🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Al Okhdood at 41%, yet in-form Al-Hazm provide a compelling counter-argument — this Al-Hazm vs Al Okhdood fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

Al Okhdood make the trip to Al-Hazem Club Stadium to face Al-Hazm in Pro League, Regular Season - 22. The match kicks off on Thursday 12 February 2026 at 17:30 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Al-Hazm have collected 1.10 PPG across 10 Pro League outings this season: 3W 2D 5L. Last five: D W L D L. They are averaging 1.20 goals per game and conceding 2.30 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.30 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Al-Hazm, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Al-Hazm's home record at Al-Hazem Club Stadium: 2W 1D 6L from 9 Pro League appearances (0.78 PPG). At home they are averaging 0.89 goals scored and 2.44 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 56% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Al Okhdood's overall Pro League record this term: 1W 2D 7L from 10 games (0.50 PPG). Last five: D L L D L. Their scoring rate of 0.60 per game is modest, conceding 2.00 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.00 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. This season is still relatively young for Al Okhdood, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Al Okhdood away from home this season: 1W 1D 8L from 10 away games — 0.40 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 0.60 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game.

The form ledger tips toward Al-Hazm. A 0.60 PPG lead over Al Okhdood (1.10 vs 0.50) is a consistent enough margin to carry weight. If the win odds appear compressed, Draw No Bet offers draw insurance at a lower cost than a full switch to Double Chance.

H2H Analysis

Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 3 head-to-head meetings have produced 1 wins for Al-Hazm, 1 for Al Okhdood and 1 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.

The 3 previous meetings have averaged 2.0 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 18 Oct 2025, ended 2–1 with Al-Hazm winning.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading & In-Play

Al-Hazm — key trading statistics (20 games, 9 at home): they score before half-time in 33% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 80% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 70% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 56% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 67% of games (home games); they fail to score in 40% of games.

Al Okhdood — key trading statistics (20 games, 9 at away): they score before half-time in 56% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 83% of the time; BTTS occurs in 33% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 44% of games (away games); they fail to score in 45% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Al-Hazm 60% versus Al Okhdood 50%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Al-Hazm 60% | Al Okhdood 50%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Al-Hazm 1.38 xG and Al Okhdood 1.53 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Al-Hazm attack 0.783 / defence 1.765 | Al Okhdood attack 0.652 / defence 1.208. League average goals — home 1.455 / away 1.332. Al-Hazm's attack strength of 0.783 is below the league average — the 1.38 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Al Okhdood bring a strong defensive rating of 1.208 — this is suppressing Al-Hazm's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 20 Al-Hazm games / 54 Al Okhdood games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Al-Hazm 34% | Draw 26% | Al Okhdood 41%. Fair-value odds: Al-Hazm 2.94 | Draw 3.85 | Al Okhdood 2.44. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 26% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 56% | BTTS probability 59% | Total xG 2.91. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 56% — the 2.91 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 59% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, Al Okhdood are the pick at 41% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Al-Hazm (1.10 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. Draw probability of 26% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Al Okhdood if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 2.91 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 56% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.0 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 59% on Yes. Form rates are neutral: Al-Hazm 56% | Al Okhdood 40%.

The outsider holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights