Sign in Register

Chengdu Better City 1-1 Wuhan Three Towns – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 21

Kick-off

Sat 1 Aug 2026

12:00

Venue

Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Chengdu Better City at 64% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Super League encounter, Regular Season - 21 sees Wuhan Three Towns travel to Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park to take on Chengdu Better City. The game is scheduled for Saturday 1 August 2026, 12:00 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, Chengdu Better City stand at 4W 4D 2L from 10 Super League matches — 1.60 PPG. Last five: W D D D D. They are averaging 1.40 goals per game and conceding 1.10 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Chengdu Better City, so this record blends games from this season and last.

In front of their own supporters this season, Chengdu Better City have posted 7W 2D 1L at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park — 2.30 PPG. They are averaging 2.40 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. Their home PPG of 2.30 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.60 — Chengdu Better City are significantly better at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park than their overall form suggests.

Across all Super League games this season, Wuhan Three Towns have recorded 2W 5D 3L from 10 outings — 1.10 PPG. Last five: D L L W W. They are scoring at 1.50 per game and conceding 1.60. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Wuhan Three Towns, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, Wuhan Three Towns have gone 0W 5D 5L from 10 away fixtures this term (0.50 PPG). Away from home they average 1.40 goals scored and 2.40 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 0.50 is notably below their overall 1.10 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

On current form, Chengdu Better City have the edge — a 0.50 PPG advantage (1.60 vs 1.10) represents a meaningful gap. That momentum makes them the form-based pick, though if the outright price looks short, Draw No Bet is worth comparing.

H2H Record

Chengdu Better City hold a clear advantage in this fixture, picking up 4 wins from 9 previous encounters compared to 1 for Wuhan Three Towns, with 4 draws in between.

The 9 previous meetings have averaged 2.3 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 17 Apr 2026, ended 1–0 with Chengdu Better City winning.

The historical record gives Chengdu Better City a meaningful edge here — 4 wins from 9 meetings is the kind of ledger that should not be discounted when the form picture is inconclusive. Even away from home, the visitors have struggled to impose themselves in this fixture.

Trading Patterns

Chengdu Better City in-play and half-time data (49 games, 24 at home): they score before half-time in 83% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 92% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 58% of those occasions; they lead at the break 47% of the time; BTTS occurs in 54% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 54% of games (home games).

Wuhan Three Towns in-play and half-time data (49 games, 24 at away): they score before half-time in 75% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 82% of the time; BTTS occurs in 67% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 67% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 45%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Chengdu Better City 63% and Wuhan Three Towns 61% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Chengdu Better City 57% | Wuhan Three Towns 59%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Chengdu Better City 2.29 xG and Wuhan Three Towns 1.09 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Chengdu Better City attack 1.105 / defence 0.799 | Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.003 / defence 1.200. League average goals — home 1.729 / away 1.362. Chengdu Better City's defence rating of 0.799 is below average — the home backline is amplifying the visitor's projected output. Data: 50 Chengdu Better City games / 49 Wuhan Three Towns games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Chengdu Better City 64% | Draw 19% | Wuhan Three Towns 17%. Fair-value odds: Chengdu Better City 1.56 | Draw 5.26 | Wuhan Three Towns 5.88. The model has a clear lean to Chengdu Better City (64%) — a 47pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 66% | BTTS probability 60% | Total xG 3.38. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 66% — a total xG of 3.38 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 60% reflects that both xG figures (2.29 / 1.09) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Our Verdict

Poisson rates Chengdu Better City as the most likely outcome at 64% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 19% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

Poisson projects 3.38 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 66% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.5 goals per game.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 60%. Form rates corroborate: Chengdu Better City 50% | Wuhan Three Towns 80% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H Chengdu Better City hold a strong historical advantage, winning 4 of 9 meetings.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to Chengdu Better City — H2H win rate 44% vs Poisson 64%.
Form Chengdu Better City lead on PPG: 1.60 vs 1.10 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
Form Wuhan Three Towns Poisson xG (1.09) is below their form scoring rate (1.40) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Chengdu Better City — Chengdu Better City at 64% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model strongly favours Chengdu Better City at 64% home win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 66% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 60% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 21 | Venue: Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park • Kick-off: Saturday 1 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Chengdu Better City 64% | Draw 19% | Wuhan Three Towns 17% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 66% | BTTS 60% | xG Chengdu Better City 2.29 / Wuhan Three Towns 1.09 • Poisson strength factors: Chengdu Better City attack 1.105 / def 0.799 | Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.003 / def 1.200 | league avg home 1.729 / away 1.362 • Poisson stance: Chengdu Better City (64%) — strong lean

🧮 Prediction Model

2.29

Chengdu Better City xG

Expected Goals

1.09

Wuhan Three Towns xG

64%
19%
17%
Chengdu Better City Draw Wuhan Three Towns

60%

BTTS

85%

Over 1.5

66%

Over 2.5

44%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns kick off?

Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns kicked off at 12:00 on Saturday 1 August 2026 at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park.

What was the final score in Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns?

Chengdu Better City 1 - 1 Wuhan Three Towns.

Where is Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns being played?

The match is being played at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park.

What competition is Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns part of?

Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns is a Regular Season - 21 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns?

Our statistical model gives Chengdu Better City a 64% chance of winning, Wuhan Three Towns a 17% chance, and a 19% chance of a draw — making Chengdu Better City the favourite.

Will both teams score in Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns?

Our model estimates a 60% probability that both Chengdu Better City and Wuhan Three Towns will score (BTTS).

Will Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 66%.

What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City and Wuhan Three Towns?

Record (9 meetings): Chengdu Better City 4W | Draws 4 | Wuhan Three Towns 1W.

What form are Chengdu Better City and Wuhan Three Towns in?

Chengdu Better City (all comps): 4W-4D-2L in 10 | 1.60 PPG | GF 1.40 / GA 1.10 | L5 W-D-D-D-D. Wuhan Three Towns (all comps): 2W-5D-3L in 10 | 1.10 PPG | GF 1.50 / GA 1.60 | L5 D-L-L-W-W.

🧮 Model Insight

How the Model Works This Match

Working from Chengdu Better City's attack rating (1.10) and Wuhan Three Towns's defence rating (1.20), the model arrives at 2.29 expected goals for the home side. The same calculation in reverse, Wuhan Three Towns's attack versus Chengdu Better City's defence, projects 1.09 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 50/49 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 2-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 9.7%. Close behind: 1-1 (9.6%), 2-0 (8.9%). Together the top three scorelines make up 28% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Chengdu Better City Win

64%

Chengdu Better City

1.56

19%

Draw

5.19

17%

Wuhan Three Towns

6.02

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

2 – 1

9.7%

Home win

Most likely

2 – 0

8.9%

Home win

1 – 1

8.5%

Draw

Expected Goals & Win Odds

2.29

Chengdu Better City xG

Total xG

3.38

1.09

Wuhan Three Towns xG

64%
19%
17%
Chengdu Better CityDrawWuhan Three Towns

1.56

64%

Home win

5.19

19%

Draw

6.02

17%

Away win

Goals Markets

85%

Over 1.5

1.18

15%

Under 1.5

6.67

66%

Over 2.5

1.52

34%

Under 2.5

2.94

44%

Over 3.5

2.27

56%

Under 3.5

1.79

25%

Over 4.5

4.00

75%

Under 4.5

1.33

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

60%

BTTS Yes

1.67

40%

BTTS No

2.49

Clean Sheet

34%

Chengdu Better City

2.98

10%

Wuhan Three Towns

9.90

Win to Nil

22%

Chengdu Better City

4.64

2%

Wuhan Three Towns

59.63

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 3.4 3.7 2.0 0.7 0.2
1 7.8 8.5 4.6 1.7 0.5 0.1
2 8.9 9.7 5.3 1.9 0.5 0.1
3 6.8 7.4 4.1 1.5 0.4 0.1
4 3.9 4.3 2.3 0.8 0.2 0.1
5 1.8 2.0 1.1 0.4 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 2.293
λ Away (xG) 1.091
Total xG 3.384
League avg home goals 1.729
League avg away goals 1.362
Chengdu Better City attack strength 1.105
Chengdu Better City defence strength 0.799
Wuhan Three Towns attack strength 1.003
Wuhan Three Towns defence strength 1.200
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 50 / 49

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns?

Our Poisson model rates 2-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 9.7%.

How many goals are Chengdu Better City and Wuhan Three Towns expected to score?

The model projects 2.29 expected goals for Chengdu Better City and 1.09 for Wuhan Three Towns, a combined total of 3.38.

How confident is the prediction model for Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns?

Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 64%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.

📈 Form Insight

Form at a Glance

Chengdu Better City come into this having played 49 games, going 29W 14D 6L for 2.06 points per game. Their last five reads W-D-D-D-D. The sample for Chengdu Better City is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

On the other side, Wuhan Three Towns sit at 0.90 PPG from 49 outings (10W 14D 25L), a run that reads D-L-L-W-W across their last five. The sample for Wuhan Three Towns is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Chengdu Better City carry the stronger recent form of the two, 1.16 PPG clear of Wuhan Three Towns — worth weighing alongside whatever the head-to-head and market data say.

Venue Form

Chengdu Better City's home form reads 16W 5D 3L across 24 games on their own ground, a 2.21 PPG return.

Away from home, Wuhan Three Towns have taken 0.54 points per game from 24 outings (2W 7D 15L).

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Chengdu Better City come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Goals in Recent Form

Chengdu Better City are averaging 2.04 goals scored and 0.98 conceded per game recently; Wuhan Three Towns are on 1.24 scored and 1.96 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Chengdu Better City have seen both teams score in 63% of their recent games; Wuhan Three Towns in 61%.

Last 49 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

Blended
W D D D D
Wuhan Three Towns

Wuhan Three Towns

Blended
D L L W W
49 Played 49
29/14/6 W / D / L 10/14/25
2.06 Points Per Game 0.90
2.04 Avg Goals Scored 1.24
0.98 Avg Goals Conceded 1.96
3.02 Avg Goals / Game 3.20
16 Clean Sheets 7
31 BTTS 30
28 Over 2.5 Games 29
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

D
H Beijing Guoan
2–2 HT 0–0
26 Jul
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 0–1
17 Jul
D
H Chongqing Tongliang Long
1–1 HT 1–0
11 Jul
D
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–1 HT 0–0
05 Jul
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
3–2 HT 1–0
27 Jun
W
H Shandong Luneng
1–0 HT 1–0
30 May
L
A Dalian Zhixing
0–2 HT 0–0
23 May
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–1 HT 0–0
19 May
W
A Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–1
15 May
W
H Henan Jianye
3–0 HT 1–0
09 May
W
A Shenyang Urban
1–0 HT 0–0
05 May
W
A Shanghai Shenhua
3–2 HT 1–2
01 May
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
4–0 HT 3–0
25 Apr
W
H Yunnan Yukun
2–1 HT 0–1
21 Apr
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 0–0
17 Apr
W
A Beijing Guoan
2–1 HT 0–0
12 Apr
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
5–1 HT 2–0
03 Apr
D
A Chongqing Tongliang Long
3–3 HT 2–0
21 Mar
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 0–0
15 Mar
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
5–1 HT 3–1
06 Mar
D
A Sichuan Jiuniu
1–1 HT 1–1
22 Nov
L
H Henan Jianye
1–2 HT 1–0
31 Oct
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
2–2 HT 0–1
26 Oct
W
H Meizhou Kejia
3–1 HT 1–1
17 Oct
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
3–3 HT 3–2
26 Sep
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 0–0
21 Sep
W
H Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Sep
W
H SHANGHAI SIPG
4–1 HT 3–1
30 Aug
W
A Yunnan Yukun
5–1 HT 1–1
23 Aug
D
H Qingdao Jonoon
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Aug
W
A Dalian Zhixing
2–0 HT 0–0
08 Aug
W
H Shandong Luneng
2–1 HT 1–1
02 Aug
W
H Beijing Guoan
2–0 HT 1–0
26 Jul
L
A Tianjin Teda
1–2 HT 0–0
18 Jul
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–2 HT 1–1
29 Jun
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
5–0 HT 2–0
25 Jun
L
A Henan Jianye
2–3 HT 2–2
14 Jun
D
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 1–1
17 May
W
A Meizhou Kejia
4–0 HT 3–0
10 May
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
2–1 HT 1–0
05 May
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–0 HT 1–0
02 May
W
A Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 1–0
26 Apr
W
A SHANGHAI SIPG
3–1 HT 2–1
20 Apr
D
H Yunnan Yukun
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Apr
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Apr
W
H Dalian Zhixing
2–0 HT 1–0
06 Apr
W
A Shandong Luneng
3–0 HT 2–0
02 Apr
D
A Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Mar
L
H Tianjin Teda
1–2 HT 1–1
02 Mar
Wuhan Three Towns

Wuhan Three Towns

W
H Chongqing Tongliang Long
1–0 HT 1–0
25 Jul
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
2–0 HT 2–0
18 Jul
L
A Dalian Zhixing
2–3 HT 2–1
04 Jul
L
A Beijing Guoan
0–1 HT 0–0
27 Jun
D
H Yunnan Yukun
1–1 HT 0–0
31 May
D
A Shandong Luneng
3–3 HT 2–2
24 May
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
2–2 HT 1–2
20 May
D
H Shenyang Urban
2–2 HT 2–1
16 May
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 0–1
10 May
L
H Qingdao Jonoon
1–3 HT 0–1
06 May
D
A Tianjin Teda
2–2 HT 0–0
01 May
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–4 HT 0–1
25 Apr
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
2–0 HT 1–0
21 Apr
L
H Chengdu Better City
0–1 HT 0–0
17 Apr
L
A Chongqing Tongliang Long
1–2 HT 0–2
11 Apr
L
A Sichuan Jiuniu
2–5 HT 0–3
05 Apr
D
A Henan Jianye
1–1 HT 0–0
21 Mar
W
H Dalian Zhixing
4–1 HT 2–1
13 Mar
L
H Beijing Guoan
0–2 HT 0–1
08 Mar
L
H Shandong Luneng
1–5 HT 0–2
22 Nov
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
0–1 HT 0–1
02 Nov
L
H Sichuan Jiuniu
1–2 HT 0–1
24 Oct
D
A Dalian Zhixing
0–0 HT 0–0
19 Oct
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
2–3 HT 0–1
26 Sep
L
H Henan Jianye
2–5 HT 0–2
19 Sep
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–4 HT 0–2
14 Sep
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–0 HT 0–0
31 Aug
L
A Beijing Guoan
0–4 HT 0–2
25 Aug
L
A Yunnan Yukun
1–2 HT 0–1
15 Aug
L
H Meizhou Kejia
1–2 HT 0–1
10 Aug
D
H Changchun Yatai
0–0 HT 0–0
03 Aug
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–3 HT 1–0
27 Jul
D
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 1–0
18 Jul
D
H Chengdu Better City
2–2 HT 1–1
29 Jun
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–3 HT 0–1
25 Jun
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
2–1 HT 0–0
18 Jun
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
2–0 HT 2–0
13 Jun
D
H Dalian Zhixing
2–2 HT 0–2
11 May
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–2 HT 0–2
05 May
W
A Henan Jianye
2–1 HT 0–0
01 May
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 0–1
27 Apr
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–1
19 Apr
D
H Beijing Guoan
4–4 HT 1–3
15 Apr
W
H Yunnan Yukun
3–1 HT 3–0
12 Apr
L
A Meizhou Kejia
1–3 HT 1–0
06 Apr
D
A Changchun Yatai
1–1 HT 1–1
02 Apr
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
0–4 HT 0–4
28 Mar
L
A Qingdao Youth Island
0–2 HT 0–1
03 Mar
L
A Chengdu Better City
0–1 HT 0–0
22 Feb

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Chengdu Better City and Wuhan Three Towns in coming into this match?

Chengdu Better City have gone 29W 14D 6L in their last 49 games (2.06 PPG), while Wuhan Three Towns have gone 10W 14D 25L in their last 49 (0.90 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Chengdu Better City at home or Wuhan Three Towns away?

Chengdu Better City's home record (2.21 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Chengdu Better City at home: 2.21 PPG; Wuhan Three Towns away: 0.54 PPG.

Have Chengdu Better City or Wuhan Three Towns been keeping clean sheets recently?

Chengdu Better City have kept a clean sheet in 33% of their recent games, Wuhan Three Towns in 14%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

Fixture History

10 meetings separate these sides on the data we hold, the series stretching back to October 2022. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. The two were last together as recently as 1 August 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Streaks & Records

Chengdu Better City's record when hosting Wuhan Three Towns specifically: 2W 2D 1L from 5 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 10 Meetings

Chengdu Better City

4

Chengdu Better City

5

Draws

Wuhan Three Towns

1

Wuhan Three Towns

Recent Meetings

Chengdu Better City
1–1
01 Aug 26
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
0–1
17 Apr 26
Chengdu Better City
Wuhan Three Towns
2–2
29 Jun 25
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
1–0
22 Feb 25
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
1–1
20 Jul 24
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
2–2
01 May 24
Wuhan Three Towns
Chengdu Better City
0–1
19 Aug 23
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
3–3
19 May 23
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
1–0
23 Dec 22
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
0–1
29 Oct 22
Chengdu Better City

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City and Wuhan Three Towns?

From 10 meetings on record, Chengdu Better City have won 4, Wuhan Three Towns have won 1, and 5 have been drawn.

When did Chengdu Better City and Wuhan Three Towns last play each other?

They last met on 1 August 2026, when Chengdu Better City 1-1 Wuhan Three Towns.

Who has won more matches between Chengdu Better City and Wuhan Three Towns?

Chengdu Better City have the better head-to-head record, with 4 wins from 10 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

First-Half Patterns

Chengdu Better City are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 83% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 62% of the time.

Wuhan Three Towns are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 75% of their matches.

Full-Time Trends

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Chengdu Better City 54%, Wuhan Three Towns 67% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 54% for Chengdu Better City and 67% for Wuhan Three Towns. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 29% and 50% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Chengdu Better City keep a clean sheet in 42% of their matches; Wuhan Three Towns in 33%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Chengdu Better City home games / Wuhan Three Towns away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Chengdu Better City Chengdu Better City Blended
Metric All
(49 games)
Venue
(24 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 37/49
(75.5%)
20/24
(83.3%)
2+ Goals Before HT 20/49
(40.8%)
9/24
(37.5%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 11/12
(91.7%)
3/4
(75%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 7/12
(58.3%)
1/4
(25%)
Winning at HT 23/49
(46.9%)
15/24
(62.5%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/49
(10.2%)
3/24
(12.5%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 5/49
(10.2%)
1/24
(4.2%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 31/49
(63.3%)
13/24
(54.2%)
Over 2.5 Goals 28/49
(57.1%)
13/24
(54.2%)
Over 3.5 Goals 17/49
(34.7%)
7/24
(29.2%)
Clean Sheet 16/49
(32.7%)
10/24
(41.7%)
Failed to Score 3/49
(6.1%)
2/24
(8.3%)
Wuhan Three Towns Wuhan Three Towns Blended
Metric All
(49 games)
Venue
(24 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 38/49
(77.6%)
18/24
(75%)
2+ Goals Before HT 20/49
(40.8%)
8/24
(33.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 9/11
(81.8%)
5/6
(83.3%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/11
(45.5%)
4/6
(66.7%)
Winning at HT 11/49
(22.4%)
3/24
(12.5%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/49
(10.2%)
3/24
(12.5%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 5/49
(10.2%)
2/24
(8.3%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 30/49
(61.2%)
16/24
(66.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 29/49
(59.2%)
16/24
(66.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 22/49
(44.9%)
12/24
(50%)
Clean Sheet 7/49
(14.3%)
1/24
(4.2%)
Failed to Score 14/49
(28.6%)
8/24
(33.3%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Chengdu Better City play Wuhan Three Towns?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 54% of Chengdu Better City's games and 67% of Wuhan Three Towns's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 54% of Chengdu Better City's matches and 67% of Wuhan Three Towns's.

Do Chengdu Better City and Wuhan Three Towns tend to score early?

Chengdu Better City have had a goal before half-time in 83% of their recent matches, Wuhan Three Towns in 75% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Chengdu Better City and Wuhan Three Towns share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park, Regular Season - 21, as Chengdu Better City and Wuhan Three Towns drew 1-1 in the Super League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Chengdu Better City 2.29 xG and Wuhan Three Towns 1.09 xG, a combined 3.38. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. Chengdu Better City fell 1.3 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Chengdu Better City attack 1.10 / defence 0.80 against Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.00 / defence 1.20, drawn from 50/49 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Chengdu Better City 64% | Draw 19% | Wuhan Three Towns 17%, with Chengdu Better City to win its most likely call at 64%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 19% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 66%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 85% and landed. Over 3.5 was 44% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 60% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 58% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Chengdu Better City 57%, Wuhan Three Towns 59%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 62%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Chengdu Better City's trading profile (49 games, 24 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 63% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and conceded here.

Wuhan Three Towns's trading profile (49 games, 24 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 61% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, Chengdu Better City arrived the stronger side — 2.06 PPG against 0.90. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Chengdu Better City (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 2.08 scoring average — below par going forward. Wuhan Three Towns (home/away splits) conceded 1 against a 2.25 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit), form (miss). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 66% Over 2.5 probability, but 2 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 60% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data bucked — 58% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.