🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates Chengdu Better City at 60% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Chengdu Better City vs Tianjin Teda encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Fixture Analysis

It is a Super League clash, Regular Season - 2 as Chengdu Better City welcome Tianjin Teda to Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park. Kick-off is set for Sunday 2 March 2025 at 10:30 UTC.

Form Guide

Chengdu Better City — All Games: 5W 2D 3L from 10 Super League outings this season, averaging 1.70 points per game. Last five: L W W D L. Offensively they are averaging 1.90 goals per game, with 1.20 conceded. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation.

In front of their own supporters this season, Chengdu Better City have posted 7W 2D 1L at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park — 2.30 PPG. They are averaging 3.10 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Their home PPG of 2.30 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.70 — Chengdu Better City are significantly better at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park than their overall form suggests.

Across all Super League games this season, Tianjin Teda have recorded 6W 0D 4L from 10 outings — 1.80 PPG. Last five: L W L W L. They are scoring at 1.50 per game and conceding 1.90. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

When travelling in Super League this season, Tianjin Teda have posted 2W 1D 7L from 10 away outings — 0.70 PPG. Away from home they average 1.30 goals scored and 2.50 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 0.70 is notably below their overall 1.80 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

There is minimal separation in the form figures — Chengdu Better City at 1.70 PPG versus Tianjin Teda's 1.80. The form guide is not providing a strong directional steer; the model and market data will carry more weight in the final assessment.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. Chengdu Better City register both teams scoring in 60% of relevant matches, Tianjin Teda in 80% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

H2H Record

Chengdu Better City hold a clear advantage in this fixture, picking up 3 wins from 6 previous encounters compared to 0 for Tianjin Teda, with 3 draws in between.

Goals have been a feature of this fixture. The last 6 meetings have averaged 2.8 per game — a rate that gives the Over 2.5 market a solid historical foundation. The most recent clash, on 12 Jul 2024, ended 2–1 with Chengdu Better City winning.

From a betting standpoint, the H2H backs both Chengdu Better City and goals. The home side's 3 wins from 6 meetings, combined with an average of 2.8 goals per game, gives the home win and Over 2.5 combination a historically grounded case.

In-Play Data

Chengdu Better City trading profile (60 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 87% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 80% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 70% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 37%.

Tianjin Teda trading profile (60 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 77% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 65% of the time; BTTS occurs in 67% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 57% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Chengdu Better City 53% versus Tianjin Teda 62%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Chengdu Better City 60% | Tianjin Teda 50%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Chengdu Better City 1.99 xG and Tianjin Teda 1.00 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Chengdu Better City attack 1.051 / defence 0.839 | Tianjin Teda attack 0.994 / defence 1.131. League average goals — home 1.673 / away 1.202. Data: 31 Chengdu Better City games / 31 Tianjin Teda games used (Blended). A blend of current and prior-season data is applied to stabilise estimates early in the campaign.

Result probabilities: Chengdu Better City 60% | Draw 23% | Tianjin Teda 18%. Fair-value odds: Chengdu Better City 1.67 | Draw 4.35 | Tianjin Teda 5.56. The model has a clear lean to Chengdu Better City (60%) — a 42pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 57% | BTTS probability 55% | Total xG 2.99. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 57% — the 2.99 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 55% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Chengdu Better City at 60% — clear model lean. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 23% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

The Poisson model projects 2.99 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 57% — strong confidence, supported by form averaging 3.9 goals per game and H2H averaging 2.8 goals per meeting.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 55% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Chengdu Better City 60% | Tianjin Teda 80% BTTS from recent games.

The Poisson model is drawing on Blended data (31 games minimum) — early-season projections carry additional uncertainty. Weight the live form and odds signals accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights