🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Crewe edge out Gillingham 1-0.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Crewe beat Gillingham 1-0 at Alexandra Stadium, Regular Season - 32, in the League Two. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Crewe 1.51 xG and Gillingham 1.23 xG, a combined 2.73. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. Gillingham landed 1.2 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Crewe attack 1.23 / defence 1.05 against Gillingham attack 0.98 / defence 0.96, drawn from 77/75 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Crewe 44% | Draw 25% | Gillingham 31%, with Crewe to win its most likely call at 44%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 51%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 76% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 55% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 37% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Crewe 39%, Gillingham 35%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 51%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Crewe's trading profile (75 games, 37 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 52% of their matches — today it did not.

Gillingham's trading profile (75 games, 37 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 51% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 32% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Crewe 1.45 PPG, Gillingham 1.32 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Crewe win broke the near-deadlock. Crewe (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.11 average — tighter than their form line. Gillingham (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.95 scoring average — below par going forward.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights