Stabaek 0-3 Bodo/Glimt – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson rates Bodo/Glimt at 55% — recent form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Stabaek vs Bodo/Glimt encounter.
✍️ Match Preview
Pre-Match Analysis
Stabaek and Bodo/Glimt meet at Nadderud Stadion in Eliteserien (matchday 21). This fixture gets under way on Sunday 3 October 2021 at 18:00 UK time.
Current Form
Stabaek's record over their last 10 games: 3W 2D 5L (1.10 PPG). Last five: D L L W D. Offensively they are averaging 1.50 goals per game, with 1.90 conceded. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings (20%). Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone.
Stabaek's form when playing at home: 2W 3D 5L across their last 10 home games (0.90 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 1.70 conceded per game.
Bodo/Glimt (all games): 6W 3D 1L across their last 10 — 2.10 points per game. Last five: W W D W W. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.00 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings (30%). Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.
Bodo/Glimt's form when playing away from home: 6W 2D 2L across their last 10 road games (2.00 PPG). They are averaging 1.80 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support.
Bodo/Glimt arrive in superior form — a 1.00 PPG advantage (2.10 vs 1.10) that offsets much of the home-ground benefit. The away side are the form pick, with draw protection the sensible way to manage the home-field uncertainty.
H2H History
The head-to-head record is closely matched — across the 3 H2H matches in our data, Bodo/Glimt edge it 2 wins to 0, with 1 draw. Neither side has a commanding advantage. With only 3 H2H matches to go on, treat this as a light input.
The 3 H2H matches in our data have been high-scoring — 5.3 goals per game on average — which backs the Over 2.5 market from the head-to-head side. The most recent of those, on 27 Jun 2021, ended Stabaek 1–4 Bodo/Glimt — a Bodo/Glimt win.
With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H signal is in the goals market — at 5.3 goals per game, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle from the head-to-head data.
Trading & In-Play
Stabaek — key trading statistics (last 50 games, 24 of them at home): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 71% of their matches in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 58% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; of the 14 games they led at half-time, they failed to win 36%; BTTS occurs in 46% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 46% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 42%.
Bodo/Glimt — key trading statistics (last 50 games, 24 of them away): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 75% of their matches in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 67% of those occasions; they lead at the break 60% of the time; of the 5 games they trailed at half-time, they recovered to draw or win 60%; BTTS occurs in 71% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 75% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 54%.
BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Stabaek 56% versus Bodo/Glimt 62%; no strong lean in either direction. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (Stabaek 60% | Bodo/Glimt 74%). There is an in-play dynamic worth noting: Stabaek surrender their half-time lead 36% of the time, while Bodo/Glimt have come from behind at the break to draw or win in 60% of cases — a combination that makes laying the hosts at HT a potential angle.
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects Stabaek 0.99 xG and Bodo/Glimt 1.82 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Stabaek attack 0.699 / defence 1.178 | Bodo/Glimt attack 1.171 / defence 0.786. League average goals — home 1.809 / away 1.322. Stabaek's attack rating of 0.699 is below the league average, which holds their xG down at 0.99. Bodo/Glimt bring a tight defence (rating 0.786, below 1 = concedes less than average) — this is pulling Stabaek's projected output down. Data: built from Stabaek's last 50 games and Bodo/Glimt's last 50.
Result probabilities: Stabaek 18% | Draw 27% | Bodo/Glimt 55%. Fair-value odds: Stabaek 5.55 | Draw 3.64 | Bodo/Glimt 1.83. The model has a clear lean to Bodo/Glimt (55%) — a 28pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 54% | BTTS Yes probability 55% | Total xG 2.82. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 54%/46% — the total xG of 2.82 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS Yes at 55% is only a slight lean — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.
Verdict
The Poisson model's primary lean is Bodo/Glimt at 55% — clear model lean. Recent form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 27% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.
Poisson projects 2.82 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 54% probability — strong conviction, supported by recent form (Stabaek's last 10 home games and Bodo/Glimt's last 10 away games) averaging 2.8 goals per game and the H2H data averaging 5.3 goals per game across 3 H2H matches.
On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 55% on Yes. Form rates are neutral — both teams scored in: Stabaek 50% (last 10 home games) | Bodo/Glimt 50% (last 10 away games).
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: Stabaek vs Bodo/Glimt | Competition: Eliteserien, matchday 21 | Venue: Nadderud Stadion • Kick-off: Sunday 3 October 2021 at 18:00 UK time • Data inputs: head-to-head data, recent form (overall and home/away), the Poisson prediction model and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: Stabaek 18% | Draw 27% | Bodo/Glimt 55% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 54% (Under 46%) | BTTS Yes 55% (No 45%) | xG Stabaek 0.99 / Bodo/Glimt 1.82 • Poisson strength factors: Stabaek attack 0.699 / def 1.178 | Bodo/Glimt attack 1.171 / def 0.786 | league avg home 1.809 / away 1.322 • Poisson stance: Bodo/Glimt (55%) — strong lean
🧮 Prediction Model
0.99
Stabaek xG
Expected Goals
1.82
Bodo/Glimt xG
55%
BTTS
80%
Over 1.5
54%
Over 2.5
31%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Stabaek vs Bodo/Glimt FAQs
What time does Stabaek vs Bodo/Glimt kick off?
Stabaek vs Bodo/Glimt kicked off at 18:00 UK time on Sunday 3 October 2021 at Nadderud Stadion.
What was the final score in Stabaek vs Bodo/Glimt?
Stabaek 0 - 3 Bodo/Glimt.
Where is Stabaek vs Bodo/Glimt being played?
The match is being played at Nadderud Stadion.
What competition is Stabaek vs Bodo/Glimt part of?
Stabaek vs Bodo/Glimt is a Eliteserien fixture (matchday 21) (Norway).
Who is favourite to win Stabaek vs Bodo/Glimt?
Our statistical model gives Stabaek a 18% chance of winning, Bodo/Glimt a 55% chance, and a 27% chance of a draw — making Bodo/Glimt the favourite.
Will both teams score in Stabaek vs Bodo/Glimt?
Our model estimates a 55% probability that both Stabaek and Bodo/Glimt will score, so it leans towards BTTS Yes.
Will Stabaek vs Bodo/Glimt have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 54%, so it leans towards over 2.5 goals.
🧮 Model Insight
Behind the Numbers
Working from Stabaek's attack rating (0.70) and Bodo/Glimt's defence rating (0.79), the model arrives at 0.99 expected goals for the home side. Flip it around — Bodo/Glimt's attack (1.17x) against Stabaek's defence (1.18x) — and the away total comes out at 1.82.
These ratings are built from Stabaek's last 50 games and Bodo/Glimt's last 50 — a full enough recent sample to trust.
The Exact-Score Picture
Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 12.2%. Close behind: 0-2 (9.9%), 1-2 (9.9%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 32% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.
Most Likely Outcome
Bodo/Glimt Win
18%
5.55
27%
3.64
55%
1.83
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
0 β 1
10.9%
Away win
Most likely
1 β 1
10.8%
Draw
0 β 2
9.9%
Away win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
0.99
Stabaek xG
Total xG
2.82
1.82
Bodo/Glimt xG
5.55
18%
Home win
3.64
27%
Draw
1.83
55%
Away win
Goals Markets
77%
Over 1.5
1.30
23%
Under 1.5
4.35
54%
Over 2.5
1.85
46%
Under 2.5
2.17
31%
Over 3.5
3.23
69%
Under 3.5
1.45
16%
Over 4.5
6.25
84%
Under 4.5
1.19
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
55%
BTTS Yes
1.81
45%
BTTS No
2.23
Clean Sheet
16%
6.20
37%
2.70
Win to Nil
3%
34.41
20%
4.96
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 6.0 | 10.9 | 9.9 | 6.0 | 2.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 | 5.9 | 10.8 | 9.9 | 6.0 | 2.7 | 1.0 |
| 2 | 3.0 | 5.4 | 4.9 | 3.0 | 1.4 | 0.5 |
| 3 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 |
| 4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | – |
| 5 | – | 0.1 | 0.1 | – | – | – |
Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Stabaek vs Bodo/Glimt Prediction FAQs
What is the most likely scoreline for Stabaek vs Bodo/Glimt?
Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 12.2%.
How many goals are Stabaek and Bodo/Glimt expected to score?
The model projects 0.99 expected goals for Stabaek and 1.82 for Bodo/Glimt, a combined total of 2.82.
How confident is the prediction model for Stabaek vs Bodo/Glimt?
Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 55%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.
📈 Form Insight
The Form Picture
Across their last 50 outings, Stabaek have picked up 1.12 PPG on a 13W 17D 20L record — D-L-L-W-D across the most recent five.
Bodo/Glimt's form line: 38W 8D 4L from 50 games, 2.44 PPG, last five W-W-D-W-W.
Put side by side, Bodo/Glimt are the form team by 1.32 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against Stabaek.
Home & Away Splits
On home soil, Stabaek have posted 1.21 PPG from their last 24 home games (7W 8D 9L).
On the road, Bodo/Glimt have gone 16W 5D 3L from their last 24 away games — 2.21 PPG when travelling.
Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Bodo/Glimt come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.
Scoring & Defensive Trends
Stabaek are averaging 1.34 goals scored and 1.72 conceded per game recently; Bodo/Glimt are on 2.88 scored and 1.02 conceded.
On BTTS specifically: Bodo/Glimt in 62%.
Last 50 Results
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
Stabaek
Blended
Bodo/Glimt
Blended
Stabaek (Home) vs Bodo/Glimt (Away)
Home games only for the home side · Away games only for the away side
Stabaek
Blended
Bodo/Glimt
Blended
❓ Stabaek vs Bodo/Glimt Form FAQs
What form are Stabaek and Bodo/Glimt in coming into this match?
Stabaek have gone 13W 17D 20L in their last 50 games (1.12 PPG), while Bodo/Glimt have gone 38W 8D 4L in their last 50 (2.44 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — Stabaek at home or Bodo/Glimt away?
Bodo/Glimt's away record (2.21 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Stabaek at home: 1.21 PPG; Bodo/Glimt away: 2.21 PPG.
Have Stabaek or Bodo/Glimt been keeping clean sheets recently?
Stabaek have kept a clean sheet in 26% of their recent games, Bodo/Glimt in 32%.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
History of the Fixture
We have 6 H2H matches between these sides on record, dating back to July 2020 — enough to show some patterns. All of them came in Eliteserien. The most recent in our data was on 5 November 2023, some 3 years back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.
Records & Recent Trends
Bodo/Glimt have won each of the latest 5 H2H matches we hold, a run that gives them the edge coming in.
For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Bodo/Glimt won Bodo/Glimt 4-0 Stabaek on 16 Apr 2023, the biggest margin in the H2H matches we hold.
Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Stabaek have gone 0W 1D 2L from the 3 H2H matches in our data played on their own ground against Bodo/Glimt — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.
Last 6 Meetings
0
Stabaek
1
Draws
5
Bodo/Glimt
Recent Meetings
❓ Stabaek vs Bodo/Glimt H2H FAQs
What is the head-to-head record between Stabaek and Bodo/Glimt?
Across the 6 head-to-head matches in our data, Stabaek have won 0, Bodo/Glimt have won 5, and 1 has been drawn.
When did Stabaek and Bodo/Glimt last play each other?
The most recent meeting in our data was on 5 November 2023: Stabaek 0-4 Bodo/Glimt.
Who has won more matches between Stabaek and Bodo/Glimt?
Bodo/Glimt have the better head-to-head record, with 5 wins from the 6 head-to-head matches in our data.
📈 Trading Insight
How These Sides Start
Stabaek are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 71% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 29% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 29% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 43% of those situations.
Bodo/Glimt are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 75% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 50% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 17% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 50% of those situations.
Goals & Clean Sheets
BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Stabaek 46%, Bodo/Glimt 71% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.
Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 46% for Stabaek and 75% for Bodo/Glimt. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 29% and 58% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.
On the defensive side: Stabaek have failed to score in 33% of games.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = Stabaek home games / Bodo/Glimt away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β shown as β where unavailable.
❓ Stabaek vs Bodo/Glimt Trading FAQs
Do both teams usually score in Stabaek and Bodo/Glimt matches?
Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 46% of Stabaek's games and 71% of Bodo/Glimt's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.
Are Stabaek and Bodo/Glimt matches usually high-scoring?
Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 46% of Stabaek's matches and 75% of Bodo/Glimt's.
Do Stabaek and Bodo/Glimt matches tend to have early goals?
There has been at least one first-half goal in 71% of Stabaek's recent matches and 75% of Bodo/Glimt's — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
Dominant Bodo/Glimt run riot with a 0-3 hammering of Stabaek.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Bodo/Glimt beat Stabaek 0-3 at Nadderud Stadion, Regular Season - 21, in the Eliteserien. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Stabaek 0.99 xG and Bodo/Glimt 1.82 xG, a combined 2.82. The scoreboard read 0-3 for 3 actual goals. Stabaek fell 1.0 short of their projected output. Bodo/Glimt outscored their 1.82 projection by 1.2. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Stabaek attack 0.70 / defence 1.18 against Bodo/Glimt attack 1.17 / defence 0.79, drawn from 50/50 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Stabaek 18% | Draw 27% | Bodo/Glimt 55%, with Bodo/Glimt to win its most likely call at 55%. The result followed the model's preferred path, landing its top-rated outcome.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 54%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 80% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 55% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 67% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Stabaek 60%, Bodo/Glimt 74%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 59%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Stabaek's trading profile (50 games, 24 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 56% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 28% of games, a blank that repeated today.
Bodo/Glimt's trading profile (50 games, 24 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 32% of the time, and duly kept one.
Form vs Result
On form, Bodo/Glimt arrived the stronger side — 2.44 PPG against 1.12. Form held, and they took the win. Stabaek (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.25 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 3 against a 1.42 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Bodo/Glimt (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.25 average — tighter than their form line.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss), form (hit). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.