🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates SC Freiburg at 40%, yet in-form RB Leipzig provide a compelling counter-argument — this SC Freiburg vs RB Leipzig fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Bundesliga encounter, Regular Season - 34 sees RB Leipzig travel to Europa-Park-Stadion to take on SC Freiburg. The game is scheduled for Saturday 16 May 2026, 14:30 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, SC Freiburg stand at 3W 2D 5L from 10 Bundesliga matches — 1.10 PPG. Last five: W W L D L. They are averaging 1.30 goals per game and conceding 1.90 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

In front of their own supporters this season, SC Freiburg have posted 5W 3D 2L at Europa-Park-Stadion — 1.80 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.60 goals scored and 1.30 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.80 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.10 — SC Freiburg are significantly better at Europa-Park-Stadion than their overall form suggests.

RB Leipzig — All Games: 8W 0D 2L from 10 Bundesliga fixtures this season — 2.40 PPG. Last five: W W W L W. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.10 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

RB Leipzig's away record: 5W 2D 3L from 10 road trips in Bundesliga this season (1.70 PPG). Away from home they average 1.50 goals scored and 1.30 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 1.70 is notably below their overall 2.40 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

Despite the home advantage, the form figures favour RB Leipzig — 1.30 PPG ahead of the hosts (2.40 vs 1.10). That gap is large enough to take seriously. Draw No Bet on the visitors neutralises home-ground risk while maintaining the form-backed selection.

Both teams score in over 70% of each side's relevant games (using home/away splits). At that combined rate, BTTS Yes is as well-evidenced as it gets — the data strongly backs two-way scoring.

H2H

The previous 9 encounters between these sides heavily favour RB Leipzig, who boast 6 victories compared to 0 for SC Freiburg.

The 9 previous meetings have averaged 2.7 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 14 Jan 2026, ended 0–2 with RB Leipzig winning.

It is worth noting that RB Leipzig have a superior record in this fixture despite their visitor status — 6 wins from 9 meetings. Home advantage alone is not a sufficient reason to dismiss that track record.

Trading Patterns

SC Freiburg in-play and half-time data (67 games, 33 at home): they score before half-time in 82% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 71% of the time; BTTS occurs in 76% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 76% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 42%.

RB Leipzig in-play and half-time data (67 games, 33 at away): they score before half-time in 64% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 60% of the time; BTTS occurs in 48% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 54% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 45%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — SC Freiburg 58% versus RB Leipzig 57%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (SC Freiburg 66% | RB Leipzig 63%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects SC Freiburg 1.57 xG and RB Leipzig 1.46 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: SC Freiburg attack 0.973 / defence 0.944 | RB Leipzig attack 1.038 / defence 0.940. League average goals — home 1.721 / away 1.492. Data: 67 SC Freiburg games / 67 RB Leipzig games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: SC Freiburg 40% | Draw 24% | RB Leipzig 36%. Fair-value odds: SC Freiburg 2.50 | Draw 4.17 | RB Leipzig 2.78. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 24% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 58% | BTTS probability 61% | Total xG 3.04. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 58% — the 3.04 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 61% reflects that both xG figures (1.57 / 1.46) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is SC Freiburg at 40% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form RB Leipzig (2.40 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. With a 24% draw probability, Draw No Bet on SC Freiburg offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 36% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 3.04 combined xG gives a 58% probability to Over 2.5 — reasonable, supported by form averaging 2.8 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 61% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: SC Freiburg 80% | RB Leipzig 70% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 36% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights