Sign in Register

Ham-Kam 4-4 Bodo/Glimt – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Eliteserien · Regular Season - 21

Kick-off

Sun 3 Sep 2023

18:15

Venue

Briskeby Arena

Competition

Eliteserien

Norway

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Bodo/Glimt at 54% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt meet at Briskeby Arena in Eliteserien, Regular Season - 21. This fixture gets under way on Sunday 3 September 2023 at 18:15 UTC.

Form

Ham-Kam (all games): 5W 0D 5L across 10 Eliteserien fixtures this term — 1.50 PPG. Last five: W L L W W. Offensively they are averaging 1.50 goals per game, with 1.60 conceded. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. This season is still relatively young for Ham-Kam, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Ham-Kam's home record at Briskeby Arena: 5W 1D 4L from 10 Eliteserien appearances (1.60 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.30 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. At home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle.

Bodo/Glimt have collected 1.90 PPG across 10 Eliteserien outings this season: 6W 1D 3L. Last five: W W L L W. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.20 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Bodo/Glimt, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, Bodo/Glimt have gone 8W 0D 2L from 10 away fixtures this term (2.40 PPG). They are averaging 2.50 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context. Their away PPG of 2.40 exceeds their overall 1.90 — they actually perform better on the road than their aggregate form implies.

Both sides are running at similar form levels — 1.50 PPG for Ham-Kam against 1.90 for Bodo/Glimt. There is no clear form edge to exploit here; other signals need to take the lead.

H2H Analysis

Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 3 head-to-head meetings have produced 0 wins for Ham-Kam, 2 for Bodo/Glimt and 1 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.

Attacking output has been a hallmark of this fixture. At 3.0 goals per game across 3 meetings, the Over 2.5 has a statistically grounded case from the head-to-head record alone. The most recent clash, on 11 Jun 2023, ended 0–3 with Bodo/Glimt winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading

Ham-Kam half-time and goal-timing data (49 games, 25 at home): they score before half-time in 68% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 69% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 62% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 48% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 48% of games (home games).

Bodo/Glimt half-time and goal-timing data (49 games, 25 at away): they score before half-time in 84% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 100% of those occasions; they lead at the break 47% of the time; BTTS occurs in 64% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 72% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 61%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Ham-Kam 59% and Bodo/Glimt 65% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (Ham-Kam 59% | Bodo/Glimt 74%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Ham-Kam 1.27 xG and Bodo/Glimt 1.98 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Ham-Kam attack 0.843 / defence 1.005 | Bodo/Glimt attack 1.521 / defence 0.885. League average goals — home 1.710 / away 1.295. Bodo/Glimt have an above-average attack strength of 1.521 — the away xG of 1.98 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 49 Ham-Kam games / 49 Bodo/Glimt games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Ham-Kam 24% | Draw 22% | Bodo/Glimt 54%. Fair-value odds: Ham-Kam 4.17 | Draw 4.55 | Bodo/Glimt 1.85. Bodo/Glimt hold a narrow Poisson edge at 54% — the draw (22%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 63% | BTTS probability 62% | Total xG 3.26. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 63% — the 3.26 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 62% reflects that both xG figures (1.27 / 1.98) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Bodo/Glimt at 54% — moderate model lean. Draw probability of 22% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Bodo/Glimt if the outright odds are short.

Poisson projects 3.26 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 63% probability — strong conviction, supported by form averaging 3.1 goals per game and H2H averaging 3.0 goals per meeting.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 62% on Yes. Form rates are neutral: Ham-Kam 30% | Bodo/Glimt 60%.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–1D–2W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to Bodo/Glimt — H2H win rate 67% vs Poisson 54%.
Goals H2H (3.00 goals/game) and Poisson xG (3.26) both back Over 2.5 goals (63% Poisson probability).
Form Bodo/Glimt Poisson xG (1.98) is below their form scoring rate (2.50) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 63% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 62% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt | Competition: Eliteserien, Regular Season - 21 | Venue: Briskeby Arena • Kick-off: Sunday 3 Sep 2023, 18:15 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Ham-Kam 24% | Draw 22% | Bodo/Glimt 54% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 63% | BTTS 62% | xG Ham-Kam 1.27 / Bodo/Glimt 1.98 • Poisson strength factors: Ham-Kam attack 0.843 / def 1.005 | Bodo/Glimt attack 1.521 / def 0.885 | league avg home 1.710 / away 1.295 • Poisson stance: Bodo/Glimt (54%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.27

Ham-Kam xG

Expected Goals

1.98

Bodo/Glimt xG

24%
22%
54%
Ham-Kam Draw Bodo/Glimt

62%

BTTS

84%

Over 1.5

63%

Over 2.5

41%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt kick off?

Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt kicked off at 18:15 on Sunday 3 September 2023 at Briskeby Arena.

What was the final score in Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt?

Ham-Kam 4 - 4 Bodo/Glimt.

Where is Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt being played?

The match is being played at Briskeby Arena.

What competition is Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt part of?

Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt is a Regular Season - 21 fixture in the Eliteserien (Norway).

Who is favourite to win Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt?

Our statistical model gives Ham-Kam a 24% chance of winning, Bodo/Glimt a 54% chance, and a 22% chance of a draw — making Bodo/Glimt the favourite.

Will both teams score in Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt?

Our model estimates a 62% probability that both Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt will score (BTTS).

Will Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 63%.

What is the head-to-head record between Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt?

Record (3 meetings): Ham-Kam 0W | Draws 1 | Bodo/Glimt 2W.

What form are Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt in?

Ham-Kam (all comps): 5W-0D-5L in 10 | 1.50 PPG | GF 1.50 / GA 1.60 | L5 W-L-L-W-W. Bodo/Glimt (all comps): 6W-1D-3L in 10 | 1.90 PPG | GF 2.20 / GA 1.40 | L5 W-W-L-L-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

Ham-Kam's attacking strength (0.84x league average) is weighed against Bodo/Glimt's defensive record (0.89x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.27. Flip it around — Bodo/Glimt's attack (1.52x) against Ham-Kam's defence (1.00x) — and the away total comes out at 1.98.

These ratings are built from 49/49 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 11.0%. Close behind: 1-2 (9.6%), 0-2 (7.6%). Together the top three scorelines make up 28% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Bodo/Glimt Win

24%

Ham-Kam

4.09

22%

Draw

4.59

54%

Bodo/Glimt

1.86

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

9.7%

Draw

Most likely

1 – 2

9.6%

Away win

0 – 1

7.6%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.27

Ham-Kam xG

Total xG

3.26

1.98

Bodo/Glimt xG

24%
22%
54%
Ham-KamDrawBodo/Glimt

4.09

24%

Home win

4.59

22%

Draw

1.86

54%

Away win

Goals Markets

84%

Over 1.5

1.19

16%

Under 1.5

6.25

63%

Over 2.5

1.59

37%

Under 2.5

2.70

41%

Over 3.5

2.44

59%

Under 3.5

1.69

23%

Over 4.5

4.35

77%

Under 4.5

1.30

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

62%

BTTS Yes

1.61

38%

BTTS No

2.64

Clean Sheet

14%

Ham-Kam

7.25

28%

Bodo/Glimt

3.58

Win to Nil

3%

Ham-Kam

29.66

15%

Bodo/Glimt

6.65

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 3.9 7.6 7.6 5.0 2.5 1.0
1 4.9 9.7 9.6 6.4 3.2 1.2
2 3.1 6.2 6.1 4.1 2.0 0.8
3 1.3 2.6 2.6 1.7 0.9 0.3
4 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.1
5 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.275
λ Away (xG) 1.981
Total xG 3.256
League avg home goals 1.710
League avg away goals 1.295
Ham-Kam attack strength 0.843
Ham-Kam defence strength 1.005
Bodo/Glimt attack strength 1.521
Bodo/Glimt defence strength 0.885
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 49 / 49

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 11.0%.

How many goals are Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt expected to score?

The model projects 1.27 expected goals for Ham-Kam and 1.98 for Bodo/Glimt, a combined total of 3.26.

How confident is the prediction model for Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 54%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Ham-Kam's recent record stands at 13W 14D 22L from 49 games, a 1.08 PPG return, with W-L-L-W-W in the last five. The sample for Ham-Kam is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Bodo/Glimt, meanwhile, have gone 32W 8D 9L across 49 games — 2.12 PPG, with W-W-L-L-W in their last five. The sample for Bodo/Glimt is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

The points-per-game comparison favours Bodo/Glimt by 1.04 — a real, if not enormous, edge over Ham-Kam heading into this one.

Home & Away Splits

At home specifically, Ham-Kam have managed 9W 7D 9L from 25 games — 1.36 PPG in front of their own supporters.

Bodo/Glimt's away record stands at 18W 0D 7L across 25 trips, a 2.16 PPG haul.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Bodo/Glimt come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Ham-Kam are averaging 1.18 goals scored and 1.67 conceded per game recently; Bodo/Glimt are on 2.73 scored and 1.29 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Bodo/Glimt in 65%.

Last 49 Results — Eliteserien

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Ham-Kam

Ham-Kam

Blended
W L L W W
Bodo/Glimt

Bodo/Glimt

Blended
W W L L W
49 Played 49
13/14/22 W / D / L 32/8/9
1.08 Points Per Game 2.12
1.18 Avg Goals Scored 2.73
1.67 Avg Goals Conceded 1.29
2.86 Avg Goals / Game 4.02
10 Clean Sheets 14
29 BTTS 32
29 Over 2.5 Games 36
Ham-Kam

Ham-Kam

W
H Rosenborg
3–0 HT 2–0
20 Aug
W
A Aalesund
2–0 HT 1–0
13 Aug
L
H Brann
0–2 HT 0–2
06 Aug
L
A Lillestrom
1–3 HT 1–2
30 Jul
W
H Stabaek
3–2 HT 1–0
23 Jul
W
A Sarpsborg 08 FF
3–2 HT 3–2
16 Jul
W
H Aalesund
2–1 HT 0–0
07 Jul
L
A Brann
1–2 HT 0–1
02 Jul
L
H ODD Ballklubb
0–1 HT 0–0
25 Jun
L
A Bodo/Glimt
0–3 HT 0–0
11 Jun
L
A Rosenborg
0–4 HT 0–1
04 Jun
D
H Lillestrom
0–0 HT 0–0
29 May
L
A Valerenga
0–3 HT 0–3
16 May
L
H Tromso
1–2 HT 0–1
13 May
L
H Molde
0–4 HT 0–1
07 May
L
A Viking
3–7 HT 1–0
30 Apr
W
H Stromsgodset
2–0 HT 0–0
23 Apr
L
A Haugesund
2–3 HT 0–1
16 Apr
W
H Sandefjord
2–0 HT 2–0
10 Apr
L
A Lillestrom
1–3 HT 1–1
13 Nov
L
H Tromso
1–2 HT 0–0
06 Nov
W
A Sandefjord
2–1 HT 1–0
30 Oct
D
H Stromsgodset
1–1 HT 1–1
22 Oct
D
A Aalesund
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Oct
L
A Molde
0–5 HT 0–4
09 Oct
W
H jerv
2–1 HT 1–0
02 Oct
L
A ODD Ballklubb
0–2 HT 0–0
17 Sep
L
H Viking
1–2 HT 1–1
11 Sep
L
A Sarpsborg 08 FF
1–2 HT 1–0
04 Sep
W
H Haugesund
1–0 HT 1–0
28 Aug
D
A Bodo/Glimt
2–2 HT 0–1
20 Aug
D
H Valerenga
1–1 HT 0–1
14 Aug
L
A Rosenborg
1–2 HT 1–1
06 Aug
L
H Kristiansund BK
0–1 HT 0–1
30 Jul
D
A Stromsgodset
1–1 HT 0–0
24 Jul
L
H Bodo/Glimt
0–2 HT 0–0
16 Jul
D
A Haugesund
1–1 HT 1–1
10 Jul
D
H Molde
0–0 HT 0–0
03 Jul
W
H Sarpsborg 08 FF
3–2 HT 2–2
26 Jun
W
A jerv
2–1 HT 2–0
19 Jun
L
H ODD Ballklubb
1–2 HT 0–2
28 May
D
A Viking
1–1 HT 0–1
25 May
D
H Rosenborg
1–1 HT 0–1
22 May
D
A Valerenga
1–1 HT 0–0
16 May
D
H Aalesund
0–0 HT 0–0
08 May
D
A Kristiansund BK
2–2 HT 1–1
24 Apr
W
H Sandefjord
3–0 HT 1–0
18 Apr
L
A Tromso
1–2 HT 1–1
10 Apr
D
H Lillestrom
2–2 HT 2–0
02 Apr
Bodo/Glimt

Bodo/Glimt

W
A Haugesund
3–1 HT 0–0
20 Aug
L
A Viking
2–3 HT 2–2
06 Aug
L
H Tromso
0–2 HT 0–1
30 Jul
W
A Sandefjord
5–2 HT 3–2
23 Jul
W
H Haugesund
2–1 HT 0–1
16 Jul
W
A ODD Ballklubb
2–0 HT 1–0
09 Jul
D
H Molde
2–2 HT 0–2
02 Jul
L
A Stromsgodset
0–2 HT 0–1
25 Jun
W
H Ham-Kam
3–0 HT 0–0
11 Jun
W
A Valerenga
3–1 HT 1–0
04 Jun
W
H Viking
5–1 HT 2–0
29 May
W
A Tromso
3–2 HT 2–1
16 May
W
H Rosenborg
3–2 HT 2–1
13 May
W
A Lillestrom
2–1 HT 0–0
07 May
W
H ODD Ballklubb
2–0 HT 0–0
03 May
D
H Brann
2–2 HT 0–2
29 Apr
W
A Aalesund
3–0 HT 2–0
23 Apr
W
H Stabaek
4–0 HT 3–0
16 Apr
W
A Sarpsborg 08 FF
2–0 HT 2–0
10 Apr
W
A Stromsgodset
4–2 HT 1–1
13 Nov
W
H Viking
5–4 HT 2–2
06 Nov
L
A Rosenborg
2–3 HT 1–0
30 Oct
W
H Kristiansund BK
5–0 HT 2–0
23 Oct
W
A Valerenga
6–0 HT 3–0
16 Oct
W
H Sandefjord
4–1 HT 0–1
09 Oct
W
A Lillestrom
4–1 HT 1–1
01 Oct
D
H Haugesund
1–1 HT 0–0
18 Sep
L
A Tromso
2–3 HT 0–2
11 Sep
L
H Molde
1–4 HT 1–2
03 Sep
W
A jerv
2–0 HT 1–0
27 Aug
D
H Ham-Kam
2–2 HT 1–0
20 Aug
W
A Sarpsborg 08 FF
4–1 HT 2–0
12 Aug
W
H ODD Ballklubb
7–0 HT 4–0
06 Aug
W
A Aalesund
2–1 HT 2–1
30 Jul
W
H jerv
5–0 HT 4–0
23 Jul
W
A Ham-Kam
2–0 HT 0–0
16 Jul
W
H Sarpsborg 08 FF
4–1 HT 2–1
09 Jul
L
A ODD Ballklubb
2–3 HT 1–1
02 Jul
W
H Aalesund
2–0 HT 0–0
26 Jun
W
A Kristiansund BK
2–0 HT 0–0
18 Jun
L
A Molde
1–3 HT 0–1
29 May
D
H Stromsgodset
2–2 HT 2–1
25 May
W
A Haugesund
4–1 HT 3–0
22 May
D
H Tromso
1–1 HT 0–0
16 May
D
H Lillestrom
1–1 HT 0–1
08 May
L
A Viking
0–2 HT 0–1
24 Apr
W
H Valerenga
5–1 HT 2–0
18 Apr
W
A Sandefjord
2–1 HT 1–0
10 Apr
D
H Rosenborg
2–2 HT 0–1
03 Apr

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt in coming into this match?

Ham-Kam have gone 13W 14D 22L in their last 49 games (1.08 PPG), while Bodo/Glimt have gone 32W 8D 9L in their last 49 (2.12 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Ham-Kam at home or Bodo/Glimt away?

Bodo/Glimt's away record (2.16 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Ham-Kam at home: 1.36 PPG; Bodo/Glimt away: 2.16 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 9 times since July 2022 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Eliteserien. The two were last together as recently as 22 July 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Records & Recent Trends

Bodo/Glimt have won the last 4 meetings between these two, a run that gives them the psychological edge coming in.

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Bodo/Glimt won 3-0 on 11 Jun 2023, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Ham-Kam have gone 1W 1D 2L from 4 meetings on their own ground against Bodo/Glimt — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 9 Meetings

Ham-Kam

1

Ham-Kam

2

Draws

Bodo/Glimt

6

Bodo/Glimt

Recent Meetings

Bodo/Glimt
3–0
22 Jul 26
Ham-Kam
Ham-Kam
1–3
03 Aug 25
Bodo/Glimt
Bodo/Glimt
3–0
05 Apr 25
Ham-Kam
Bodo/Glimt
3–0
13 Sep 24
Ham-Kam
Ham-Kam
1–0
20 May 24
Bodo/Glimt
Ham-Kam
4–4
03 Sep 23
Bodo/Glimt
Bodo/Glimt
3–0
11 Jun 23
Ham-Kam
Bodo/Glimt
2–2
20 Aug 22
Ham-Kam
Ham-Kam
0–2
16 Jul 22
Bodo/Glimt

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt?

From 9 meetings on record, Ham-Kam have won 1, Bodo/Glimt have won 6, and 2 have been drawn.

When did Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt last play each other?

They last met on 22 July 2026, when Bodo/Glimt 3-0 Ham-Kam.

Who has won more matches between Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt?

Bodo/Glimt have the better head-to-head record, with 6 wins from 9 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Ham-Kam are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 68% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 28% of the time.

Bodo/Glimt are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 84% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 52% of the time.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Ham-Kam 48%, Bodo/Glimt 64% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 48% for Ham-Kam and 72% for Bodo/Glimt. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 16% and 56% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Ham-Kam keep a clean sheet in 32% of their matches; Ham-Kam have failed to score in 32% of games.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Ham-Kam home games / Bodo/Glimt away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Ham-Kam Ham-Kam Blended
Metric All
(49 games)
Venue
(25 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 36/49
(73.5%)
17/25
(68%)
2+ Goals Before HT 18/49
(36.7%)
8/25
(32%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 9/13
(69.2%)
5/8
(62.5%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 8/13
(61.5%)
4/8
(50%)
Winning at HT 13/49
(26.5%)
7/25
(28%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/49
(6.1%)
1/25
(4%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/49
(8.2%)
2/25
(8%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 29/49
(59.2%)
12/25
(48%)
Over 2.5 Goals 29/49
(59.2%)
12/25
(48%)
Over 3.5 Goals 13/49
(26.5%)
4/25
(16%)
Clean Sheet 10/49
(20.4%)
8/25
(32%)
Failed to Score 14/49
(28.6%)
8/25
(32%)
Bodo/Glimt Bodo/Glimt Blended
Metric All
(49 games)
Venue
(25 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 40/49
(81.6%)
21/25
(84%)
2+ Goals Before HT 26/49
(53.1%)
13/25
(52%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 9/9
(100%)
4/4
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 9/9
(100%)
4/4
(100%)
Winning at HT 23/49
(46.9%)
13/25
(52%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/49
(6.1%)
1/25
(4%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/49
(12.2%)
0/25
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 32/49
(65.3%)
16/25
(64%)
Over 2.5 Goals 36/49
(73.5%)
18/25
(72%)
Over 3.5 Goals 30/49
(61.2%)
14/25
(56%)
Clean Sheet 14/49
(28.6%)
7/25
(28%)
Failed to Score 3/49
(6.1%)
2/25
(8%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Ham-Kam play Bodo/Glimt?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 48% of Ham-Kam's games and 64% of Bodo/Glimt's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 48% of Ham-Kam's matches and 72% of Bodo/Glimt's.

Do Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt tend to score early?

Ham-Kam have had a goal before half-time in 68% of their recent matches, Bodo/Glimt in 84% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt share the spoils in a 4-4 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt finished level at 4-4 at Briskeby Arena, Regular Season - 21, in the Eliteserien. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Ham-Kam 1.27 xG and Bodo/Glimt 1.98 xG, a combined 3.26. The scoreboard read 4-4 for 8 actual goals. Ham-Kam beat their projection by 2.7 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Bodo/Glimt outscored their 1.98 projection by 2.0. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Ham-Kam attack 0.84 / defence 1.00 against Bodo/Glimt attack 1.52 / defence 0.89, drawn from 49/49 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Ham-Kam 24% | Draw 22% | Bodo/Glimt 54%, with Bodo/Glimt to win its most likely call at 54%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 22% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 63%. The game delivered 8, so it went over — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 84% and landed. Over 3.5 was 41% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 62% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 66% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Ham-Kam 59%, Bodo/Glimt 74%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 62%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Ham-Kam's trading profile (49 games, 25 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 59% of their matches — today it did.

Bodo/Glimt's trading profile (49 games, 25 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 65% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, Bodo/Glimt arrived the stronger side — 2.12 PPG against 1.08. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Ham-Kam (home/away splits) scored 4 against a 1.20 average — above their attacking norm and shipped 4 against a 1.16 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Bodo/Glimt (home/away splits) scored 4 against a 2.56 average — above their attacking norm and shipped 4 against a 1.32 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 63% Over 2.5 probability, 8 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 62% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 66% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.