Sign in Register

Chelsea 1-3 Nottingham Forest – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Premier League · Regular Season - 35

Kick-off

Mon 4 May 2026

15:00

Venue

Stamford Bridge

Competition

Premier League

England

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Nottingham Forest at 53% — recent form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Chelsea and Nottingham Forest meet at Stamford Bridge in Premier League (matchday 35). This fixture gets under way on Monday 4 May 2026 at 16:00 UK time.

Current Form

Chelsea's record over their last 10 games: 2W 2D 6L (0.80 PPG). Last five: L L L L L. They are averaging 1.10 goals per game and conceding 1.80 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market.

Chelsea's form when playing at home: 3W 3D 4L across their last 10 home games (1.20 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.30 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game.

Nottingham Forest (all games): 3W 4D 3L across their last 10 — 1.30 points per game. Last five: D W D W W. They are scoring at 1.70 per game and conceding 1.00. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity.

Nottingham Forest's away record over their last 10 away games: 4W 1D 5L (1.30 PPG). Away from home they average 1.70 goals scored and 1.50 conceded per game.

On a straight form reading, Nottingham Forest are the stronger side — 0.50 PPG clear of the hosts (1.30 vs 0.80). Backing them with draw insurance is the conservative play if the outright away price appears short.

Head-to-Head

The head-to-head record is closely matched — across the 7 H2H matches in our data, Chelsea edge it 3 wins to 1, with 3 draws. Neither side has a commanding advantage.

The 7 H2H matches in our data averaged 2.6 goals per game — a neutral rate that gives no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent of those, on 18 Oct 2025, ended Chelsea 3–0 Nottingham Forest — a Chelsea win.

The head-to-head data offers no strong steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the model and current market pricing should carry more weight for this fixture.

Trading

Chelsea half-time and goal-timing data (last 72 games, 36 of them at home): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 75% of their matches in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 76% of the time; of the 28 games they led at half-time, they failed to win 32%; of the 20 games they trailed at half-time, they recovered to draw or win 40%; BTTS occurs in 58% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 56% of games (home games).

Nottingham Forest half-time and goal-timing data (last 72 games, 36 of them away): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 83% of their matches in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 81% of the time; of the 22 games they trailed at half-time, they recovered to draw or win 27%; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 64% of games (away games); they fail to score in 31% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Chelsea 58% versus Nottingham Forest 44%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Chelsea 60% | Nottingham Forest 51%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Chelsea 1.09 xG and Nottingham Forest 1.82 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Chelsea attack 0.832 / defence 1.099 | Nottingham Forest attack 1.337 / defence 0.904. League average goals — home 1.445 / away 1.236. Nottingham Forest have an above-average attack rating of 1.337, which lifts their away xG to 1.82. Data: built from Chelsea's last 72 games and Nottingham Forest's last 72.

Result probabilities: Chelsea 21% | Draw 25% | Nottingham Forest 53%. Fair-value odds: Chelsea 4.66 | Draw 3.98 | Nottingham Forest 1.87. Nottingham Forest hold a narrow Poisson edge at 53% — the draw (25%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 55% | BTTS Yes probability 57% | Total xG 2.90. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 55% — the 2.90 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 57% is only a slight lean — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Nottingham Forest at 53% — moderate model lean. Recent form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 25% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Nottingham Forest if the outright odds are short.

The Poisson model projects 2.90 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 55% — reasonable conviction, supported by recent form (Chelsea's last 10 home games and Nottingham Forest's last 10 away games) averaging 3.0 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 57% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates are neutral — both teams scored in: Chelsea 50% (last 10 home games) | Nottingham Forest 50% (last 10 away games).

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (Chelsea 3W, 3D, Nottingham Forest 1W from the 7 H2H matches in our data), with no clear advantage.
Form Nottingham Forest lead on PPG: 1.30 vs 0.80 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Nottingham Forest — Nottingham Forest at 53% win probability.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest | Competition: Premier League, matchday 35 | Venue: Stamford Bridge • Kick-off: Monday 4 May 2026 at 16:00 UK time • Data inputs: head-to-head data, recent form (overall and home/away), the Poisson prediction model and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Chelsea 21% | Draw 25% | Nottingham Forest 53% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 55% (Under 45%) | BTTS Yes 57% (No 43%) | xG Chelsea 1.09 / Nottingham Forest 1.82 • Poisson strength factors: Chelsea attack 0.832 / def 1.099 | Nottingham Forest attack 1.337 / def 0.904 | league avg home 1.445 / away 1.236 • Poisson stance: Nottingham Forest (53%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.09

Chelsea xG

Expected Goals

1.82

Nottingham Forest xG

21%
25%
53%
Chelsea Draw Nottingham Forest

57%

BTTS

80%

Over 1.5

55%

Over 2.5

33%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest FAQs

What time does Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest kick off?

Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest kicked off at 16:00 UK time on Monday 4 May 2026 at Stamford Bridge.

What was the final score in Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest?

Chelsea 1 - 3 Nottingham Forest.

Where is Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest being played?

The match is being played at Stamford Bridge.

What competition is Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest part of?

Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest is a Premier League fixture (matchday 35) (England).

Who is favourite to win Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest?

Our statistical model gives Chelsea a 21% chance of winning, Nottingham Forest a 53% chance, and a 25% chance of a draw — making Nottingham Forest the favourite.

Will both teams score in Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest?

Our model estimates a 57% probability that both Chelsea and Nottingham Forest will score, so it leans towards BTTS Yes.

Will Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 55%, so it leans towards over 2.5 goals.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

The model rates Chelsea's attack at 0.83x the league average against Nottingham Forest's defence at 0.90x — combine the two and it projects 1.09 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — Nottingham Forest's attack (1.34x) against Chelsea's defence (1.10x) — and the away total comes out at 1.82.

These ratings are built from Chelsea's last 72 games and Nottingham Forest's last 72 — a full enough recent sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 12.2% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 1-2 (9.8%), 0-2 (9.1%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 31% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Nottingham Forest Win

21%

Chelsea

4.66

25%

Draw

3.98

53%

Nottingham Forest

1.87

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

10.8%

Draw

Most likely

0 – 1

10.0%

Away win

1 – 2

9.8%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.09

Chelsea xG

Total xG

2.90

1.82

Nottingham Forest xG

21%
25%
53%
ChelseaDrawNottingham Forest

4.66

21%

Home win

3.98

25%

Draw

1.87

53%

Away win

Goals Markets

79%

Over 1.5

1.27

21%

Under 1.5

4.76

55%

Over 2.5

1.82

45%

Under 2.5

2.22

33%

Over 3.5

3.03

67%

Under 3.5

1.49

17%

Over 4.5

5.88

83%

Under 4.5

1.20

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

57%

BTTS Yes

1.77

43%

BTTS No

2.30

Clean Sheet

16%

Chelsea

6.15

34%

Nottingham Forest

2.96

Win to Nil

3%

Chelsea

28.63

18%

Nottingham Forest

5.55

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 5.5 10.0 9.1 5.5 2.5 0.9
1 6.0 10.8 9.8 6.0 2.7 1.0
2 3.2 5.9 5.3 3.2 1.5 0.5
3 1.2 2.1 1.9 1.2 0.5 0.2
4 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1
5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 – –

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

▶ Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.086
λ Away (xG) 1.816
Total xG 2.902
League avg home goals 1.445
League avg away goals 1.236
Chelsea attack strength 0.832
Chelsea defence strength 1.099
Nottingham Forest attack strength 1.337
Nottingham Forest defence strength 0.904
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 72 / 72

❓ Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest Prediction FAQs

What is the most likely scoreline for Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 12.2%.

How many goals are Chelsea and Nottingham Forest expected to score?

The model projects 1.09 expected goals for Chelsea and 1.82 for Nottingham Forest, a combined total of 2.90.

How confident is the prediction model for Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 53%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Chelsea come into this having played 72 games, going 33W 18D 21L for 1.62 points per game. Their last five reads L-L-L-L-L.

On the other side, Nottingham Forest sit at 1.44 PPG from 72 outings (29W 17D 26L), a run that reads D-W-D-W-W across their last five.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.62 PPG for Chelsea against 1.44 for Nottingham Forest. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

Home & Away Splits

Chelsea's home form reads 18W 10D 8L across their last 36 home games, a 1.78 PPG return.

Away from home, Nottingham Forest have taken 1.50 points per game from their last 36 away games (16W 6D 14L).

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Chelsea are averaging 1.62 goals scored and 1.22 conceded per game recently; Nottingham Forest are on 1.38 scored and 1.26 conceded.

Last 72 Results

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Chelsea

Chelsea

Current Season
L L L L L
Nottingham Forest

Nottingham Forest

Current Season
D W D W W
72 Played 72
33/18/21 W / D / L 29/17/26
1.62 Points Per Game 1.44
1.62 Avg Goals Scored 1.38
1.22 Avg Goals Conceded 1.26
2.85 Avg Goals / Game 2.64
20 Clean Sheets 22
42 BTTS 32
43 Over 2.5 Games 37
Chelsea

Chelsea

L
A Brighton
0–3 HT 0–1
21 Apr
L
H Manchester United
0–1 HT 0–1
18 Apr
L
H Manchester City
0–3 HT 0–0
12 Apr
L
A Everton
0–3 HT 0–1
21 Mar
L
H Newcastle
0–1 HT 0–1
14 Mar
W
A Aston Villa
4–1 HT 2–1
04 Mar
L
A Arsenal
1–2 HT 1–1
01 Mar
D
H Burnley
1–1 HT 1–0
21 Feb
D
H Leeds
2–2 HT 1–0
10 Feb
W
A Wolves
3–1 HT 3–0
07 Feb
W
H West Ham
3–2 HT 0–2
31 Jan
W
A Crystal Palace
3–1 HT 1–0
25 Jan
W
H Brentford
2–0 HT 1–0
17 Jan
L
A Fulham
1–2 HT 0–0
07 Jan
D
A Manchester City
1–1 HT 0–1
04 Jan
D
H Bournemouth
2–2 HT 2–2
30 Dec
L
H Aston Villa
1–2 HT 1–0
27 Dec
D
A Newcastle
2–2 HT 0–2
20 Dec
W
H Everton
2–0 HT 2–0
13 Dec
D
A Bournemouth
0–0 HT 0–0
06 Dec
L
A Leeds
1–3 HT 0–2
03 Dec
D
H Arsenal
1–1 HT 0–0
30 Nov
W
A Burnley
2–0 HT 1–0
22 Nov
W
H Wolves
3–0 HT 0–0
08 Nov
W
A Tottenham
1–0 HT 1–0
01 Nov
L
H Sunderland
1–2 HT 1–1
25 Oct
W
A Nottingham Forest
3–0 HT 0–0
18 Oct
W
H Liverpool
2–1 HT 1–0
04 Oct
L
H Brighton
1–3 HT 1–0
27 Sep
L
A Manchester United
1–2 HT 0–2
20 Sep
D
A Brentford
2–2 HT 0–1
13 Sep
W
H Fulham
2–0 HT 1–0
30 Aug
W
A West Ham
5–1 HT 3–1
22 Aug
D
H Crystal Palace
0–0 HT 0–0
17 Aug
W
A Nottingham Forest
1–0 HT 0–0
25 May
W
H Manchester United
1–0 HT 0–0
16 May
L
A Newcastle
0–2 HT 0–1
11 May
W
H Liverpool
3–1 HT 1–0
04 May
W
H Everton
1–0 HT 1–0
26 Apr
W
A Fulham
2–1 HT 0–1
20 Apr
D
H Ipswich
2–2 HT 0–2
13 Apr
D
A Brentford
0–0 HT 0–0
06 Apr
W
H Tottenham
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Apr
L
A Arsenal
0–1 HT 0–1
16 Mar
W
H Leicester
1–0 HT 0–0
09 Mar
W
H Southampton
4–0 HT 3–0
25 Feb
L
A Aston Villa
1–2 HT 1–0
22 Feb
L
A Brighton
0–3 HT 0–2
14 Feb
W
H West Ham
2–1 HT 0–1
03 Feb
L
A Manchester City
1–3 HT 1–1
25 Jan
W
H Wolves
3–1 HT 1–1
20 Jan
D
H Bournemouth
2–2 HT 1–0
14 Jan
D
A Crystal Palace
1–1 HT 1–0
04 Jan
L
A Ipswich
0–2 HT 0–1
30 Dec
L
H Fulham
1–2 HT 1–0
26 Dec
D
A Everton
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Dec
W
H Brentford
2–1 HT 1–0
15 Dec
W
A Tottenham
4–3 HT 1–2
08 Dec
W
A Southampton
5–1 HT 3–1
04 Dec
W
H Aston Villa
3–0 HT 2–0
01 Dec
W
A Leicester
2–1 HT 1–0
23 Nov
D
H Arsenal
1–1 HT 0–0
10 Nov
D
A Manchester United
1–1 HT 0–0
03 Nov
W
H Newcastle
2–1 HT 1–1
27 Oct
L
A Liverpool
1–2 HT 0–1
20 Oct
D
H Nottingham Forest
1–1 HT 0–0
06 Oct
W
H Brighton
4–2 HT 4–2
28 Sep
W
A West Ham
3–0 HT 2–0
21 Sep
W
A Bournemouth
1–0 HT 0–0
14 Sep
D
H Crystal Palace
1–1 HT 1–0
01 Sep
W
A Wolves
6–2 HT 2–2
25 Aug
L
H Manchester City
0–2 HT 0–1
18 Aug
Nottingham Forest

Nottingham Forest

W
A Sunderland
5–0 HT 4–0
24 Apr
W
H Burnley
4–1 HT 0–1
19 Apr
D
H Aston Villa
1–1 HT 1–1
12 Apr
W
A Tottenham
3–0 HT 1–0
22 Mar
D
H Fulham
0–0 HT 0–0
15 Mar
D
A Manchester City
2–2 HT 0–1
04 Mar
L
A Brighton
1–2 HT 1–2
01 Mar
L
H Liverpool
0–1 HT 0–0
22 Feb
D
H Wolves
0–0 HT 0–0
11 Feb
L
A Leeds
1–3 HT 0–2
06 Feb
D
H Crystal Palace
1–1 HT 1–1
01 Feb
W
A Brentford
2–0 HT 1–0
25 Jan
D
H Arsenal
0–0 HT 0–0
17 Jan
W
A West Ham
2–1 HT 0–1
06 Jan
L
A Aston Villa
1–3 HT 0–1
03 Jan
L
H Everton
0–2 HT 0–1
30 Dec
L
H Manchester City
1–2 HT 0–0
27 Dec
L
A Fulham
0–1 HT 0–1
22 Dec
W
H Tottenham
3–0 HT 1–0
14 Dec
L
A Everton
0–3 HT 0–2
06 Dec
W
A Wolves
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Dec
L
H Brighton
0–2 HT 0–1
30 Nov
W
A Liverpool
3–0 HT 1–0
22 Nov
W
H Leeds
3–1 HT 1–1
09 Nov
D
H Manchester United
2–2 HT 0–1
01 Nov
L
A Bournemouth
0–2 HT 0–2
26 Oct
L
H Chelsea
0–3 HT 0–0
18 Oct
L
A Newcastle
0–2 HT 0–0
05 Oct
L
H Sunderland
0–1 HT 0–1
27 Sep
D
A Burnley
1–1 HT 1–1
20 Sep
L
A Arsenal
0–3 HT 0–1
13 Sep
L
H West Ham
0–3 HT 0–0
31 Aug
D
A Crystal Palace
1–1 HT 0–1
24 Aug
W
H Brentford
3–1 HT 3–0
17 Aug
L
H Chelsea
0–1 HT 0–0
25 May
W
A West Ham
2–1 HT 1–0
18 May
D
H Leicester
2–2 HT 1–1
11 May
D
A Crystal Palace
1–1 HT 0–0
05 May
L
H Brentford
0–2 HT 0–1
01 May
W
A Tottenham
2–1 HT 2–0
21 Apr
L
H Everton
0–1 HT 0–0
12 Apr
L
A Aston Villa
1–2 HT 0–2
05 Apr
W
H Manchester United
1–0 HT 1–0
01 Apr
W
A Ipswich
4–2 HT 3–0
15 Mar
W
H Manchester City
1–0 HT 0–0
08 Mar
D
H Arsenal
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Feb
L
A Newcastle
3–4 HT 1–4
23 Feb
L
A Fulham
1–2 HT 1–1
15 Feb
W
H Brighton
7–0 HT 3–0
01 Feb
L
A Bournemouth
0–5 HT 0–1
25 Jan
W
H Southampton
3–2 HT 3–0
19 Jan
D
H Liverpool
1–1 HT 1–0
14 Jan
W
A Wolves
3–0 HT 2–0
06 Jan
W
A Everton
2–0 HT 1–0
29 Dec
W
H Tottenham
1–0 HT 1–0
26 Dec
W
A Brentford
2–0 HT 1–0
21 Dec
W
H Aston Villa
2–1 HT 0–0
14 Dec
W
A Manchester United
3–2 HT 1–1
07 Dec
L
A Manchester City
0–3 HT 0–2
04 Dec
W
H Ipswich
1–0 HT 0–0
30 Nov
L
A Arsenal
0–3 HT 0–1
23 Nov
L
H Newcastle
1–3 HT 1–0
10 Nov
W
H West Ham
3–0 HT 1–0
02 Nov
W
A Leicester
3–1 HT 1–1
25 Oct
W
H Crystal Palace
1–0 HT 0–0
21 Oct
D
A Chelsea
1–1 HT 0–0
06 Oct
L
H Fulham
0–1 HT 0–0
28 Sep
D
A Brighton
2–2 HT 1–2
22 Sep
W
A Liverpool
1–0 HT 0–0
14 Sep
D
H Wolves
1–1 HT 1–1
31 Aug
W
A Southampton
1–0 HT 0–0
24 Aug
D
H Bournemouth
1–1 HT 1–0
17 Aug

Chelsea (Home) vs Nottingham Forest (Away)

Home games only for the home side · Away games only for the away side

Chelsea

Chelsea

Current Season
D D L L L
Nottingham Forest

Nottingham Forest

Current Season
L L D W W
36 Played 36
18/10/8 W / D / L 16/6/14
1.78 Points Per Game 1.50
1.61 Avg Goals Scored 1.53
1.08 Avg Goals Conceded 1.50
2.69 Avg Goals / Game 3.03
11 Clean Sheets 10
21 BTTS 18
20 Over 2.5 Games 23
Chelsea

Chelsea — Home

L
Manchester United
0–1 HT 0–1
18 Apr
L
Manchester City
0–3 HT 0–0
12 Apr
L
Newcastle
0–1 HT 0–1
14 Mar
D
Burnley
1–1 HT 1–0
21 Feb
D
Leeds
2–2 HT 1–0
10 Feb
W
West Ham
3–2 HT 0–2
31 Jan
W
Brentford
2–0 HT 1–0
17 Jan
D
Bournemouth
2–2 HT 2–2
30 Dec
L
Aston Villa
1–2 HT 1–0
27 Dec
W
Everton
2–0 HT 2–0
13 Dec
D
Arsenal
1–1 HT 0–0
30 Nov
W
Wolves
3–0 HT 0–0
08 Nov
L
Sunderland
1–2 HT 1–1
25 Oct
W
Liverpool
2–1 HT 1–0
04 Oct
L
Brighton
1–3 HT 1–0
27 Sep
W
Fulham
2–0 HT 1–0
30 Aug
D
Crystal Palace
0–0 HT 0–0
17 Aug
W
Manchester United
1–0 HT 0–0
16 May
W
Liverpool
3–1 HT 1–0
04 May
W
Everton
1–0 HT 1–0
26 Apr
D
Ipswich
2–2 HT 0–2
13 Apr
W
Tottenham
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Apr
W
Leicester
1–0 HT 0–0
09 Mar
W
Southampton
4–0 HT 3–0
25 Feb
W
West Ham
2–1 HT 0–1
03 Feb
W
Wolves
3–1 HT 1–1
20 Jan
D
Bournemouth
2–2 HT 1–0
14 Jan
L
Fulham
1–2 HT 1–0
26 Dec
W
Brentford
2–1 HT 1–0
15 Dec
W
Aston Villa
3–0 HT 2–0
01 Dec
D
Arsenal
1–1 HT 0–0
10 Nov
W
Newcastle
2–1 HT 1–1
27 Oct
D
Nottingham Forest
1–1 HT 0–0
06 Oct
W
Brighton
4–2 HT 4–2
28 Sep
D
Crystal Palace
1–1 HT 1–0
01 Sep
L
Manchester City
0–2 HT 0–1
18 Aug
Nottingham Forest

Nottingham Forest — Away

W
Sunderland
5–0 HT 4–0
24 Apr
W
Tottenham
3–0 HT 1–0
22 Mar
D
Manchester City
2–2 HT 0–1
04 Mar
L
Brighton
1–2 HT 1–2
01 Mar
L
Leeds
1–3 HT 0–2
06 Feb
W
Brentford
2–0 HT 1–0
25 Jan
W
West Ham
2–1 HT 0–1
06 Jan
L
Aston Villa
1–3 HT 0–1
03 Jan
L
Fulham
0–1 HT 0–1
22 Dec
L
Everton
0–3 HT 0–2
06 Dec
W
Wolves
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Dec
W
Liverpool
3–0 HT 1–0
22 Nov
L
Bournemouth
0–2 HT 0–2
26 Oct
L
Newcastle
0–2 HT 0–0
05 Oct
D
Burnley
1–1 HT 1–1
20 Sep
L
Arsenal
0–3 HT 0–1
13 Sep
D
Crystal Palace
1–1 HT 0–1
24 Aug
W
West Ham
2–1 HT 1–0
18 May
D
Crystal Palace
1–1 HT 0–0
05 May
W
Tottenham
2–1 HT 2–0
21 Apr
L
Aston Villa
1–2 HT 0–2
05 Apr
W
Ipswich
4–2 HT 3–0
15 Mar
L
Newcastle
3–4 HT 1–4
23 Feb
L
Fulham
1–2 HT 1–1
15 Feb
L
Bournemouth
0–5 HT 0–1
25 Jan
W
Wolves
3–0 HT 2–0
06 Jan
W
Everton
2–0 HT 1–0
29 Dec
W
Brentford
2–0 HT 1–0
21 Dec
W
Manchester United
3–2 HT 1–1
07 Dec
L
Manchester City
0–3 HT 0–2
04 Dec
L
Arsenal
0–3 HT 0–1
23 Nov
W
Leicester
3–1 HT 1–1
25 Oct
D
Chelsea
1–1 HT 0–0
06 Oct
D
Brighton
2–2 HT 1–2
22 Sep
W
Liverpool
1–0 HT 0–0
14 Sep
W
Southampton
1–0 HT 0–0
24 Aug

❓ Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest Form FAQs

What form are Chelsea and Nottingham Forest in coming into this match?

Chelsea have gone 33W 18D 21L in their last 72 games (1.62 PPG), while Nottingham Forest have gone 29W 17D 26L in their last 72 (1.44 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Chelsea at home or Nottingham Forest away?

Chelsea's home record (1.78 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Chelsea at home: 1.78 PPG; Nottingham Forest away: 1.50 PPG.

Have Chelsea or Nottingham Forest been keeping clean sheets recently?

Chelsea have kept a clean sheet in 28% of their recent games, Nottingham Forest in 31%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

We have 8 H2H matches between these sides on record, dating back to January 2023 — enough to show some patterns. All of them came in Premier League. The most recent was on 4 May 2026, roughly 6 months ago.

Records & Recent Trends

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Chelsea won Nottingham Forest 0-3 Chelsea on 18 Oct 2025, the biggest margin in the H2H matches we hold.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Chelsea have gone 0W 2D 2L from the 4 H2H matches in our data played on their own ground against Nottingham Forest — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 8 Meetings

Chelsea

3

Chelsea

3

Draws

Nottingham Forest

2

Nottingham Forest

Recent Meetings

Chelsea
1–3
04 May 26
Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest
0–3
18 Oct 25
Chelsea
Nottingham Forest
0–1
25 May 25
Chelsea
Chelsea
1–1
06 Oct 24
Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest
2–3
11 May 24
Chelsea
Chelsea
0–1
02 Sep 23
Nottingham Forest
Chelsea
2–2
13 May 23
Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest
1–1
01 Jan 23
Chelsea

❓ Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest H2H FAQs

What is the head-to-head record between Chelsea and Nottingham Forest?

Across the 8 head-to-head matches in our data, Chelsea have won 3, Nottingham Forest have won 2, and 3 have been drawn.

When did Chelsea and Nottingham Forest last play each other?

The most recent meeting in our data was on 4 May 2026: Chelsea 1-3 Nottingham Forest.

Who has won more matches between Chelsea and Nottingham Forest?

Chelsea have the better head-to-head record, with 3 wins from the 8 head-to-head matches in our data.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Chelsea are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 75% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 47% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 41% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 50% of those situations.

Nottingham Forest are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 83% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 28% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 25% of those situations.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Chelsea 58%, Nottingham Forest 50% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 56% (Chelsea) and 64% (Nottingham Forest). Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 28% and 28% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Chelsea keep a clean sheet in 31% of their matches.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Chelsea home games / Nottingham Forest away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Chelsea Chelsea Current Season
Metric All
(72 games)
Venue
(36 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 55/72
(76.4%)
27/36
(75%)
2+ Goals Before HT 23/72
(31.9%)
10/36
(27.8%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 13/17
(76.5%)
8/9
(88.9%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 8/17
(47.1%)
5/9
(55.6%)
Winning at HT 28/72
(38.9%)
17/36
(47.2%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 9/28
(32.1%)
7/17
(41.2%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 8/20
(40%)
3/6
(50%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 42/72
(58.3%)
21/36
(58.3%)
Over 2.5 Goals 43/72
(59.7%)
20/36
(55.6%)
Over 3.5 Goals 21/72
(29.2%)
10/36
(27.8%)
Clean Sheet 20/72
(27.8%)
11/36
(30.6%)
Failed to Score 14/72
(19.4%)
5/36
(13.9%)
Nottingham Forest Nottingham Forest Current Season
Metric All
(72 games)
Venue
(36 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 51/72
(70.8%)
30/36
(83.3%)
2+ Goals Before HT 24/72
(33.3%)
16/36
(44.4%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 17/21
(81%)
6/6
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 7/21
(33.3%)
3/6
(50%)
Winning at HT 20/72
(27.8%)
10/36
(27.8%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/20
(15%)
0/10
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/22
(27.3%)
4/16
(25%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 32/72
(44.4%)
18/36
(50%)
Over 2.5 Goals 37/72
(51.4%)
23/36
(63.9%)
Over 3.5 Goals 18/72
(25%)
10/36
(27.8%)
Clean Sheet 22/72
(30.6%)
10/36
(27.8%)
Failed to Score 22/72
(30.6%)
8/36
(22.2%)

❓ Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest Trading FAQs

Do both teams usually score in Chelsea and Nottingham Forest matches?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 58% of Chelsea's recent matches and 50% of Nottingham Forest's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Are Chelsea and Nottingham Forest matches usually high-scoring?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 56% of Chelsea's matches and 64% of Nottingham Forest's.

Do Chelsea and Nottingham Forest matches tend to have early goals?

There has been at least one first-half goal in 75% of Chelsea's recent matches and 83% of Nottingham Forest's — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Nottingham Forest cruise to a comfortable 1-3 victory over Chelsea.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Nottingham Forest beat Chelsea 1-3 at Stamford Bridge, Regular Season - 35, in the Premier League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Chelsea 1.09 xG and Nottingham Forest 1.82 xG, a combined 2.90. The scoreboard read 1-3 for 4 actual goals. Nottingham Forest outscored their 1.82 projection by 1.2. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Chelsea attack 0.83 / defence 1.10 against Nottingham Forest attack 1.34 / defence 0.90, drawn from 72/72 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Chelsea 21% | Draw 25% | Nottingham Forest 53%, with Nottingham Forest to win its most likely call at 53%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 55%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 80% and landed. Over 3.5 was 33% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 57% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 56% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Chelsea 60%, Nottingham Forest 51%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 51%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Chelsea's trading profile (72 games, 36 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 58% of their matches — today it did.

Nottingham Forest's trading profile (72 games, 36 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 44% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 31% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Chelsea 1.62 PPG, Nottingham Forest 1.44 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Nottingham Forest win broke the near-deadlock. Chelsea (home/away splits) shipped 3 against a 1.08 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Nottingham Forest (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 1.53 average — above their attacking norm.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). The numbers read this fixture well — the outcome largely followed the script the data laid out beforehand.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 55% Over 2.5 probability, 4 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 57% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 56% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.

More Premier League fixtures — matchday 35

All Premier League fixtures →
More UK football predictions →