Sign in Register
🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 5

Kick-off

Sun 6 Apr 2025

12:00

Venue

Wuhua County Olympic Sports Centre

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
📋

Poisson model rates Meizhou Kejia at 46%, yet other data sources diverge — this Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Wuhua County Olympic Sports Centre plays host to Meizhou Kejia versus Wuhan Three Towns in Super League, Regular Season - 5. Kick-off: Sunday 6 April 2025 at 12:00 UTC.

Current Form

Meizhou Kejia's overall Super League record this term: 3W 1D 6L from 10 games (1.00 PPG). Last five: L L D W L. They are averaging 1.30 goals per game and conceding 2.30 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.30 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

In front of their own supporters this season, Meizhou Kejia have posted 4W 2D 4L at Wuhua County Olympic Sports Centre — 1.40 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Wuhan Three Towns (all games): 2W 2D 6L across 10 Super League outings this term — 0.80 points per game. Last five: D W L L L. Their scoring rate of 0.70 per game is modest, conceding 1.30 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their games, reflecting a regular tendency to keep or record clean sheets.

On the road, Wuhan Three Towns have gone 3W 3D 4L from 10 away fixtures this term (1.20 PPG). Away from home they average 0.90 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game.

A near-identical PPG reading — 1.00 for Meizhou Kejia, 0.80 for Wuhan Three Towns — means the form record is uninstructive on result selection. The goals and market sections will carry greater evidential weight.

H2H History

The head-to-head record is closely matched — Meizhou Kejia lead 2W to 4W over the last 6 encounters, with 0 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.

The 6 previous meetings have averaged 2.3 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 27 Oct 2024, ended 1–0 with Meizhou Kejia winning.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading

Meizhou Kejia half-time and goal-timing data (60 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 73% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 65% of the time; BTTS occurs in 63% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 57% of games (home games); they fail to score in 30% of games.

Wuhan Three Towns half-time and goal-timing data (60 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 83% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 78% of the time; BTTS occurs in 73% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 57% of games (away games).

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Meizhou Kejia 62% and Wuhan Three Towns 62% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Meizhou Kejia 60% | Wuhan Three Towns 48%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Meizhou Kejia 1.69 xG and Wuhan Three Towns 1.24 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Meizhou Kejia attack 1.174 / defence 1.180 | Wuhan Three Towns attack 0.672 / defence 0.885. League average goals — home 1.625 / away 1.558. Data: 34 Meizhou Kejia games / 34 Wuhan Three Towns games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Meizhou Kejia 46% | Draw 28% | Wuhan Three Towns 26%. Fair-value odds: Meizhou Kejia 2.17 | Draw 3.57 | Wuhan Three Towns 3.85. Meizhou Kejia hold a narrow Poisson edge at 46% — the draw (28%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 56% | BTTS probability 60% | Total xG 2.92. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 56% — the 2.92 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 60% reflects that both xG figures (1.69 / 1.24) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Meizhou Kejia at 46% — moderate model lean. Draw probability of 28% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Meizhou Kejia if the outright odds are short.

The Poisson model projects 2.92 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 56% — Poisson-only — limited corroboration confidence.

Poisson assigns a 60% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Meizhou Kejia 60% | Wuhan Three Towns 50% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (2W–0D–4W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history favours Wuhan Three Towns but Poisson model leans Meizhou Kejia — current-season strength data diverges from historical pattern.
Form Meizhou Kejia Poisson xG (1.69) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (1.10) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Form Wuhan Three Towns Poisson xG (1.24) exceeds their form scoring rate (0.90) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
Goals Form only shows ~1.7 goals/game but Poisson xG sum is 2.92 — underlying strength metrics suggest more goals than form results indicate.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 60% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 5 | Venue: Wuhua County Olympic Sports Centre • Kick-off: Sunday 6 Apr 2025, 12:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

⚔️ Head-to-Head History

• Record (6 meetings): Meizhou Kejia 2W | Draws 0 | Wuhan Three Towns 4W • Goals trend: 2.33 goals/game | Total H2H goals: Meizhou Kejia 5 – 9 Wuhan Three Towns • H2H markets: BTTS 50% | Over 2.5 67% | Win rates: Meizhou Kejia 33% / Draw 0% / Wuhan Three Towns 67% • Historical edge: no clear dominance — balanced H2H ledger • H2H vs Poisson divergence: H2H favours Wuhan Three Towns (historical win rate 67%) but Poisson model rates Meizhou Kejia as more likely (home 46% / draw 28% / away 26%) — current season form and strength ratings are overriding the historical pattern • Goals: H2H average 2.33/game (67% Over 2.5 historically), Poisson total xG 2.92 (56% Over 2.5) — broadly consistent • BTTS: H2H rate 50%, Poisson probability 60% — no strong aligned signal

📈 Recent Form

• Meizhou Kejia (all comps): 3W-1D-6L in 10 | 1.00 PPG | GF 1.30 / GA 2.30 | L5 L-L-D-W-L • Wuhan Three Towns (all comps): 2W-2D-6L in 10 | 0.80 PPG | GF 0.70 / GA 1.30 | L5 D-W-L-L-L • Meizhou Kejia home split: 1.40 PPG from 10 | GF 1.10 / GA 1.60 | CS 3 • Wuhan Three Towns away split: 1.20 PPG from 10 | GF 0.90 / GA 1.20 | CS 2 • Form edge: minimal separation (Meizhou Kejia 1.00 PPG vs Wuhan Three Towns 0.80 PPG) • xG vs form (Meizhou Kejia): Poisson projects 1.69 xG vs form scoring rate of 1.10 — model rates them higher than raw form suggests, likely reflecting a strong defence-adjusted attack strength • xG vs form (Wuhan Three Towns): Poisson projects 1.24 xG vs form scoring rate of 0.90 — model rates visitors higher than form alone implies, noting a favourable attack-vs-defence matchup • Goals contradiction — form projects only ~1.7 goals/game (Under signal) but Poisson xG sum is 2.92 (56% Over probability) — underlying attack/defence strengths differ from surface-level results • BTTS: mixed signals — form blend ~55% BTTS rate, Poisson probability 60% — no strong positional edge

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Meizhou Kejia 46% | Draw 28% | Wuhan Three Towns 26% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 56% | BTTS 60% | xG Meizhou Kejia 1.69 / Wuhan Three Towns 1.24 • Poisson strength factors: Meizhou Kejia attack 1.174 / def 1.180 | Wuhan Three Towns attack 0.672 / def 0.885 | league avg home 1.625 / away 1.558 • Poisson stance: Meizhou Kejia (46%) — moderate lean

🎲 Betting Market Intelligence

• Odds data is not currently available for this fixture

🧮 Prediction Model

1.69

Meizhou Kejia xG

Expected Goals

1.24

Wuhan Three Towns xG

46%
28%
26%
Meizhou Kejia Draw Wuhan Three Towns

60%

BTTS

81%

Over 1.5

56%

Over 2.5

34%

Over 3.5

πŸ”’

Full score probability matrix is a Premium feature

Upgrade to see the exact probability of every scoreline from 0-0 to 6-6, not just the headline 1X2 split.

Upgrade to Premium

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns kick off?

Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns kicked off at 12:00 on Sunday 6 April 2025 at Wuhua County Olympic Sports Centre.

What was the final score in Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns?

Meizhou Kejia 3 - 1 Wuhan Three Towns.

Where is Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns being played?

The match is being played at Wuhua County Olympic Sports Centre.

What competition is Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns part of?

Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns is a Regular Season - 5 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns?

Our statistical model gives Meizhou Kejia a 46% chance of winning, Wuhan Three Towns a 26% chance, and a 28% chance of a draw — making Meizhou Kejia the favourite.

Will both teams score in Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns?

Our model estimates a 60% probability that both Meizhou Kejia and Wuhan Three Towns will score (BTTS).

Will Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 56%.

What is the head-to-head record between Meizhou Kejia and Wuhan Three Towns?

• Record (6 meetings): Meizhou Kejia 2W | Draws 0 | Wuhan Three Towns 4W • Goals trend: 2.33 goals/game | Total H2H goals: Meizhou Kejia 5 – 9 Wuhan Three Towns • H2H markets: BTTS 50% | Over 2.5 67% | Win rates: Meizhou Kejia 33% / Draw 0% / Wuhan Three Towns 67% • Historical edge: no clear dominance — balanced H2H ledger • H2H vs Poisson divergence: H2H favours Wuhan Three Towns (historical win rate 67%) but Poisson model rates Meizhou Kejia as more likely (home 46% / draw 28% / away 26%) — current season form and strength ratings are overriding the historical pattern • Goals: H2H average 2.33/game (67% Over 2.5 historically), Poisson total xG 2.92 (56% Over 2.5) — broadly consistent • BTTS: H2H rate 50%, Poisson probability 60% — no strong aligned signal

What form are Meizhou Kejia and Wuhan Three Towns in?

• Meizhou Kejia (all comps): 3W-1D-6L in 10 | 1.00 PPG | GF 1.30 / GA 2.30 | L5 L-L-D-W-L • Wuhan Three Towns (all comps): 2W-2D-6L in 10 | 0.80 PPG | GF 0.70 / GA 1.30 | L5 D-W-L-L-L • Meizhou Kejia home split: 1.40 PPG from 10 | GF 1.10 / GA 1.60 | CS 3 • Wuhan Three Towns away split: 1.20 PPG from 10 | GF 0.90 / GA 1.20 | CS 2 • Form edge: minimal separation (Meizhou Kejia 1.00 PPG vs Wuhan Three Towns 0.80 PPG) • xG vs form (Meizhou Kejia): Poisson projects 1.69 xG vs form scoring rate of 1.10 — model rates them higher than raw form suggests, likely reflecting a strong defence-adjusted attack strength • xG vs form (Wuhan Three Towns): Poisson projects 1.24 xG vs form scoring rate of 0.90 — model rates visitors higher than form alone implies, noting a favourable attack-vs-defence matchup • Goals contradiction — form projects only ~1.7 goals/game (Under signal) but Poisson xG sum is 2.92 (56% Over probability) — underlying attack/defence strengths differ from surface-level results • BTTS: mixed signals — form blend ~55% BTTS rate, Poisson probability 60% — no strong positional edge

What do the betting odds say about Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns?

• Odds data is not currently available for this fixture