🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Rayong FC at 37%, yet other data sources diverge — this Rayong FC vs BG Pathum United fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Rayong Provincial Stadium plays host to Rayong FC versus BG Pathum United in Thai League 1, Regular Season - 25. Kick-off: Saturday 14 March 2026 at 12:00 UTC.

Form

Rayong FC (all games): 3W 2D 5L across 10 Thai League 1 fixtures this term — 1.10 PPG. Last five: L D L L L. Offensively they are averaging 1.60 goals per game, with 1.70 conceded. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Rayong FC, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Rayong FC at Rayong Provincial Stadium this season: 5W 3D 2L from 10 home games — 1.80 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 1.90 goals scored and 1.30 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.80 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.10 — Rayong FC are significantly better at Rayong Provincial Stadium than their overall form suggests.

BG Pathum United have collected 1.70 PPG across 10 Thai League 1 outings this season: 5W 2D 3L. Last five: D L W W L. They are scoring at 1.90 per game and conceding 1.20. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for BG Pathum United, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, BG Pathum United have gone 4W 3D 3L from 10 away fixtures this term (1.50 PPG). Away from home they average 1.10 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. 4 clean sheets from 10 away games (40%) shows they are capable of shutting up shop on the road.

On a straight form reading, BG Pathum United are the stronger side — 0.60 PPG clear of the hosts (1.70 vs 1.10). Backing them with draw insurance is the conservative play if the outright away price appears short.

H2H History

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 3 meetings: Rayong FC 1W, BG Pathum United 0W, 2D.

Scoring has been limited when these teams have met. The 3 previous contests averaged 1.7 goals, making the Under 2.5 the historically backed angle in the goals market. The most recent clash, on 9 Nov 2025, ended 1–1 with a draw.

With a balanced win record and just 1.7 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

Trading Data

Rayong FC goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (52 games, 25 at home): they score before half-time in 88% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 56% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 76% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 60% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 40%.

BG Pathum United goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (52 games, 25 at away): they score before half-time in 72% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 93% of the time; BTTS occurs in 64% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 52% of games (away games).

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Rayong FC 71% and BG Pathum United 56% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Rayong FC 60% | BG Pathum United 50%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Rayong FC 1.38 xG and BG Pathum United 1.27 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Rayong FC attack 1.145 / defence 1.081 | BG Pathum United attack 1.020 / defence 0.796. League average goals — home 1.514 / away 1.154. BG Pathum United's defence strength of 0.796 is below average — they are conceding at a rate that inflates the home xG figure. Data: 52 Rayong FC games / 53 BG Pathum United games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Rayong FC 37% | Draw 30% | BG Pathum United 33%. Fair-value odds: Rayong FC 2.70 | Draw 3.33 | BG Pathum United 3.03. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 30% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 49% | BTTS probability 56% | Total xG 2.65. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 49%/51% — the total xG of 2.65 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 56% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates Rayong FC as the most likely outcome at 37% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form BG Pathum United (1.70 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. Draw probability of 30% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Rayong FC if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 2.65 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 49% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by H2H averaging 1.7 goals per meeting.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 56% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Rayong FC 70% | BG Pathum United 50% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights