🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Al Najma at 43%, yet other data sources diverge — this Al Najma vs Al Riyadh fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

Al Najma host Al Riyadh at King Abdullah Sports City Stadium in Pro League, Regular Season - 19. Kick-off is scheduled for Wednesday 28 January 2026 at 15:20 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, Al Najma stand at 0W 4D 6L from 10 Pro League matches — 0.40 PPG. Last five: L L D D L. They are averaging 1.20 goals per game and conceding 2.00 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.00 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Al Najma, so this record blends games from this season and last.

At home at King Abdullah Sports City Stadium, Al Najma have gone 0W 2D 6L this season (8 games, 0.25 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.25 goals scored and 2.25 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 75% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Across all Pro League games this season, Al Riyadh have recorded 0W 4D 6L from 10 outings — 0.40 PPG. Last five: D L L D D. Their scoring rate of 0.90 per game is modest, conceding 2.10 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.10 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play. This season is still relatively young for Al Riyadh, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Al Riyadh's form when playing away from home: 1W 2D 7L across 10 road games this term (0.50 PPG). Away from home they average 1.10 goals scored and 2.70 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

There is minimal separation in the form figures — Al Najma at 0.40 PPG versus Al Riyadh's 0.40. The form guide is not providing a strong directional steer; the model and market data will carry more weight in the final assessment.

Both teams score in over 75% of each side's relevant games (using home/away splits). At that combined rate, BTTS Yes is as well-evidenced as it gets — the data strongly backs two-way scoring.

Head to Head

The rivalry is an even one: 0 wins apiece for Al Najma, 1 for Al Riyadh and 0 shared spoils from 1 past contests. Neither side holds a meaningful historical edge.

The 1 previous encounters between these sides have been high-scoring affairs — 3.0 goals per contest on average. Historical precedent backs the Over 2.5 goals market. The most recent clash, on 14 Sep 2025, ended 1–2 with Al Riyadh winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

In-Play Data

Al Najma trading profile (17 games, 8 at home): they score before half-time in 62% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 71% of the time; BTTS occurs in 75% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 62% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 41%.

Al Riyadh trading profile (17 games, 8 at away): they score before half-time in 88% of fixtures in away games; BTTS occurs in 75% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 75% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 41%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Al Najma 71% and Al Riyadh 76% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Al Najma 65% | Al Riyadh 59%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Al Najma 1.94 xG and Al Riyadh 1.71 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Al Najma attack 0.932 / defence 1.371 | Al Riyadh attack 0.861 / defence 1.365. League average goals — home 1.522 / away 1.449. Al Riyadh bring a strong defensive rating of 1.365 — this is suppressing Al Najma's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 17 Al Najma games / 51 Al Riyadh games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Al Najma 43% | Draw 23% | Al Riyadh 34%. Fair-value odds: Al Najma 2.33 | Draw 4.35 | Al Riyadh 2.94. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 23% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 71% | BTTS probability 71% | Total xG 3.65. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 71% — a total xG of 3.65 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 71% reflects that both xG figures (1.94 / 1.71) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, Al Najma are the pick at 43% — marginal model lean. With a 23% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Al Najma offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 3.65 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 71% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 3.6 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 71% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Al Najma 75% | Al Riyadh 80% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights