🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates Al Shabab at 41% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Al-Hazm vs Al Shabab encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Fixture Analysis

It is a Pro League clash, Regular Season - 19 as Al-Hazm welcome Al Shabab to Al-Hazem Club Stadium. Kick-off is set for Thursday 29 January 2026 at 17:30 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, Al-Hazm stand at 4W 2D 4L from 10 Pro League matches — 1.40 PPG. Last five: L W L D W. They are averaging 1.40 goals per game and conceding 2.10 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.10 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone. This season is still relatively young for Al-Hazm, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Al-Hazm's home record at Al-Hazem Club Stadium: 2W 1D 5L from 8 Pro League appearances (0.88 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.00 goals scored and 2.25 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 62% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Somewhat surprisingly, their home PPG of 0.88 lags behind their overall 1.40 — the home advantage has not translated into superior results at Al-Hazem Club Stadium this season.

Across all Pro League games this season, Al Shabab have recorded 1W 4D 5L from 10 outings — 0.70 PPG. Last five: L W L D D. Their scoring rate of 0.90 per game is modest, conceding 1.60 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. This season is still relatively young for Al Shabab, so this record blends games from this season and last.

When travelling in Pro League this season, Al Shabab have posted 1W 4D 5L from 10 away outings — 0.70 PPG. Away from home they average 0.60 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game. Away from home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — a low rate that backs BTTS No when they travel.

Al-Hazm carry the stronger recent momentum — 0.70 PPG ahead of their opponents on 1.40 vs 0.70. The form data is a point in their favour, and where the price allows, it is the cleaner directional bet.

H2H

Despite the anticipated home advantage, Al Shabab have the better historical record — 5 wins from 5 previous contests against 0 for Al-Hazm.

The 5 previous encounters between these sides have been high-scoring affairs — 2.8 goals per contest on average. Historical precedent backs the Over 2.5 goals market. The most recent clash, on 12 Sep 2025, ended 0–1 with Al Shabab winning.

The H2H provides genuine backing for the away side. Al Shabab have won 5 of 5 previous encounters, and at 2.8 goals per game, the goals market also points upward. The away win and Over 2.5 combination has a historical case worth noting.

In-Play Data

Al-Hazm trading profile (17 games, 8 at home): they score before half-time in 38% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 75% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 62% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 62% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 62% of games (home games); they fail to score in 35% of games.

Al Shabab trading profile (17 games, 8 at away): they score before half-time in 88% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 40% of the time; BTTS occurs in 38% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 12% of games (away games); they fail to score in 41% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Al-Hazm 65% versus Al Shabab 53%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Al-Hazm 65% | Al Shabab 29%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Al-Hazm 1.16 xG and Al Shabab 1.38 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Al-Hazm attack 0.841 / defence 1.516 | Al Shabab attack 0.641 / defence 0.891. League average goals — home 1.545 / away 1.423. Data: 17 Al-Hazm games / 51 Al Shabab games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Al-Hazm 30% | Draw 29% | Al Shabab 41%. Fair-value odds: Al-Hazm 3.33 | Draw 3.45 | Al Shabab 2.44. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 29% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 47% | BTTS probability 53% | Total xG 2.54. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 47%/53% — the total xG of 2.54 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 53% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Our Verdict

Al Shabab lead the H2H ledger, but Al-Hazm carry stronger current form — do not let history alone dictate your assessment.

Poisson rates Al Shabab as the most likely outcome at 41% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Al-Hazm (1.40 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. With a 29% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Al Shabab offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 30% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 2.54 xG in total — Under 2.5 at 47% — Poisson-only — limited corroboration confidence — though H2H averaging only 2.8 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 53% on Yes. Form rates are neutral: Al-Hazm 62% | Al Shabab 30%.

The outsider holds a 30% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights