🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model favours Utrecht (63%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as Utrecht face NAC Breda.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

NAC Breda make the trip to Stadion Galgenwaard to face Utrecht in Eredivisie, Regular Season - 32. The match kicks off on Saturday 2 May 2026 at 15:30 UTC.

Form

Utrecht (all games): 6W 2D 2L across 10 Eredivisie fixtures this term — 2.00 PPG. Last five: W W L W L. Offensively they are averaging 1.90 goals per game, with 1.30 conceded. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base.

Utrecht's form when playing at home: 5W 2D 3L across 10 games at Stadion Galgenwaard this term (1.70 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.40 goals scored and 0.80 conceded per game.

NAC Breda have collected 0.90 PPG across 10 Eredivisie outings this season: 2W 3D 5L. Last five: L L D D L. Their scoring rate of 0.70 per game is modest, conceding 1.90 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their games, reflecting a regular tendency to keep or record clean sheets.

NAC Breda's form when playing away from home: 1W 3D 6L across 10 road games this term (0.60 PPG). Away from home they average 0.60 goals scored and 1.80 conceded per game.

The form ledger tips toward Utrecht. A 1.10 PPG lead over NAC Breda (2.00 vs 0.90) is a consistent enough margin to carry weight. If the win odds appear compressed, Draw No Bet offers draw insurance at a lower cost than a full switch to Double Chance.

Head-to-Head

Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 3 head-to-head meetings have produced 2 wins for Utrecht, 0 for NAC Breda and 1 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.

The 3 previous meetings have averaged 2.0 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 14 Dec 2025, ended 1–1 with a draw.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading Data

Utrecht goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (65 games, 32 at home): they score before half-time in 81% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 75% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 47% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 40%.

NAC Breda goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (65 games, 32 at away): they score before half-time in 75% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 84% of the time; BTTS occurs in 47% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 56% of games (away games); they fail to score in 35% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Utrecht 62% versus NAC Breda 54%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Utrecht 55% | NAC Breda 51%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Utrecht 1.97 xG and NAC Breda 0.75 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Utrecht attack 1.006 / defence 0.812 | NAC Breda attack 0.730 / defence 1.135. League average goals — home 1.728 / away 1.265. Data: 65 Utrecht games / 65 NAC Breda games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Utrecht 63% | Draw 26% | NAC Breda 11%. Fair-value odds: Utrecht 1.59 | Draw 3.85 | NAC Breda 9.09. The model has a clear lean to Utrecht (63%) — a 52pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 51% | BTTS probability 48% | Total xG 2.72. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 51%/49% — the total xG of 2.72 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 48% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, Utrecht are the pick at 63% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 26% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.72 combined xG gives a 51% probability to Over 2.5 — Poisson-only — limited corroboration.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is No at 48%. Form rates corroborate: Utrecht 50% | NAC Breda 40% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights