🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model projects a closely fought contest — draw probability sits at 34% as Reggiana take on Sampdoria.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

MAPEI Stadium - Città del Tricolore plays host to Reggiana versus Sampdoria in Serie B, Regular Season - 38. Kick-off: Friday 8 May 2026 at 19:30 UTC.

Form

Reggiana (all games): 1W 2D 7L across 10 Serie B fixtures this term — 0.50 PPG. Last five: L W L D L. They are averaging 0.60 goals per game and conceding 2.00 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.00 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation.

In front of their own supporters this season, Reggiana have posted 2W 4D 4L at MAPEI Stadium - Città del Tricolore — 1.00 PPG. At home they are averaging 0.90 goals scored and 1.50 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.00 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.50 — Reggiana are significantly better at MAPEI Stadium - Città del Tricolore than their overall form suggests.

Sampdoria have collected 1.50 PPG across 10 Serie B outings this season: 4W 3D 3L. Last five: W W L D W. Their scoring rate of 0.70 per game is modest, conceding 1.10 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their games, reflecting a regular tendency to keep or record clean sheets.

Sampdoria's form when playing away from home: 2W 4D 4L across 10 road games this term (1.00 PPG). Away from home they average 0.80 goals scored and 1.30 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context. Their away PPG of 1.00 is notably below their overall 1.50 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

On a straight form reading, Sampdoria are the stronger side — 1.00 PPG clear of the hosts (1.50 vs 0.50). Backing them with draw insurance is the conservative play if the outright away price appears short.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Reggiana have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, Sampdoria in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H History

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 5 meetings: Reggiana 1W, Sampdoria 3W, 1D.

The 5 previous meetings have averaged 2.4 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 27 Dec 2025, ended 1–2 with Sampdoria winning.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading Data

Reggiana goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (75 games, 36 at home): they score before half-time in 81% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 63% of the time; BTTS occurs in 56% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 47% of games (home games); they fail to score in 31% of games.

Sampdoria goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (75 games, 36 at away): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; BTTS occurs in 67% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (away games); they fail to score in 35% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Reggiana 56% versus Sampdoria 49%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Reggiana 48% | Sampdoria 39%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Reggiana 1.03 xG and Sampdoria 0.97 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Reggiana attack 0.776 / defence 1.162 | Sampdoria attack 0.788 / defence 0.962. League average goals — home 1.380 / away 1.062. Reggiana's attack strength of 0.776 is below the league average — the 1.03 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 75 Reggiana games / 75 Sampdoria games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Reggiana 34% | Draw 34% | Sampdoria 31%. Fair-value odds: Reggiana 2.94 | Draw 2.94 | Sampdoria 3.23. The draw (34%) is the Poisson-preferred outcome — neither side is more likely to win than to draw, making draw-inclusive markets the most model-aligned approach.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 32% | BTTS probability 42% | Total xG 2.00. Under 2.5 is the strongly backed market at 68% probability — total xG of 2.00 sits well below the 2.5 threshold. The model is projecting a tight, low-scoring match based on both sides' defensive quality. BTTS probability of 42% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Final Verdict

The Poisson model's preferred outcome is the draw at 34% — neither side is more likely to win than to draw. Draw-inclusive markets are the most model-aligned approach. Home win at 34% and away win at 31% are close enough that backing either outright carries significant draw exposure.

Poisson projects 2.00 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 32% probability — Poisson-only — limited corroboration conviction.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 42% on No. This conflicts with form data: Reggiana 60% | Sampdoria 60% from recent games — a notable divergence.

The outsider holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights