Sign in Register

Chongqing Lifan 0-3 Shenzhen Ruby FC – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 7

Kick-off

Wed 21 Jul 2021

13:00

Venue

Huadu Stadium

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Shenzhen Ruby FC at 42% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Chongqing Lifan vs Shenzhen Ruby FC encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Huadu Stadium plays host to Chongqing Lifan versus Shenzhen Ruby FC in Super League, Regular Season - 7. Kick-off: Wednesday 21 July 2021 at 13:00 UTC.

Form

Chongqing Lifan (all games): 1W 1D 4L across 6 Super League fixtures this term — 0.67 PPG. Last five: L D W L L. They are averaging 1.17 goals per game and conceding 2.17 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.17 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. Both teams have scored in 67% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. Chongqing Lifan have played only a handful of Super League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

Chongqing Lifan's form when playing at home: 1W 1D 1L across 3 games at Huadu Stadium this term (1.33 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.67 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 67% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.33 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.67 — Chongqing Lifan are significantly better at Huadu Stadium than their overall form suggests.

Shenzhen Ruby FC have collected 1.83 PPG across 6 Super League outings this season: 3W 2D 1L. Last five: D L W D W. They are scoring at 1.67 per game and conceding 1.33. 1 clean sheet from 6 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 67% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. Shenzhen Ruby FC have played only a handful of Super League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

Shenzhen Ruby FC's form when playing away from home: 2W 0D 1L across 3 road games this term (2.00 PPG). They are averaging 2.00 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. BTTS has landed in 67% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

The travelling side arrive in better shape. Shenzhen Ruby FC are 1.16 PPG clear of Chongqing Lifan in recent Super League fixtures (1.83 vs 0.67). Backing the visitors outright or on Draw No Bet are both valid approaches where the price allows.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Chongqing Lifan have seen both teams score in 67% of their games, Shenzhen Ruby FC in 67%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

Trading

Chongqing Lifan half-time and goal-timing data (6 games, 3 at home): they score before half-time in 50% of fixtures; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 67% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 67% of their matches; Over 2.5 goals lands in 67% of games; Over 3.5 in 67%; they fail to score in 33% of games.

Shenzhen Ruby FC half-time and goal-timing data (6 games, 3 at away): they score before half-time in 83% of fixtures; when trailing at the break they recover to draw or win in 33% of cases; BTTS occurs in 67% of their matches; Over 2.5 goals lands in 67% of games; they fail to score in 33% of games.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Chongqing Lifan 67% and Shenzhen Ruby FC 67% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (Chongqing Lifan 67% | Shenzhen Ruby FC 67%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Chongqing Lifan 1.25 xG and Shenzhen Ruby FC 1.60 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Chongqing Lifan attack 1.116 / defence 1.326 | Shenzhen Ruby FC attack 1.032 / defence 1.256. League average goals — home 0.893 / away 1.168. Shenzhen Ruby FC bring a strong defensive rating of 1.256 — this is suppressing Chongqing Lifan's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 6 Chongqing Lifan games / 6 Shenzhen Ruby FC games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Chongqing Lifan 26% | Draw 32% | Shenzhen Ruby FC 42%. Fair-value odds: Chongqing Lifan 3.85 | Draw 3.12 | Shenzhen Ruby FC 2.38. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 32% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 54% | BTTS probability 60% | Total xG 2.85. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 54%/46% — the total xG of 2.85 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS Yes at 60% reflects that both xG figures (1.25 / 1.60) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates Shenzhen Ruby FC as the most likely outcome at 42% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 32% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Shenzhen Ruby FC if the outright odds are short.

The Poisson model projects 2.85 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 54% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 3.7 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 60% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Chongqing Lifan 67% | Shenzhen Ruby FC 67% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

Form Shenzhen Ruby FC lead on PPG: 1.83 vs 0.67 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Chongqing Lifan Poisson xG (1.25) is below their recent form scoring rate (1.67) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Form Shenzhen Ruby FC Poisson xG (1.60) is below their form scoring rate (2.00) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Chongqing Lifan 2/3, Shenzhen Ruby FC 2/3) and Poisson model (60%).
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Shenzhen Ruby FC — Shenzhen Ruby FC at 42% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model shows elevated draw probability at 32% — tight contest expected.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 60% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Chongqing Lifan vs Shenzhen Ruby FC | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 7 | Venue: Huadu Stadium • Kick-off: Wednesday 21 Jul 2021, 13:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Chongqing Lifan 26% | Draw 32% | Shenzhen Ruby FC 42% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 54% | BTTS 60% | xG Chongqing Lifan 1.25 / Shenzhen Ruby FC 1.60 • Poisson strength factors: Chongqing Lifan attack 1.116 / def 1.326 | Shenzhen Ruby FC attack 1.032 / def 1.256 | league avg home 0.893 / away 1.168 • Poisson stance: Shenzhen Ruby FC (42%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.25

Chongqing Lifan xG

Expected Goals

1.60

Shenzhen Ruby FC xG

26%
32%
42%
Chongqing Lifan Draw Shenzhen Ruby FC

60%

BTTS

81%

Over 1.5

54%

Over 2.5

32%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Chongqing Lifan vs Shenzhen Ruby FC kick off?

Chongqing Lifan vs Shenzhen Ruby FC kicked off at 13:00 on Wednesday 21 July 2021 at Huadu Stadium.

What was the final score in Chongqing Lifan vs Shenzhen Ruby FC?

Chongqing Lifan 0 - 3 Shenzhen Ruby FC.

Where is Chongqing Lifan vs Shenzhen Ruby FC being played?

The match is being played at Huadu Stadium.

What competition is Chongqing Lifan vs Shenzhen Ruby FC part of?

Chongqing Lifan vs Shenzhen Ruby FC is a Regular Season - 7 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Chongqing Lifan vs Shenzhen Ruby FC?

Our statistical model gives Chongqing Lifan a 26% chance of winning, Shenzhen Ruby FC a 42% chance, and a 32% chance of a draw — making Shenzhen Ruby FC the favourite.

Will both teams score in Chongqing Lifan vs Shenzhen Ruby FC?

Our model estimates a 60% probability that both Chongqing Lifan and Shenzhen Ruby FC will score (BTTS).

Will Chongqing Lifan vs Shenzhen Ruby FC have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 54%.

What is the head-to-head record between Chongqing Lifan and Shenzhen Ruby FC?

No recorded head-to-head meetings available in the dataset.

What form are Chongqing Lifan and Shenzhen Ruby FC in?

Chongqing Lifan (all comps): 1W-1D-4L in 6 | 0.67 PPG | GF 1.17 / GA 2.17 | L5 L-D-W-L-L. Shenzhen Ruby FC (all comps): 3W-2D-1L in 6 | 1.83 PPG | GF 1.67 / GA 1.33 | L5 D-L-W-D-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

Working from Chongqing Lifan's attack rating (1.12) and Shenzhen Ruby FC's defence rating (1.26), the model arrives at 1.25 expected goals for the home side. Flip it around — Shenzhen Ruby FC's attack (1.03x) against Chongqing Lifan's defence (1.33x) — and the away total comes out at 1.60.

These ratings are built from 6/6 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 13.1%. Close behind: 1-2 (9.2%), 0-1 (7.7%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 30% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Shenzhen Ruby FC Win

26%

Chongqing Lifan

3.78

32%

Draw

3.17

42%

Shenzhen Ruby FC

2.38

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

11.6%

Draw

Most likely

0 – 1

9.2%

Away win

1 – 2

9.2%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.25

Chongqing Lifan xG

Total xG

2.85

1.60

Shenzhen Ruby FC xG

26%
32%
42%
Chongqing LifanDrawShenzhen Ruby FC

3.78

26%

Home win

3.17

32%

Draw

2.38

42%

Away win

Goals Markets

78%

Over 1.5

1.28

22%

Under 1.5

4.55

54%

Over 2.5

1.85

46%

Under 2.5

2.17

32%

Over 3.5

3.12

68%

Under 3.5

1.47

16%

Over 4.5

6.25

84%

Under 4.5

1.19

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

60%

BTTS Yes

1.65

40%

BTTS No

2.53

Clean Sheet

20%

Chongqing Lifan

4.95

29%

Shenzhen Ruby FC

3.50

Win to Nil

5%

Chongqing Lifan

18.70

12%

Shenzhen Ruby FC

8.33

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 5.8 9.2 7.4 3.9 1.6 0.5
1 7.2 11.6 9.2 4.9 2.0 0.6
2 4.5 7.2 5.8 3.1 1.2 0.4
3 1.9 3.0 2.4 1.3 0.5 0.2
4 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1
5 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.252
λ Away (xG) 1.599
Total xG 2.851
League avg home goals 0.893
League avg away goals 1.168
Chongqing Lifan attack strength 1.116
Chongqing Lifan defence strength 1.326
Shenzhen Ruby FC attack strength 1.032
Shenzhen Ruby FC defence strength 1.256
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 6 / 6

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Chongqing Lifan vs Shenzhen Ruby FC?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 13.1%.

How many goals are Chongqing Lifan and Shenzhen Ruby FC expected to score?

The model projects 1.25 expected goals for Chongqing Lifan and 1.60 for Shenzhen Ruby FC, a combined total of 2.85.

How confident is the prediction model for Chongqing Lifan vs Shenzhen Ruby FC?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 42%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Chongqing Lifan's recent record stands at 1W 1D 4L from 6 games, a 0.67 PPG return, with L-D-W-L-L in the last five. It's still early in the season for Chongqing Lifan, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

Shenzhen Ruby FC, meanwhile, have gone 3W 2D 1L across 6 games — 1.83 PPG, with D-L-W-D-W in their last five. It's still early in the season for Shenzhen Ruby FC, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

The points-per-game comparison favours Shenzhen Ruby FC by 1.16 — a real, if not enormous, edge over Chongqing Lifan heading into this one.

Home & Away Splits

At home specifically, Chongqing Lifan have managed 1W 1D 1L from 3 games — 1.33 PPG in front of their own supporters. That's noticeably better than their 0.67 PPG overall — Chongqing Lifan are a different proposition at home than their general record suggests.

Shenzhen Ruby FC's away record stands at 2W 0D 1L across 3 trips, a 2.00 PPG haul.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Shenzhen Ruby FC come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Chongqing Lifan are averaging 1.17 goals scored and 2.17 conceded per game recently; Shenzhen Ruby FC are on 1.67 scored and 1.33 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Chongqing Lifan have seen both teams score in 67% of their recent games; Shenzhen Ruby FC in 67%.

Last 6 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Chongqing Lifan

Chongqing Lifan

Early Season
L D W L L
Shenzhen Ruby FC

Shenzhen Ruby FC

Early Season
D L W D W
6 Played 6
1/1/4 W / D / L 3/2/1
0.67 Points Per Game 1.83
1.17 Avg Goals Scored 1.67
2.17 Avg Goals Conceded 1.33
3.33 Avg Goals / Game 3.00
0 Clean Sheets 1
4 BTTS 4
4 Over 2.5 Games 4
Chongqing Lifan

Chongqing Lifan

L
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
1–3 HT 1–2
18 Jul
L
A Qingdao Huanghai
0–1 HT 0–0
15 May
W
H Henan Jianye
3–2 HT 0–1
09 May
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–2 HT 2–2
03 May
L
A Guangzhou R&F
1–3 HT 0–0
26 Apr
L
H Shandong Luneng
0–2 HT 0–0
20 Apr
Shenzhen Ruby FC

Shenzhen Ruby FC

W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–1 HT 0–1
18 Jul
D
H Shandong Luneng
2–2 HT 0–1
14 May
W
A Guangzhou R&F
4–2 HT 3–0
08 May
L
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
0–2 HT 0–1
02 May
D
H Qingdao Huanghai
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Apr
W
A Henan Jianye
2–1 HT 1–1
21 Apr

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Chongqing Lifan and Shenzhen Ruby FC in coming into this match?

Chongqing Lifan have gone 1W 1D 4L in their last 6 games (0.67 PPG), while Shenzhen Ruby FC have gone 3W 2D 1L in their last 6 (1.83 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Chongqing Lifan at home or Shenzhen Ruby FC away?

Shenzhen Ruby FC's away record (2.00 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Chongqing Lifan at home: 1.33 PPG; Shenzhen Ruby FC away: 2.00 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 2 times since July 2021 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. It has been a while since the last meeting — 11 August 2021, some 1 year back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.

Last 2 Meetings

Chongqing Lifan

0

Chongqing Lifan

0

Draws

Shenzhen Ruby FC

2

Shenzhen Ruby FC

Recent Meetings

Shenzhen Ruby FC
2–1
11 Aug 21
Chongqing Lifan
Chongqing Lifan
0–3
21 Jul 21
Shenzhen Ruby FC

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Chongqing Lifan and Shenzhen Ruby FC?

From 2 meetings on record, Chongqing Lifan have won 0, Shenzhen Ruby FC have won 2, and 0 have been drawn.

When did Chongqing Lifan and Shenzhen Ruby FC last play each other?

They last met on 11 August 2021, when Shenzhen Ruby FC 2-1 Chongqing Lifan.

Who has won more matches between Chongqing Lifan and Shenzhen Ruby FC?

Shenzhen Ruby FC have the better head-to-head record, with 2 wins from 2 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Chongqing Lifan are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 67% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 33% of those situations.

Shenzhen Ruby FC are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 100% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 33% of the time.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS has landed consistently for both sides recently — 67% for Chongqing Lifan, 67% for Shenzhen Ruby FC — a strong two-way scoring signal.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 67% for Chongqing Lifan and 67% for Shenzhen Ruby FC. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 67% and 33% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Chongqing Lifan have failed to score in 33% of games; Shenzhen Ruby FC in 33%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Chongqing Lifan home games / Shenzhen Ruby FC away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Chongqing Lifan Chongqing Lifan Early Season
Metric All
(6 games)
Venue
(3 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 3/6
(50%)
2/3
(66.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 2/6
(33.3%)
1/3
(33.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 3/3
(100%)
1/1
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 2/3
(66.7%)
1/1
(100%)
Winning at HT 0/6
(0%)
0/3
(0%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 0/6
(0%)
0/3
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/6
(16.7%)
1/3
(33.3%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 4/6
(66.7%)
2/3
(66.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 4/6
(66.7%)
2/3
(66.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 4/6
(66.7%)
2/3
(66.7%)
Clean Sheet 0/6
(0%)
0/3
(0%)
Failed to Score 2/6
(33.3%)
1/3
(33.3%)
Shenzhen Ruby FC Shenzhen Ruby FC Early Season
Metric All
(6 games)
Venue
(3 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 5/6
(83.3%)
3/3
(100%)
2+ Goals Before HT 2/6
(33.3%)
2/3
(66.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 0/1
(0%)
β€”
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 0/1
(0%)
β€”
Winning at HT 1/6
(16.7%)
1/3
(33.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 0/6
(0%)
0/3
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 2/6
(33.3%)
0/3
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 4/6
(66.7%)
2/3
(66.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 4/6
(66.7%)
2/3
(66.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 2/6
(33.3%)
1/3
(33.3%)
Clean Sheet 1/6
(16.7%)
0/3
(0%)
Failed to Score 2/6
(33.3%)
1/3
(33.3%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Chongqing Lifan play Shenzhen Ruby FC?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 67% of Chongqing Lifan's games and 67% of Shenzhen Ruby FC's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Chongqing Lifan vs Shenzhen Ruby FC usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 67% of Chongqing Lifan's matches and 67% of Shenzhen Ruby FC's.

Do Chongqing Lifan and Shenzhen Ruby FC tend to score early?

Chongqing Lifan have had a goal before half-time in 67% of their recent matches, Shenzhen Ruby FC in 100% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Dominant Shenzhen Ruby FC run riot with a 0-3 hammering of Chongqing Lifan.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Shenzhen Ruby FC beat Chongqing Lifan 0-3 at Huadu Stadium, Regular Season - 7, in the Super League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Chongqing Lifan 1.25 xG and Shenzhen Ruby FC 1.60 xG, a combined 2.85. The scoreboard read 0-3 for 3 actual goals. Chongqing Lifan fell 1.3 short of their projected output. Shenzhen Ruby FC outscored their 1.60 projection by 1.4. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Chongqing Lifan attack 1.12 / defence 1.33 against Shenzhen Ruby FC attack 1.03 / defence 1.26, drawn from 6/6 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Chongqing Lifan 26% | Draw 32% | Shenzhen Ruby FC 42%, with Shenzhen Ruby FC to win its most likely call at 42%. The result followed the model's preferred path, landing its top-rated outcome.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 54%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 81% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 60% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 67% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Chongqing Lifan 67%, Shenzhen Ruby FC 67%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 67%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Chongqing Lifan's trading profile (6 games, 3 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 67% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 33% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Shenzhen Ruby FC's trading profile (6 games, 3 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 67% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

On form, Shenzhen Ruby FC arrived the stronger side — 1.83 PPG against 0.67. Form held, and they took the win. Chongqing Lifan (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.67 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 3 against a 2.00 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Shenzhen Ruby FC (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 2.00 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 1.67 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss), form (hit). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 54% Over 2.5 probability, 3 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 60% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 67% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.