Aalesund 0-3 Bodo/Glimt – Result & Analysis

Poisson rates Bodo/Glimt at 44% — the head-to-head data provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Aalesund vs Bodo/Glimt encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Aalesund and Bodo/Glimt meet at Color Line Stadion in Eliteserien (matchday 3). This fixture gets under way on Sunday 23 April 2023 at 17:00 UK time.

Current Form

Aalesund's record over their last 10 games: 5W 2D 3L (1.70 PPG). Last five: W W L W D. They are averaging 1.10 goals per game and conceding 1.50 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings (30%).

Aalesund at home: 4W 3D 3L from their last 10 home games — 1.50 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 1.00 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. 4 home clean sheets from their last 10 home games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Bodo/Glimt have collected 1.90 PPG across their last 10 games: 6W 1D 3L. Last five: W W L W W. Their attacking form is sharp — 3.40 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings (20%). Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — a high rate that makes Yes a well-evidenced angle from their form.

Bodo/Glimt's form when playing away from home: 7W 0D 3L across their last 10 road games (2.10 PPG). They are averaging 3.00 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

A near-identical PPG reading — 1.70 for Aalesund, 1.90 for Bodo/Glimt — means the form record is uninstructive on result selection. The goals and market sections will carry greater evidential weight.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (from Aalesund's last 10 home games and Bodo/Glimt's last 10 away games) — Aalesund have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, Bodo/Glimt in 70%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H Analysis

The head-to-head sample leans to Bodo/Glimt, who have 4 wins from 4 H2H matches compared to 0 for the hosts, with 0 draws.

Goals have been a feature of this fixture — the 4 H2H matches in our data averaged 4.8 per game, which gives Over 2.5 a solid head-to-head foundation. The most recent of those, on 30 Jul 2022, ended Aalesund 1–2 Bodo/Glimt — a Bodo/Glimt win.

The H2H data backs the away side. Bodo/Glimt have won 4 of 4 H2H matches, and at 4.8 goals per game the goals market also points upward — the away win and Over 2.5 combination has a head-to-head case.

Trading & In-Play

Aalesund — key trading statistics (last 30 games, 15 of them at home): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 47% of their matches in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 75% of the time; of the 6 games they led at half-time, they failed to win 50%; BTTS occurs in 60% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 53% of games (home games); they fail to score in 33% of games.

Bodo/Glimt — key trading statistics (last 30 games, 15 of them away): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 87% of their matches in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 100% of those occasions; they lead at the break 47% of the time; of the 7 games they trailed at half-time, they recovered to draw or win 43%; BTTS occurs in 67% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 73% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 67%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Aalesund 53% and Bodo/Glimt 70% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (Aalesund 60% | Bodo/Glimt 73%). There is an in-play dynamic worth noting: Aalesund surrender their half-time lead 50% of the time, while Bodo/Glimt have come from behind at the break to draw or win in 43% of cases — a combination that makes laying the hosts at HT a potential angle.

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Aalesund 1.03 xG and Bodo/Glimt 1.35 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Aalesund attack 0.765 / defence 0.990 | Bodo/Glimt attack 1.322 / defence 0.812. League average goals — home 1.666 / away 1.031. Aalesund's attack rating of 0.765 is below the league average, which holds their xG down at 1.03. Bodo/Glimt have an above-average attack rating of 1.322, which lifts their away xG to 1.35. Data: built from Aalesund's last 32 games and Bodo/Glimt's last 32. Some of those games are older results, so treat these probabilities as directional rather than precise.

Result probabilities: Aalesund 29% | Draw 27% | Bodo/Glimt 44%. Fair-value odds: Aalesund 3.48 | Draw 3.66 | Bodo/Glimt 2.27. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome reaches 45%. The draw at 27% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 43% | BTTS Yes probability 48% | Total xG 2.38. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 57% — total xG of 2.38 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS No at 52% is only a slight lean — the model gives both sides a fair chance of scoring, so No isn't a clear standalone call.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates Bodo/Glimt as the most likely outcome at 44% — marginal model lean. The head-to-head data (Bodo/Glimt 4 wins from 4 H2H matches) corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 27% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Bodo/Glimt if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 29% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.38 combined xG gives a 57% probability to Under 2.5 — low conviction — though recent form (Aalesund's last 10 home games and Bodo/Glimt's last 10 away games) averaging 3.2 goals per game and the H2H data averaging 4.8 goals per game across 4 H2H matches point the other way.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is No at 52%. This conflicts with form data — both teams scored in: Aalesund 60% (last 10 home games) | Bodo/Glimt 70% (last 10 away games), a notable divergence.

The Poisson model's sample (Aalesund 32 games, Bodo/Glimt 32) includes some older results, so its projections carry extra uncertainty — weight recent form and the odds accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights