🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Zaglebie Lubin at 38%, yet other data sources diverge — this Zaglebie Lubin vs Raków Częstochowa fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

KGHM Zaglebie Arena plays host to Zaglebie Lubin versus Raków Częstochowa in Ekstraklasa, Regular Season - 21. Kick-off: Saturday 14 February 2026 at 16:30 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Zaglebie Lubin have collected 1.80 PPG across 10 Ekstraklasa outings this season: 5W 3D 2L. Last five: D W W L W. They are averaging 1.20 goals per game and conceding 1.10 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. This season is still relatively young for Zaglebie Lubin, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Zaglebie Lubin at KGHM Zaglebie Arena this season: 5W 4D 1L from 10 home games — 1.90 PPG on home soil. They are averaging 2.20 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Raków Częstochowa (all games): 5W 1D 4L across 10 Ekstraklasa outings this term — 1.60 points per game. Last five: W W L L D. They are scoring at 1.50 per game and conceding 1.20. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Raków Częstochowa, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Raków Częstochowa away from home this season: 6W 0D 4L from 10 away games — 1.80 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 1.70 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

A near-identical PPG reading — 1.80 for Zaglebie Lubin, 1.60 for Raków Częstochowa — means the form record is uninstructive on result selection. The goals and market sections will carry greater evidential weight.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Zaglebie Lubin have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, Raków Częstochowa in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H Analysis

Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 9 head-to-head meetings have produced 3 wins for Zaglebie Lubin, 5 for Raków Częstochowa and 1 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 2.9 per game across 9 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 14 Dec 2025, ended 1–0 with Zaglebie Lubin winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 2.9 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading

Zaglebie Lubin half-time and goal-timing data (54 games, 27 at home): they score before half-time in 78% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 85% of the time; BTTS occurs in 56% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 59% of games (home games).

Raków Częstochowa half-time and goal-timing data (54 games, 27 at away): they score before half-time in 63% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 74% of the time; BTTS occurs in 41% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 37% of games (away games); they keep a clean sheet 41% of the time.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Zaglebie Lubin 56% versus Raków Częstochowa 46%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Zaglebie Lubin 52% | Raków Częstochowa 43%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Zaglebie Lubin 1.49 xG and Raków Częstochowa 1.43 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Zaglebie Lubin attack 1.035 / defence 0.976 | Raków Częstochowa attack 1.234 / defence 0.976. League average goals — home 1.476 / away 1.186. Raków Częstochowa have an above-average attack strength of 1.234 — the away xG of 1.43 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 54 Zaglebie Lubin games / 54 Raków Częstochowa games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Zaglebie Lubin 38% | Draw 27% | Raków Częstochowa 35%. Fair-value odds: Zaglebie Lubin 2.63 | Draw 3.70 | Raków Częstochowa 2.86. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 27% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 56% | BTTS probability 60% | Total xG 2.92. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 56% — the 2.92 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 60% reflects that both xG figures (1.49 / 1.43) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, Zaglebie Lubin are the pick at 38% — marginal model lean. Draw probability of 27% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Zaglebie Lubin if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.92 combined xG gives a 56% probability to Over 2.5 — strong, supported by form averaging 3.2 goals per game and H2H averaging 2.9 goals per meeting.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 60%. Form rates corroborate: Zaglebie Lubin 60% | Raków Częstochowa 60% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights