🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Gimcheon Sangmu FC's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Gimcheon Stadium, Regular Season - 5, as Gimcheon Sangmu FC and Gwangju FC drew 0-0 in the K League 1. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Gimcheon Sangmu FC 1.36 xG and Gwangju FC 1.15 xG, a combined 2.51. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Gimcheon Sangmu FC fell 1.4 short of their projected output. Gwangju FC landed 1.1 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Gimcheon Sangmu FC attack 1.10 / defence 0.96 against Gwangju FC attack 1.07 / defence 1.14, drawn from 37/36 games (Blended).

On the result, the model split it Gimcheon Sangmu FC 42% | Draw 27% | Gwangju FC 31%, with Gimcheon Sangmu FC to win its most likely call at 42%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 27%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 46%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 71% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 51% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 46% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Gimcheon Sangmu FC 47%, Gwangju FC 45%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 46%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Gimcheon Sangmu FC's trading profile (38 games, 18 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 42% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 45% of the time, and duly kept one; they fail to score in 26% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Gwangju FC's trading profile (38 games, 18 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 34% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

On form, Gimcheon Sangmu FC arrived the stronger side — 1.66 PPG against 1.24. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Gimcheon Sangmu FC (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.61 scoring average — below par going forward. Gwangju FC (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.89 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.33 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss), form (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights