Bodo/Glimt 1-1 Haugesund – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson rates Bodo/Glimt at 61% — recent form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Bodo/Glimt vs Haugesund encounter.
✍️ Match Preview
Match Analysis
Bodo/Glimt host Haugesund at Aspmyra Stadion in Eliteserien (matchday 23). Kick-off is Sunday 18 September 2022 at 18:00 UK time.
Form Guide
Bodo/Glimt — last 10 games: 7W 1D 2L, averaging 2.20 points per game. Last five: W D W L L. They are averaging 3.10 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.
Bodo/Glimt's home record over their last 10 home games: 5W 4D 1L (1.90 PPG). They are averaging 3.00 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.
Across their last 10 games, Haugesund have recorded 5W 1D 4L — 1.60 PPG. Last five: W L L W W. Their scoring rate of 1.30 per game is modest, conceding 1.00 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.
Haugesund's form when playing away from home: 2W 2D 6L across their last 10 road games (0.80 PPG). Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. Their away PPG of 0.80 is notably below their overall 1.60 — form away from home has been a clear weakness recently.
Bodo/Glimt are in the better shape of the two on recent form — 0.60 PPG ahead (2.20 vs 1.60). That form margin is the baseline of a sensible selection even before other signals are layered in.
H2H Record
The H2H picture is flat: the 3 H2H matches we hold have produced 2 wins for Bodo/Glimt, 0 for Haugesund and 1 draw. Form and model data should carry more weight here. With only 3 H2H matches to go on, treat this as a light input.
Goals have been a feature of this fixture — the 3 H2H matches in our data averaged 3.7 per game, which gives Over 2.5 a solid head-to-head foundation. The most recent of those, on 22 May 2022, ended Bodo/Glimt 4–1 Haugesund — a Bodo/Glimt win.
With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H signal is in the goals market — at 3.7 goals per game, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle from the head-to-head data.
In-Play Profile
Bodo/Glimt in-play tendencies (last 52 games, 25 of them at home): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 76% of their matches in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 94% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 69% of those occasions; of the 9 games they trailed at half-time, they recovered to draw or win 44%; BTTS occurs in 60% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 60% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 42%.
Haugesund in-play tendencies (last 52 games, 25 of them away): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 60% of their matches in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 71% of the time; of the 11 games they led at half-time, they failed to win 27%; BTTS occurs in 56% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 52% of games (away games).
BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Bodo/Glimt 56% versus Haugesund 60%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Bodo/Glimt 58% | Haugesund 64%). Note also that Haugesund surrender HT leads in 27% of cases while Bodo/Glimt recover from half-time deficits to draw or win 44% of the time — a dynamic that could influence in-play positioning.
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects Bodo/Glimt 2.32 xG and Haugesund 1.24 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Bodo/Glimt attack 1.428 / defence 1.038 | Haugesund attack 0.876 / defence 0.923. League average goals — home 1.760 / away 1.367. Bodo/Glimt carry an above-average attack rating of 1.428 — their 2.32 xG reflects attacking quality above the league norm. Data: built from Bodo/Glimt's last 52 games and Haugesund's last 52.
Result probabilities: Bodo/Glimt 61% | Draw 19% | Haugesund 19%. Fair-value odds: Bodo/Glimt 1.63 | Draw 5.21 | Haugesund 5.16. The model has a clear lean to Bodo/Glimt (61%) — a 42pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 69% | BTTS Yes probability 64% | Total xG 3.56. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 69% — a total xG of 3.56 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 64% — both xG figures (2.32 / 1.24) are high enough that each side is projected to find the net.
Analysis Verdict
On the Poisson output, Bodo/Glimt are the pick at 61% — clear model lean. Recent form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 19% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.
On the goals line, Poisson's 3.56 combined xG gives a 69% probability to Over 2.5 — strong conviction, supported by recent form (Bodo/Glimt's last 10 home games and Haugesund's last 10 away games) averaging 3.5 goals per game and the H2H data averaging 3.7 goals per game across 3 H2H matches.
Poisson assigns a 64% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate — both teams scored in: Bodo/Glimt 70% (last 10 home games) | Haugesund 50% (last 10 away games).
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: Bodo/Glimt vs Haugesund | Competition: Eliteserien, matchday 23 | Venue: Aspmyra Stadion • Kick-off: Sunday 18 September 2022 at 18:00 UK time • Data inputs: head-to-head data, recent form (overall and home/away), the Poisson prediction model and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: Bodo/Glimt 61% | Draw 19% | Haugesund 19% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 69% (Under 31%) | BTTS Yes 64% (No 36%) | xG Bodo/Glimt 2.32 / Haugesund 1.24 • Poisson strength factors: Bodo/Glimt attack 1.428 / def 1.038 | Haugesund attack 0.876 / def 0.923 | league avg home 1.760 / away 1.367 • Poisson stance: Bodo/Glimt (61%) — strong lean
🧮 Prediction Model
2.32
Bodo/Glimt xG
Expected Goals
1.24
Haugesund xG
64%
BTTS
87%
Over 1.5
69%
Over 2.5
48%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Bodo/Glimt vs Haugesund FAQs
What time does Bodo/Glimt vs Haugesund kick off?
Bodo/Glimt vs Haugesund kicked off at 18:00 UK time on Sunday 18 September 2022 at Aspmyra Stadion.
What was the final score in Bodo/Glimt vs Haugesund?
Bodo/Glimt 1 - 1 Haugesund.
Where is Bodo/Glimt vs Haugesund being played?
The match is being played at Aspmyra Stadion.
What competition is Bodo/Glimt vs Haugesund part of?
Bodo/Glimt vs Haugesund is a Eliteserien fixture (matchday 23) (Norway).
Who is favourite to win Bodo/Glimt vs Haugesund?
Our statistical model gives Bodo/Glimt a 61% chance of winning, Haugesund a 19% chance, and a 19% chance of a draw — making Bodo/Glimt the favourite.
Will both teams score in Bodo/Glimt vs Haugesund?
Our model estimates a 64% probability that both Bodo/Glimt and Haugesund will score, so it leans towards BTTS Yes.
Will Bodo/Glimt vs Haugesund have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 69%, so it leans towards over 2.5 goals.
🧮 Model Insight
Model Mechanics
Working from Bodo/Glimt's attack rating (1.43) and Haugesund's defence rating (0.92), the model arrives at 2.32 expected goals for the home side. The same calculation in reverse, Haugesund's attack versus Bodo/Glimt's defence, projects 1.24 expected goals for the visitors.
These ratings are built from Bodo/Glimt's last 52 games and Haugesund's last 52 — a full enough recent sample to trust.
The Exact-Score Picture
Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 2-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 9.5%. Close behind: 1-1 (9.2%), 2-0 (7.6%). Together the top three scorelines make up 26% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.
Most Likely Outcome
Bodo/Glimt Win
61%
1.63
19%
5.21
19%
5.16
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
2 β 1
9.5%
Home win
Most likely
1 β 1
8.2%
Draw
2 β 0
7.6%
Home win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
2.32
Bodo/Glimt xG
Total xG
3.56
1.24
Haugesund xG
1.63
61%
Home win
5.21
19%
Draw
5.16
19%
Away win
Goals Markets
87%
Over 1.5
1.15
13%
Under 1.5
7.69
69%
Over 2.5
1.45
31%
Under 2.5
3.23
48%
Over 3.5
2.08
52%
Under 3.5
1.92
29%
Over 4.5
3.45
71%
Under 4.5
1.41
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
64%
BTTS Yes
1.56
36%
BTTS No
2.79
Clean Sheet
29%
3.47
10%
10.18
Win to Nil
18%
5.65
2%
52.53
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2.8 | 3.5 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 1 | 6.6 | 8.2 | 5.1 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| 2 | 7.6 | 9.5 | 5.9 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| 3 | 5.9 | 7.3 | 4.6 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.1 |
| 4 | 3.4 | 4.3 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 5 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | – |
Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Bodo/Glimt vs Haugesund Prediction FAQs
What is the most likely scoreline for Bodo/Glimt vs Haugesund?
Our Poisson model rates 2-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 9.5%.
How many goals are Bodo/Glimt and Haugesund expected to score?
The model projects 2.32 expected goals for Bodo/Glimt and 1.24 for Haugesund, a combined total of 3.56.
How confident is the prediction model for Bodo/Glimt vs Haugesund?
Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 61%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.
📈 Form Insight
Where Both Sides Stand
Bodo/Glimt's recent record stands at 30W 14D 8L from 52 games, a 2.00 PPG return, with W-D-W-L-L in the last five.
Haugesund, meanwhile, have gone 17W 12D 23L across 52 games — 1.21 PPG, with W-L-L-W-W in their last five.
The points-per-game comparison favours Bodo/Glimt by 0.79 — a real, if not enormous, edge over Haugesund heading into this one.
Home Ground vs the Road
At home specifically, Bodo/Glimt have managed 14W 9D 2L from their last 25 home games — 2.04 PPG in front of their own supporters.
Haugesund's away record stands at 3W 7D 15L across their last 25 away games, a 0.64 PPG haul. That's a step down from their 1.21 PPG overall record — away form has been the weaker part of Haugesund's recent record.
Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Bodo/Glimt come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.
The Goals Picture
Bodo/Glimt are averaging 2.19 goals scored and 1.04 conceded per game recently; Haugesund are on 1.52 scored and 1.52 conceded.
Defensively: Bodo/Glimt have kept a clean sheet in 37% of their games — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.
Last 52 Results
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
Bodo/Glimt
Blended
Haugesund
Blended
Bodo/Glimt (Home) vs Haugesund (Away)
Home games only for the home side · Away games only for the away side
Bodo/Glimt
Blended
Haugesund
Blended
❓ Bodo/Glimt vs Haugesund Form FAQs
What form are Bodo/Glimt and Haugesund in coming into this match?
Bodo/Glimt have gone 30W 14D 8L in their last 52 games (2.00 PPG), while Haugesund have gone 17W 12D 23L in their last 52 (1.21 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — Bodo/Glimt at home or Haugesund away?
Bodo/Glimt's home record (2.04 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Bodo/Glimt at home: 2.04 PPG; Haugesund away: 0.64 PPG.
Have Bodo/Glimt or Haugesund been keeping clean sheets recently?
Bodo/Glimt have kept a clean sheet in 37% of their recent games, Haugesund in 21%.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
A Look Back
The head-to-head numbers here are drawn from the 10 H2H matches in our data, going back to May 2021. All of them came in Eliteserien. The most recent in our data was on 5 October 2025, some 1 year back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.
Digging Into the Numbers
Bodo/Glimt have won the most recent 6 H2H matches in our data — the current momentum in this pairing sits with them.
The biggest gap in our H2H data came on 1 Jun 2025, when Bodo/Glimt won Haugesund 0-4 Bodo/Glimt.
Bodo/Glimt's record when hosting Haugesund specifically: 4W 1D 0L from 5 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.
Last 10 Meetings
8
Bodo/Glimt
2
Draws
0
Haugesund
Recent Meetings
❓ Bodo/Glimt vs Haugesund H2H FAQs
What is the head-to-head record between Bodo/Glimt and Haugesund?
Across the 10 head-to-head matches in our data, Bodo/Glimt have won 8, Haugesund have won 0, and 2 have been drawn.
When did Bodo/Glimt and Haugesund last play each other?
The most recent meeting in our data was on 5 October 2025: Bodo/Glimt 2-0 Haugesund.
Who has won more matches between Bodo/Glimt and Haugesund?
Bodo/Glimt have the better head-to-head record, with 8 wins from the 10 head-to-head matches in our data.
📈 Trading Insight
Half-Time Trends
Bodo/Glimt are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 76% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 52% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 23% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 67% of those situations.
Haugesund are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 60% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 11% of those situations.
The Numbers That Matter
BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Bodo/Glimt 60%, Haugesund 56% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.
Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 60% (Bodo/Glimt) and 52% (Haugesund). Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 52% and 28% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.
On the defensive side: Bodo/Glimt keep a clean sheet in 36% of their matches; Haugesund in 40%.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = Bodo/Glimt home games / Haugesund away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β shown as β where unavailable.
❓ Bodo/Glimt vs Haugesund Trading FAQs
Do both teams usually score in Bodo/Glimt and Haugesund matches?
Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 60% of Bodo/Glimt's games and 56% of Haugesund's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.
Are Bodo/Glimt and Haugesund matches usually high-scoring?
Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 60% of Bodo/Glimt's matches and 52% of Haugesund's.
Do Bodo/Glimt and Haugesund matches tend to have early goals?
There has been at least one first-half goal in 76% of Bodo/Glimt's recent matches and 60% of Haugesund's — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
Bodo/Glimt and Haugesund share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Bodo/Glimt and Haugesund finished level at 1-1 at Aspmyra Stadion, Regular Season - 23, in the Eliteserien. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Bodo/Glimt 2.32 xG and Haugesund 1.24 xG, a combined 3.56. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. Bodo/Glimt fell 1.3 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Bodo/Glimt attack 1.43 / defence 1.04 against Haugesund attack 0.88 / defence 0.92, drawn from 52/52 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Bodo/Glimt 61% | Draw 19% | Haugesund 19%, with Bodo/Glimt to win its most likely call at 61%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 19% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 69%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 87% and landed. Over 3.5 was 48% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 64% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 61% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Bodo/Glimt 58%, Haugesund 64%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 58%, which matched the both-scored outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Bodo/Glimt's trading profile (52 games, 25 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 56% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 36% of the time, and conceded here.
Haugesund's trading profile (52 games, 25 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 60% of their matches — today it did.
Form vs Result
On form, Bodo/Glimt arrived the stronger side — 2.00 PPG against 1.21. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Bodo/Glimt (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 2.52 scoring average — below par going forward.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit), form (miss). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.