🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates 1. FC Heidenheim at 36%, yet other data sources diverge — this Werder Bremen vs 1. FC Heidenheim fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Weserstadion plays host to Werder Bremen versus 1. FC Heidenheim in Bundesliga, Regular Season - 24. Kick-off: Saturday 28 February 2026 at 14:30 UTC.

Form

Werder Bremen (all games): 0W 3D 7L across 10 Bundesliga fixtures this term — 0.30 PPG. Last five: L D L L L. They are averaging 0.50 goals per game and conceding 2.00 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.00 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their matches, indicating a tendency toward clean sheets or low-scoring outcomes. This season is still relatively young for Werder Bremen, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Werder Bremen's form when playing at home: 3W 3D 4L across 10 games at Weserstadion this term (1.20 PPG). At home they are averaging 0.90 goals scored and 1.80 conceded per game. Their home PPG of 1.20 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.30 — Werder Bremen are significantly better at Weserstadion than their overall form suggests.

1. FC Heidenheim have collected 0.30 PPG across 10 Bundesliga outings this season: 0W 3D 7L. Last five: L L L L D. Their scoring rate of 1.00 per game is modest, conceding 2.30 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.30 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for 1. FC Heidenheim, so this record blends games from this season and last.

1. FC Heidenheim's form when playing away from home: 1W 1D 8L across 10 road games this term (0.40 PPG). Away from home they average 0.90 goals scored and 2.20 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

Both sides are running at similar form levels — 0.30 PPG for Werder Bremen against 0.30 for 1. FC Heidenheim. There is no clear form edge to exploit here; other signals need to take the lead.

H2H Analysis

The head-to-head record is closely matched — Werder Bremen lead 2W to 3W over the last 7 encounters, with 2 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.

Attacking output has been a hallmark of this fixture. At 4.3 goals per game across 7 meetings, the Over 2.5 has a statistically grounded case from the head-to-head record alone. The most recent clash, on 18 Oct 2025, ended 2–2 with a draw.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.3 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading & In-Play

Werder Bremen — key trading statistics (57 games, 28 at home): they score before half-time in 75% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 69% of the time; BTTS occurs in 46% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 54% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 42%; they fail to score in 33% of games.

1. FC Heidenheim — key trading statistics (57 games, 28 at away): they score before half-time in 86% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 83% of the time; BTTS occurs in 57% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 61% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 37%; they fail to score in 40% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Werder Bremen 49% versus 1. FC Heidenheim 51%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Werder Bremen 61% | 1. FC Heidenheim 63%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Werder Bremen 1.35 xG and 1. FC Heidenheim 1.36 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Werder Bremen attack 0.700 / defence 1.184 | 1. FC Heidenheim attack 0.825 / defence 1.116. League average goals — home 1.726 / away 1.391. Werder Bremen's attack strength of 0.700 is below the league average — the 1.35 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 57 Werder Bremen games / 57 1. FC Heidenheim games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Werder Bremen 36% | Draw 28% | 1. FC Heidenheim 36%. Fair-value odds: Werder Bremen 2.78 | Draw 3.57 | 1. FC Heidenheim 2.78. The draw (28%) is the Poisson-preferred outcome — neither side is more likely to win than to draw, making draw-inclusive markets the most model-aligned approach.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 51% | BTTS probability 56% | Total xG 2.71. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 51%/49% — the total xG of 2.71 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 56% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Picks & Verdict

The Poisson model's preferred outcome is the draw at 28% — neither side is more likely to win than to draw. Draw-inclusive markets are the most model-aligned approach. Home win at 36% and away win at 36% are close enough that backing either outright carries significant draw exposure.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.71 combined xG gives a 51% probability to Over 2.5 — strong, supported by form averaging 2.9 goals per game and H2H averaging 4.3 goals per meeting.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 56%. Form rates corroborate: Werder Bremen 40% | 1. FC Heidenheim 70% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 36% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights