🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates Beijing Guoan at 39% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Beijing Guoan vs Hangzhou Greentown encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Workers' Stadium plays host to Beijing Guoan versus Hangzhou Greentown in Super League, Regular Season - 5. Kick-off: Sunday 6 April 2025 at 12:35 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Beijing Guoan have collected 1.90 PPG across 10 Super League outings this season: 5W 4D 1L. Last five: W W W W D. They are averaging 2.70 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

Beijing Guoan's form when playing at home: 7W 2D 1L across 10 games at Workers' Stadium this term (2.30 PPG). They are averaging 3.10 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. 5 clean sheets from 10 home games (50%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Workers' Stadium.

Hangzhou Greentown's overall Super League record this term: 2W 4D 4L from 10 games (1.00 PPG). Last five: D L W D D. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.10 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. Conceding 2.30 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play.

Hangzhou Greentown away from home this season: 1W 2D 7L from 10 away games — 0.50 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 1.40 goals scored and 2.40 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 0.50 is notably below their overall 1.00 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

Form favours the hosts. Beijing Guoan's 1.90 PPG return is 0.90 points per game ahead of Hangzhou Greentown's 1.00 — a genuine gap in recent results that provides a statistically grounded case for backing the home side.

H2H History

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 6 meetings: Beijing Guoan 1W, Hangzhou Greentown 3W, 2D.

The 6 previous meetings have averaged 2.5 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 16 Aug 2024, ended 0–0 with a draw.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading

Beijing Guoan half-time and goal-timing data (60 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 77% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 76% of the time; BTTS occurs in 63% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 60% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 38%.

Hangzhou Greentown half-time and goal-timing data (60 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 80% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 67% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 77% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 42%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Beijing Guoan 63% and Hangzhou Greentown 65% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (Beijing Guoan 57% | Hangzhou Greentown 77%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Beijing Guoan 1.65 xG and Hangzhou Greentown 1.51 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Beijing Guoan attack 1.137 / defence 0.854 | Hangzhou Greentown attack 1.153 / defence 0.878. League average goals — home 1.649 / away 1.530. Data: 34 Beijing Guoan games / 34 Hangzhou Greentown games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Beijing Guoan 39% | Draw 27% | Hangzhou Greentown 33%. Fair-value odds: Beijing Guoan 2.56 | Draw 3.70 | Hangzhou Greentown 3.03. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 27% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 61% | BTTS probability 65% | Total xG 3.15. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 61% — the 3.15 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 65% reflects that both xG figures (1.65 / 1.51) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Final Verdict

Hangzhou Greentown lead the H2H ledger, but Beijing Guoan carry stronger current form — do not let history alone dictate your assessment.

Poisson rates Beijing Guoan as the most likely outcome at 39% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 27% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Beijing Guoan if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 3.15 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 61% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.8 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 65% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Beijing Guoan 50% | Hangzhou Greentown 70% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights