🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates NEOM at 57%, yet other data sources diverge — this Al-Hazm vs NEOM fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Al-Hazem Club Stadium plays host to Al-Hazm versus NEOM in Pro League, Regular Season - 13. Kick-off: Sunday 4 January 2026 at 15:05 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Al-Hazm have collected 1.20 PPG across 10 Pro League outings this season: 3W 3D 4L. Last five: D L W D W. They are averaging 0.90 goals per game and conceding 1.40 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. This season is still relatively young for Al-Hazm, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Al-Hazm at Al-Hazem Club Stadium this season: 0W 1D 3L from 4 home games — 0.25 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 0.25 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game. At home, both teams have scored in only 25% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle. Somewhat surprisingly, their home PPG of 0.25 lags behind their overall 1.20 — the home advantage has not translated into superior results at Al-Hazem Club Stadium this season.

NEOM's overall Pro League record this term: 5W 2D 3L from 10 games (1.70 PPG). Last five: W L D W L. They are scoring at 1.60 per game and conceding 1.70. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 90% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play. This season is still relatively young for NEOM, so this record blends games from this season and last.

When travelling in Pro League this season, NEOM have posted 3W 1D 1L from 5 away outings — 2.00 PPG. They are averaging 1.80 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

The travelling side arrive in better shape. NEOM are 0.50 PPG clear of Al-Hazm in recent Pro League fixtures (1.70 vs 1.20). Backing the visitors outright or on Draw No Bet are both valid approaches where the price allows.

Trading

Al-Hazm half-time and goal-timing data (11 games, 4 at home): they score before half-time in 50% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 60% of the time; BTTS occurs in 25% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 25% of games (home games); they fail to score in 46% of games.

NEOM half-time and goal-timing data (11 games, 4 at away): they score before half-time in 75% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 100% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 100% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 75% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 46%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Al-Hazm 54% and NEOM 82% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Al-Hazm 46% | NEOM 64%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Al-Hazm 0.98 xG and NEOM 1.84 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Al-Hazm attack 0.630 / defence 1.233 | NEOM attack 1.009 / defence 1.074. League average goals — home 1.454 / away 1.480. Al-Hazm's attack strength of 0.630 is below the league average — the 0.98 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 11 Al-Hazm games / 11 NEOM games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Al-Hazm 20% | Draw 23% | NEOM 57%. Fair-value odds: Al-Hazm 5.00 | Draw 4.35 | NEOM 1.75. The model has a clear lean to NEOM (57%) — a 37pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 54% | BTTS probability 53% | Total xG 2.83. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 54%/46% — the total xG of 2.83 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 53% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates NEOM as the most likely outcome at 57% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 23% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.83 combined xG gives a 54% probability to Over 2.5 — reasonable, supported by form averaging 2.7 goals per game.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 53%. Form rates are neutral: Al-Hazm 25% | NEOM 80%.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights