Sign in Register
🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Eredivisie · Regular Season - 32

Kick-off

Sat 2 May 2026

15:30

Venue

Stadion Galgenwaard

Competition

Eredivisie

Netherlands

Status

FT
📰

Utrecht cruise to a comfortable 2-0 victory over NAC Breda.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Utrecht beat NAC Breda 2-0 at Stadion Galgenwaard, Regular Season - 32, in the Eredivisie. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Utrecht 1.97 xG and NAC Breda 0.75 xG, a combined 2.72. The scoreboard read 2-0 for 2 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Utrecht attack 1.01 / defence 0.81 against NAC Breda attack 0.73 / defence 1.14, drawn from 65/65 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Utrecht 63% | Draw 26% | NAC Breda 11%, with Utrecht to win its most likely call at 63%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 51%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 78% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 48% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 53% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Utrecht 55%, NAC Breda 51%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 58%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Utrecht's trading profile (65 games, 32 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did not.

NAC Breda's trading profile (65 games, 32 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 54% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 35% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

On form, Utrecht arrived the stronger side — 1.66 PPG against 0.89. The form guide was vindicated by the result. Utrecht (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.16 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit), form (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 51% Over 2.5 probability, but 2 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 48% projected, both teams did not both score.
Trading Trading data bucked — 53% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.