Sign in Register

Wuhan Three Towns 0-1 Chengdu Better City – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 6

Kick-off

Fri 17 Apr 2026

12:00

Venue

Wuhan Sports Center Stadium

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Wuhan Three Towns at 39%, yet in-form Chengdu Better City provide a compelling counter-argument — this Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

Wuhan Three Towns host Chengdu Better City at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium in Super League, Regular Season - 6. Kick-off is scheduled for Friday 17 April 2026 at 12:00 UTC.

Form Guide

Wuhan Three Towns — All Games: 1W 1D 8L from 10 Super League outings this season, averaging 0.40 points per game. Last five: L D L L L. They are averaging 0.80 goals per game and conceding 2.60 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.60 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation.

At home at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium, Wuhan Three Towns have gone 2W 4D 4L this season (10 games, 1.00 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.30 goals scored and 1.90 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.00 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.40 — Wuhan Three Towns are significantly better at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium than their overall form suggests.

Across all Super League games this season, Chengdu Better City have recorded 4W 5D 1L from 10 outings — 1.70 PPG. Last five: D W D L D. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.10 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play.

When travelling in Super League this season, Chengdu Better City have posted 3W 5D 2L from 10 away outings — 1.40 PPG. They are averaging 2.30 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

The form data does not support a straightforward home bias here. Chengdu Better City are 1.30 PPG ahead (1.70 vs 0.40), making them the form-guided selection despite the trip.

Both teams score in over 70% of each side's relevant games (using home/away splits). At that combined rate, BTTS Yes is as well-evidenced as it gets — the data strongly backs two-way scoring.

H2H Record

The H2H landscape is flat: 8 previous encounters have yielded 1 wins for Wuhan Three Towns, 3 for Chengdu Better City and 4 draws. A neutral reading in isolation.

The 8 previous meetings have averaged 2.5 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 29 Jun 2025, ended 2–2 with a draw.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

In-Play Data

Wuhan Three Towns trading profile (60 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 77% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 71% of the time; BTTS occurs in 57% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 53% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 37%; they fail to score in 33% of games.

Chengdu Better City trading profile (60 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 77% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 89% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 56% of those occasions; they lead at the break 48% of the time; BTTS occurs in 67% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 60% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 37%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Wuhan Three Towns 58% versus Chengdu Better City 58%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Wuhan Three Towns 53% | Chengdu Better City 60%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Wuhan Three Towns 1.77 xG and Chengdu Better City 1.76 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Wuhan Three Towns attack 0.972 / defence 1.150 | Chengdu Better City attack 1.343 / defence 1.008. League average goals — home 1.802 / away 1.139. Chengdu Better City have an above-average attack strength of 1.343 — the away xG of 1.76 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 35 Wuhan Three Towns games / 35 Chengdu Better City games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Wuhan Three Towns 39% | Draw 22% | Chengdu Better City 39%. Fair-value odds: Wuhan Three Towns 2.56 | Draw 4.55 | Chengdu Better City 2.56. The draw (22%) is the Poisson-preferred outcome — neither side is more likely to win than to draw, making draw-inclusive markets the most model-aligned approach.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 68% | BTTS probability 69% | Total xG 3.53. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 68% — a total xG of 3.53 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 69% reflects that both xG figures (1.77 / 1.76) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's preferred outcome is the draw at 22% — neither side is more likely to win than to draw. Draw-inclusive markets are the most model-aligned approach. Home win at 39% and away win at 39% are close enough that backing either outright carries significant draw exposure.

Poisson projects 3.53 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 68% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.5 goals per game.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 69%. Form rates corroborate: Wuhan Three Towns 70% | Chengdu Better City 80% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 39% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (1W–4D–3W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history favours Chengdu Better City but Poisson model leans Wuhan Three Towns — current-season strength data diverges from historical pattern.
Form Chengdu Better City lead on PPG: 1.70 vs 0.40 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Wuhan Three Towns Poisson xG (1.77) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (1.30) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Form Chengdu Better City Poisson xG (1.76) is below their form scoring rate (2.30) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Wuhan Three Towns 7/10, Chengdu Better City 8/10) and Poisson model (69%).
Form Form (PPG) favours Chengdu Better City but Poisson leans Wuhan Three Towns (39%) — divergence worth monitoring.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 68% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 69% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 6 | Venue: Wuhan Sports Center Stadium • Kick-off: Friday 17 Apr 2026, 12:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Wuhan Three Towns 39% | Draw 22% | Chengdu Better City 39% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 68% | BTTS 69% | xG Wuhan Three Towns 1.77 / Chengdu Better City 1.76 • Poisson strength factors: Wuhan Three Towns attack 0.972 / def 1.150 | Chengdu Better City attack 1.343 / def 1.008 | league avg home 1.802 / away 1.139 • Poisson stance: Draw (22%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.77

Wuhan Three Towns xG

Expected Goals

1.76

Chengdu Better City xG

39%
22%
39%
Wuhan Three Towns Draw Chengdu Better City

69%

BTTS

87%

Over 1.5

68%

Over 2.5

47%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City kick off?

Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City kicked off at 12:00 on Friday 17 April 2026 at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium.

What was the final score in Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City?

Wuhan Three Towns 0 - 1 Chengdu Better City.

Where is Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City being played?

The match is being played at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium.

What competition is Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City part of?

Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City is a Regular Season - 6 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City?

Our statistical model gives Wuhan Three Towns a 39% chance of winning, Chengdu Better City a 39% chance, and a 22% chance of a draw, making this a very evenly-matched fixture.

Will both teams score in Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City?

Our model estimates a 69% probability that both Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City will score (BTTS).

Will Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 68%.

What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City?

Record (8 meetings): Wuhan Three Towns 1W | Draws 4 | Chengdu Better City 3W.

What form are Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City in?

Wuhan Three Towns (all comps): 1W-1D-8L in 10 | 0.40 PPG | GF 0.80 / GA 2.60 | L5 L-D-L-L-L. Chengdu Better City (all comps): 4W-5D-1L in 10 | 1.70 PPG | GF 2.10 / GA 1.20 | L5 D-W-D-L-D.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

Working from Wuhan Three Towns's attack rating (0.97) and Chengdu Better City's defence rating (1.01), the model arrives at 1.77 expected goals for the home side. The same calculation in reverse, Chengdu Better City's attack versus Wuhan Three Towns's defence, projects 1.76 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 35/35 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 10.3%. Close behind: 2-1 (8.1%), 1-2 (8.0%). Together the top three scorelines make up 26% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Wuhan Three Towns Win

39%

Wuhan Three Towns

2.56

22%

Draw

4.51

39%

Chengdu Better City

2.58

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

9.1%

Draw

Most likely

2 – 1

8.1%

Home win

1 – 2

8.0%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.77

Wuhan Three Towns xG

Total xG

3.53

1.76

Chengdu Better City xG

39%
22%
39%
Wuhan Three TownsDrawChengdu Better City

2.56

39%

Home win

4.51

22%

Draw

2.58

39%

Away win

Goals Markets

87%

Over 1.5

1.15

13%

Under 1.5

7.69

68%

Over 2.5

1.47

32%

Under 2.5

3.12

47%

Over 3.5

2.13

53%

Under 3.5

1.89

28%

Over 4.5

3.57

72%

Under 4.5

1.39

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

69%

BTTS Yes

1.46

31%

BTTS No

3.19

Clean Sheet

17%

Wuhan Three Towns

5.81

17%

Chengdu Better City

5.85

Win to Nil

7%

Wuhan Three Towns

14.86

7%

Chengdu Better City

15.11

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 2.9 5.2 4.6 2.7 1.2 0.4
1 5.2 9.1 8.0 4.7 2.1 0.7
2 4.6 8.1 7.1 4.2 1.8 0.6
3 2.7 4.8 4.2 2.5 1.1 0.4
4 1.2 2.1 1.8 1.1 0.5 0.2
5 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.767
λ Away (xG) 1.759
Total xG 3.526
League avg home goals 1.802
League avg away goals 1.139
Wuhan Three Towns attack strength 0.972
Wuhan Three Towns defence strength 1.150
Chengdu Better City attack strength 1.343
Chengdu Better City defence strength 1.008
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 35 / 35

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 10.3%.

How many goals are Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City expected to score?

The model projects 1.77 expected goals for Wuhan Three Towns and 1.76 for Chengdu Better City, a combined total of 3.53.

How confident is the prediction model for Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 39%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Across their last 60 outings, Wuhan Three Towns have picked up 0.93 PPG on a 14W 14D 32L record — L-D-L-L-L across the most recent five.

Chengdu Better City's form line: 35W 14D 11L from 60 games, 1.98 PPG, last five D-W-D-L-D.

Put side by side, Chengdu Better City are the form team by 1.05 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against Wuhan Three Towns.

Home Ground vs the Road

On home soil, Wuhan Three Towns have posted 1.03 PPG from 30 outings (8W 7D 15L).

On the road, Chengdu Better City have gone 14W 9D 7L from 30 away games — 1.70 PPG when travelling.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Chengdu Better City come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

The Goals Picture

Wuhan Three Towns are averaging 1.08 goals scored and 1.77 conceded per game recently; Chengdu Better City are on 2.08 scored and 0.98 conceded.

Last 60 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Wuhan Three Towns

Wuhan Three Towns

Current Season
L D L L L
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

Current Season
D W D L D
60 Played 60
14/14/32 W / D / L 35/14/11
0.93 Points Per Game 1.98
1.08 Avg Goals Scored 2.08
1.77 Avg Goals Conceded 0.98
2.85 Avg Goals / Game 3.07
9 Clean Sheets 20
35 BTTS 35
32 Over 2.5 Games 36
Wuhan Three Towns

Wuhan Three Towns

L
H Shandong Luneng
1–5 HT 0–2
22 Nov
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
0–1 HT 0–1
02 Nov
L
H Sichuan Jiuniu
1–2 HT 0–1
24 Oct
D
A Dalian Zhixing
0–0 HT 0–0
19 Oct
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
2–3 HT 0–1
26 Sep
L
H Henan Jianye
2–5 HT 0–2
19 Sep
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–4 HT 0–2
14 Sep
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–0 HT 0–0
31 Aug
L
A Beijing Guoan
0–4 HT 0–2
25 Aug
L
A Yunnan Yukun
1–2 HT 0–1
15 Aug
L
H Meizhou Kejia
1–2 HT 0–1
10 Aug
D
H Changchun Yatai
0–0 HT 0–0
03 Aug
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–3 HT 1–0
27 Jul
D
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 1–0
18 Jul
D
H Chengdu Better City
2–2 HT 1–1
29 Jun
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–3 HT 0–1
25 Jun
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
2–1 HT 0–0
18 Jun
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
2–0 HT 2–0
13 Jun
D
H Dalian Zhixing
2–2 HT 0–2
11 May
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–2 HT 0–2
05 May
W
A Henan Jianye
2–1 HT 0–0
01 May
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 0–1
27 Apr
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–1
19 Apr
D
H Beijing Guoan
4–4 HT 1–3
15 Apr
W
H Yunnan Yukun
3–1 HT 3–0
12 Apr
L
A Meizhou Kejia
1–3 HT 1–0
06 Apr
D
A Changchun Yatai
1–1 HT 1–1
02 Apr
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
0–4 HT 0–4
28 Mar
L
A Qingdao Youth Island
0–2 HT 0–1
03 Mar
L
A Chengdu Better City
0–1 HT 0–0
22 Feb
L
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–3 HT 0–2
02 Nov
L
A Meizhou Kejia
0–1 HT 0–1
27 Oct
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
0–2 HT 0–1
18 Oct
W
H Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 0–0
29 Sep
D
A Shandong Luneng
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Sep
D
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–1 HT 0–1
15 Sep
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–1 HT 0–0
16 Aug
L
A Changchun Yatai
0–2 HT 0–2
10 Aug
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
4–1 HT 3–0
03 Aug
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–1
29 Jul
D
H Chengdu Better City
1–1 HT 0–0
20 Jul
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 1–1
12 Jul
W
A Beijing Guoan
2–1 HT 1–0
07 Jul
L
H Nantong Zhiyun
1–2 HT 0–1
29 Jun
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–2 HT 0–2
25 Jun
W
A Qingdao Youth Island
1–0 HT 1–0
16 Jun
L
H Meizhou Kejia
0–1 HT 0–0
25 May
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
1–3 HT 1–2
21 May
W
A Henan Jianye
3–2 HT 2–1
17 May
L
H Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 0–1
11 May
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 1–0
05 May
D
A Chengdu Better City
2–2 HT 1–1
01 May
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–1
26 Apr
D
H Changchun Yatai
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Apr
D
A Sichuan Jiuniu
1–1 HT 0–0
14 Apr
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–4 HT 0–2
09 Apr
L
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–3 HT 0–1
04 Apr
L
H Beijing Guoan
0–1 HT 0–0
30 Mar
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
3–1 HT 1–0
09 Mar
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–3 HT 1–1
01 Mar
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

D
A Sichuan Jiuniu
1–1 HT 1–1
22 Nov
L
H Henan Jianye
1–2 HT 1–0
31 Oct
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
2–2 HT 0–1
26 Oct
W
H Meizhou Kejia
3–1 HT 1–1
17 Oct
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
3–3 HT 3–2
26 Sep
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 0–0
21 Sep
W
H Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Sep
W
H SHANGHAI SIPG
4–1 HT 3–1
30 Aug
W
A Yunnan Yukun
5–1 HT 1–1
23 Aug
D
H Qingdao Jonoon
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Aug
W
A Dalian Zhixing
2–0 HT 0–0
08 Aug
W
H Shandong Luneng
2–1 HT 1–1
02 Aug
W
H Beijing Guoan
2–0 HT 1–0
26 Jul
L
A Tianjin Teda
1–2 HT 0–0
18 Jul
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–2 HT 1–1
29 Jun
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
5–0 HT 2–0
25 Jun
L
A Henan Jianye
2–3 HT 2–2
14 Jun
D
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 1–1
17 May
W
A Meizhou Kejia
4–0 HT 3–0
10 May
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
2–1 HT 1–0
05 May
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–0 HT 1–0
02 May
W
A Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 1–0
26 Apr
W
A SHANGHAI SIPG
3–1 HT 2–1
20 Apr
D
H Yunnan Yukun
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Apr
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Apr
W
H Dalian Zhixing
2–0 HT 1–0
06 Apr
W
A Shandong Luneng
3–0 HT 2–0
02 Apr
D
A Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Mar
L
H Tianjin Teda
1–2 HT 1–1
02 Mar
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 0–0
22 Feb
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–2 HT 1–1
02 Nov
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 0–1
27 Oct
W
H SHANGHAI SIPG
3–1 HT 3–1
18 Oct
W
H Meizhou Kejia
2–0 HT 1–0
29 Sep
L
A Henan Jianye
0–2 HT 0–1
21 Sep
D
H Beijing Guoan
2–2 HT 2–0
14 Sep
L
A Shandong Luneng
0–3 HT 0–1
17 Aug
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
3–0 HT 3–0
09 Aug
W
H Changchun Yatai
4–0 HT 3–0
03 Aug
W
A Hangzhou Greentown
3–1 HT 1–1
28 Jul
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–1 HT 0–0
20 Jul
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–1
12 Jul
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
1–0 HT 0–0
07 Jul
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–0 HT 2–0
30 Jun
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
5–1 HT 2–1
26 Jun
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–1
16 Jun
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
7–0 HT 3–0
26 May
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–2 HT 0–0
22 May
W
A Meizhou Kejia
4–1 HT 1–0
17 May
W
H Henan Jianye
4–2 HT 3–2
10 May
L
A Beijing Guoan
1–2 HT 0–2
05 May
D
H Wuhan Three Towns
2–2 HT 1–1
01 May
L
H Shandong Luneng
0–1 HT 0–1
26 Apr
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
3–1 HT 1–1
20 Apr
W
A Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 0–1
14 Apr
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
3–0 HT 1–0
10 Apr
W
A Tianjin Teda
3–2 HT 1–0
06 Apr
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
1–0 HT 1–0
30 Mar
L
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
0–1 HT 0–0
10 Mar
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
2–0 HT 1–0
02 Mar

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City in coming into this match?

Wuhan Three Towns have gone 14W 14D 32L in their last 60 games (0.93 PPG), while Chengdu Better City have gone 35W 14D 11L in their last 60 (1.98 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Wuhan Three Towns at home or Chengdu Better City away?

Chengdu Better City's away record (1.70 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Wuhan Three Towns at home: 1.03 PPG; Chengdu Better City away: 1.70 PPG.

Have Wuhan Three Towns or Chengdu Better City been keeping clean sheets recently?

Wuhan Three Towns have kept a clean sheet in 15% of their recent games, Chengdu Better City in 33%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City runs to 10 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to October 2022. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. The two were last together as recently as 1 August 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Digging Into the Numbers

Wuhan Three Towns's record when hosting Chengdu Better City specifically: 0W 3D 2L from 5 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 10 Meetings

Wuhan Three Towns

1

Wuhan Three Towns

5

Draws

Chengdu Better City

4

Chengdu Better City

Recent Meetings

Chengdu Better City
1–1
01 Aug 26
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
0–1
17 Apr 26
Chengdu Better City
Wuhan Three Towns
2–2
29 Jun 25
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
1–0
22 Feb 25
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
1–1
20 Jul 24
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
2–2
01 May 24
Wuhan Three Towns
Chengdu Better City
0–1
19 Aug 23
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
3–3
19 May 23
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
1–0
23 Dec 22
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
0–1
29 Oct 22
Chengdu Better City

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City?

From 10 meetings on record, Wuhan Three Towns have won 1, Chengdu Better City have won 4, and 5 have been drawn.

When did Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City last play each other?

They last met on 1 August 2026, when Chengdu Better City 1-1 Wuhan Three Towns.

Who has won more matches between Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City?

Chengdu Better City have the better head-to-head record, with 4 wins from 10 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

Wuhan Three Towns are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 77% of their matches.

Chengdu Better City are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 77% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 33% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 13% of those situations.

The Numbers That Matter

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Wuhan Three Towns 57%, Chengdu Better City 67% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 53% (Wuhan Three Towns) and 60% (Chengdu Better City). Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 33% and 37% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Wuhan Three Towns have failed to score in 30% of games.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Wuhan Three Towns home games / Chengdu Better City away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Wuhan Three Towns Wuhan Three Towns Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 46/60
(76.7%)
23/30
(76.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 23/60
(38.3%)
13/30
(43.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 10/14
(71.4%)
5/7
(71.4%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 4/14
(28.6%)
1/7
(14.3%)
Winning at HT 11/60
(18.3%)
5/30
(16.7%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/60
(5%)
1/30
(3.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/60
(6.7%)
3/30
(10%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 35/60
(58.3%)
17/30
(56.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 32/60
(53.3%)
16/30
(53.3%)
Over 3.5 Goals 22/60
(36.7%)
10/30
(33.3%)
Clean Sheet 9/60
(15%)
6/30
(20%)
Failed to Score 20/60
(33.3%)
9/30
(30%)
Chengdu Better City Chengdu Better City Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 51/60
(85%)
23/30
(76.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 29/60
(48.3%)
13/30
(43.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/9
(88.9%)
7/7
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/9
(55.6%)
5/7
(71.4%)
Winning at HT 29/60
(48.3%)
10/30
(33.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/60
(6.7%)
1/30
(3.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/60
(6.7%)
4/30
(13.3%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 35/60
(58.3%)
20/30
(66.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 36/60
(60%)
18/30
(60%)
Over 3.5 Goals 22/60
(36.7%)
11/30
(36.7%)
Clean Sheet 20/60
(33.3%)
6/30
(20%)
Failed to Score 6/60
(10%)
4/30
(13.3%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Wuhan Three Towns play Chengdu Better City?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 57% of Wuhan Three Towns's games and 67% of Chengdu Better City's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 53% of Wuhan Three Towns's matches and 60% of Chengdu Better City's.

Do Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City tend to score early?

Wuhan Three Towns have had a goal before half-time in 77% of their recent matches, Chengdu Better City in 77% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Shock result as Chengdu Better City defy the odds to beat Wuhan Three Towns 0-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Chengdu Better City beat Wuhan Three Towns 0-1 at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium, Regular Season - 6, in the Super League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Wuhan Three Towns 1.77 xG and Chengdu Better City 1.76 xG, a combined 3.53. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. Wuhan Three Towns fell 1.8 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Wuhan Three Towns attack 0.97 / defence 1.15 against Chengdu Better City attack 1.34 / defence 1.01, drawn from 35/35 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Wuhan Three Towns 39% | Draw 22% | Chengdu Better City 39%, with Wuhan Three Towns to win its most likely call at 39%. The actual Chengdu Better City win had been the model's second-ranked read at 39%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 68%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 87% and missed. Over 3.5 was 47% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 69% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 57% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Wuhan Three Towns 53%, Chengdu Better City 60%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 58%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Wuhan Three Towns's trading profile (60 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 58% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 33% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Chengdu Better City's trading profile (60 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 58% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

On form, Chengdu Better City arrived the stronger side — 1.98 PPG against 0.93. Form held, and they took the win. Wuhan Three Towns (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.20 scoring average — below par going forward. Chengdu Better City (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 1.93 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.23 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 68% Over 2.5 probability, but 1 goal scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 69% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 57% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.