Sign in Register

Ljungskile SK 2-0 IK brage – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Superettan · Regular Season - 27

Kick-off

Sat 17 Oct 2026

11:00

Venue

Skarsjövallen

Competition

Superettan

Sweden

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates IK brage at 37%, yet other data sources diverge — this Ljungskile SK vs IK brage fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

IK brage make the trip to Skarsjövallen to face Ljungskile SK in Superettan, Regular Season - 27. The match kicks off on Saturday 17 October 2026 at 11:00 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Ljungskile SK have collected 0.70 PPG across 10 Superettan outings this season: 1W 4D 5L. Last five: D W L L D. They are averaging 1.10 goals per game and conceding 1.60 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Ljungskile SK, so this record blends games from this season and last.

At home at Skarsjövallen, Ljungskile SK have gone 4W 1D 5L this season (10 games, 1.30 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.20 goals scored and 1.50 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.30 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.70 — Ljungskile SK are significantly better at Skarsjövallen than their overall form suggests.

IK brage (all games): 2W 3D 5L across 10 Superettan outings this term — 0.90 points per game. Last five: L D D L W. Their scoring rate of 1.30 per game is modest, conceding 1.90 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for IK brage, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, IK brage have gone 1W 3D 6L from 10 away fixtures this term (0.60 PPG). Away from home they average 1.30 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

A near-identical PPG reading — 0.70 for Ljungskile SK, 0.90 for IK brage — means the form record is uninstructive on result selection. The goals and market sections will carry greater evidential weight.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Ljungskile SK have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, IK brage in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

Head-to-Head

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 1 meetings: Ljungskile SK 0W, IK brage 0W, 1D.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 4.0 per game across 1 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 9 Jun 2026, ended 2–2 with a draw.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading

Ljungskile SK half-time and goal-timing data (26 games, 13 at home): they score before half-time in 69% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 78% of the time; BTTS occurs in 54% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 46% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 38%; they fail to score in 35% of games.

IK brage half-time and goal-timing data (26 games, 13 at away): they score before half-time in 62% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 75% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 54% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 62% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 46%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Ljungskile SK 62% and IK brage 65% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Ljungskile SK 50% | IK brage 65%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Ljungskile SK 1.44 xG and IK brage 1.49 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Ljungskile SK attack 0.814 / defence 1.181 | IK brage attack 0.942 / defence 1.313. League average goals — home 1.347 / away 1.341. IK brage bring a strong defensive rating of 1.313 — this is suppressing Ljungskile SK's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 26 Ljungskile SK games / 56 IK brage games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Ljungskile SK 35% | Draw 28% | IK brage 37%. Fair-value odds: Ljungskile SK 2.86 | Draw 3.57 | IK brage 2.70. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 28% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 56% | BTTS probability 61% | Total xG 2.93. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 56% — the 2.93 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 61% reflects that both xG figures (1.44 / 1.49) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is IK brage at 37% — marginal model lean. Draw probability of 28% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on IK brage if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 2.93 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 56% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.0 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 61% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Ljungskile SK 60% | IK brage 60% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–1D–0W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H (4.00 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.93) both back Over 2.5 goals (56% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 100% and Poisson BTTS 61% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Ljungskile SK 6/10, IK brage 6/10) and Poisson model (61%).
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 61% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Ljungskile SK vs IK brage | Competition: Superettan, Regular Season - 27 | Venue: Skarsjövallen • Kick-off: Saturday 17 Oct 2026, 11:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Ljungskile SK 35% | Draw 28% | IK brage 37% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 56% | BTTS 61% | xG Ljungskile SK 1.44 / IK brage 1.49 • Poisson strength factors: Ljungskile SK attack 0.814 / def 1.181 | IK brage attack 0.942 / def 1.313 | league avg home 1.347 / away 1.341 • Poisson stance: IK brage (37%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.44

Ljungskile SK xG

Expected Goals

1.49

IK brage xG

35%
28%
37%
Ljungskile SK Draw IK brage

61%

BTTS

81%

Over 1.5

56%

Over 2.5

34%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Ljungskile SK vs IK brage kick off?

Ljungskile SK vs IK brage kicked off at 11:00 on Saturday 17 October 2026 at Skarsjövallen.

What was the final score in Ljungskile SK vs IK brage?

Ljungskile SK 2 - 0 IK brage.

Where is Ljungskile SK vs IK brage being played?

The match is being played at Skarsjövallen.

What competition is Ljungskile SK vs IK brage part of?

Ljungskile SK vs IK brage is a Regular Season - 27 fixture in the Superettan (Sweden).

Who is favourite to win Ljungskile SK vs IK brage?

Our statistical model gives Ljungskile SK a 35% chance of winning, IK brage a 37% chance, and a 28% chance of a draw — making IK brage the favourite.

Will both teams score in Ljungskile SK vs IK brage?

Our model estimates a 61% probability that both Ljungskile SK and IK brage will score (BTTS).

Will Ljungskile SK vs IK brage have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 56%.

What is the head-to-head record between Ljungskile SK and IK brage?

Record (1 meetings): Ljungskile SK 0W | Draws 1 | IK brage 0W.

What form are Ljungskile SK and IK brage in?

Ljungskile SK (all comps): 1W-4D-5L in 10 | 0.70 PPG | GF 1.10 / GA 1.60 | L5 D-W-L-L-D. IK brage (all comps): 2W-3D-5L in 10 | 0.90 PPG | GF 1.30 / GA 1.90 | L5 L-D-D-L-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Where the Numbers Come From

The model rates Ljungskile SK's attack at 0.81x the league average against IK brage's defence at 1.31x — combine the two and it projects 1.44 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — IK brage's attack (0.94x) against Ljungskile SK's defence (1.18x) — and the away total comes out at 1.49.

These ratings are built from 26/56 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 12.9% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 1-2 (8.5%), 2-1 (8.2%). Together the top three scorelines make up 30% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

IK brage Win

35%

Ljungskile SK

2.87

28%

Draw

3.58

37%

IK brage

2.69

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

11.4%

Draw

Most likely

1 – 2

8.5%

Away win

2 – 1

8.2%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.44

Ljungskile SK xG

Total xG

2.93

1.49

IK brage xG

35%
28%
37%
Ljungskile SKDrawIK brage

2.87

35%

Home win

3.58

28%

Draw

2.69

37%

Away win

Goals Markets

79%

Over 1.5

1.27

21%

Under 1.5

4.76

56%

Over 2.5

1.79

44%

Under 2.5

2.27

34%

Over 3.5

2.94

66%

Under 3.5

1.52

17%

Over 4.5

5.88

83%

Under 4.5

1.20

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

61%

BTTS Yes

1.64

39%

BTTS No

2.55

Clean Sheet

22%

Ljungskile SK

4.45

24%

IK brage

4.22

Win to Nil

8%

Ljungskile SK

12.74

9%

IK brage

11.37

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 5.3 7.9 5.9 2.9 1.1 0.3
1 7.7 11.4 8.5 4.2 1.6 0.5
2 5.5 8.2 6.2 3.1 1.1 0.3
3 2.7 4.0 3.0 1.5 0.5 0.2
4 1.0 1.4 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.1
5 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 –

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

▶ Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.441
λ Away (xG) 1.492
Total xG 2.933
League avg home goals 1.347
League avg away goals 1.341
Ljungskile SK attack strength 0.814
Ljungskile SK defence strength 1.181
IK brage attack strength 0.942
IK brage defence strength 1.313
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 26 / 56

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Ljungskile SK vs IK brage?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 12.9%.

How many goals are Ljungskile SK and IK brage expected to score?

The model projects 1.44 expected goals for Ljungskile SK and 1.49 for IK brage, a combined total of 2.93.

How confident is the prediction model for Ljungskile SK vs IK brage?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 37%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Recent Form Overview

Across their last 26 outings, Ljungskile SK have picked up 1.12 PPG on a 7W 8D 11L record — D-W-L-L-D across the most recent five. The sample for Ljungskile SK is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

IK brage's form line: 6W 8D 12L from 26 games, 1.00 PPG, last five L-D-D-L-W. The sample for IK brage is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.12 PPG for Ljungskile SK against 1.00 for IK brage. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

How They Fare by Venue

On home soil, Ljungskile SK have posted 1.23 PPG from 13 outings (5W 1D 7L).

On the road, IK brage have gone 3W 3D 7L from 13 away games — 0.92 PPG when travelling.

Attack vs Defence

Ljungskile SK are averaging 1.31 goals scored and 1.42 conceded per game recently; IK brage are on 1.58 scored and 1.85 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Ljungskile SK have seen both teams score in 62% of their recent games; IK brage in 65%.

Last 26 Results — Superettan

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Ljungskile SK

Ljungskile SK

Blended
D W L L D
IK brage

IK brage

Blended
L D D L W
26 Played 26
7/8/11 W / D / L 6/8/12
1.12 Points Per Game 1.00
1.31 Avg Goals Scored 1.58
1.42 Avg Goals Conceded 1.85
2.73 Avg Goals / Game 3.42
3 Clean Sheets 5
16 BTTS 17
13 Over 2.5 Games 17
Ljungskile SK

Ljungskile SK

D
A Orebro SK
1–1 HT 0–0
11 Oct
L
A GIF Sundsvall
2–3 HT 2–0
20 Sep
L
H Falkenbergs FF
0–2 HT 0–1
13 Sep
W
H Norrby IF
2–1 HT 0–1
09 Sep
D
A IFK Norrkoping
2–2 HT 1–1
04 Sep
L
H IFK Varnamo
0–1 HT 0–0
29 Aug
D
A Ostersunds FK
0–0 HT 0–0
24 Aug
L
H Osters IF
2–3 HT 2–2
15 Aug
L
H Oddevold
0–1 HT 0–0
08 Aug
D
A United Nordic
2–2 HT 1–1
02 Aug
W
H Sandviken
2–1 HT 2–0
26 Jul
W
A IFK Varnamo
3–2 HT 1–0
19 Jul
W
H Orebro SK
3–2 HT 1–2
27 Jun
D
A Oddevold
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Jun
D
H Ostersunds FK
1–1 HT 0–0
14 Jun
D
A IK brage
2–2 HT 0–0
09 Jun
L
H Varbergs BoIS FC
1–3 HT 0–2
30 May
L
A Norrby IF
1–2 HT 1–0
23 May
W
A Osters IF
4–1 HT 1–0
17 May
W
H GIF Sundsvall
1–0 HT 1–0
14 May
L
A Sandviken
0–1 HT 0–1
09 May
L
H United Nordic
0–2 HT 0–0
02 May
W
H Helsingborg
4–1 HT 0–1
24 Apr
L
A Landskrona BoIS
0–1 HT 0–0
18 Apr
L
H IFK Norrkoping
0–1 HT 0–1
11 Apr
D
A Falkenbergs FF
1–1 HT 0–1
06 Apr
IK brage

IK brage

W
H Helsingborg
2–0 HT 1–0
11 Oct
L
A Varbergs BoIS FC
2–3 HT 1–0
19 Sep
D
H Sandviken
1–1 HT 1–1
15 Sep
D
A Ostersunds FK
1–1 HT 0–0
10 Sep
L
H GIF Sundsvall
0–1 HT 0–1
05 Sep
L
A Falkenbergs FF
1–4 HT 0–2
29 Aug
L
H United Nordic
1–2 HT 0–2
23 Aug
D
H Orebro SK
3–3 HT 1–1
14 Aug
L
A IFK Norrkoping
0–3 HT 0–3
08 Aug
W
H Landskrona BoIS
2–1 HT 0–0
01 Aug
D
A IFK Varnamo
0–0 HT 0–0
25 Jul
L
A Osters IF
2–3 HT 1–1
18 Jul
L
H Falkenbergs FF
2–4 HT 2–1
26 Jun
W
H IFK Varnamo
5–1 HT 2–1
21 Jun
L
A Sandviken
2–3 HT 1–1
14 Jun
D
H Ljungskile SK
2–2 HT 0–0
09 Jun
D
A Landskrona BoIS
2–2 HT 1–1
30 May
L
A United Nordic
0–1 HT 0–0
23 May
D
H IFK Norrkoping
0–0 HT 0–0
16 May
L
H Ostersunds FK
2–4 HT 1–2
13 May
W
A Orebro SK
3–0 HT 0–0
08 May
L
A Helsingborg
0–2 HT 0–1
03 May
D
H Varbergs BoIS FC
2–2 HT 0–2
26 Apr
W
A GIF Sundsvall
2–1 HT 1–0
20 Apr
L
H Oddevold
3–4 HT 1–3
12 Apr
W
A Norrby IF
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Apr

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Ljungskile SK and IK brage in coming into this match?

Ljungskile SK have gone 7W 8D 11L in their last 26 games (1.12 PPG), while IK brage have gone 6W 8D 12L in their last 26 (1.00 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Ljungskile SK at home or IK brage away?

Ljungskile SK's home record (1.23 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Ljungskile SK at home: 1.23 PPG; IK brage away: 0.92 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

The Rivalry So Far

These sides have met 2 times that we have on record, stretching back to June 2026 — a rivalry that has played out across roughly 1 year. Every recorded meeting has come in Superettan. The two were last together as recently as 17 October 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Last 2 Meetings

Ljungskile SK

1

Ljungskile SK

1

Draws

IK brage

0

IK brage

Recent Meetings

Ljungskile SK
2–0
17 Oct 26
IK brage
IK brage
2–2
09 Jun 26
Ljungskile SK

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Ljungskile SK and IK brage?

From 2 meetings on record, Ljungskile SK have won 1, IK brage have won 0, and 1 have been drawn.

When did Ljungskile SK and IK brage last play each other?

They last met on 17 October 2026, when Ljungskile SK 2-0 IK brage.

Who has won more matches between Ljungskile SK and IK brage?

Ljungskile SK have the better head-to-head record, with 1 wins from 2 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Early Goal Trends

Ljungskile SK are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 69% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 23% of those situations.

IK brage are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 62% of their matches.

Full-Time Markets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Ljungskile SK 54%, IK brage 54% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 46% (Ljungskile SK) and 62% (IK brage).

On the defensive side: Ljungskile SK have failed to score in 38% of games; IK brage in 31%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Ljungskile SK home games / IK brage away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Ljungskile SK Ljungskile SK Blended
Metric All
(26 games)
Venue
(13 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 17/26
(65.4%)
9/13
(69.2%)
2+ Goals Before HT 7/26
(26.9%)
4/13
(30.8%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 7/9
(77.8%)
4/4
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 4/9
(44.4%)
2/4
(50%)
Winning at HT 6/26
(23.1%)
2/13
(15.4%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/26
(7.7%)
0/13
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/26
(15.4%)
3/13
(23.1%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 16/26
(61.5%)
7/13
(53.8%)
Over 2.5 Goals 13/26
(50%)
6/13
(46.2%)
Over 3.5 Goals 10/26
(38.5%)
4/13
(30.8%)
Clean Sheet 3/26
(11.5%)
1/13
(7.7%)
Failed to Score 9/26
(34.6%)
5/13
(38.5%)
IK brage IK brage Blended
Metric All
(26 games)
Venue
(13 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 18/26
(69.2%)
8/13
(61.5%)
2+ Goals Before HT 13/26
(50%)
5/13
(38.5%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 6/8
(75%)
4/5
(80%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 4/8
(50%)
2/5
(40%)
Winning at HT 5/26
(19.2%)
2/13
(15.4%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/26
(7.7%)
1/13
(7.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/26
(3.8%)
0/13
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 17/26
(65.4%)
7/13
(53.8%)
Over 2.5 Goals 17/26
(65.4%)
8/13
(61.5%)
Over 3.5 Goals 12/26
(46.2%)
5/13
(38.5%)
Clean Sheet 5/26
(19.2%)
3/13
(23.1%)
Failed to Score 6/26
(23.1%)
4/13
(30.8%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Ljungskile SK play IK brage?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 54% of Ljungskile SK's recent matches and 54% of IK brage's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Ljungskile SK vs IK brage usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 46% of Ljungskile SK's recent games and 62% of IK brage's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Ljungskile SK and IK brage tend to score early?

Ljungskile SK have had a goal before half-time in 69% of their recent matches, IK brage in 62% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Ljungskile SK cruise to a comfortable 2-0 victory over IK brage.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Ljungskile SK beat IK brage 2-0 at Skarsjövallen, Regular Season - 27, in the Superettan. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Ljungskile SK 1.44 xG and IK brage 1.49 xG, a combined 2.93. The scoreboard read 2-0 for 2 actual goals. IK brage landed 1.5 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Ljungskile SK attack 0.81 / defence 1.18 against IK brage attack 0.94 / defence 1.31, drawn from 26/56 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Ljungskile SK 35% | Draw 28% | IK brage 37%, with IK brage to win its most likely call at 37%. The actual Ljungskile SK win had been the model's second-ranked read at 35%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 56%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 81% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 61% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 58% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Ljungskile SK 50%, IK brage 65%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 63%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Ljungskile SK's trading profile (26 games, 13 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did not.

IK brage's trading profile (26 games, 13 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 65% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Ljungskile SK 1.12 PPG, IK brage 1.00 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Ljungskile SK win broke the near-deadlock. Ljungskile SK (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.46 average — tighter than their form line. IK brage (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.23 scoring average — below par going forward.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 56% Over 2.5 probability, but 2 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 61% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 58% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.