🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates LNZ Cherkasy at 36%, yet other data sources diverge — this LNZ Cherkasy vs Metalist 1925 Kharkiv fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Premier League encounter, Regular Season - 25 sees Metalist 1925 Kharkiv travel to Cherkasy Arena to take on LNZ Cherkasy. The game is scheduled for Sunday 26 April 2026, 13:30 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, LNZ Cherkasy stand at 7W 1D 2L from 10 Premier League matches — 2.20 PPG. Last five: W W W D L. They are averaging 2.00 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. Defensively, conceding just 0.70 per game is an exceptional defensive record — one of the tightest in the division. 6 clean sheets from 10 games (60%) is a standout defensive return — they are keeping their net clean in more than half their matches. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their matches, indicating a tendency toward clean sheets or low-scoring outcomes. This season is still relatively young for LNZ Cherkasy, so this record blends games from this season and last.

LNZ Cherkasy's form when playing at home: 6W 2D 2L across 10 games at Cherkasy Arena this term (2.00 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.30 goals scored and 0.60 conceded per game. 7 clean sheets from 10 home games (70%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Cherkasy Arena. At home, both teams have scored in only 20% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle.

Across all Premier League games this season, Metalist 1925 Kharkiv have recorded 7W 2D 1L from 10 outings — 2.30 PPG. Last five: W D W W W. They are scoring at 1.50 per game and conceding 0.20. Defensively, 0.20 goals conceded per game is elite-level — a side this difficult to score against is a real threat to Over 2.5 and BTTS Yes. 8 clean sheets from 10 games (80%) is an exceptional defensive record — they are keeping clean sheets more often than not. Both teams have scored in only 10% of their fixtures — a very low rate that strongly backs BTTS No. This season is still relatively young for Metalist 1925 Kharkiv, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Metalist 1925 Kharkiv's form when playing away from home: 4W 5D 1L across 10 road games this term (1.70 PPG). Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 0.50 conceded per game. 5 away clean sheets from 10 games (50%) — they are as difficult to score against on the road as they are at home. Their away PPG of 1.70 is notably below their overall 2.30 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

The form figures are too closely matched to derive a directional pick: LNZ Cherkasy 2.20 PPG, Metalist 1925 Kharkiv 2.30 PPG. Look to other data sets to build the analysis.

Head to Head

There is little to separate the sides historically. From 3 previous meetings, LNZ Cherkasy have won 1, Metalist 1925 Kharkiv 1, with 1 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.

These sides have historically produced few goals — 1.3 per contest from 3 previous meetings. The Under 2.5 market has a well-supported historical case here. The most recent clash, on 25 Oct 2025, ended 1–0 with LNZ Cherkasy winning.

With a balanced win record and just 1.3 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

Trading Patterns

LNZ Cherkasy in-play and half-time data (27 games, 13 at home): they score before half-time in 77% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 50% of the time; BTTS occurs in 15% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 23% of games (home games); they keep a clean sheet 67% of the time.

Metalist 1925 Kharkiv in-play and half-time data (27 games, 13 at away): they score before half-time in 62% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 62% of the time; BTTS occurs in 38% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 31% of games (away games); they keep a clean sheet 59% of the time.

The in-play data supports BTTS No — both teams show low combined scoring rates (LNZ Cherkasy 22% | Metalist 1925 Kharkiv 30%). Under 2.5 goals has backing from the in-play data — both teams register low Over 2.5 rates (LNZ Cherkasy 30% | Metalist 1925 Kharkiv 22%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects LNZ Cherkasy 1.07 xG and Metalist 1925 Kharkiv 1.02 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: LNZ Cherkasy attack 1.095 / defence 0.936 | Metalist 1925 Kharkiv attack 0.901 / defence 0.780. League average goals — home 1.257 / away 1.206. Metalist 1925 Kharkiv's defence strength of 0.780 is below average — they are conceding at a rate that inflates the home xG figure. Data: 54 LNZ Cherkasy games / 24 Metalist 1925 Kharkiv games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: LNZ Cherkasy 36% | Draw 30% | Metalist 1925 Kharkiv 34%. Fair-value odds: LNZ Cherkasy 2.78 | Draw 3.33 | Metalist 1925 Kharkiv 2.94. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 30% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 35% | BTTS probability 42% | Total xG 2.09. Under 2.5 is the strongly backed market at 65% probability — total xG of 2.09 sits well below the 2.5 threshold. The model is projecting a tight, low-scoring match based on both sides' defensive quality. BTTS probability of 42% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is LNZ Cherkasy at 36% — marginal model lean. With a 30% draw probability, Draw No Bet on LNZ Cherkasy offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 2.09 xG in total — Under 2.5 at 35% — strong confidence, supported by form averaging 1.8 goals per game and H2H averaging 1.3 goals per meeting.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 42% on No. Form rates corroborate: LNZ Cherkasy 20% | Metalist 1925 Kharkiv 40% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights