🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Ulsan Hyundai FC's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Ulsan Munsu Football Stadium, Regular Season - 7, as Ulsan Hyundai FC and FC Seoul drew 0-0 in the K League 1. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Ulsan Hyundai FC 1.11 xG and FC Seoul 0.89 xG, a combined 2.00. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Ulsan Hyundai FC fell 1.1 short of their projected output. FC Seoul landed 0.9 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Ulsan Hyundai FC attack 1.15 / defence 0.98 against FC Seoul attack 0.81 / defence 0.87, drawn from 40/39 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Ulsan Hyundai FC 40% | Draw 31% | FC Seoul 29%, with Ulsan Hyundai FC to win its most likely call at 40%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 31%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 32%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 60% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 40% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 51% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Ulsan Hyundai FC 53%, FC Seoul 49%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 56%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Ulsan Hyundai FC's trading profile (76 games, 38 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 53% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 36% of the time, and duly kept one.

FC Seoul's trading profile (76 games, 38 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 59% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

On form, Ulsan Hyundai FC arrived the stronger side — 1.95 PPG against 1.49. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Ulsan Hyundai FC (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 2.08 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.05 average — tighter than their form line. FC Seoul (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.47 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.32 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights