Sign in Register

Viking 1-1 Bodo/Glimt – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Eliteserien · Regular Season - 18

Kick-off

Sat 10 Aug 2024

17:00

Venue

SR-Bank Arena

Competition

Eliteserien

Norway

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Viking at 41%, yet other data sources diverge — this Viking vs Bodo/Glimt fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

Bodo/Glimt make the trip to SR-Bank Arena to face Viking in Eliteserien, Regular Season - 18. The match kicks off on Saturday 10 August 2024 at 17:00 UTC.

Form

Viking (all games): 6W 2D 2L across 10 Eliteserien fixtures this term — 2.00 PPG. Last five: W W L W D. They are averaging 2.10 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. This season is still relatively young for Viking, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Viking's form when playing at home: 6W 2D 2L across 10 games at SR-Bank Arena this term (2.00 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.70 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Bodo/Glimt have collected 1.80 PPG across 10 Eliteserien outings this season: 5W 3D 2L. Last five: W L W D W. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.00 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play. This season is still relatively young for Bodo/Glimt, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Bodo/Glimt's away record: 6W 1D 3L from 10 road trips in Eliteserien this season (1.90 PPG). They are averaging 2.10 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

Neither side holds a meaningful form edge. The 2.00 vs 1.80 PPG split is negligible — model and market signals should carry more analytical weight for this one.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Viking have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, Bodo/Glimt in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H Analysis

Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 6 head-to-head meetings have produced 2 wins for Viking, 4 for Bodo/Glimt and 0 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.

Attacking output has been a hallmark of this fixture. At 4.5 goals per game across 6 meetings, the Over 2.5 has a statistically grounded case from the head-to-head record alone. The most recent clash, on 6 Apr 2024, ended 0–1 with Bodo/Glimt winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.5 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading & In-Play

Viking — key trading statistics (47 games, 23 at home): they score before half-time in 65% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 56% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 74% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 61% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 40%.

Bodo/Glimt — key trading statistics (47 games, 23 at away): they score before half-time in 83% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 62% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 65% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 70% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 53%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Viking 60% and Bodo/Glimt 62% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Viking 57% | Bodo/Glimt 66%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Viking 1.49 xG and Bodo/Glimt 1.35 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Viking attack 1.183 / defence 0.863 | Bodo/Glimt attack 1.140 / defence 0.863. League average goals — home 1.459 / away 1.375. Data: 47 Viking games / 48 Bodo/Glimt games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Viking 41% | Draw 25% | Bodo/Glimt 34%. Fair-value odds: Viking 2.44 | Draw 4.00 | Bodo/Glimt 2.94. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 25% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 54% | BTTS probability 57% | Total xG 2.84. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 54%/46% — the total xG of 2.84 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 57% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, Viking are the pick at 41% — marginal model lean. Draw probability of 25% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Viking if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 2.84 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 54% probability — strong conviction, supported by form averaging 3.2 goals per game and H2H averaging 4.5 goals per meeting.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 57% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Viking 60% | Bodo/Glimt 60% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (2W–0D–4W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history favours Bodo/Glimt but Poisson model leans Viking — current-season strength data diverges from historical pattern.
Goals H2H (4.50 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.84) both back Over 2.5 goals (54% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 67% and Poisson BTTS 57% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Form Bodo/Glimt Poisson xG (1.35) is below their form scoring rate (2.10) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Viking 6/10, Bodo/Glimt 6/10) and Poisson model (57%).

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Viking vs Bodo/Glimt | Competition: Eliteserien, Regular Season - 18 | Venue: SR-Bank Arena • Kick-off: Saturday 10 Aug 2024, 17:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Viking 41% | Draw 25% | Bodo/Glimt 34% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 54% | BTTS 57% | xG Viking 1.49 / Bodo/Glimt 1.35 • Poisson strength factors: Viking attack 1.183 / def 0.863 | Bodo/Glimt attack 1.140 / def 0.863 | league avg home 1.459 / away 1.375 • Poisson stance: Viking (41%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.49

Viking xG

Expected Goals

1.35

Bodo/Glimt xG

41%
25%
34%
Viking Draw Bodo/Glimt

57%

BTTS

78%

Over 1.5

54%

Over 2.5

32%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Viking vs Bodo/Glimt kick off?

Viking vs Bodo/Glimt kicked off at 17:00 on Saturday 10 August 2024 at SR-Bank Arena.

What was the final score in Viking vs Bodo/Glimt?

Viking 1 - 1 Bodo/Glimt.

Where is Viking vs Bodo/Glimt being played?

The match is being played at SR-Bank Arena.

What competition is Viking vs Bodo/Glimt part of?

Viking vs Bodo/Glimt is a Regular Season - 18 fixture in the Eliteserien (Norway).

Who is favourite to win Viking vs Bodo/Glimt?

Our statistical model gives Viking a 41% chance of winning, Bodo/Glimt a 34% chance, and a 25% chance of a draw — making Viking the favourite.

Will both teams score in Viking vs Bodo/Glimt?

Our model estimates a 57% probability that both Viking and Bodo/Glimt will score (BTTS).

Will Viking vs Bodo/Glimt have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 54%.

What is the head-to-head record between Viking and Bodo/Glimt?

Record (6 meetings): Viking 2W | Draws 0 | Bodo/Glimt 4W.

What form are Viking and Bodo/Glimt in?

Viking (all comps): 6W-2D-2L in 10 | 2.00 PPG | GF 2.10 / GA 1.30 | L5 W-W-L-W-D. Bodo/Glimt (all comps): 5W-3D-2L in 10 | 1.80 PPG | GF 2.00 / GA 1.20 | L5 W-L-W-D-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

Viking's attacking strength (1.18x league average) is weighed against Bodo/Glimt's defensive record (0.86x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.49. Flip it around — Bodo/Glimt's attack (1.14x) against Viking's defence (0.86x) — and the away total comes out at 1.35.

These ratings are built from 47/48 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 13.3%. Close behind: 2-1 (8.7%), 1-2 (7.9%). Together the top three scorelines make up 30% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Viking Win

41%

Viking

2.46

25%

Draw

4.00

34%

Bodo/Glimt

2.90

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

11.7%

Draw

Most likely

1 – 0

8.7%

Home win

2 – 1

8.7%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.49

Viking xG

Total xG

2.84

1.35

Bodo/Glimt xG

41%
25%
34%
VikingDrawBodo/Glimt

2.46

41%

Home win

4.00

25%

Draw

2.90

34%

Away win

Goals Markets

78%

Over 1.5

1.28

22%

Under 1.5

4.55

54%

Over 2.5

1.85

46%

Under 2.5

2.17

32%

Over 3.5

3.12

68%

Under 3.5

1.47

16%

Over 4.5

6.25

84%

Under 4.5

1.19

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

57%

BTTS Yes

1.74

43%

BTTS No

2.35

Clean Sheet

26%

Viking

3.87

23%

Bodo/Glimt

4.43

Win to Nil

10%

Viking

9.54

8%

Bodo/Glimt

12.87

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 5.8 7.9 5.3 2.4 0.8 0.2
1 8.7 11.7 7.9 3.6 1.2 0.3
2 6.5 8.7 5.9 2.7 0.9 0.2
3 3.2 4.3 2.9 1.3 0.4 0.1
4 1.2 1.6 1.1 0.5 0.2
5 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· White ring = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.489
λ Away (xG) 1.353
Total xG 2.842
League avg home goals 1.459
League avg away goals 1.375
Viking attack strength 1.183
Viking defence strength 0.863
Bodo/Glimt attack strength 1.140
Bodo/Glimt defence strength 0.863
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 47 / 48

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Viking vs Bodo/Glimt?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 13.3%.

How many goals are Viking and Bodo/Glimt expected to score?

The model projects 1.49 expected goals for Viking and 1.35 for Bodo/Glimt, a combined total of 2.84.

How confident is the prediction model for Viking vs Bodo/Glimt?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 41%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Across their last 47 outings, Viking have picked up 1.91 PPG on a 27W 9D 11L record — W-W-L-W-D across the most recent five. The sample for Viking is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Bodo/Glimt's form line: 33W 8D 6L from 47 games, 2.28 PPG, last five W-L-W-D-W. The sample for Bodo/Glimt is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.91 PPG for Viking against 2.28 for Bodo/Glimt. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

Home & Away Splits

On home soil, Viking have posted 2.13 PPG from 23 outings (15W 4D 4L).

On the road, Bodo/Glimt have gone 15W 3D 5L from 23 away games — 2.09 PPG when travelling.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Viking are averaging 1.94 goals scored and 1.45 conceded per game recently; Bodo/Glimt are on 2.49 scored and 1.15 conceded. Both sides have been scoring freely, which tends to support the goals markets running hot in this fixture.

On BTTS specifically: Bodo/Glimt in 62%.

Last 47 Results — Eliteserien

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Viking

Viking

Blended
W W L W D
Bodo/Glimt

Bodo/Glimt

Blended
W L W D W
47 Played 47
27/9/11 W / D / L 33/8/6
1.91 Points Per Game 2.28
1.94 Avg Goals Scored 2.49
1.45 Avg Goals Conceded 1.15
3.38 Avg Goals / Game 3.64
13 Clean Sheets 15
28 BTTS 29
27 Over 2.5 Games 31
Viking

Viking

D
A Ham-Kam
3–3 HT 1–0
04 Aug
W
H Molde
1–0 HT 0–0
28 Jul
L
A Haugesund
0–1 HT 0–0
21 Jul
W
H Kristiansund BK
2–0 HT 0–0
13 Jul
W
A KFUM Oslo
2–1 HT 0–1
07 Jul
W
H Rosenborg
4–2 HT 1–0
30 Jun
D
A Molde
2–2 HT 1–1
02 Jun
W
H Ham-Kam
3–0 HT 2–0
26 May
W
A Sandefjord
3–0 HT 1–0
20 May
L
H Lillestrom
1–4 HT 0–3
16 May
W
A Stromsgodset
1–0 HT 0–0
12 May
W
H Tromso
2–1 HT 0–0
05 May
D
A ODD Ballklubb
3–3 HT 1–2
28 Apr
D
H Fredrikstad
1–1 HT 1–1
21 Apr
D
H Brann
1–1 HT 1–0
14 Apr
L
A Bodo/Glimt
0–1 HT 0–0
06 Apr
W
H Sarpsborg 08 FF
1–0 HT 1–0
01 Apr
L
H Rosenborg
1–5 HT 0–1
03 Dec
W
A Aalesund
4–0 HT 2–0
26 Nov
W
H Sarpsborg 08 FF
2–1 HT 0–1
12 Nov
L
A Ham-Kam
0–3 HT 0–0
04 Nov
L
A Stromsgodset
0–1 HT 0–1
29 Oct
L
H Tromso
3–4 HT 0–0
22 Oct
D
A ODD Ballklubb
1–1 HT 1–1
07 Oct
L
A Molde
0–4 HT 0–2
01 Oct
W
H Sandefjord
4–3 HT 2–2
24 Sep
W
A Haugesund
2–0 HT 1–0
16 Sep
D
H Valerenga
1–1 HT 0–0
02 Sep
W
H Stabaek
1–0 HT 0–0
20 Aug
W
A Lillestrom
3–1 HT 0–0
13 Aug
W
H Bodo/Glimt
3–2 HT 2–2
06 Aug
W
A Brann
2–0 HT 1–0
30 Jul
W
H Aalesund
3–1 HT 1–1
24 Jul
W
A Stabaek
1–0 HT 0–0
16 Jul
W
H Haugesund
2–0 HT 0–0
08 Jul
W
A Valerenga
2–1 HT 1–0
01 Jul
W
H Brann
3–1 HT 1–1
24 Jun
W
A Sarpsborg 08 FF
3–1 HT 1–0
11 Jun
L
H Molde
3–4 HT 1–2
04 Jun
L
A Bodo/Glimt
1–5 HT 0–2
29 May
W
H ODD Ballklubb
3–2 HT 0–2
16 May
W
A Sandefjord
2–1 HT 1–1
13 May
D
H Stromsgodset
1–1 HT 0–0
07 May
W
H Ham-Kam
7–3 HT 0–1
30 Apr
D
A Tromso
1–1 HT 0–1
23 Apr
W
H Lillestrom
2–0 HT 0–0
15 Apr
L
A Rosenborg
0–1 HT 0–0
10 Apr
Bodo/Glimt

Bodo/Glimt

W
H Haugesund
4–2 HT 1–1
03 Aug
D
A KFUM Oslo
1–1 HT 0–1
27 Jul
W
H ODD Ballklubb
3–1 HT 1–1
19 Jul
L
A Sandefjord
1–2 HT 0–1
13 Jul
W
H Brann
5–1 HT 2–0
07 Jul
W
A Sarpsborg 08 FF
2–1 HT 0–1
28 Jun
W
A Haugesund
1–0 HT 0–0
02 Jun
D
H Sandefjord
1–1 HT 1–1
29 May
D
H KFUM Oslo
2–2 HT 1–1
24 May
L
A Ham-Kam
0–1 HT 0–1
20 May
W
H Tromso
4–0 HT 2–0
16 May
W
A Kristiansund BK
4–2 HT 1–1
12 May
W
H Stromsgodset
1–0 HT 0–0
05 May
W
A Rosenborg
3–1 HT 2–0
27 Apr
D
H Molde
1–1 HT 1–0
21 Apr
W
A Lillestrom
5–0 HT 1–0
14 Apr
W
H Viking
1–0 HT 0–0
06 Apr
W
A Fredrikstad
2–0 HT 0–0
01 Apr
W
H Sarpsborg 08 FF
2–0 HT 1–0
03 Dec
L
A Brann
2–4 HT 0–3
26 Nov
W
H Aalesund
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Nov
W
A Stabaek
4–0 HT 3–0
05 Nov
W
H Lillestrom
3–1 HT 1–0
30 Oct
W
H Sandefjord
4–3 HT 4–2
21 Oct
W
A Molde
3–1 HT 2–1
08 Oct
W
H Stromsgodset
2–0 HT 1–0
01 Oct
W
H Valerenga
4–2 HT 2–1
24 Sep
D
A Rosenborg
1–1 HT 1–1
17 Sep
D
A Ham-Kam
4–4 HT 0–2
03 Sep
W
A Haugesund
3–1 HT 0–0
20 Aug
L
A Viking
2–3 HT 2–2
06 Aug
L
H Tromso
0–2 HT 0–1
30 Jul
W
A Sandefjord
5–2 HT 3–2
23 Jul
W
H Haugesund
2–1 HT 0–1
16 Jul
W
A ODD Ballklubb
2–0 HT 1–0
09 Jul
D
H Molde
2–2 HT 0–2
02 Jul
L
A Stromsgodset
0–2 HT 0–1
25 Jun
W
H Ham-Kam
3–0 HT 0–0
11 Jun
W
A Valerenga
3–1 HT 1–0
04 Jun
W
H Viking
5–1 HT 2–0
29 May
W
A Tromso
3–2 HT 2–1
16 May
W
H Rosenborg
3–2 HT 2–1
13 May
W
A Lillestrom
2–1 HT 0–0
07 May
W
H ODD Ballklubb
2–0 HT 0–0
03 May
D
H Brann
2–2 HT 0–2
29 Apr
W
A Aalesund
3–0 HT 2–0
23 Apr
W
H Stabaek
4–0 HT 3–0
16 Apr

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Viking and Bodo/Glimt in coming into this match?

Viking have gone 27W 9D 11L in their last 47 games (1.91 PPG), while Bodo/Glimt have gone 33W 8D 6L in their last 47 (2.28 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Viking at home or Bodo/Glimt away?

Viking's home record (2.13 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Viking at home: 2.13 PPG; Bodo/Glimt away: 2.09 PPG.

Have Viking or Bodo/Glimt been keeping clean sheets recently?

Viking have kept a clean sheet in 28% of their recent games, Bodo/Glimt in 32%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 10 times since September 2021 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Eliteserien. They last met on 11 April 2026, roughly 3 months ago.

Records & Recent Trends

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Viking won 5-0 on 11 Apr 2026, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Viking have gone 3W 1D 2L from 6 meetings on their own ground against Bodo/Glimt — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 10 Meetings

Viking

4

Viking

1

Draws

Bodo/Glimt

5

Bodo/Glimt

Recent Meetings

Viking
5–0
11 Apr 26
Bodo/Glimt
Viking
2–4
19 Jul 25
Bodo/Glimt
Bodo/Glimt
2–4
28 May 25
Viking
Viking
1–1
10 Aug 24
Bodo/Glimt
Bodo/Glimt
1–0
06 Apr 24
Viking
Viking
3–2
06 Aug 23
Bodo/Glimt
Bodo/Glimt
5–1
29 May 23
Viking
Bodo/Glimt
5–4
06 Nov 22
Viking
Viking
2–0
24 Apr 22
Bodo/Glimt
Viking
1–3
19 Sep 21
Bodo/Glimt

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Viking and Bodo/Glimt?

From 10 meetings on record, Viking have won 4, Bodo/Glimt have won 5, and 1 have been drawn.

When did Viking and Bodo/Glimt last play each other?

They last met on 11 April 2026, when Viking 5-0 Bodo/Glimt.

Who has won more matches between Viking and Bodo/Glimt?

Bodo/Glimt have the better head-to-head record, with 5 wins from 10 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Viking are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 65% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 13% of those situations.

Bodo/Glimt are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 83% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 39% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 13% of those situations.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS has landed consistently for both sides recently — 74% for Viking, 65% for Bodo/Glimt — a strong two-way scoring signal.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 61% for Viking and 70% for Bodo/Glimt. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 48% and 52% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Viking home games / Bodo/Glimt away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Viking Viking Blended
Metric All
(47 games)
Venue
(23 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 31/47
(66%)
15/23
(65.2%)
2+ Goals Before HT 16/47
(34%)
9/23
(39.1%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 16/16
(100%)
8/8
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 9/16
(56.2%)
6/8
(75%)
Winning at HT 11/47
(23.4%)
4/23
(17.4%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/47
(4.3%)
1/23
(4.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/47
(12.8%)
3/23
(13%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 28/47
(59.6%)
17/23
(73.9%)
Over 2.5 Goals 27/47
(57.4%)
14/23
(60.9%)
Over 3.5 Goals 19/47
(40.4%)
11/23
(47.8%)
Clean Sheet 13/47
(27.7%)
6/23
(26.1%)
Failed to Score 6/47
(12.8%)
0/23
(0%)
Bodo/Glimt Bodo/Glimt Blended
Metric All
(47 games)
Venue
(23 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 39/47
(83%)
19/23
(82.6%)
2+ Goals Before HT 24/47
(51.1%)
11/23
(47.8%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/8
(100%)
4/4
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/8
(62.5%)
3/4
(75%)
Winning at HT 21/47
(44.7%)
9/23
(39.1%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 1/47
(2.1%)
0/23
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/47
(12.8%)
3/23
(13%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 29/47
(61.7%)
15/23
(65.2%)
Over 2.5 Goals 31/47
(66%)
16/23
(69.6%)
Over 3.5 Goals 25/47
(53.2%)
12/23
(52.2%)
Clean Sheet 15/47
(31.9%)
6/23
(26.1%)
Failed to Score 3/47
(6.4%)
2/23
(8.7%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Viking play Bodo/Glimt?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 74% of Viking's games and 65% of Bodo/Glimt's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Viking vs Bodo/Glimt usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 61% of Viking's matches and 70% of Bodo/Glimt's.

Do Viking and Bodo/Glimt tend to score early?

Viking have had a goal before half-time in 65% of their recent matches, Bodo/Glimt in 83% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Viking and Bodo/Glimt share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Viking and Bodo/Glimt finished level at 1-1 at SR-Bank Arena, Regular Season - 18, in the Eliteserien. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Viking 1.49 xG and Bodo/Glimt 1.35 xG, a combined 2.84. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Viking attack 1.18 / defence 0.86 against Bodo/Glimt attack 1.14 / defence 0.86, drawn from 47/48 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Viking 41% | Draw 25% | Bodo/Glimt 34%, with Viking to win its most likely call at 41%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 25% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 54%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 78% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 57% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 62% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Viking 57%, Bodo/Glimt 66%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 61%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Viking's trading profile (47 games, 23 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 60% of their matches — today it did.

Bodo/Glimt's trading profile (47 games, 23 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 32% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Viking 1.91 PPG, Bodo/Glimt 2.28 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Viking (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 2.30 scoring average — below par going forward. Bodo/Glimt (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 2.43 scoring average — below par going forward.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 54% Over 2.5 probability, but 2 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 57% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data bucked — 62% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.