🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model favours Benfica (38%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as Famalicao face Benfica.

✍️ Match Preview

Fixture Analysis

It is a Primeira Liga clash, Regular Season - 32 as Famalicao welcome Benfica to Estadio Municipal de Famalicao. Kick-off is set for Saturday 2 May 2026 at 18:00 UTC.

Form Guide

Famalicao — All Games: 5W 4D 1L from 10 Primeira Liga outings this season, averaging 1.90 points per game. Last five: W D D D W. They are averaging 1.20 goals per game and conceding 0.70 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. Defensively, conceding just 0.70 per game is an exceptional defensive record — one of the tightest in the division. 5 clean sheets from 10 games (50%) is a standout defensive return — they are keeping their net clean in more than half their matches.

In front of their own supporters this season, Famalicao have posted 6W 1D 3L at Estadio Municipal de Famalicao — 1.90 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.80 goals scored and 0.80 conceded per game. 5 clean sheets from 10 home games (50%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Estadio Municipal de Famalicao.

Across all Primeira Liga games this season, Benfica have recorded 8W 2D 0L from 10 outings — 2.60 PPG. Last five: W D W W W. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.30 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. Defensively, 0.80 goals conceded per game is elite-level — a side this difficult to score against is a real threat to Over 2.5 and BTTS Yes. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

Benfica's away record: 7W 3D 0L from 10 road trips in Primeira Liga this season (2.40 PPG). They are averaging 1.90 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

Form points away from home here. Benfica's 2.60 PPG return is 0.70 points per game ahead of Famalicao's 1.90 — the visitors are the form-based selection, and Double Chance is an alternative worth pricing if the outright looks tight.

Head to Head

Despite the anticipated home advantage, Benfica have the better historical record — 6 wins from 9 previous contests against 2 for Famalicao.

The 9 previous meetings have averaged 2.2 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 22 Dec 2025, ended 0–1 with Benfica winning.

It is worth noting that Benfica have a superior record in this fixture despite their visitor status — 6 wins from 9 meetings. Home advantage alone is not a sufficient reason to dismiss that track record.

Trading Patterns

Famalicao in-play and half-time data (65 games, 32 at home): they score before half-time in 59% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; BTTS occurs in 38% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 41% of games (home games); they keep a clean sheet 43% of the time.

Benfica in-play and half-time data (65 games, 32 at away): they score before half-time in 72% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 85% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 69% of those occasions; they lead at the break 60% of the time; BTTS occurs in 53% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 59% of games (away games); they keep a clean sheet 45% of the time.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Famalicao 46% versus Benfica 52%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Famalicao 46% | Benfica 68%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Famalicao 1.05 xG and Benfica 1.16 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Famalicao attack 1.012 / defence 0.782 | Benfica attack 1.281 / defence 0.702. League average goals — home 1.478 / away 1.160. Benfica's defence strength of 0.702 is below average — they are conceding at a rate that inflates the home xG figure. Benfica have an above-average attack strength of 1.281 — the away xG of 1.16 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Famalicao's defence rating of 0.782 is below average — the home backline is amplifying the visitor's projected output. Data: 65 Famalicao games / 65 Benfica games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Famalicao 33% | Draw 29% | Benfica 38%. Fair-value odds: Famalicao 3.03 | Draw 3.45 | Benfica 2.63. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 29% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 38% | BTTS probability 45% | Total xG 2.21. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 62% — total xG of 2.21 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 45% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Benfica at 38% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. With a 29% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Benfica offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.21 combined xG gives a 38% probability to Under 2.5 — Poisson-only — limited corroboration.

Poisson assigns a 45% probability to BTTS No based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates are neutral: Famalicao 40% | Benfica 70%.

The outsider holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights