Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Qingdao Jonoon – Pre-Match Analysis

Poisson model rates Chongqing Tongliang Long at 41%, yet other data sources diverge — this Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Qingdao Jonoon fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

Chongqing Tongliang Long host Qingdao Jonoon at Tongliang Long Stadium in Super League, Regular Season - 29. Kick-off is scheduled for Saturday 24 October 2026 at 07:30 UTC.

Form Guide

Chongqing Tongliang Long — All Games: 0W 5D 5L from 10 Super League outings this season, averaging 0.50 points per game. Last five: L D L D D. They are averaging 0.70 goals per game and conceding 1.40 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

Chongqing Tongliang Long's home record at Tongliang Long Stadium: 1W 5D 4L from 10 Super League appearances (0.80 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.00 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Across all Super League games this season, Qingdao Jonoon have recorded 0W 0D 10L from 10 outings — 0.00 PPG. Last five: L L L L L. Their scoring rate of 0.50 per game is modest, conceding 2.90 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.90 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season.

Qingdao Jonoon's away record: 1W 0D 9L from 10 road trips in Super League this season (0.30 PPG). Away from home they average 1.40 goals scored and 2.70 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 90% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

On current form, Chongqing Tongliang Long have the edge — a 0.50 PPG advantage (0.50 vs 0.00) represents a meaningful gap. That momentum makes them the form-based pick, though if the outright price looks short, Draw No Bet is worth comparing.

Both teams score in over 70% of each side's relevant games (using home/away splits). At that combined rate, BTTS Yes is as well-evidenced as it gets — the data strongly backs two-way scoring.

H2H

The H2H landscape is flat: 1 previous encounters have yielded 1 wins for Chongqing Tongliang Long, 0 for Qingdao Jonoon and 0 draws. A neutral reading in isolation.

The last 1 meetings have been tight affairs, averaging just 1.0 goals per game. That low-scoring pattern is a meaningful historical input for the Under 2.5 market. The most recent clash, on 24 May 2026, ended 1–0 with Chongqing Tongliang Long winning.

With a balanced win record and just 1.0 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

Trading Patterns

Chongqing Tongliang Long in-play and half-time data (28 games, 14 at home): they score before half-time in 57% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 75% of the time; BTTS occurs in 64% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 36% of games (home games).

Qingdao Jonoon in-play and half-time data (28 games, 14 at away): they score before half-time in 79% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 88% of the time; BTTS occurs in 79% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 71% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 50%; they fail to score in 32% of games.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Chongqing Tongliang Long 57% and Qingdao Jonoon 64% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Chongqing Tongliang Long 32% | Qingdao Jonoon 64%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Chongqing Tongliang Long 1.56 xG and Qingdao Jonoon 1.35 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Chongqing Tongliang Long attack 0.725 / defence 1.054 | Qingdao Jonoon attack 0.912 / defence 1.264. League average goals — home 1.707 / away 1.404. Chongqing Tongliang Long's attack strength of 0.725 is below the league average — the 1.56 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Qingdao Jonoon bring a strong defensive rating of 1.264 — this is suppressing Chongqing Tongliang Long's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 28 Chongqing Tongliang Long games / 58 Qingdao Jonoon games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Chongqing Tongliang Long 41% | Draw 27% | Qingdao Jonoon 32%. Fair-value odds: Chongqing Tongliang Long 2.44 | Draw 3.70 | Qingdao Jonoon 3.12. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 27% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 56% | BTTS probability 60% | Total xG 2.91. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 56% — the 2.91 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 60% reflects that both xG figures (1.56 / 1.35) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, Chongqing Tongliang Long are the pick at 41% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. With a 27% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Chongqing Tongliang Long offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 2.91 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 56% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.2 goals per game.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 60%. Form rates corroborate: Chongqing Tongliang Long 70% | Qingdao Jonoon 90% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights