NEC Nijmegen 2-2 PEC Zwolle – Result & Analysis

Poisson model favours NEC Nijmegen (71%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as NEC Nijmegen face PEC Zwolle.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Goffertstadion plays host to NEC Nijmegen versus PEC Zwolle in Eredivisie, Regular Season - 30. Kick-off: Sunday 14 April 2024 at 19:00 UTC.

Form

NEC Nijmegen (all games): 6W 2D 2L across 10 Eredivisie fixtures this term — 2.00 PPG. Last five: W L W D W. They are averaging 2.10 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation.

NEC Nijmegen's home record at Goffertstadion: 6W 3D 1L from 10 Eredivisie appearances (2.10 PPG). They are averaging 2.10 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

PEC Zwolle have collected 0.80 PPG across 10 Eredivisie outings this season: 2W 2D 6L. Last five: D L L L W. Their scoring rate of 1.00 per game is modest, conceding 2.40 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.40 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

When travelling in Eredivisie this season, PEC Zwolle have posted 2W 4D 4L from 10 away outings — 1.00 PPG. Away from home they average 1.50 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

The points-per-game gap of 1.20 in NEC Nijmegen's favour (2.00 vs 0.80) is a statistically meaningful difference. The hosts are the form pick here, with draw protection the sensible hedge given the away side's competitiveness.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — NEC Nijmegen have seen both teams score in 70% of their games, PEC Zwolle in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H History

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 3 meetings: NEC Nijmegen 2W, PEC Zwolle 0W, 1D.

The 3 previous meetings have averaged 2.7 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 9 Dec 2023, ended 3–1 with NEC Nijmegen winning.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading

NEC Nijmegen half-time and goal-timing data (63 games, 31 at home): they score before half-time in 64% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 78% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 56% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 71% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 58% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 36%.

PEC Zwolle half-time and goal-timing data (63 games, 31 at away): they score before half-time in 74% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 94% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 75% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 64% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 71% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 46%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — NEC Nijmegen 59% versus PEC Zwolle 60%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (NEC Nijmegen 52% | PEC Zwolle 64%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects NEC Nijmegen 2.61 xG and PEC Zwolle 0.97 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: NEC Nijmegen attack 1.219 / defence 0.771 | PEC Zwolle attack 0.943 / defence 1.235. League average goals — home 1.734 / away 1.341. PEC Zwolle bring a strong defensive rating of 1.235 — this is suppressing NEC Nijmegen's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. NEC Nijmegen's defence rating of 0.771 is below average — the home backline is amplifying the visitor's projected output. Data: 63 NEC Nijmegen games / 29 PEC Zwolle games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: NEC Nijmegen 71% | Draw 18% | PEC Zwolle 10%. Fair-value odds: NEC Nijmegen 1.41 | Draw 5.56 | PEC Zwolle 10.00. The model has a clear lean to NEC Nijmegen (71%) — a 61pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 69% | BTTS probability 59% | Total xG 3.58. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 69% — a total xG of 3.58 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS probability of 59% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates NEC Nijmegen as the most likely outcome at 71% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 18% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

Poisson projects 3.58 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 69% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.3 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 59% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: NEC Nijmegen 70% | PEC Zwolle 60% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights