🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates NEC Nijmegen at 62% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this NEC Nijmegen vs Utrecht encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

NEC Nijmegen and Utrecht meet at Goffertstadion in Eredivisie, Regular Season - 18. This fixture gets under way on Wednesday 11 February 2026 at 20:00 UTC.

Current Form

NEC Nijmegen's overall Eredivisie record this term: 8W 2D 0L from 10 games (2.60 PPG). Last five: D W W W W. They are averaging 2.90 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 90% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone. This season is still relatively young for NEC Nijmegen, so this record blends games from this season and last.

In front of their own supporters this season, NEC Nijmegen have posted 7W 2D 1L at Goffertstadion — 2.30 PPG. They are averaging 2.90 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Utrecht have collected 0.80 PPG across 10 Eredivisie outings this season: 1W 5D 4L. Last five: L L L D L. Their scoring rate of 1.00 per game is modest, conceding 1.30 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play. This season is still relatively young for Utrecht, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Utrecht's away record: 1W 4D 5L from 10 road trips in Eredivisie this season (0.70 PPG). Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.70 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

The points-per-game gap of 1.80 in NEC Nijmegen's favour (2.60 vs 0.80) is a statistically meaningful difference. The hosts are the form pick here, with draw protection the sensible hedge given the away side's competitiveness.

The BTTS picture is exceptionally clear (using home/away splits) — NEC Nijmegen register both teams scoring in 70% of relevant games, Utrecht in 80%. Both sides above 70% makes BTTS Yes one of the strongest standalone angles in this fixture.

H2H Analysis

The head-to-head ledger leans to Utrecht, who have claimed 5 wins from 9 meetings compared to 2 for the hosts, with 2 draws.

The 9 previous meetings have averaged 1.9 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 2 Nov 2025, ended 0–1 with Utrecht winning.

It is worth noting that Utrecht have a superior record in this fixture despite their visitor status — 5 wins from 9 meetings. Home advantage alone is not a sufficient reason to dismiss that track record.

Trading Data

NEC Nijmegen goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (55 games, 26 at home): they score before half-time in 81% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 92% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 54% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 73% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 81% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 44%.

Utrecht goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (55 games, 26 at away): they score before half-time in 85% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 80% of the time; BTTS occurs in 77% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 65% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 40%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — NEC Nijmegen 60% and Utrecht 64% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (NEC Nijmegen 69% | Utrecht 56%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects NEC Nijmegen 2.27 xG and Utrecht 1.18 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: NEC Nijmegen attack 1.341 / defence 0.958 | Utrecht attack 0.861 / defence 1.035. League average goals — home 1.639 / away 1.435. NEC Nijmegen carry an above-average attack strength of 1.341 — their λ of 2.27 reflects genuine attacking quality above the league norm. Data: 55 NEC Nijmegen games / 55 Utrecht games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: NEC Nijmegen 62% | Draw 19% | Utrecht 19%. Fair-value odds: NEC Nijmegen 1.61 | Draw 5.26 | Utrecht 5.26. The model has a clear lean to NEC Nijmegen (62%) — a 43pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 67% | BTTS probability 62% | Total xG 3.46. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 67% — a total xG of 3.46 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 62% reflects that both xG figures (2.27 / 1.18) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Final Verdict

Utrecht lead the H2H ledger, but NEC Nijmegen carry stronger current form — do not let history alone dictate your assessment.

Poisson rates NEC Nijmegen as the most likely outcome at 62% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 19% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

On the goals line, Poisson's 3.46 combined xG gives a 67% probability to Over 2.5 — marginal — conflicting signals, supported by form averaging 3.6 goals per game — though H2H averaging only 1.9 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 62%. Form rates corroborate: NEC Nijmegen 70% | Utrecht 80% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights