🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Al Nasr edge out Al-Dhafra 0-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Al Nasr beat Al-Dhafra 0-1 at Sheikh Hamdan Bin Zayed Stadium, Regular Season - 22, in the Pro League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Al-Dhafra 1.01 xG and Al Nasr 1.90 xG, a combined 2.91. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. Al-Dhafra fell 1.0 short of their projected output. Al Nasr landed 0.9 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Al-Dhafra attack 0.79 / defence 1.41 against Al Nasr attack 1.00 / defence 0.88, drawn from 21/47 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Al-Dhafra 20% | Draw 22% | Al Nasr 58%, with Al Nasr to win its most likely call at 58%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 56%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 79% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 54% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 50% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Al-Dhafra 57%, Al Nasr 43%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 62%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Al-Dhafra's trading profile (21 games, 10 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 57% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 38% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Al Nasr's trading profile (21 games, 10 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 67% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

On form, Al Nasr arrived the stronger side — 1.33 PPG against 0.86. The form guide was vindicated by the result. Al-Dhafra (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.50 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 1 against a 1.90 average — tighter than their form line. Al Nasr (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.10 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights