Sign in Register

NEOM vs Al Shabab – Pre-Match Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Pro League · Regular Season - 33

Kick-off

Mon 24 May 2027

18:00

Venue

King Khalid Sports City

Competition

Pro League

Saudi-Arabia

Status

NS
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model projects a closely fought contest — draw probability sits at 34% as NEOM take on Al Shabab.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

NEOM host Al Shabab at King Khalid Sports City in Pro League, Regular Season - 33. Kick-off is scheduled for Monday 24 May 2027 at 18:00 UTC.

Form Guide

NEOM — All Games: 3W 3D 4L from 10 Pro League outings this season, averaging 1.20 points per game. Last five: D W W L L. They are averaging 1.10 goals per game and conceding 1.30 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. NEOM have played only a handful of Pro League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

NEOM's home record at King Khalid Sports City: 5W 3D 2L from 10 Pro League appearances (1.80 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.40 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.80 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.20 — NEOM are significantly better at King Khalid Sports City than their overall form suggests.

Looking at all fixtures this season, Al Shabab stand at 1W 4D 5L from 10 Pro League matches — 0.70 PPG. Last five: L L D D D. Their scoring rate of 1.30 per game is modest, conceding 2.20 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.20 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play. Al Shabab have played only a handful of Pro League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

When travelling in Pro League this season, Al Shabab have posted 2W 5D 3L from 10 away outings — 1.10 PPG. Away from home they average 1.30 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

NEOM are in the better shape of the two on current Pro League data — 0.50 PPG ahead (1.20 vs 0.70). That form margin is the baseline of a sensible selection even before other signals are layered in.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. NEOM register both teams scoring in 60% of relevant matches, Al Shabab in 60% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

Head to Head

There is little to separate the sides historically. From 2 previous meetings, NEOM have won 1, Al Shabab 1, with 0 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.

The 2 previous encounters between these sides have been high-scoring affairs — 4.0 goals per contest on average. Historical precedent backs the Over 2.5 goals market. The most recent clash, on 11 May 2026, ended 2–1 with NEOM winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading Patterns

NEOM in-play and half-time data (38 games, 19 at home): they score before half-time in 74% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 92% of the time; BTTS occurs in 63% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 58% of games (home games).

Al Shabab in-play and half-time data (38 games, 19 at away): they score before half-time in 63% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 64% of the time; BTTS occurs in 47% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 26% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 40%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — NEOM 60% and Al Shabab 63% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (NEOM 50% | Al Shabab 45%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects NEOM 1.09 xG and Al Shabab 1.03 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: NEOM attack 0.921 / defence 0.982 | Al Shabab attack 0.745 / defence 0.839. League average goals — home 1.414 / away 1.406. Data: 38 NEOM games / 38 Al Shabab games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: NEOM 34% | Draw 34% | Al Shabab 31%. Fair-value odds: NEOM 2.94 | Draw 2.94 | Al Shabab 3.23. The draw (34%) is the Poisson-preferred outcome — neither side is more likely to win than to draw, making draw-inclusive markets the most model-aligned approach.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 36% | BTTS probability 45% | Total xG 2.12. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 64% — total xG of 2.12 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 45% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's preferred outcome is the draw at 34% — neither side is more likely to win than to draw. Draw-inclusive markets are the most model-aligned approach. Home win at 34% and away win at 31% are close enough that backing either outright carries significant draw exposure.

Poisson projects 2.12 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 36% probability — Poisson-only — limited corroboration conviction.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is No at 45%. This conflicts with form data: NEOM 60% | Al Shabab 60% from recent games — a notable divergence.

The outsider holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (1W–0D–1W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H suggests 4.00 goals/game but Poisson xG is only 2.12 — current-season defences are outperforming historical norms.
Form NEOM lead on PPG: 1.20 vs 0.70 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
Form NEOM Poisson xG (1.09) is below their recent form scoring rate (1.40) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Form Al Shabab Poisson xG (1.03) is below their form scoring rate (1.30) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
Goals Form averages (~1.8 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.12) both support Under 2.5 goals (64% probability).
Form Form and Poisson model both favour NEOM — NEOM at 34% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model shows elevated draw probability at 34% — tight contest expected.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is only 36% — the model points to an Under 2.5 outcome.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: NEOM vs Al Shabab | Competition: Pro League, Regular Season - 33 | Venue: King Khalid Sports City • Kick-off: Monday 24 May 2027, 18:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: NEOM 34% | Draw 34% | Al Shabab 31% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 36% | BTTS 45% | xG NEOM 1.09 / Al Shabab 1.03 • Poisson strength factors: NEOM attack 0.921 / def 0.982 | Al Shabab attack 0.745 / def 0.839 | league avg home 1.414 / away 1.406 • Poisson stance: Draw (34%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.09

NEOM xG

Expected Goals

1.03

Al Shabab xG

34%
34%
31%
NEOM Draw Al Shabab

45%

BTTS

65%

Over 1.5

36%

Over 2.5

17%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does NEOM vs Al Shabab kick off?

NEOM vs Al Shabab is scheduled to kick off at 18:00 on Monday 24 May 2027 at King Khalid Sports City.

Where is NEOM vs Al Shabab being played?

The match is being played at King Khalid Sports City.

What competition is NEOM vs Al Shabab part of?

NEOM vs Al Shabab is a Regular Season - 33 fixture in the Pro League (Saudi-Arabia).

Who is favourite to win NEOM vs Al Shabab?

Our statistical model gives NEOM a 34% chance of winning, Al Shabab a 31% chance, and a 34% chance of a draw, making this a very evenly-matched fixture.

Will both teams score in NEOM vs Al Shabab?

Our model estimates a 45% probability that both NEOM and Al Shabab will score (BTTS).

Will NEOM vs Al Shabab have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 36%.

What is the head-to-head record between NEOM and Al Shabab?

Record (2 meetings): NEOM 1W | Draws 0 | Al Shabab 1W.

What form are NEOM and Al Shabab in?

NEOM (all comps): 3W-3D-4L in 10 | 1.20 PPG | GF 1.10 / GA 1.30 | L5 D-W-W-L-L. Al Shabab (all comps): 1W-4D-5L in 10 | 0.70 PPG | GF 1.30 / GA 2.20 | L5 L-L-D-D-D.

🧮 Model Insight

How the Model Works This Match

NEOM's attacking strength (0.92x league average) is weighed against Al Shabab's defensive record (0.84x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.09. The same calculation in reverse, Al Shabab's attack versus NEOM's defence, projects 1.03 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 38/38 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 15.2%. Close behind: 0-0 (13.7%), 1-0 (11.3%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 40% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Draw

34%

NEOM

2.91

34%

Draw

2.90

31%

Al Shabab

3.21

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

13.5%

Draw

Most likely

1 – 0

13.1%

Home win

0 – 1

12.3%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.09

NEOM xG

Total xG

2.12

1.03

Al Shabab xG

34%
34%
31%
NEOMDrawAl Shabab

2.91

34%

Home win

2.90

34%

Draw

3.21

31%

Away win

Goals Markets

63%

Over 1.5

1.59

37%

Under 1.5

2.70

36%

Over 2.5

2.78

64%

Under 2.5

1.56

17%

Over 3.5

5.88

83%

Under 3.5

1.20

6%

Over 4.5

16.67

94%

Under 4.5

1.06

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

45%

BTTS Yes

2.22

55%

BTTS No

1.82

Clean Sheet

36%

NEOM

2.80

34%

Al Shabab

2.98

Win to Nil

12%

NEOM

8.13

10%

Al Shabab

9.58

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 12.0 12.3 6.3 2.2 0.6 0.1
1 13.1 13.5 6.9 2.4 0.6 0.1
2 7.2 7.4 3.8 1.3 0.3 0.1
3 2.6 2.7 1.4 0.5 0.1
4 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.1
5 0.2 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.093
λ Away (xG) 1.029
Total xG 2.122
League avg home goals 1.414
League avg away goals 1.406
NEOM attack strength 0.921
NEOM defence strength 0.982
Al Shabab attack strength 0.745
Al Shabab defence strength 0.839
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 38 / 38

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for NEOM vs Al Shabab?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 15.2%.

How many goals are NEOM and Al Shabab expected to score?

The model projects 1.09 expected goals for NEOM and 1.03 for Al Shabab, a combined total of 2.12.

How confident is the prediction model for NEOM vs Al Shabab?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 34%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Form at a Glance

Across their last 38 outings, NEOM have picked up 1.34 PPG on a 14W 9D 15L record — D-W-W-L-L across the most recent five. It's still early in the season for NEOM, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

Al Shabab's form line: 8W 14D 16L from 38 games, 1.00 PPG, last five L-L-D-D-D. It's still early in the season for Al Shabab, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

Form-wise this is close to level: NEOM on 1.34 PPG, Al Shabab on 1.00. Other factors will likely decide this one more than recent results.

Venue Form

On home soil, NEOM have posted 1.32 PPG from 19 outings (7W 4D 8L).

On the road, Al Shabab have gone 2W 9D 8L from 19 away games — 0.79 PPG when travelling.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, NEOM come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Goals in Recent Form

NEOM are averaging 1.24 goals scored and 1.37 conceded per game recently; Al Shabab are on 1.29 scored and 1.68 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: NEOM have seen both teams score in 61% of their recent games; Al Shabab in 63%.

Last 38 Results — Pro League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

NEOM

NEOM

Early Season
D W W L L
Al Shabab

Al Shabab

Early Season
L L D D D
38 Played 38
14/9/15 W / D / L 8/14/16
1.34 Points Per Game 1.00
1.24 Avg Goals Scored 1.29
1.37 Avg Goals Conceded 1.68
2.61 Avg Goals / Game 2.97
7 Clean Sheets 8
23 BTTS 24
19 Over 2.5 Games 17
NEOM

NEOM

L
A Al Riyadh
0–1 HT 0–0
28 Aug
L
H Al-Qadisiyah FC
0–2 HT 0–1
24 Aug
W
A Al-Faisaly FC
2–0 HT 0–0
21 Aug
W
H Al-Fayha
2–1 HT 2–0
14 Aug
D
H Al-Ettifaq
1–1 HT 0–1
21 May
L
A Al-Hilal Saudi FC
0–2 HT 0–1
16 May
W
H Al Shabab
2–1 HT 2–0
11 May
D
A Al-Fateh
2–2 HT 1–0
02 May
D
H Al-Hazm
1–1 HT 1–0
28 Apr
L
A Al Najma
1–2 HT 0–1
11 Apr
W
A Al-Ittihad FC
4–3 HT 2–2
08 Apr
W
H Al-Fayha
1–0 HT 0–0
04 Apr
D
H Al Taawon
2–2 HT 1–0
12 Mar
L
A Al-Nassr
0–1 HT 0–0
07 Mar
L
H Al Kholood
1–2 HT 1–2
28 Feb
D
A Al-Fayha
1–1 HT 1–0
25 Feb
W
A Al Khaleej Saihat
1–0 HT 0–0
21 Feb
L
A Al-Qadisiyah FC
0–1 HT 0–0
12 Feb
W
H Al Riyadh
1–0 HT 0–0
06 Feb
D
A Al Okhdood
1–1 HT 0–1
02 Feb
W
H Damac
3–0 HT 2–0
30 Jan
L
H Al-Ahli Jeddah
0–3 HT 0–0
24 Jan
D
A Al-Ettifaq
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Jan
L
H Al-Hilal Saudi FC
1–2 HT 1–0
18 Jan
L
A Al Shabab
2–3 HT 1–1
14 Jan
L
H Al-Fateh
0–1 HT 0–1
10 Jan
W
A Al-Hazm
2–1 HT 0–0
04 Jan
L
H Al-Ittihad FC
1–3 HT 1–1
31 Dec
W
H Al Najma
2–1 HT 0–0
25 Dec
D
A Al Taawon
1–1 HT 0–0
23 Nov
L
H Al-Nassr
1–3 HT 0–0
08 Nov
W
A Al Kholood
3–2 HT 2–1
30 Oct
D
H Al Khaleej Saihat
1–1 HT 1–1
24 Oct
L
H Al-Qadisiyah FC
1–3 HT 0–2
19 Oct
W
A Al Riyadh
3–2 HT 2–1
27 Sep
W
H Al Okhdood
1–0 HT 1–0
18 Sep
W
A Damac
2–1 HT 1–0
14 Sep
L
A Al-Ahli Jeddah
0–1 HT 0–1
28 Aug
Al Shabab

Al Shabab

D
A Al-Hazm
1–1 HT 0–0
30 Aug
D
H Al Riyadh
3–3 HT 2–2
25 Aug
D
A Al Khaleej Saihat
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Aug
L
H Al-Qadisiyah FC
1–3 HT 1–1
13 Aug
L
A Al Najma
0–1 HT 0–1
20 May
W
H Al-Ittihad FC
3–2 HT 0–0
17 May
L
A NEOM
1–2 HT 0–2
11 May
L
H Al-Nassr
2–4 HT 1–2
07 May
L
H Al Taawon
1–5 HT 1–2
03 May
D
H Al-Fateh
1–1 HT 0–1
28 Apr
D
A Al-Qadisiyah FC
2–2 HT 1–1
14 Apr
D
A Al Riyadh
1–1 HT 1–1
05 Apr
W
H Al Okhdood
2–0 HT 1–0
14 Mar
D
A Al-Ettifaq
1–1 HT 0–0
07 Mar
L
H Al-Hilal Saudi FC
3–5 HT 2–3
27 Feb
W
H Al Riyadh
3–1 HT 2–0
23 Feb
W
A Damac
3–1 HT 1–1
20 Feb
L
H Al-Ahli Jeddah
2–5 HT 2–4
13 Feb
L
A Al Kholood
0–1 HT 0–0
07 Feb
W
H Al-Fayha
1–0 HT 1–0
01 Feb
W
A Al-Hazm
4–0 HT 0–0
29 Jan
D
A Al Khaleej Saihat
0–0 HT 0–0
24 Jan
D
H Al Najma
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Jan
L
A Al-Nassr
2–3 HT 1–2
17 Jan
W
H NEOM
3–2 HT 1–1
14 Jan
L
A Al Taawon
0–2 HT 0–2
09 Jan
L
A Al-Fateh
0–2 HT 0–1
03 Jan
L
H Al-Qadisiyah FC
2–3 HT 0–3
31 Dec
L
A Al-Ittihad FC
0–2 HT 0–1
27 Dec
D
A Al Okhdood
1–1 HT 1–1
23 Nov
D
H Al-Ettifaq
1–1 HT 1–0
08 Nov
L
A Al-Hilal Saudi FC
0–1 HT 0–1
31 Oct
D
H Damac
1–1 HT 1–1
25 Oct
D
A Al-Ahli Jeddah
1–1 HT 0–1
17 Oct
L
H Al Kholood
1–2 HT 0–0
25 Sep
D
A Al-Fayha
0–0 HT 0–0
19 Sep
W
H Al-Hazm
1–0 HT 0–0
12 Sep
L
H Al Khaleej Saihat
1–4 HT 0–1
29 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are NEOM and Al Shabab in coming into this match?

NEOM have gone 14W 9D 15L in their last 38 games (1.34 PPG), while Al Shabab have gone 8W 14D 16L in their last 38 (1.00 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — NEOM at home or Al Shabab away?

NEOM's home record (1.32 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — NEOM at home: 1.32 PPG; Al Shabab away: 0.79 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

Fixture History

2 meetings separate these sides on the data we hold, the series stretching back to January 2026. Every recorded meeting has come in Pro League. They last met on 11 May 2026, roughly 3 months ago.

Last 2 Meetings

NEOM

1

NEOM

0

Draws

Al Shabab

1

Al Shabab

Recent Meetings

NEOM
2–1
11 May 26
Al Shabab
Al Shabab
3–2
14 Jan 26
NEOM

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between NEOM and Al Shabab?

From 2 meetings on record, NEOM have won 1, Al Shabab have won 1, and 0 have been drawn.

When did NEOM and Al Shabab last play each other?

They last met on 11 May 2026, when NEOM 2-1 Al Shabab.

📈 Trading Insight

First-Half Patterns

NEOM are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 74% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 37% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 16% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one.

Al Shabab are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 63% of their matches.

Full-Time Trends

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — NEOM 63%, Al Shabab 47% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 58% (NEOM) and 26% (Al Shabab).

On the defensive side: Al Shabab in 47%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = NEOM home games / Al Shabab away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

NEOM NEOM Early Season
Metric All
(38 games)
Venue
(19 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 25/38
(65.8%)
14/19
(73.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 11/38
(28.9%)
7/19
(36.8%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 12/13
(92.3%)
5/5
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 6/13
(46.2%)
3/5
(60%)
Winning at HT 12/38
(31.6%)
7/19
(36.8%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/38
(13.2%)
3/19
(15.8%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 2/38
(5.3%)
1/19
(5.3%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 23/38
(60.5%)
12/19
(63.2%)
Over 2.5 Goals 19/38
(50%)
11/19
(57.9%)
Over 3.5 Goals 9/38
(23.7%)
4/19
(21.1%)
Clean Sheet 7/38
(18.4%)
4/19
(21.1%)
Failed to Score 9/38
(23.7%)
3/19
(15.8%)
Al Shabab Al Shabab Early Season
Metric All
(38 games)
Venue
(19 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 27/38
(71.1%)
12/19
(63.2%)
2+ Goals Before HT 17/38
(44.7%)
7/19
(36.8%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 7/11
(63.6%)
4/7
(57.1%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/11
(45.5%)
3/7
(42.9%)
Winning at HT 4/38
(10.5%)
0/19
(0%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 1/38
(2.6%)
0/19
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 2/38
(5.3%)
1/19
(5.3%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 24/38
(63.2%)
9/19
(47.4%)
Over 2.5 Goals 17/38
(44.7%)
5/19
(26.3%)
Over 3.5 Goals 15/38
(39.5%)
4/19
(21.1%)
Clean Sheet 8/38
(21.1%)
4/19
(21.1%)
Failed to Score 10/38
(26.3%)
9/19
(47.4%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when NEOM play Al Shabab?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 63% of NEOM's games and 47% of Al Shabab's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is NEOM vs Al Shabab usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 58% of NEOM's recent games and 26% of Al Shabab's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do NEOM and Al Shabab tend to score early?

NEOM have had a goal before half-time in 74% of their recent matches, Al Shabab in 63% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

The match report will be available once the game has finished.