🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates Wolfsberger AC at 50% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Bundesliga encounter, Relegation Group - 29 sees Grazer AK travel to Lavanttal-Arena to take on Wolfsberger AC. The game is scheduled for Saturday 25 April 2026, 16:00 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Bundesliga games this season, Wolfsberger AC have gone 0W 4D 6L from 10 outings — a 0.40 PPG return. Last five: D L D D L. They are averaging 0.60 goals per game and conceding 1.80 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation.

Wolfsberger AC's home record at Lavanttal-Arena: 2W 6D 2L from 10 Bundesliga appearances (1.20 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.00 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.20 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.40 — Wolfsberger AC are significantly better at Lavanttal-Arena than their overall form suggests.

Grazer AK — All Games: 4W 2D 4L from 10 Bundesliga fixtures this season — 1.40 PPG. Last five: W W L D L. Their scoring rate of 1.40 per game is modest, conceding 1.10 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

Grazer AK away from home this season: 2W 1D 7L from 10 away games — 0.70 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.50 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context. Their away PPG of 0.70 is notably below their overall 1.40 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

The form data does not support a straightforward home bias here. Grazer AK are 1.00 PPG ahead (1.40 vs 0.40), making them the form-guided selection despite the trip.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. Wolfsberger AC register both teams scoring in 60% of relevant matches, Grazer AK in 60% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

H2H Record

There is little to separate the sides historically. From 5 previous meetings, Wolfsberger AC have won 3, Grazer AK 1, with 1 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.

The 5 previous encounters between these sides have been high-scoring affairs — 4.6 goals per contest on average. Historical precedent backs the Over 2.5 goals market. The most recent clash, on 14 Mar 2026, ended 0–2 with Grazer AK winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.6 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

In-Play Profile

Wolfsberger AC in-play tendencies (60 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 64% of the time; BTTS occurs in 63% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 60% of games (home games).

Grazer AK in-play tendencies (60 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 63% of the time; BTTS occurs in 60% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 57% of games (away games); they fail to score in 32% of games.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Wolfsberger AC 62% and Grazer AK 63% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Wolfsberger AC 60% | Grazer AK 55%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Wolfsberger AC 1.62 xG and Grazer AK 1.07 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Wolfsberger AC attack 1.079 / defence 1.104 | Grazer AK attack 0.842 / defence 1.116. League average goals — home 1.346 / away 1.147. Data: 44 Wolfsberger AC games / 44 Grazer AK games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Wolfsberger AC 50% | Draw 26% | Grazer AK 24%. Fair-value odds: Wolfsberger AC 2.00 | Draw 3.85 | Grazer AK 4.17. Wolfsberger AC hold a narrow Poisson edge at 50% — the draw (26%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 50% | BTTS probability 53% | Total xG 2.69. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 50%/50% — the total xG of 2.69 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 53% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Analysis Verdict

Wolfsberger AC dominate the H2H record, yet Grazer AK are the in-form side right now — historical edge versus current momentum creates a genuine dilemma.

On the Poisson output, Wolfsberger AC are the pick at 50% — moderate model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Grazer AK (1.40 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. With a 26% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Wolfsberger AC offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win.

The Poisson model projects 2.69 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 50% — reasonable confidence, supported by H2H averaging 4.6 goals per meeting.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 53% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Wolfsberger AC 60% | Grazer AK 60% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights