🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Patro Eisden edge out Club Brugge II 2-3.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Patro Eisden beat Club Brugge II 2-3 at Schiervelde Stadion, Regular Season - 25, in the Challenger Pro League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Club Brugge II 0.98 xG and Patro Eisden 1.33 xG, a combined 2.32. The scoreboard read 2-3 for 5 actual goals. Club Brugge II beat their projection by 1.0 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Patro Eisden outscored their 1.33 projection by 1.7. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Club Brugge II attack 0.86 / defence 0.97 against Patro Eisden attack 1.05 / defence 0.86, drawn from 52/52 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Club Brugge II 28% | Draw 28% | Patro Eisden 45%, with Patro Eisden to win its most likely call at 45%. The result followed the model's preferred path, landing its top-rated outcome.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 41%. The game delivered 5, so it went over — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 67% and landed. Over 3.5 was 20% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 46% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 53% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Club Brugge II 58%, Patro Eisden 48%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 56%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Club Brugge II's trading profile (52 games, 25 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 56% of their matches — today it did.

Patro Eisden's trading profile (52 games, 25 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 56% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

On form, Patro Eisden arrived the stronger side — 1.73 PPG against 1.21. Form held, and they took the win. Club Brugge II (home/away splits) scored 2 against a 1.16 average — above their attacking norm and shipped 3 against a 1.32 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Patro Eisden (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 1.48 average — above their attacking norm and shipped 2 against a 1.00 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights