🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Union Berlin at 38%, yet other data sources diverge — this 1. FC Heidenheim vs Union Berlin fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

1. FC Heidenheim and Union Berlin meet at Voith-Arena in Bundesliga, Regular Season - 29. This fixture gets under way on Saturday 11 April 2026 at 14:30 UTC.

Current Form

1. FC Heidenheim's overall Bundesliga record this term: 0W 3D 7L from 10 games (0.30 PPG). Last five: L L L D D. They are averaging 1.20 goals per game and conceding 2.40 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.40 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly.

1. FC Heidenheim's form when playing at home: 1W 4D 5L across 10 games at Voith-Arena this term (0.70 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.30 goals scored and 2.60 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Union Berlin (all games): 2W 2D 6L across 10 Bundesliga outings this term — 0.80 points per game. Last five: L L W L D. Their scoring rate of 0.80 per game is modest, conceding 2.00 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.00 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation.

Union Berlin's form when playing away from home: 3W 2D 5L across 10 road games this term (1.10 PPG). Away from home they average 0.90 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game.

Union Berlin arrive in superior form — a 0.50 PPG advantage (0.80 vs 0.30) that offsets much of the home-ground benefit. The away side are the form pick, with draw protection the sensible way to manage the home-field uncertainty.

H2H History

Across 5 previous meetings, 1. FC Heidenheim are the stronger side on paper — 4 victories to 0, with 1 draws in between.

The 5 previous meetings have averaged 2.6 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 29 Nov 2025, ended 2–1 with 1. FC Heidenheim winning.

The historical record gives 1. FC Heidenheim a meaningful edge here — 4 wins from 5 meetings is the kind of ledger that should not be discounted when the form picture is inconclusive. Even away from home, the visitors have struggled to impose themselves in this fixture.

Trading

1. FC Heidenheim half-time and goal-timing data (62 games, 31 at home): they score before half-time in 74% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 86% of the time; BTTS occurs in 48% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 68% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 39%; they fail to score in 40% of games.

Union Berlin half-time and goal-timing data (62 games, 31 at away): they score before half-time in 68% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; BTTS occurs in 42% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 48% of games (away games); they fail to score in 34% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — 1. FC Heidenheim 52% versus Union Berlin 53%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (1. FC Heidenheim 63% | Union Berlin 52%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects 1. FC Heidenheim 1.57 xG and Union Berlin 1.57 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: 1. FC Heidenheim attack 0.918 / defence 1.450 | Union Berlin attack 0.743 / defence 0.998. League average goals — home 1.710 / away 1.458. Data: 62 1. FC Heidenheim games / 62 Union Berlin games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: 1. FC Heidenheim 38% | Draw 24% | Union Berlin 38%. Fair-value odds: 1. FC Heidenheim 2.63 | Draw 4.17 | Union Berlin 2.63. The draw (24%) is the Poisson-preferred outcome — neither side is more likely to win than to draw, making draw-inclusive markets the most model-aligned approach.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 61% | BTTS probability 63% | Total xG 3.14. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 61% — the 3.14 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 63% reflects that both xG figures (1.57 / 1.57) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Verdict

1. FC Heidenheim dominate the H2H record, yet Union Berlin are the in-form side right now — historical edge versus current momentum creates a genuine dilemma.

The Poisson model's preferred outcome is the draw at 24% — neither side is more likely to win than to draw. Draw-inclusive markets are the most model-aligned approach. Home win at 38% and away win at 38% are close enough that backing either outright carries significant draw exposure.

Poisson projects 3.14 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 61% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.2 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 63% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: 1. FC Heidenheim 60% | Union Berlin 50% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 38% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights