Sign in Register

Cambridge United 2-2 Cheltenham – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

League One · Regular Season - 46

Kick-off

Sat 30 Apr 2022

12:30

Venue

Abbey Stadium

Competition

League One

England

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Cambridge United at 38%, yet other data sources diverge — this Cambridge United vs Cheltenham fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Abbey Stadium plays host to Cambridge United versus Cheltenham in League One, Regular Season - 46. Kick-off: Saturday 30 April 2022 at 12:30 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Cambridge United have collected 1.30 PPG across 10 League One outings this season: 4W 1D 5L. Last five: L W W L L. They are averaging 0.80 goals per game and conceding 2.00 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.00 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation.

Cambridge United's home record at Abbey Stadium: 5W 2D 3L from 10 League One appearances (1.70 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 0.90 conceded per game. 5 clean sheets from 10 home games (50%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Abbey Stadium. At home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle.

Cheltenham's overall League One record this term: 3W 2D 5L from 10 games (1.10 PPG). Last five: D W D L L. They are scoring at 1.60 per game and conceding 2.20. Conceding 2.20 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

Cheltenham's away record: 1W 4D 5L from 10 road trips in League One this season (0.70 PPG). Away from home they average 1.60 goals scored and 2.50 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

A near-identical PPG reading — 1.30 for Cambridge United, 1.10 for Cheltenham — means the form record is uninstructive on result selection. The goals and market sections will carry greater evidential weight.

H2H Analysis

The head-to-head record is closely matched — Cambridge United lead 1W to 0W over the last 1 encounters, with 0 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.

Attacking output has been a hallmark of this fixture. At 5.0 goals per game across 1 meetings, the Over 2.5 has a statistically grounded case from the head-to-head record alone. The most recent clash, on 7 Dec 2021, ended 5–0 with Cambridge United winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 5.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading & In-Play

Cambridge United — key trading statistics (45 games, 22 at home): they score before half-time in 64% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 86% of the time; BTTS occurs in 46% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 41% of games (home games).

Cheltenham — key trading statistics (45 games, 22 at away): they score before half-time in 91% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 75% of the time; BTTS occurs in 68% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 59% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 42%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Cambridge United 51% versus Cheltenham 64%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Cambridge United 49% | Cheltenham 58%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Cambridge United 1.62 xG and Cheltenham 1.54 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Cambridge United attack 0.800 / defence 1.238 | Cheltenham attack 1.081 / defence 1.775. League average goals — home 1.140 / away 1.150. Cheltenham bring a strong defensive rating of 1.775 — this is suppressing Cambridge United's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 45 Cambridge United games / 45 Cheltenham games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Cambridge United 38% | Draw 27% | Cheltenham 35%. Fair-value odds: Cambridge United 2.63 | Draw 3.70 | Cheltenham 2.86. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 27% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 61% | BTTS probability 65% | Total xG 3.16. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 61% — the 3.16 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 65% reflects that both xG figures (1.62 / 1.54) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, Cambridge United are the pick at 38% — marginal model lean. Draw probability of 27% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Cambridge United if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 3.16 combined xG gives a 61% probability to Over 2.5 — reasonable, supported by form averaging 3.0 goals per game.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 65%. Form rates are neutral: Cambridge United 30% | Cheltenham 60%.

The outsider holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (1W–0D–0W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H (5.00 goals/game) and Poisson xG (3.16) both back Over 2.5 goals (61% Poisson probability).
Form Cambridge United Poisson xG (1.62) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (1.10) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 61% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 65% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Cambridge United vs Cheltenham | Competition: League One, Regular Season - 46 | Venue: Abbey Stadium • Kick-off: Saturday 30 Apr 2022, 12:30 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Cambridge United 38% | Draw 27% | Cheltenham 35% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 61% | BTTS 65% | xG Cambridge United 1.62 / Cheltenham 1.54 • Poisson strength factors: Cambridge United attack 0.800 / def 1.238 | Cheltenham attack 1.081 / def 1.775 | league avg home 1.140 / away 1.150 • Poisson stance: Cambridge United (38%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.62

Cambridge United xG

Expected Goals

1.54

Cheltenham xG

38%
27%
35%
Cambridge United Draw Cheltenham

65%

BTTS

84%

Over 1.5

61%

Over 2.5

39%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Cambridge United vs Cheltenham kick off?

Cambridge United vs Cheltenham kicked off at 12:30 on Saturday 30 April 2022 at Abbey Stadium.

What was the final score in Cambridge United vs Cheltenham?

Cambridge United 2 - 2 Cheltenham.

Where is Cambridge United vs Cheltenham being played?

The match is being played at Abbey Stadium.

What competition is Cambridge United vs Cheltenham part of?

Cambridge United vs Cheltenham is a Regular Season - 46 fixture in the League One (England).

Who is favourite to win Cambridge United vs Cheltenham?

Our statistical model gives Cambridge United a 38% chance of winning, Cheltenham a 35% chance, and a 27% chance of a draw — making Cambridge United the favourite.

Will both teams score in Cambridge United vs Cheltenham?

Our model estimates a 65% probability that both Cambridge United and Cheltenham will score (BTTS).

Will Cambridge United vs Cheltenham have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 61%.

What is the head-to-head record between Cambridge United and Cheltenham?

Record (1 meetings): Cambridge United 1W | Draws 0 | Cheltenham 0W.

What form are Cambridge United and Cheltenham in?

Cambridge United (all comps): 4W-1D-5L in 10 | 1.30 PPG | GF 0.80 / GA 2.00 | L5 L-W-W-L-L. Cheltenham (all comps): 3W-2D-5L in 10 | 1.10 PPG | GF 1.60 / GA 2.20 | L5 D-W-D-L-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

Cambridge United's attacking strength (0.80x league average) is weighed against Cheltenham's defensive record (1.77x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.62. Flip it around — Cheltenham's attack (1.08x) against Cambridge United's defence (1.24x) — and the away total comes out at 1.54.

These ratings are built from 45/45 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 12.0%. Close behind: 2-1 (8.6%), 1-2 (8.2%). Together the top three scorelines make up 29% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Cambridge United Win

38%

Cambridge United

2.61

27%

Draw

3.74

35%

Cheltenham

2.87

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

10.6%

Draw

Most likely

2 – 1

8.6%

Home win

1 – 2

8.2%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.62

Cambridge United xG

Total xG

3.16

1.54

Cheltenham xG

38%
27%
35%
Cambridge UnitedDrawCheltenham

2.61

38%

Home win

3.74

27%

Draw

2.87

35%

Away win

Goals Markets

82%

Over 1.5

1.22

18%

Under 1.5

5.56

61%

Over 2.5

1.64

39%

Under 2.5

2.56

39%

Over 3.5

2.56

61%

Under 3.5

1.64

21%

Over 4.5

4.76

79%

Under 4.5

1.27

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

65%

BTTS Yes

1.55

35%

BTTS No

2.82

Clean Sheet

21%

Cambridge United

4.66

20%

Cheltenham

5.05

Win to Nil

8%

Cambridge United

12.15

7%

Cheltenham

14.47

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 4.3 6.5 5.0 2.6 1.0 0.3
1 6.9 10.6 8.2 4.2 1.6 0.5
2 5.6 8.6 6.6 3.4 1.3 0.4
3 3.0 4.6 3.6 1.8 0.7 0.2
4 1.2 1.9 1.4 0.7 0.3 0.1
5 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.619
λ Away (xG) 1.539
Total xG 3.158
League avg home goals 1.140
League avg away goals 1.150
Cambridge United attack strength 0.800
Cambridge United defence strength 1.238
Cheltenham attack strength 1.081
Cheltenham defence strength 1.775
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 45 / 45

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Cambridge United vs Cheltenham?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 12.0%.

How many goals are Cambridge United and Cheltenham expected to score?

The model projects 1.62 expected goals for Cambridge United and 1.54 for Cheltenham, a combined total of 3.16.

How confident is the prediction model for Cambridge United vs Cheltenham?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 38%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Across their last 45 outings, Cambridge United have picked up 1.27 PPG on a 15W 12D 18L record — L-W-W-L-L across the most recent five.

Cheltenham's form line: 13W 16D 16L from 45 games, 1.22 PPG, last five D-W-D-L-L.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.27 PPG for Cambridge United against 1.22 for Cheltenham. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

Home & Away Splits

On home soil, Cambridge United have posted 1.41 PPG from 22 outings (8W 7D 7L).

On the road, Cheltenham have gone 3W 9D 10L from 22 away games — 0.82 PPG when travelling. That's a step down from their 1.22 PPG overall record — away form has been the weaker part of Cheltenham's season.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Cambridge United come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Cambridge United are averaging 1.20 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game recently; Cheltenham are on 1.42 scored and 1.73 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Cheltenham in 64%.

Last 45 Results — League One

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Cambridge United

Cambridge United

Current Season
L W W L L
Cheltenham

Cheltenham

Current Season
D W D L L
45 Played 45
15/12/18 W / D / L 13/16/16
1.27 Points Per Game 1.22
1.20 Avg Goals Scored 1.42
1.60 Avg Goals Conceded 1.73
2.80 Avg Goals / Game 3.16
13 Clean Sheets 8
23 BTTS 29
22 Over 2.5 Games 26
Cambridge United

Cambridge United

L
A Sunderland
1–5 HT 1–3
23 Apr
L
H Charlton
0–2 HT 0–0
19 Apr
W
A Wigan
2–1 HT 2–0
16 Apr
W
H Morecambe
2–1 HT 1–0
09 Apr
L
H Wycombe
1–4 HT 0–1
05 Apr
W
A Ipswich
1–0 HT 0–0
02 Apr
W
A AFC Wimbledon
1–0 HT 0–0
26 Mar
L
H Milton Keynes Dons
0–1 HT 0–0
19 Mar
L
A Sheffield Wednesday
0–6 HT 0–4
12 Mar
D
H Shrewsbury
0–0 HT 0–0
05 Mar
L
A Wycombe
0–3 HT 0–2
01 Mar
L
A Oxford United
2–4 HT 1–1
26 Feb
W
H Plymouth
2–0 HT 2–0
22 Feb
W
H Accrington ST
2–0 HT 0–0
19 Feb
D
A Burton Albion
2–2 HT 1–1
12 Feb
L
A Gillingham
0–1 HT 0–0
08 Feb
L
A Bolton
0–2 HT 0–1
01 Feb
D
A Fleetwood Town
1–1 HT 0–0
29 Jan
W
H Crewe
1–0 HT 1–0
22 Jan
W
H Doncaster
3–1 HT 1–0
18 Jan
W
A Lincoln
1–0 HT 0–0
15 Jan
D
H Portsmouth
0–0 HT 0–0
03 Jan
L
H Rotherham
0–1 HT 0–0
18 Dec
L
A Charlton
0–2 HT 0–1
11 Dec
W
A Cheltenham
5–0 HT 1–0
07 Dec
L
H Sunderland
1–2 HT 1–2
27 Nov
D
H Wigan
2–2 HT 1–0
23 Nov
L
A Rotherham
1–3 HT 0–2
20 Nov
L
A Milton Keynes Dons
1–4 HT 0–3
13 Nov
W
A Morecambe
2–0 HT 1–0
02 Nov
W
H AFC Wimbledon
1–0 HT 0–0
30 Oct
D
A Doncaster
1–1 HT 1–0
26 Oct
L
A Shrewsbury
1–4 HT 0–1
23 Oct
D
H Sheffield Wednesday
1–1 HT 1–0
19 Oct
D
H Ipswich
2–2 HT 1–2
16 Oct
D
A Crewe
2–2 HT 0–2
02 Oct
L
H Gillingham
0–2 HT 0–1
28 Sep
D
H Fleetwood Town
2–2 HT 1–1
25 Sep
W
A Portsmouth
2–1 HT 1–0
18 Sep
L
H Lincoln
1–5 HT 0–3
11 Sep
W
H Bolton
1–0 HT 1–0
28 Aug
W
H Burton Albion
3–0 HT 0–0
21 Aug
D
A Plymouth
1–1 HT 0–0
17 Aug
L
A Accrington ST
1–2 HT 0–2
14 Aug
D
H Oxford United
1–1 HT 0–1
07 Aug
Cheltenham

Cheltenham

L
H Bolton
1–2 HT 0–0
23 Apr
L
A Lincoln
0–3 HT 0–3
18 Apr
D
H Gillingham
2–2 HT 1–1
15 Apr
W
H Portsmouth
1–0 HT 0–0
09 Apr
D
A Accrington ST
4–4 HT 1–2
02 Apr
L
A Sheffield Wednesday
1–4 HT 1–1
26 Mar
L
A Plymouth
0–2 HT 0–2
22 Mar
W
H AFC Wimbledon
3–1 HT 0–1
19 Mar
W
A Morecambe
3–1 HT 1–0
12 Mar
L
A Milton Keynes Dons
1–3 HT 0–2
08 Mar
W
H Doncaster
4–0 HT 2–0
05 Mar
L
H Crewe
1–2 HT 0–1
26 Feb
D
A Ipswich
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Feb
D
A Wycombe
5–5 HT 1–3
19 Feb
W
H Fleetwood Town
2–0 HT 2–0
12 Feb
W
H Sunderland
2–1 HT 0–1
08 Feb
D
A AFC Wimbledon
2–2 HT 2–1
01 Feb
D
H Wigan
0–0 HT 0–0
29 Jan
L
A Rotherham
0–1 HT 0–1
22 Jan
D
H Charlton
1–1 HT 1–0
15 Jan
D
H Burton Albion
1–1 HT 1–0
08 Jan
D
A Oxford United
1–1 HT 0–0
01 Jan
L
H Plymouth
0–2 HT 0–1
26 Dec
L
A Shrewsbury
1–3 HT 1–1
18 Dec
D
H Lincoln
2–2 HT 1–0
11 Dec
L
H Cambridge United
0–5 HT 0–1
07 Dec
D
A Bolton
2–2 HT 2–1
27 Nov
W
A Gillingham
2–0 HT 1–0
23 Nov
W
H Shrewsbury
2–1 HT 1–1
20 Nov
D
A Portsmouth
1–1 HT 1–1
02 Nov
D
H Sheffield Wednesday
2–2 HT 1–0
30 Oct
L
A Doncaster
2–3 HT 0–2
23 Oct
W
H Morecambe
3–1 HT 1–1
19 Oct
W
H Accrington ST
1–0 HT 0–0
16 Oct
L
H Rotherham
0–2 HT 0–0
02 Oct
L
A Sunderland
0–5 HT 0–3
28 Sep
L
A Wigan
0–2 HT 0–1
25 Sep
W
H Oxford United
1–0 HT 0–0
18 Sep
W
A Charlton
2–1 HT 2–0
11 Sep
D
H Milton Keynes Dons
1–1 HT 1–0
04 Sep
D
A Burton Albion
1–1 HT 1–0
27 Aug
L
A Fleetwood Town
2–3 HT 1–1
21 Aug
W
H Ipswich
2–1 HT 0–1
17 Aug
L
H Wycombe
1–3 HT 1–1
14 Aug
D
A Crewe
1–1 HT 1–1
07 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Cambridge United and Cheltenham in coming into this match?

Cambridge United have gone 15W 12D 18L in their last 45 games (1.27 PPG), while Cheltenham have gone 13W 16D 16L in their last 45 (1.22 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Cambridge United at home or Cheltenham away?

Cambridge United's home record (1.41 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Cambridge United at home: 1.41 PPG; Cheltenham away: 0.82 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 8 times since December 2021 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. The pairing has crossed competitions too — League One, League Two all feature in the head-to-head log. They last met on 6 April 2026, roughly 4 months ago.

Records & Recent Trends

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Cambridge United won 0-5 on 7 Dec 2021, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Cambridge United have gone 1W 1D 2L from 4 meetings on their own ground against Cheltenham — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 8 Meetings

Cambridge United

2

Cambridge United

2

Draws

Cheltenham

4

Cheltenham

Recent Meetings

Cheltenham
1–1
06 Apr 26
Cambridge United
Cambridge United
1–0
02 Aug 25
Cheltenham
Cambridge United
0–1
10 Feb 24
Cheltenham
Cheltenham
1–0
21 Oct 23
Cambridge United
Cambridge United
1–2
14 Feb 23
Cheltenham
Cheltenham
2–1
13 Sep 22
Cambridge United
Cambridge United
2–2
30 Apr 22
Cheltenham
Cheltenham
0–5
07 Dec 21
Cambridge United

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Cambridge United and Cheltenham?

From 8 meetings on record, Cambridge United have won 2, Cheltenham have won 4, and 2 have been drawn.

When did Cambridge United and Cheltenham last play each other?

They last met on 6 April 2026, when Cheltenham 1-1 Cambridge United.

Who has won more matches between Cambridge United and Cheltenham?

Cheltenham have the better head-to-head record, with 4 wins from 8 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Cambridge United are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 64% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 32% of the time.

Cheltenham are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 91% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 27% of the time.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Cambridge United 46%, Cheltenham 68% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 41% (Cambridge United) and 59% (Cheltenham).

On the defensive side: Cambridge United keep a clean sheet in 36% of their matches; Cambridge United have failed to score in 27% of games; Cheltenham in 27%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Cambridge United home games / Cheltenham away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Cambridge United Cambridge United Current Season
Metric All
(45 games)
Venue
(22 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 31/45
(68.9%)
14/22
(63.6%)
2+ Goals Before HT 15/45
(33.3%)
5/22
(22.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 12/14
(85.7%)
6/8
(75%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/14
(35.7%)
3/8
(37.5%)
Winning at HT 12/45
(26.7%)
7/22
(31.8%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/45
(6.7%)
2/22
(9.1%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 3/45
(6.7%)
2/22
(9.1%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 23/45
(51.1%)
10/22
(45.5%)
Over 2.5 Goals 22/45
(48.9%)
9/22
(40.9%)
Over 3.5 Goals 15/45
(33.3%)
6/22
(27.3%)
Clean Sheet 13/45
(28.9%)
8/22
(36.4%)
Failed to Score 11/45
(24.4%)
6/22
(27.3%)
Cheltenham Cheltenham Current Season
Metric All
(45 games)
Venue
(22 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 37/45
(82.2%)
20/22
(90.9%)
2+ Goals Before HT 21/45
(46.7%)
15/22
(68.2%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 6/8
(75%)
1/2
(50%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 3/8
(37.5%)
1/2
(50%)
Winning at HT 13/45
(28.9%)
6/22
(27.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 8/45
(17.8%)
3/22
(13.6%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 5/45
(11.1%)
2/22
(9.1%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 29/45
(64.4%)
15/22
(68.2%)
Over 2.5 Goals 26/45
(57.8%)
13/22
(59.1%)
Over 3.5 Goals 19/45
(42.2%)
11/22
(50%)
Clean Sheet 8/45
(17.8%)
2/22
(9.1%)
Failed to Score 10/45
(22.2%)
6/22
(27.3%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Cambridge United play Cheltenham?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 46% of Cambridge United's games and 68% of Cheltenham's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Cambridge United vs Cheltenham usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 41% of Cambridge United's recent games and 59% of Cheltenham's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Cambridge United and Cheltenham tend to score early?

Cambridge United have had a goal before half-time in 64% of their recent matches, Cheltenham in 91% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Cambridge United and Cheltenham share the spoils in a 2-2 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Cambridge United and Cheltenham finished level at 2-2 at Abbey Stadium, Regular Season - 46, in the League One. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Cambridge United 1.62 xG and Cheltenham 1.54 xG, a combined 3.16. The scoreboard read 2-2 for 4 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Cambridge United attack 0.80 / defence 1.24 against Cheltenham attack 1.08 / defence 1.77, drawn from 45/45 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Cambridge United 38% | Draw 27% | Cheltenham 35%, with Cambridge United to win its most likely call at 38%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 27%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 61%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 84% and landed. Over 3.5 was 39% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 65% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 53% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Cambridge United 49%, Cheltenham 58%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 58%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Cambridge United's trading profile (45 games, 22 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 51% of their matches — today it did.

Cheltenham's trading profile (45 games, 22 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 64% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Cambridge United 1.27 PPG, Cheltenham 1.22 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Cambridge United (home/away splits) scored 2 against a 1.18 average — above their attacking norm.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 61% Over 2.5 probability, 4 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 65% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 53% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.