🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates NEC Nijmegen at 45% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this AZ Alkmaar vs NEC Nijmegen encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

AZ Alkmaar and NEC Nijmegen meet at AFAS Stadion in Eredivisie, Regular Season - 21. This fixture gets under way on Saturday 31 January 2026 at 15:30 UTC.

Form & Momentum

AZ Alkmaar have collected 1.10 PPG across 10 Eredivisie outings this season: 3W 2D 5L. Last five: L W L D W. They are averaging 1.20 goals per game and conceding 1.90 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for AZ Alkmaar, so this record blends games from this season and last.

AZ Alkmaar at AFAS Stadion this season: 5W 4D 1L from 10 home games — 1.90 PPG on home soil. They are averaging 2.30 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 90% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.90 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.10 — AZ Alkmaar are significantly better at AFAS Stadion than their overall form suggests.

NEC Nijmegen's overall Eredivisie record this term: 6W 3D 1L from 10 games (2.10 PPG). Last five: W D D W W. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.40 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play. This season is still relatively young for NEC Nijmegen, so this record blends games from this season and last.

NEC Nijmegen away from home this season: 4W 3D 3L from 10 away games — 1.50 PPG on the road. They are averaging 2.40 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. Both teams have scored in 90% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 1.50 is notably below their overall 2.10 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

On a straight form reading, NEC Nijmegen are the stronger side — 1.00 PPG clear of the hosts (2.10 vs 1.10). Backing them with draw insurance is the conservative play if the outright away price appears short.

The BTTS picture is exceptionally clear (using home/away splits) — AZ Alkmaar register both teams scoring in 90% of relevant games, NEC Nijmegen in 90%. Both sides above 70% makes BTTS Yes one of the strongest standalone angles in this fixture.

H2H History

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 9 meetings: AZ Alkmaar 4W, NEC Nijmegen 2W, 3D.

Attacking output has been a hallmark of this fixture. At 3.0 goals per game across 9 meetings, the Over 2.5 has a statistically grounded case from the head-to-head record alone. The most recent clash, on 28 Sep 2025, ended 1–2 with NEC Nijmegen winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading & In-Play

AZ Alkmaar — key trading statistics (54 games, 27 at home): they score before half-time in 74% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 88% of the time; BTTS occurs in 74% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 67% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 39%.

NEC Nijmegen — key trading statistics (54 games, 27 at away): they score before half-time in 70% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 92% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 54% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 48% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 59% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 41%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — AZ Alkmaar 65% and NEC Nijmegen 59% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (AZ Alkmaar 65% | NEC Nijmegen 68%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects AZ Alkmaar 1.92 xG and NEC Nijmegen 2.20 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: AZ Alkmaar attack 1.016 / defence 1.107 | NEC Nijmegen attack 1.359 / defence 1.167. League average goals — home 1.620 / away 1.462. NEC Nijmegen have an above-average attack strength of 1.359 — the away xG of 2.20 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 54 AZ Alkmaar games / 53 NEC Nijmegen games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: AZ Alkmaar 35% | Draw 20% | NEC Nijmegen 45%. Fair-value odds: AZ Alkmaar 2.86 | Draw 5.00 | NEC Nijmegen 2.22. NEC Nijmegen hold a narrow Poisson edge at 45% — the draw (20%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 78% | BTTS probability 76% | Total xG 4.12. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 78% — a total xG of 4.12 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 76% reflects that both xG figures (1.92 / 2.20) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Verdict

AZ Alkmaar dominate the H2H record, yet NEC Nijmegen are the in-form side right now — historical edge versus current momentum creates a genuine dilemma.

The Poisson model's primary lean is NEC Nijmegen at 45% — moderate model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. The opposing side holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 4.12 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 78% probability — strong conviction, supported by form averaging 4.2 goals per game and H2H averaging 3.0 goals per meeting.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 76% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: AZ Alkmaar 90% | NEC Nijmegen 90% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights