🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates NEOM at 44%, yet other data sources diverge — this NEOM vs Al-Hazm fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

King Khalid Sports City plays host to NEOM versus Al-Hazm in Pro League, Regular Season - 30. Kick-off: Tuesday 28 April 2026 at 17:45 UTC.

Form & Momentum

NEOM have collected 1.40 PPG across 10 Pro League outings this season: 4W 2D 4L. Last five: L D W W L. They are averaging 1.20 goals per game and conceding 1.20 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation.

In front of their own supporters this season, NEOM have posted 4W 1D 5L at King Khalid Sports City — 1.30 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.20 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game.

Al-Hazm's overall Pro League record this term: 5W 1D 4L from 10 games (1.60 PPG). Last five: L W L W W. Their scoring rate of 1.30 per game is modest, conceding 1.40 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

On the road, Al-Hazm have gone 2W 3D 5L from 10 away fixtures this term (0.90 PPG). Away from home they average 0.80 goals scored and 1.70 conceded per game. Their away PPG of 0.90 is notably below their overall 1.60 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

Both sides are running at similar form levels — 1.40 PPG for NEOM against 1.60 for Al-Hazm. There is no clear form edge to exploit here; other signals need to take the lead.

H2H History

The head-to-head record is closely matched — NEOM lead 1W to 0W over the last 1 encounters, with 0 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.

Attacking output has been a hallmark of this fixture. At 3.0 goals per game across 1 meetings, the Over 2.5 has a statistically grounded case from the head-to-head record alone. The most recent clash, on 4 Jan 2026, ended 2–1 with NEOM winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading

NEOM half-time and goal-timing data (29 games, 14 at home): they score before half-time in 64% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 91% of the time; BTTS occurs in 57% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 64% of games (home games).

Al-Hazm half-time and goal-timing data (29 games, 14 at away): they score before half-time in 57% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 85% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 69% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 57% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 57% of games (away games); they fail to score in 34% of games.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — NEOM 62% and Al-Hazm 62% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (NEOM 55% | Al-Hazm 62%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects NEOM 1.33 xG and Al-Hazm 1.00 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: NEOM attack 0.776 / defence 1.054 | Al-Hazm attack 0.688 / defence 1.098. League average goals — home 1.558 / away 1.382. NEOM's attack strength of 0.776 is below the league average — the 1.33 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 29 NEOM games / 29 Al-Hazm games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: NEOM 44% | Draw 28% | Al-Hazm 28%. Fair-value odds: NEOM 2.27 | Draw 3.57 | Al-Hazm 3.57. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 28% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 41% | BTTS probability 46% | Total xG 2.33. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 59% — total xG of 2.33 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 46% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates NEOM as the most likely outcome at 44% — marginal model lean. Draw probability of 28% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on NEOM if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 28% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.33 combined xG gives a 41% probability to Under 2.5 — Poisson-only — limited corroboration.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is No at 46%. Form rates are neutral: NEOM 50% | Al-Hazm 50%.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights