 20% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 44% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 48% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Wuhan Three Towns 53%, Qingdao Jonoon 42%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 51%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Wuhan Three Towns's trading profile (60 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 58% of their matches — today it did.

Qingdao Jonoon's trading profile (60 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 43% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Wuhan Three Towns 0.93 PPG, Qingdao Jonoon 0.90 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Qingdao Jonoon win broke the near-deadlock. Wuhan Three Towns (home/away splits) shipped 3 against a 1.73 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Qingdao Jonoon (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 0.73 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 1 against a 2.00 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 40% Over 2.5 probability, but 4 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 44% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data bucked — 48% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.