🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates FC Thun at 61% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this FC Thun vs Grasshoppers encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Super League encounter, Regular Season - 30 sees Grasshoppers travel to Stockhorn Arena to take on FC Thun. The game is scheduled for Saturday 14 March 2026, 17:00 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, FC Thun stand at 9W 1D 0L from 10 Super League matches — 2.80 PPG. Last five: W W W D W. They are averaging 2.70 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone.

FC Thun's home record at Stockhorn Arena: 7W 1D 2L from 10 Super League appearances (2.20 PPG). They are averaging 2.40 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture. Somewhat surprisingly, their home PPG of 2.20 lags behind their overall 2.80 — the home advantage has not translated into superior results at Stockhorn Arena this season.

Grasshoppers — All Games: 1W 4D 5L from 10 Super League fixtures this season — 0.70 PPG. Last five: D L W L L. Their scoring rate of 1.10 per game is modest, conceding 1.60 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

When travelling in Super League this season, Grasshoppers have posted 2W 2D 6L from 10 away outings — 0.80 PPG. Away from home they average 1.10 goals scored and 2.10 conceded per game. Away from home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — a low rate that backs BTTS No when they travel.

FC Thun are in the better shape of the two on current Super League data — 2.10 PPG ahead (2.80 vs 0.70). That form margin is the baseline of a sensible selection even before other signals are layered in.

H2H Record

The H2H landscape is flat: 4 previous encounters have yielded 1 wins for FC Thun, 1 for Grasshoppers and 2 draws. A neutral reading in isolation.

The 4 previous meetings have averaged 2.8 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 18 Jan 2026, ended 3–1 with FC Thun winning.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

In-Play Profile

FC Thun in-play tendencies (29 games, 14 at home): they score before half-time in 79% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 67% of those occasions; they lead at the break 48% of the time; BTTS occurs in 71% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 71% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 41%.

Grasshoppers in-play tendencies (29 games, 14 at away): they score before half-time in 57% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 88% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 43% of games (away games).

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — FC Thun 72% and Grasshoppers 62% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (FC Thun 79% | Grasshoppers 52%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects FC Thun 2.23 xG and Grasshoppers 1.11 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: FC Thun attack 1.294 / defence 0.891 | Grasshoppers attack 0.838 / defence 1.018. League average goals — home 1.694 / away 1.491. FC Thun carry an above-average attack strength of 1.294 — their λ of 2.23 reflects genuine attacking quality above the league norm. Data: 29 FC Thun games / 62 Grasshoppers games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: FC Thun 61% | Draw 24% | Grasshoppers 16%. Fair-value odds: FC Thun 1.64 | Draw 4.17 | Grasshoppers 6.25. The model has a clear lean to FC Thun (61%) — a 45pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 65% | BTTS probability 62% | Total xG 3.34. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 65% — a total xG of 3.34 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 62% reflects that both xG figures (2.23 / 1.11) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Our Verdict

Poisson rates FC Thun as the most likely outcome at 61% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 24% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

On the goals line, Poisson's 3.34 combined xG gives a 65% probability to Over 2.5 — strong, supported by form averaging 3.4 goals per game and H2H averaging 2.8 goals per meeting.

Poisson assigns a 62% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates are neutral: FC Thun 70% | Grasshoppers 30%.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights