🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model favours Al-Nassr (66%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as Al-Nassr face Al-Hazm.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

King Saud University Stadium plays host to Al-Nassr versus Al-Hazm in Pro League, Regular Season - 23. Kick-off: Saturday 21 February 2026 at 19:00 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Al-Nassr have collected 2.10 PPG across 10 Pro League outings this season: 7W 0D 3L. Last five: W W W W W. Offensively they are averaging 1.80 goals per game, with 1.10 conceded. 5 clean sheets from 10 games (50%) is a standout defensive return — they are keeping their net clean in more than half their matches. This season is still relatively young for Al-Nassr, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Al-Nassr's form when playing at home: 9W 0D 1L across 10 games at King Saud University Stadium this term (2.70 PPG). They are averaging 2.80 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Their home PPG of 2.70 is noticeably stronger than their overall 2.10 — Al-Nassr are significantly better at King Saud University Stadium than their overall form suggests.

Al-Hazm (all games): 3W 2D 5L across 10 Pro League outings this term — 1.10 points per game. Last five: W L D L W. Their scoring rate of 1.20 per game is modest, conceding 2.30 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.30 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Al-Hazm, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Al-Hazm's form when playing away from home: 3W 4D 3L across 10 road games this term (1.30 PPG). Away from home they average 1.10 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

The points-per-game gap of 1.00 in Al-Nassr's favour (2.10 vs 1.10) is a statistically meaningful difference. The hosts are the form pick here, with draw protection the sensible hedge given the away side's competitiveness.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Al-Nassr have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, Al-Hazm in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H Analysis

Historically, Al-Nassr have had the better of this match-up — 4 wins from 5 meetings, with Al-Hazm managing just 0 victories and 1 draws shared.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 4.8 per game across 5 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 25 Oct 2025, ended 2–0 with Al-Nassr winning.

From a betting standpoint, the H2H backs both Al-Nassr and goals. The home side's 4 wins from 5 meetings, combined with an average of 4.8 goals per game, gives the home win and Over 2.5 combination a historically grounded case.

Trading

Al-Nassr half-time and goal-timing data (21 games, 10 at home): they score before half-time in 70% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 100% of those occasions; they lead at the break 62% of the time; BTTS occurs in 60% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 70% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 43%; they keep a clean sheet 48% of the time.

Al-Hazm half-time and goal-timing data (21 games, 10 at away): they score before half-time in 70% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 80% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 70% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 60% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 60% of games (away games); they fail to score in 38% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Al-Nassr 52% versus Al-Hazm 62%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Al-Nassr 67% | Al-Hazm 62%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Al-Nassr 2.05 xG and Al-Hazm 0.81 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Al-Nassr attack 1.366 / defence 0.742 | Al-Hazm attack 0.779 / defence 1.015. League average goals — home 1.480 / away 1.400. Al-Nassr carry an above-average attack strength of 1.366 — their λ of 2.05 reflects genuine attacking quality above the league norm. Al-Nassr's defence rating of 0.742 is below average — the home backline is amplifying the visitor's projected output. Data: 55 Al-Nassr games / 21 Al-Hazm games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Al-Nassr 66% | Draw 21% | Al-Hazm 13%. Fair-value odds: Al-Nassr 1.52 | Draw 4.76 | Al-Hazm 7.69. The model has a clear lean to Al-Nassr (66%) — a 53pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 55% | BTTS probability 49% | Total xG 2.86. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 55% — the 2.86 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 49% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, Al-Nassr are the pick at 66% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 21% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.86 combined xG gives a 55% probability to Over 2.5 — strong, supported by form averaging 3.0 goals per game and H2H averaging 4.8 goals per meeting.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is No at 49%. This conflicts with form data: Al-Nassr 60% | Al-Hazm 60% from recent games — a notable divergence.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights