🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates Al-Nassr at 46% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Al Taawon vs Al-Nassr encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Fixture Analysis

It is a Pro League clash, Regular Season - 15 as Al Taawon welcome Al-Nassr to King Abdullah Sport City Stadium. Kick-off is set for Friday 17 January 2025 at 17:00 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Pro League games this season, Al Taawon have gone 4W 3D 3L from 10 outings — a 1.50 PPG return. Last five: W L W L W. They are averaging 1.30 goals per game and conceding 1.10 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. This season is still relatively young for Al Taawon, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Al Taawon's form when playing at home: 6W 2D 2L across 10 games at King Abdullah Sport City Stadium this term (2.00 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.20 goals scored and 0.90 conceded per game. 6 clean sheets from 10 home games (60%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at King Abdullah Sport City Stadium. At home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle. Their home PPG of 2.00 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.50 — Al Taawon are significantly better at King Abdullah Sport City Stadium than their overall form suggests.

Al-Nassr — All Games: 6W 2D 2L from 10 Pro League fixtures this season — 2.00 PPG. Last five: W L W L W. They are scoring at 1.90 per game and conceding 1.00. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Al-Nassr, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Al-Nassr away from home this season: 7W 2D 1L from 10 away games — 2.30 PPG on the road. They are averaging 2.10 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. 4 clean sheets from 10 away games (40%) shows they are capable of shutting up shop on the road. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

Despite the home advantage, the form figures favour Al-Nassr — 0.50 PPG ahead of the hosts (2.00 vs 1.50). That gap is large enough to take seriously. Draw No Bet on the visitors neutralises home-ground risk while maintaining the form-backed selection.

H2H

The rivalry is an even one: 2 wins apiece for Al Taawon, 4 for Al-Nassr and 0 shared spoils from 6 past contests. Neither side holds a meaningful historical edge.

The 6 previous meetings have averaged 2.7 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 30 Dec 2023, ended 1–4 with Al-Nassr winning.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

In-Play Data

Al Taawon trading profile (48 games, 23 at home): they score before half-time in 70% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 76% of the time; BTTS occurs in 52% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 48% of games (home games).

Al-Nassr trading profile (48 games, 23 at away): they score before half-time in 70% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 62% of those occasions; they lead at the break 65% of the time; BTTS occurs in 65% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 83% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 52%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Al Taawon 48% versus Al-Nassr 67%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Al Taawon 40% | Al-Nassr 75%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Al Taawon 1.31 xG and Al-Nassr 1.66 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Al Taawon attack 0.983 / defence 0.946 | Al-Nassr attack 1.207 / defence 0.922. League average goals — home 1.450 / away 1.455. Al-Nassr have an above-average attack strength of 1.207 — the away xG of 1.66 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 48 Al Taawon games / 48 Al-Nassr games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Al Taawon 30% | Draw 24% | Al-Nassr 46%. Fair-value odds: Al Taawon 3.33 | Draw 4.17 | Al-Nassr 2.17. Al-Nassr hold a narrow Poisson edge at 46% — the draw (24%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 57% | BTTS probability 59% | Total xG 2.98. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 57% — the 2.98 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 59% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Our Verdict

Poisson rates Al-Nassr as the most likely outcome at 46% — moderate model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. With a 24% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Al-Nassr offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 30% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 2.98 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 57% — Poisson-only — limited corroboration confidence.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 59% on Yes. Form rates are neutral: Al Taawon 30% | Al-Nassr 60%.

The outsider holds a 30% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights