🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates TSV Hartberg at 39%, yet other data sources diverge — this Red Bull Salzburg vs TSV Hartberg fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Bundesliga encounter, Regular Season - 21 sees TSV Hartberg travel to Red Bull Arena to take on Red Bull Salzburg. The game is scheduled for Sunday 1 March 2026, 16:00 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Bundesliga games this season, Red Bull Salzburg have gone 5W 3D 2L from 10 outings — a 1.80 PPG return. Last five: W W L D W. They are averaging 2.10 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Red Bull Salzburg, so this record blends games from this season and last.

In front of their own supporters this season, Red Bull Salzburg have posted 5W 2D 3L at Red Bull Arena — 1.70 PPG. They are averaging 2.20 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Looking at all fixtures this season, TSV Hartberg stand at 5W 4D 1L from 10 Bundesliga matches — 1.90 PPG. Last five: D W D D W. Their scoring rate of 1.40 per game is modest, conceding 0.90 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for TSV Hartberg, so this record blends games from this season and last.

When travelling in Bundesliga this season, TSV Hartberg have posted 4W 4D 2L from 10 away outings — 1.60 PPG. Away from home they average 1.60 goals scored and 1.30 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

The form comparison is too close to call — 1.80 PPG (Red Bull Salzburg) versus 1.90 (TSV Hartberg). When the figures are this level, no pick can be reliably derived from recent results alone.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. Red Bull Salzburg register both teams scoring in 60% of relevant matches, TSV Hartberg in 60% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

Head to Head

The historical ledger comes down firmly in favour of Red Bull Salzburg: 6 wins from 7 previous clashes against 0 for TSV Hartberg, with 1 draws across those contests.

Goals have been a feature of this fixture. The last 7 meetings have averaged 4.6 per game — a rate that gives the Over 2.5 market a solid historical foundation. The most recent clash, on 16 Aug 2025, ended 2–1 with Red Bull Salzburg winning.

From a betting standpoint, the H2H backs both Red Bull Salzburg and goals. The home side's 6 wins from 7 meetings, combined with an average of 4.6 goals per game, gives the home win and Over 2.5 combination a historically grounded case.

In-Play Data

Red Bull Salzburg trading profile (52 games, 26 at home): they score before half-time in 81% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 64% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 54% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 62% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 69% of games (home games).

TSV Hartberg trading profile (52 games, 26 at away): they score before half-time in 65% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 74% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Red Bull Salzburg 62% versus TSV Hartberg 54%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Red Bull Salzburg 60% | TSV Hartberg 46%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Red Bull Salzburg 1.43 xG and TSV Hartberg 1.47 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Red Bull Salzburg attack 1.127 / defence 1.163 | TSV Hartberg attack 1.084 / defence 0.963. League average goals — home 1.317 / away 1.169. Data: 42 Red Bull Salzburg games / 42 TSV Hartberg games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Red Bull Salzburg 37% | Draw 25% | TSV Hartberg 39%. Fair-value odds: Red Bull Salzburg 2.70 | Draw 4.00 | TSV Hartberg 2.56. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 25% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 55% | BTTS probability 59% | Total xG 2.90. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 55% — the 2.90 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 59% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Our Verdict

Poisson rates TSV Hartberg as the most likely outcome at 39% — marginal model lean. With a 25% draw probability, Draw No Bet on TSV Hartberg offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 37% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.90 combined xG gives a 55% probability to Over 2.5 — strong, supported by form averaging 3.2 goals per game and H2H averaging 4.6 goals per meeting.

Poisson assigns a 59% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Red Bull Salzburg 60% | TSV Hartberg 60% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 37% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights