Sign in Register

Hangzhou Greentown 2-0 Qingdao Youth Island – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 1

Kick-off

Sun 8 Mar 2026

07:30

Venue

Huizhou Olympic Stadium

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Hangzhou Greentown at 45%, yet other data sources diverge — this Hangzhou Greentown vs Qingdao Youth Island fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Super League encounter, Regular Season - 1 sees Qingdao Youth Island travel to Huizhou Olympic Stadium to take on Hangzhou Greentown. The game is scheduled for Sunday 8 March 2026, 07:30 UTC.

Form Guide

Hangzhou Greentown — All Games: 2W 7D 1L from 10 Super League outings this season, averaging 1.30 points per game. Last five: D D D L D. Offensively they are averaging 1.80 goals per game, with 1.70 conceded. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

Hangzhou Greentown's home record at Huizhou Olympic Stadium: 3W 6D 1L from 10 Super League appearances (1.50 PPG). They are averaging 2.20 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 80% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Across all Super League games this season, Qingdao Youth Island have recorded 4W 1D 5L from 10 outings — 1.30 PPG. Last five: W L D L W. Their scoring rate of 1.30 per game is modest, conceding 1.50 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

Qingdao Youth Island's form when playing away from home: 3W 3D 4L across 10 road games this term (1.20 PPG). Away from home they average 1.10 goals scored and 1.10 conceded per game.

The form figures are too closely matched to derive a directional pick: Hangzhou Greentown 1.30 PPG, Qingdao Youth Island 1.30 PPG. Look to other data sets to build the analysis.

H2H

The rivalry is an even one: 2 wins apiece for Hangzhou Greentown, 2 for Qingdao Youth Island and 0 shared spoils from 4 past contests. Neither side holds a meaningful historical edge.

Goals have been a feature of this fixture. The last 4 meetings have averaged 3.8 per game — a rate that gives the Over 2.5 market a solid historical foundation. The most recent clash, on 13 Sep 2025, ended 2–0 with Hangzhou Greentown winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.8 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

In-Play Data

Hangzhou Greentown trading profile (60 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 90% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 56% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 80% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 83% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 58%.

Qingdao Youth Island trading profile (60 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 87% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; BTTS occurs in 60% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 63% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 40%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Hangzhou Greentown 67% and Qingdao Youth Island 60% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (Hangzhou Greentown 77% | Qingdao Youth Island 57%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Hangzhou Greentown 1.80 xG and Qingdao Youth Island 1.44 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Hangzhou Greentown attack 1.053 / defence 1.053 | Qingdao Youth Island attack 0.970 / defence 0.900. League average goals — home 1.896 / away 1.412. Data: 30 Hangzhou Greentown games / 30 Qingdao Youth Island games used (PrevSeason). Note: current-season sample is too small — prior-season data is carrying the calculation. Model confidence is reduced; treat probabilities as directional rather than precise.

Result probabilities: Hangzhou Greentown 45% | Draw 25% | Qingdao Youth Island 30%. Fair-value odds: Hangzhou Greentown 2.22 | Draw 4.00 | Qingdao Youth Island 3.33. Hangzhou Greentown hold a narrow Poisson edge at 45% — the draw (25%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 63% | BTTS probability 65% | Total xG 3.24. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 63% — the 3.24 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 65% reflects that both xG figures (1.80 / 1.44) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Our Verdict

Poisson rates Hangzhou Greentown as the most likely outcome at 45% — moderate model lean. With a 25% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Hangzhou Greentown offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 30% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 3.24 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 63% — strong confidence, supported by form averaging 3.1 goals per game and H2H averaging 3.8 goals per meeting.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 65% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Hangzhou Greentown 80% | Qingdao Youth Island 50% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 30% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects. The Poisson model is drawing on PrevSeason data (30 games minimum) — early-season projections carry additional uncertainty. Weight the live form and odds signals accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (2W–0D–2W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H (3.75 goals/game) and Poisson xG (3.24) both back Over 2.5 goals (63% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 75% and Poisson BTTS 65% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Form Hangzhou Greentown Poisson xG (1.80) is below their recent form scoring rate (2.20) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Form Qingdao Youth Island Poisson xG (1.44) exceeds their form scoring rate (1.10) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 63% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 65% — model favours both teams scoring.
Market Poisson model is using prior-season data only (30/30 games) — current-season form data is limited; weight form and market signals more heavily for this fixture.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Hangzhou Greentown vs Qingdao Youth Island | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 1 | Venue: Huizhou Olympic Stadium • Kick-off: Sunday 8 Mar 2026, 07:30 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Hangzhou Greentown 45% | Draw 25% | Qingdao Youth Island 30% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 63% | BTTS 65% | xG Hangzhou Greentown 1.80 / Qingdao Youth Island 1.44 • Poisson strength factors: Hangzhou Greentown attack 1.053 / def 1.053 | Qingdao Youth Island attack 0.970 / def 0.900 | league avg home 1.896 / away 1.412 • Poisson stance: Hangzhou Greentown (45%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.80

Hangzhou Greentown xG

Expected Goals

1.44

Qingdao Youth Island xG

45%
25%
30%
Hangzhou Greentown Draw Qingdao Youth Island

65%

BTTS

84%

Over 1.5

63%

Over 2.5

41%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Hangzhou Greentown vs Qingdao Youth Island kick off?

Hangzhou Greentown vs Qingdao Youth Island kicked off at 07:30 on Sunday 8 March 2026 at Huizhou Olympic Stadium.

What was the final score in Hangzhou Greentown vs Qingdao Youth Island?

Hangzhou Greentown 2 - 0 Qingdao Youth Island.

Where is Hangzhou Greentown vs Qingdao Youth Island being played?

The match is being played at Huizhou Olympic Stadium.

What competition is Hangzhou Greentown vs Qingdao Youth Island part of?

Hangzhou Greentown vs Qingdao Youth Island is a Regular Season - 1 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Hangzhou Greentown vs Qingdao Youth Island?

Our statistical model gives Hangzhou Greentown a 45% chance of winning, Qingdao Youth Island a 30% chance, and a 25% chance of a draw — making Hangzhou Greentown the favourite.

Will both teams score in Hangzhou Greentown vs Qingdao Youth Island?

Our model estimates a 65% probability that both Hangzhou Greentown and Qingdao Youth Island will score (BTTS).

Will Hangzhou Greentown vs Qingdao Youth Island have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 63%.

What is the head-to-head record between Hangzhou Greentown and Qingdao Youth Island?

Record (4 meetings): Hangzhou Greentown 2W | Draws 0 | Qingdao Youth Island 2W.

What form are Hangzhou Greentown and Qingdao Youth Island in?

Hangzhou Greentown (all comps): 2W-7D-1L in 10 | 1.30 PPG | GF 1.80 / GA 1.70 | L5 D-D-D-L-D. Qingdao Youth Island (all comps): 4W-1D-5L in 10 | 1.30 PPG | GF 1.30 / GA 1.50 | L5 W-L-D-L-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

The model rates Hangzhou Greentown's attack at 1.05x the league average against Qingdao Youth Island's defence at 0.90x — combine the two and it projects 1.80 expected goals for the hosts. The same calculation in reverse, Qingdao Youth Island's attack versus Hangzhou Greentown's defence, projects 1.44 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 30/30 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 11.5% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 2-1 (9.1%), 1-2 (7.3%). Together the top three scorelines make up 28% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Hangzhou Greentown Win

45%

Hangzhou Greentown

2.22

25%

Draw

4.05

30%

Qingdao Youth Island

3.32

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

10.2%

Draw

Most likely

2 – 1

9.1%

Home win

1 – 2

7.3%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.80

Hangzhou Greentown xG

Total xG

3.24

1.44

Qingdao Youth Island xG

45%
25%
30%
Hangzhou GreentownDrawQingdao Youth Island

2.22

45%

Home win

4.05

25%

Draw

3.32

30%

Away win

Goals Markets

83%

Over 1.5

1.20

17%

Under 1.5

5.88

63%

Over 2.5

1.59

37%

Under 2.5

2.70

41%

Over 3.5

2.44

59%

Under 3.5

1.69

23%

Over 4.5

4.35

77%

Under 4.5

1.30

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

65%

BTTS Yes

1.55

35%

BTTS No

2.83

Clean Sheet

24%

Hangzhou Greentown

4.23

17%

Qingdao Youth Island

6.03

Win to Nil

11%

Hangzhou Greentown

9.37

5%

Qingdao Youth Island

20.01

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 3.9 5.7 4.1 2.0 0.7 0.2
1 7.0 10.2 7.3 3.5 1.3 0.4
2 6.3 9.1 6.6 3.2 1.1 0.3
3 3.8 5.5 3.9 1.9 0.7 0.2
4 1.7 2.5 1.8 0.9 0.3 0.1
5 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.797
λ Away (xG) 1.442
Total xG 3.239
League avg home goals 1.896
League avg away goals 1.412
Hangzhou Greentown attack strength 1.053
Hangzhou Greentown defence strength 1.053
Qingdao Youth Island attack strength 0.970
Qingdao Youth Island defence strength 0.900
Data phase PrevSeason
Games used (H/A) 30 / 30

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Hangzhou Greentown vs Qingdao Youth Island?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 11.5%.

How many goals are Hangzhou Greentown and Qingdao Youth Island expected to score?

The model projects 1.80 expected goals for Hangzhou Greentown and 1.44 for Qingdao Youth Island, a combined total of 3.24.

How confident is the prediction model for Hangzhou Greentown vs Qingdao Youth Island?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 45%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Hangzhou Greentown's recent record stands at 21W 17D 22L from 60 games, a 1.33 PPG return, with D-D-D-L-D in the last five.

Qingdao Youth Island, meanwhile, have gone 18W 18D 24L across 60 games — 1.20 PPG, with W-L-D-L-W in their last five.

Form-wise this is close to level: Hangzhou Greentown on 1.33 PPG, Qingdao Youth Island on 1.20. Other factors will likely decide this one more than recent results.

Home Ground vs the Road

At home specifically, Hangzhou Greentown have managed 14W 11D 5L from 30 games — 1.77 PPG in front of their own supporters. That's noticeably better than their 1.33 PPG overall — Hangzhou Greentown are a different proposition at home than their general record suggests.

Qingdao Youth Island's away record stands at 9W 6D 15L across 30 trips, a 1.10 PPG haul.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Hangzhou Greentown come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

The Goals Picture

Hangzhou Greentown are averaging 1.92 goals scored and 1.85 conceded per game recently; Qingdao Youth Island are on 1.33 scored and 1.68 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Hangzhou Greentown have seen both teams score in 67% of their recent games; Qingdao Youth Island in 60%.

Last 60 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Hangzhou Greentown

Hangzhou Greentown

Current Season
D D D L D
Qingdao Youth Island

Qingdao Youth Island

Current Season
W L D L W
60 Played 60
21/17/22 W / D / L 18/18/24
1.33 Points Per Game 1.20
1.92 Avg Goals Scored 1.33
1.85 Avg Goals Conceded 1.68
3.77 Avg Goals / Game 3.02
12 Clean Sheets 12
40 BTTS 36
46 Over 2.5 Games 34
Hangzhou Greentown

Hangzhou Greentown

D
H Qingdao Jonoon
2–2 HT 1–1
22 Nov
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–3 HT 0–1
31 Oct
D
A Henan Jianye
2–2 HT 0–1
25 Oct
D
H Shandong Luneng
2–2 HT 1–1
18 Oct
D
H Chengdu Better City
3–3 HT 2–3
26 Sep
D
A Changchun Yatai
3–3 HT 1–1
20 Sep
W
A Qingdao Youth Island
2–0 HT 0–0
13 Sep
D
A Meizhou Kejia
2–2 HT 2–1
24 Aug
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–0 HT 1–0
20 Aug
D
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Aug
L
H Beijing Guoan
3–4 HT 2–1
10 Aug
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
4–2 HT 1–0
03 Aug
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
3–2 HT 0–1
27 Jul
W
H Yunnan Yukun
3–1 HT 0–1
18 Jul
L
A Dalian Zhixing
0–1 HT 0–1
30 Jun
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
3–0 HT 0–0
25 Jun
D
H SHANGHAI SIPG
2–2 HT 0–1
14 Jun
D
H Henan Jianye
2–2 HT 2–1
16 May
L
A Shandong Luneng
2–4 HT 1–1
10 May
L
A Chengdu Better City
1–2 HT 0–1
05 May
W
H Changchun Yatai
4–2 HT 3–1
01 May
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
2–1 HT 0–0
27 Apr
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–2 HT 0–0
20 Apr
D
H Meizhou Kejia
2–2 HT 2–0
16 Apr
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
2–3 HT 0–1
12 Apr
L
A Beijing Guoan
0–2 HT 0–1
06 Apr
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
3–0 HT 1–0
01 Apr
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
4–0 HT 4–0
28 Mar
D
A Yunnan Yukun
1–1 HT 1–0
01 Mar
D
H Dalian Zhixing
1–1 HT 1–0
23 Feb
D
A Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 0–1
02 Nov
D
H Shandong Luneng
3–3 HT 2–1
27 Oct
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–0 HT 1–0
18 Oct
L
A Nantong Zhiyun
2–3 HT 2–2
28 Sep
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–2 HT 0–2
22 Sep
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
3–4 HT 2–2
13 Sep
D
A Beijing Guoan
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Aug
L
A Tianjin Teda
2–3 HT 0–2
11 Aug
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
4–3 HT 2–1
03 Aug
L
H Chengdu Better City
1–3 HT 1–1
28 Jul
L
A Henan Jianye
1–2 HT 1–2
21 Jul
L
A Qingdao Youth Island
2–5 HT 2–1
13 Jul
W
H Meizhou Kejia
4–0 HT 3–0
07 Jul
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–3 HT 1–1
29 Jun
L
A Sichuan Jiuniu
2–3 HT 1–0
25 Jun
W
H Changchun Yatai
3–1 HT 0–1
15 Jun
L
A Shandong Luneng
0–3 HT 0–3
25 May
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
3–1 HT 2–1
21 May
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
5–2 HT 3–1
17 May
W
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–0 HT 0–0
12 May
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–4 HT 0–2
05 May
W
H Henan Jianye
4–1 HT 3–1
30 Apr
L
H Beijing Guoan
1–2 HT 0–1
26 Apr
W
H Tianjin Teda
3–2 HT 1–1
19 Apr
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
0–2 HT 0–1
14 Apr
L
A Chengdu Better City
0–3 HT 0–1
10 Apr
L
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–2 HT 0–1
06 Apr
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 0–0
31 Mar
D
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–0 HT 0–0
09 Mar
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
1–0 HT 1–0
03 Mar
Qingdao Youth Island

Qingdao Youth Island

W
H Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
22 Nov
L
A Yunnan Yukun
0–1 HT 0–1
02 Nov
D
H Chengdu Better City
2–2 HT 1–0
26 Oct
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–2 HT 1–1
17 Oct
W
A Dalian Zhixing
2–0 HT 1–0
04 Oct
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
2–1 HT 1–1
28 Sep
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 1–1
20 Sep
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
0–2 HT 0–0
13 Sep
L
A Shandong Luneng
2–3 HT 0–1
24 Aug
L
H Beijing Guoan
1–3 HT 0–1
16 Aug
D
A Tianjin Teda
0–0 HT 0–0
10 Aug
W
H Henan Jianye
2–1 HT 2–1
02 Aug
D
A SHANGHAI SIPG
2–2 HT 0–1
26 Jul
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–1 HT 0–1
18 Jul
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 1–0
29 Jun
L
A Changchun Yatai
0–1 HT 0–0
25 Jun
L
A Beijing Guoan
0–1 HT 0–1
17 Jun
D
H Yunnan Yukun
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Jun
D
A Chengdu Better City
1–1 HT 1–1
17 May
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–4 HT 0–3
10 May
D
H Sichuan Jiuniu
0–0 HT 0–0
06 May
W
H Meizhou Kejia
3–1 HT 1–0
02 May
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
1–2 HT 0–0
27 Apr
W
H Dalian Zhixing
2–0 HT 0–0
20 Apr
L
H Shandong Luneng
1–5 HT 0–1
15 Apr
D
H Tianjin Teda
2–2 HT 1–2
06 Apr
W
A Henan Jianye
3–2 HT 0–1
01 Apr
D
H SHANGHAI SIPG
3–3 HT 3–1
28 Mar
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
2–0 HT 1–0
03 Mar
D
A Qingdao Jonoon
2–2 HT 1–2
23 Feb
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
3–1 HT 2–0
02 Nov
D
H Chengdu Better City
1–1 HT 1–0
27 Oct
L
A Changchun Yatai
0–4 HT 0–1
19 Oct
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–2 HT 0–1
28 Sep
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
3–2 HT 2–2
22 Sep
W
A Shandong Luneng
1–0 HT 1–0
13 Sep
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
3–0 HT 1–0
16 Aug
D
H Beijing Guoan
2–2 HT 0–1
11 Aug
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 0–0
02 Aug
L
A Tianjin Teda
1–2 HT 0–1
27 Jul
D
H Meizhou Kejia
3–3 HT 3–1
21 Jul
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
5–2 HT 1–2
13 Jul
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–3 HT 1–3
07 Jul
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–1 HT 0–0
30 Jun
L
A Henan Jianye
0–1 HT 0–0
25 Jun
L
H Wuhan Three Towns
0–1 HT 0–1
16 Jun
L
A Chengdu Better City
0–7 HT 0–3
26 May
D
H Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 0–2
22 May
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
3–5 HT 1–3
18 May
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
2–1 HT 1–1
12 May
D
H Shandong Luneng
0–0 HT 0–0
04 May
D
A Meizhou Kejia
1–1 HT 1–0
30 Apr
L
H Nantong Zhiyun
0–2 HT 0–2
26 Apr
L
A Beijing Guoan
1–4 HT 0–1
21 Apr
L
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–3 HT 2–0
14 Apr
L
H Tianjin Teda
1–3 HT 0–0
10 Apr
W
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–1 HT 1–0
06 Apr
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 1–0
30 Mar
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–2
08 Mar
D
H Henan Jianye
1–1 HT 0–1
01 Mar

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Hangzhou Greentown and Qingdao Youth Island in coming into this match?

Hangzhou Greentown have gone 21W 17D 22L in their last 60 games (1.33 PPG), while Qingdao Youth Island have gone 18W 18D 24L in their last 60 (1.20 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Hangzhou Greentown at home or Qingdao Youth Island away?

Hangzhou Greentown's home record (1.77 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Hangzhou Greentown at home: 1.77 PPG; Qingdao Youth Island away: 1.10 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between Hangzhou Greentown and Qingdao Youth Island runs to 6 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to April 2024. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. The two were last together as recently as 28 June 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Digging Into the Numbers

The biggest gap between the sides came on 13 Jul 2024, when Qingdao Youth Island won 5-2 — the largest margin of victory on record between these two.

Hangzhou Greentown's record when hosting Qingdao Youth Island specifically: 2W 0D 1L from 3 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 6 Meetings

Hangzhou Greentown

3

Hangzhou Greentown

0

Draws

Qingdao Youth Island

3

Qingdao Youth Island

Recent Meetings

Qingdao Youth Island
3–1
28 Jun 26
Hangzhou Greentown
Hangzhou Greentown
2–0
08 Mar 26
Qingdao Youth Island
Qingdao Youth Island
0–2
13 Sep 25
Hangzhou Greentown
Hangzhou Greentown
2–1
27 Apr 25
Qingdao Youth Island
Qingdao Youth Island
5–2
13 Jul 24
Hangzhou Greentown
Hangzhou Greentown
1–2
06 Apr 24
Qingdao Youth Island

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Hangzhou Greentown and Qingdao Youth Island?

From 6 meetings on record, Hangzhou Greentown have won 3, Qingdao Youth Island have won 3, and 0 have been drawn.

When did Hangzhou Greentown and Qingdao Youth Island last play each other?

They last met on 28 June 2026, when Qingdao Youth Island 3-1 Hangzhou Greentown.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

Hangzhou Greentown are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 90% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 47% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 17% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 20% of those situations.

Qingdao Youth Island are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 87% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 13% of those situations.

The Numbers That Matter

Both teams scoring has been the norm for this pairing lately — Hangzhou Greentown at 80%, Qingdao Youth Island at 60%. That combined rate makes BTTS Yes a well-supported trading angle.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 83% for Hangzhou Greentown and 63% for Qingdao Youth Island. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 70% and 37% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Qingdao Youth Island in 30%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Hangzhou Greentown home games / Qingdao Youth Island away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Hangzhou Greentown Hangzhou Greentown Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 51/60
(85%)
27/30
(90%)
2+ Goals Before HT 28/60
(46.7%)
17/30
(56.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 6/9
(66.7%)
1/3
(33.3%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/9
(55.6%)
1/3
(33.3%)
Winning at HT 21/60
(35%)
14/30
(46.7%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 9/60
(15%)
5/30
(16.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 8/60
(13.3%)
6/30
(20%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 40/60
(66.7%)
24/30
(80%)
Over 2.5 Goals 46/60
(76.7%)
25/30
(83.3%)
Over 3.5 Goals 35/60
(58.3%)
21/30
(70%)
Clean Sheet 12/60
(20%)
6/30
(20%)
Failed to Score 11/60
(18.3%)
2/30
(6.7%)
Qingdao Youth Island Qingdao Youth Island Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 48/60
(80%)
26/30
(86.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 21/60
(35%)
11/30
(36.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/12
(66.7%)
3/4
(75%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/12
(41.7%)
1/4
(25%)
Winning at HT 17/60
(28.3%)
7/30
(23.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 6/60
(10%)
2/30
(6.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 9/60
(15%)
4/30
(13.3%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 36/60
(60%)
18/30
(60%)
Over 2.5 Goals 34/60
(56.7%)
19/30
(63.3%)
Over 3.5 Goals 24/60
(40%)
11/30
(36.7%)
Clean Sheet 12/60
(20%)
4/30
(13.3%)
Failed to Score 16/60
(26.7%)
9/30
(30%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Hangzhou Greentown play Qingdao Youth Island?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 80% of Hangzhou Greentown's games and 60% of Qingdao Youth Island's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Hangzhou Greentown vs Qingdao Youth Island usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 83% of Hangzhou Greentown's matches and 63% of Qingdao Youth Island's.

Do Hangzhou Greentown and Qingdao Youth Island tend to score early?

Hangzhou Greentown have had a goal before half-time in 90% of their recent matches, Qingdao Youth Island in 87% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Hangzhou Greentown cruise to a comfortable 2-0 victory over Qingdao Youth Island.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Hangzhou Greentown beat Qingdao Youth Island 2-0 at Huizhou Olympic Stadium, Regular Season - 1, in the Super League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Hangzhou Greentown 1.80 xG and Qingdao Youth Island 1.44 xG, a combined 3.24. The scoreboard read 2-0 for 2 actual goals. Qingdao Youth Island landed 1.4 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Hangzhou Greentown attack 1.05 / defence 1.05 against Qingdao Youth Island attack 0.97 / defence 0.90, drawn from 30/30 games (PrevSeason).

On the result, the model split it Hangzhou Greentown 45% | Draw 25% | Qingdao Youth Island 30%, with Hangzhou Greentown to win its most likely call at 45%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 63%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 84% and landed. Over 3.5 was 41% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 65% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 67% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Hangzhou Greentown 77%, Qingdao Youth Island 57%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 63%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Hangzhou Greentown's trading profile (60 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 67% of their matches — today it did not.

Qingdao Youth Island's trading profile (60 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 60% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 27% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Hangzhou Greentown 1.33 PPG, Qingdao Youth Island 1.20 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Hangzhou Greentown win broke the near-deadlock. Hangzhou Greentown (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.67 average — tighter than their form line. Qingdao Youth Island (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.20 scoring average — below par going forward.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 63% Over 2.5 probability, but 2 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 65% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 67% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.