🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Fakel's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Stadion Fakel, Regular Season - 23, as Fakel and Akhmat drew 0-0 in the Premier League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Fakel 1.02 xG and Akhmat 1.03 xG, a combined 2.05. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Fakel fell 1.0 short of their projected output. Akhmat landed 1.0 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Fakel attack 0.70 / defence 1.00 against Akhmat attack 0.96 / defence 0.97, drawn from 52/52 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Fakel 31% | Draw 37% | Akhmat 31%, with the draw its most likely call at 37%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 34%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 64% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 45% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 36% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Fakel 27%, Akhmat 44%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 43%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Fakel's trading profile (52 games, 25 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 35% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 35% of the time, and duly kept one; they fail to score in 54% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Akhmat's trading profile (52 games, 25 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 52% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 35% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Fakel 0.88 PPG, Akhmat 1.04 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Akhmat (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.80 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.40 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). The data earned its keep here, calling the bulk of the fixture correctly.

💡 Key Insights