🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Qingdao Youth Island at 48%, yet in-form SHANGHAI SIPG provide a compelling counter-argument — this Qingdao Youth Island vs SHANGHAI SIPG fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Super League encounter, Regular Season - 3 sees SHANGHAI SIPG travel to Qingdao Guzhenkou University City Sports Center to take on Qingdao Youth Island. The game is scheduled for Friday 28 March 2025, 11:00 UTC.

Form Guide

Qingdao Youth Island — All Games: 4W 3D 3L from 10 Super League outings this season, averaging 1.50 points per game. Last five: W L L D W. Offensively they are averaging 1.60 goals per game, with 1.50 conceded. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

Qingdao Youth Island's home record at Qingdao Guzhenkou University City Sports Center: 2W 5D 3L from 10 Super League appearances (1.10 PPG). They are averaging 2.00 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 80% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Looking at all fixtures this season, SHANGHAI SIPG stand at 8W 0D 2L from 10 Super League matches — 2.40 PPG. Last five: W W L W W. Their attacking form is sharp — 3.20 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

SHANGHAI SIPG's away record: 8W 0D 2L from 10 road trips in Super League this season (2.40 PPG). They are averaging 2.10 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. 5 away clean sheets from 10 games (50%) — they are as difficult to score against on the road as they are at home.

Despite the home advantage, the form figures favour SHANGHAI SIPG — 0.90 PPG ahead of the hosts (2.40 vs 1.50). That gap is large enough to take seriously. Draw No Bet on the visitors neutralises home-ground risk while maintaining the form-backed selection.

Head to Head

There is little to separate the sides historically. From 2 previous meetings, Qingdao Youth Island have won 0, SHANGHAI SIPG 2, with 0 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.

The 2 previous encounters between these sides have been high-scoring affairs — 5.5 goals per contest on average. Historical precedent backs the Over 2.5 goals market. The most recent clash, on 28 Sep 2024, ended 1–2 with SHANGHAI SIPG winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 5.5 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

In-Play Profile

Qingdao Youth Island in-play tendencies (30 games, 15 at home): they score before half-time in 73% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 80% of the time; BTTS occurs in 67% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 47% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 43%.

SHANGHAI SIPG in-play tendencies (30 games, 15 at away): they score before half-time in 80% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 86% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 71% of those occasions; they lead at the break 57% of the time; BTTS occurs in 40% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 67% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 60%; they keep a clean sheet 43% of the time.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Qingdao Youth Island 63% and SHANGHAI SIPG 57% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (Qingdao Youth Island 60% | SHANGHAI SIPG 73%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Qingdao Youth Island 1.71 xG and SHANGHAI SIPG 1.24 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Qingdao Youth Island attack 1.068 / defence 0.940 | SHANGHAI SIPG attack 1.101 / defence 0.962. League average goals — home 1.660 / away 1.193. Data: 32 Qingdao Youth Island games / 32 SHANGHAI SIPG games used (Blended). A blend of current and prior-season data is applied to stabilise estimates early in the campaign.

Result probabilities: Qingdao Youth Island 48% | Draw 26% | SHANGHAI SIPG 27%. Fair-value odds: Qingdao Youth Island 2.08 | Draw 3.85 | SHANGHAI SIPG 3.70. Qingdao Youth Island hold a narrow Poisson edge at 48% — the draw (26%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 56% | BTTS probability 59% | Total xG 2.94. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 56% — the 2.94 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 59% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, Qingdao Youth Island are the pick at 48% — moderate model lean. Note a divergence: in-form SHANGHAI SIPG (2.40 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. With a 26% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Qingdao Youth Island offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win.

Poisson projects 2.94 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 56% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.7 goals per game.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 59%. Form rates corroborate: Qingdao Youth Island 80% | SHANGHAI SIPG 50% BTTS from recent games.

The Poisson model is drawing on Blended data (32 games minimum) — early-season projections carry additional uncertainty. Weight the live form and odds signals accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights